@@Paranormal3activity if you had a basic understanding of the history of US interventionism in the World, and Imperialism in general, you wouldn't be asking this.
@@denxero … I’m asking a specific question, … not “Imperialism in general” … this generalization works sometimes, but usually used to simplify explanations.
NATO is USA's Lap-dog and a useful tool to launder huge amounts of money from the Tax-bases of America and European Union countries! "Wars are never fought for Freedom. Wars are always fought for the Rich" Major General Smedley Butler in his Memoirs (1937).
our military industrial complex is PROFIT oriented ... not PURPOSE oriented. Each time they role out a new bespoke weapon system, it cuts into the mfr-ing capacity of other bespoke systems! Because ... excess capacity doesn't maximize profits.
Not entirely I'll agree they are over price but they are definitely are made for war. Just not a war of attrition. I would much rather sit in a badly but if I was going to war I would feel safer knowing there is 3 other bmp s and 2 tanks and loaded arty looking over us They where made before fpv droves and all equipment and man seems to have a have a have time vs droves.
Saying U.S. military vehicles are designed solely for profit disregards their proven combat effectiveness, the strict oversight in their development, and the priorities set by military professionals. While the defense industry does involve profit motives, the primary purpose of these vehicles remains to meet the operational demands of modern warfare and ensure the safety and effectiveness of the troops who use them. Ukrainian forces are generally happy with the Bradleys. While they are not invincible and face challenges in a high-intensity war, their combination of protection, firepower, and versatility has made them a valuable asset in Ukraine's efforts to resist Russian aggression.
I think Russia is conducting a war of attrition, taking away Ukraine's potential (so they can't be a threat in the future), and the last heavily fortified position in Ukraine's 600 miles long defens line has been reached now, Pokrovsk. After that, it's a strole in the park.
Stop repeating the word "advanced." If they are so advanced, why can't they fight off the Russian Lancets? Please know the difference between marketing and hype-up and battlefield capability......
Bro these vehicles are 40 years old specifically the m1a1 doesn't have all the shit on it at all and also why is the t90m being taken out by $100 drones if putin said it was the best tank in the world?
Probably they belived to Russia and were not prepared for an invasion of the world's 2nd army against the poorest country of Europe. There was a 4.000km2 gain of territory of Ukraine in 2024. It means they advanced about 4kms along the 1.000km frontline in average. Yes. It's 7 times bigger, than in 2023 and can be called "advancing". Russian troops will reach Kiev by this tempo in 150 years.😀
@@gyulanyars6636you just don't get it do you? All this "it's only 4km" talk is just a cope. It's not about how much they moved the front East, it's about how badly and how quickly Ukraine will run out of fighting potential, because once they do, it's a walk to Kiev.
Agree 100% this website is on google because lot of support money from EU Brussels>EU Support in different ways. It is free money as well cause eu citizens taxpayer cash also involved.
Russia has not invaded Ukraine , Russian cultured provinces had a majority vote for independence and this is recognized under international law, Russia has a special military operation to protect the civilians of these independent regions which the Ukraine Military supported by USA and NATO attacked these independent Russian speaking provinces. Odessa must also be returned to the Russian Culture as its their heritage city, Ukraine is Occupying it!
Why are the Western world and the USA sending dogs to attack a very large Elephant? They all know elephants are very intelligent, and they remember their friends and enemies.
We have been warning you about the use of the phrase 'Russia aggression' So, today, we are all unsubscribing. Meaning we are not going to watch your news again. God bless Russia🇿🇦❤️🇷🇺
Russian Agreession is a wrong phrase. Russia was not sneaking around any NATO country plotting with its neighbor to strangle that country. On the contrary, it was NATO that was plotting with Ukraine to strangle Russia. Unfortunately, for NATO, Russia woke up to plot and began to defend itself.
I thought this channel wasn't about propaganda, but I was wrong! "Bradley plays a key role for Ukraine on the battlefield"?! By chance, two Bradleys managed to disable a T-90M, which had apparently strayed into an area under Ukrainian control?! Truly an incredible success for the "game changer" - disabling one Russian tank in 2 years, and 150 Bradleys destroyed, bravo!
It's rather the expression "unprovoked aggression" that makes me jump. It seems to me that Jacques Baud described the mechanics of international law used by the Russians to intervene, it would not be as illegal as the West says (but I am not a lawyer).
@@ZcommeZorglub o greece have a big population in the war zone and we know first hand what ukraine was doing for 10 years in russian speaking citizens.those areas ask help from russia, russia ties hard to solve peacefully the problem, but west wanted to destroy russia and steal resources.but russia is not africa
@@nikxohs3925 Rumblings and murmers that ,due to US agressive talk Greenland Panama and Venezuela are seeking help from Russia .Then we will see just how big a bully the US is against a battle hardened,super power, They cant even put out a forest fire in California.Trump just doesnt get it, All this BS talk, only makes, enemies bigger ,The man is a complete lunatic, along with his supporters
Before you can maintain " technological edge" you have to gain it first. This is not a chicken or egg question. This is simple common sense even for mifrange 2 digit IQ person.
The actual value of advanced weapons can be measured only in real symmetric wars where sides are on equal grounds (so not iraq vs usa and similar), that's how everyone learned here but also famously in the 1st world war that a lot of "advanced weapons" are almost useless. There's no simulation to test that, especially because there's an evolution of tactics where one weapon seemingly useful after a few months becomes useless. It will be brutal when in the future entire drone swarms with autonomous connected AIs will attack armies and cities as even today in games AI is dominating humans in many cases.
"The Bradley helped Ukraine retake territory" ?????? Where???? Bradley is a 40 year old upgraded jeep with a big gun. Cheaper targets then a tank but still can be taken out easy with a 200 dollar drone with an artillery shell taped to it. All these upgraded toys were made for an occupation of hostile areas and IED's, not for combat. Just look at all the western tanks. Every anti tank missile made over the last 40 years has come into the tank from the top, the weakest point and yet they have not strengthened the tops of tanks to this day. Now they have cheap drones that their easiest way of attack is from the top if they are not hit by artillery spotted by drones that also comes in from the top.
Украина проиграла еще до того, как они начались. Даже с помощью НАТО они проиграют. Вскоре эти страны увидят, что вся помощь ни к чему не приведет, и перестанут ее отправлять.
In that battle against the T-90, 2 Bradleys with FPV drone support participated. First, a drone hit the tank. Multiple hits on the tank (2 Bradleys fired all their ammunition at it) could not immobilize it, but most likely the tank's optics were damaged, perhaps something happened to the rotation mechanism after the FPV drone hit. Even after being hit by 2 drones, all 3 crew members left the tank. I think that this tank is quite repairable, since the Bradley is not capable of causing serious damage to the T-90. Propaganda uses this video, with cropped footage of the crew leaving the tank, in order to deceive by showing that the Bradley can withstand the T-90. But in fact, this is nonsense. This battle can be called luck of the Ukrainian Armed Forces, apparently the Russian crew was confused and could not take advantage of the extraordinary survivability of the T-90.
Stop at 0'50" : repeat "russian agression" distorts the reality of documented facts. Distorting the reality of documented facts is an assault on historical truth. MilitaryTV missed the film despite warnings.
i remember feeling completely stuck, like no matter what i did, life wasn’t moving forward. nothing worked-journals, affirmations, vision boards. then i found Vibrations of Manifestation by Alex Lane, and it felt like everything clicked. especially chapter 3, where it dives into energy alignment-it’s like it was written just for me.
i hit a point where i couldn’t figure out why things weren’t working out for me. other people seemed to manifest success effortlessly, while i stayed stuck. then i came across Vibrations of Manifestation by Alex Lane, and the way it explains energy blew my mind. there’s a section in chapter 3 that really stands out-it helped me see how much power i already have.
Let’s break down the story: - Ukraine is running out of trained, experienced soldiers - there are no wonder weapons that can change the inevitable outcome - NATOstan proxy Ukraine lost the war End of story.
I don't know,but after seeing the video(s) about those 2 soldiers who had a knife fight and the chubbier&smaller Russian had won its pretty much believable. The Ukrainian soldier would been still alive if he retreats. Guy charged a house completely alone on the ground and the Russian was hiding (alone) because his squad got wiped out by drones on the first day. It pretty much happens on both sides or the Russian dude yeeted the other Ukrainian soldiers and not just that one(which is unlikely)
We are seeing the situation where destroyed equipment exceeds replacement equipment and this is even with the new western equipment being the best available not the old handed downs from storage depots across the NATO block.
The T90 was hit by drone and then later on the 2 IFV engaged the scene but the tank was still driving and the drone was able to disable the firing capability of T90 both IFV did not damage the T90 if you watch the footage later on the crew come out unharmed and more 4 drones finished the tank
Destroy vehicle who is abondone is not same as destroy vehicle in move with crew!All crew from time to time must live vehicle if something break or not move even a best defence vehicle or a tanks,but RUSSIA lost more then 3000x NEW tanks,know take some from museum as T-55,62,64,72 because a NEW tanks used a lot electronic parts from west&they not just mehanicical!
Only a complete idiot can believe the Ukrainians and Western media that they destroyed 3000 tanks! This looks like nonsense about chips from washing machines!
Russia just lost 50 vehicles in one assault a couple days ago. And that’s happening almost everyday to them several times over at different points of the front
.cute story. Nobody believes that propaganda Just like Ukrainform (desinform) claiming 800k Russian soldier losses while Ukra only losing 40 k... 🤣 Everyone knows it's the other way around, Ukra is out of men
You arent winning you are in maximum cope mode when you can name individually all Bradleys killed in a short video, but THOUSANDS of Russian junk vehicles have been destroyed.
Nato remember... this is Russia, not some small middle eastern countires
NATO, it's an acronym.
Small middle Eastern country would have gone more than a couple days walking distance into Ukraine in 3 YEARS time. Russia is trash.
Acronym of war mongers who thought they can deceive, bully, destroy, and loot countries and steal natural resources.
It's Ukraine, not Russia
NATO = NASTY
This is not a Ukrainian-Russian war, but NATO and Russia.
Genau so ist es,nur die ASOW meint immer noch sie Kämpfen für die Ukraine
… so what are bandera flags doing on the frontline ?
@@Paranormal3activity if you had a basic understanding of the history of US interventionism in the World, and Imperialism in general, you wouldn't be asking this.
@@denxero … I’m asking a specific question, … not “Imperialism in general” … this generalization works sometimes, but usually used to simplify explanations.
NATO is USA's Lap-dog and a useful tool to launder huge amounts of money from the Tax-bases of America and European Union countries! "Wars are never fought for Freedom. Wars are always fought for the Rich" Major General Smedley Butler in his Memoirs (1937).
These weapons were designed for profit and not war......and that's why they perform so badly.......
our military industrial complex is PROFIT oriented ... not PURPOSE oriented.
Each time they role out a new bespoke weapon system,
it cuts into the mfr-ing capacity of other bespoke systems!
Because ... excess capacity doesn't maximize profits.
Not entirely I'll agree they are over price but they are definitely are made for war. Just not a war of attrition.
I would much rather sit in a badly but if I was going to war
I would feel safer knowing there is 3 other bmp s and 2 tanks and loaded arty looking over us
They where made before fpv droves and all equipment and man seems to have a have a have time vs droves.
Saying U.S. military vehicles are designed solely for profit disregards their proven combat effectiveness, the strict oversight in their development, and the priorities set by military professionals. While the defense industry does involve profit motives, the primary purpose of these vehicles remains to meet the operational demands of modern warfare and ensure the safety and effectiveness of the troops who use them.
Ukrainian forces are generally happy with the Bradleys. While they are not invincible and face challenges in a high-intensity war, their combination of protection, firepower, and versatility has made them a valuable asset in Ukraine's efforts to resist Russian aggression.
I think Russia is conducting a war of attrition, taking away Ukraine's potential (so they can't be a threat in the future), and the last heavily fortified position in Ukraine's 600 miles long defens line has been reached now, Pokrovsk. After that, it's a strole in the park.
I'm afraid the Anglo-Saxons will again come up with some lie or war to stop Russia.
Stop repeating the word "advanced." If they are so advanced, why can't they fight off the Russian Lancets? Please know the difference between marketing and hype-up and battlefield capability......
100%!!!!!!!!!!!!
Bro these vehicles are 40 years old specifically the m1a1 doesn't have all the shit on it at all and also why is the t90m being taken out by $100 drones if putin said it was the best tank in the world?
Its a bad day when you have 30+ nato countries combined military industrial complex and cant stop russia from advancing
Don't forget the 66,000 sanctions on RUS also....
NATO cou tries haave debt-based consumer service economies. NATO can only produce small batches of overpriced weapons.
Probably they belived to Russia and were not prepared for an invasion of the world's 2nd army against the poorest country of Europe.
There was a 4.000km2 gain of territory of Ukraine in 2024. It means they advanced about 4kms along the 1.000km frontline in average. Yes. It's 7 times bigger, than in 2023 and can be called "advancing". Russian troops will reach Kiev by this tempo in 150 years.😀
It would be a different matter if NATO was actually operating the equipment.
@@gyulanyars6636you just don't get it do you? All this "it's only 4km" talk is just a cope. It's not about how much they moved the front East, it's about how badly and how quickly Ukraine will run out of fighting potential, because once they do, it's a walk to Kiev.
Military TV.....stop parroting Western propaganda because your audience have eyes.......remember that.....
It's their job to put pro-West spins on everything.
Agree 100% this website is on google because lot of support money from EU Brussels>EU Support in different ways. It is free money as well cause eu citizens taxpayer cash also involved.
they have to mantain number of visitors from both sides telling whatever convenient
Russia has the right to defend itself.
Can it stay in Russia while defending itself, please?
Turns out NATO hardware has a vulnerability to Russian shovels.
do not forget the washing machines...
Don't forget those awesome washing machine chips that our fantastic British 'intelligence' officers discovered the Russians are using.
Shovels are Kryptonite for NATO weapon systems .
😂
@jardosipox1470 Yeah, they got wings!
GOD BLESS RUSSIA
Russia has not invaded Ukraine , Russian cultured provinces had a majority vote for independence and this is recognized under international law, Russia has a special military operation to protect the civilians of these independent regions which the Ukraine Military supported by USA and NATO attacked these independent Russian speaking provinces. Odessa must also be returned to the Russian Culture as its their heritage city, Ukraine is Occupying it!
Absolutely right. This is a propaganda site.
Why are the Western world and the USA sending dogs to attack a very large Elephant? They all know elephants are very intelligent, and they remember their friends and enemies.
The Russian tank took the hits and move on, but when the Abrams or Bradly took a hit, they are dead.....
big and expensive machines that are of little use in this ' new type of war'
Its because the Bradley can not penetrate its armor.
Which territory has Ukraine reclaimed? Ukraine is retreating and losing ground. NATO is done in this proxy war
Аааааааа. А как же курская губернія? То ж хотели за 3 дня ликвидировать прорив .
"Advanced design," stop making your audience laugh.....
The bradley cost $14.000 million dollars to develop , it took 17 years to produce 1 prototype model 😂😂😂😂😂
The Boo Radley Fighting Vehicle, LOL.
seen the movie ... lol
Urrrrrra Viva la Kremlin 🇷🇺
We have been warning you about the use of the phrase 'Russia aggression'
So, today, we are all unsubscribing. Meaning we are not going to watch your news again.
God bless Russia🇿🇦❤️🇷🇺
Even the MBT Abrams stand no chance, forget about the loser Bradlys....
It’s NA T Os aggression as usual invert for somewhere close to the truth
Russian Agreession is a wrong phrase. Russia was not sneaking around any NATO country plotting with its neighbor to strangle that country. On the contrary, it was NATO that was plotting with Ukraine to strangle Russia. Unfortunately, for NATO, Russia woke up to plot and began to defend itself.
Zelesky should be a comedian again not president 😂 honest comment from Singapore 🇷🇺🇸🇬❤️
You say it as if there is a difference.
Bravo Russia! Vpered k pobede! Slovensko-Rusko!
The t 90 survived and the crew the Bradley's were destroyed later .
Thanks for this...I needed a good laugh at the delusional western coping.
I thought this channel wasn't about propaganda, but I was wrong! "Bradley plays a key role for Ukraine on the battlefield"?! By chance, two Bradleys managed to disable a T-90M, which had apparently strayed into an area under Ukrainian control?! Truly an incredible success for the "game changer" - disabling one Russian tank in 2 years, and 150 Bradleys destroyed, bravo!
Кстати, экипаж того Т 90 выжил.
When you are fighting for your national sovereignty you do Not give mercy
stop talking about russias aggression.others are the ones. usa eu and nato
It's rather the expression "unprovoked aggression" that makes me jump.
It seems to me that Jacques Baud described the mechanics of international law used by the Russians to intervene, it would not be as illegal as the West says (but I am not a lawyer).
@@ZcommeZorglub o greece have a big population in the war zone and we know first hand what ukraine was doing for 10 years in russian speaking citizens.those areas ask help from russia, russia ties hard to solve peacefully the problem, but west wanted to destroy russia and steal resources.but russia is not africa
@@nikxohs3925 Rumblings and murmers that ,due to US agressive talk Greenland Panama and Venezuela are seeking help from Russia .Then we will see just how big a bully the US is against a battle hardened,super power, They cant even put out a forest fire in California.Trump just doesnt get it, All this BS talk, only makes, enemies bigger ,The man is a complete lunatic, along with his supporters
Ukraine thought the senators were equipped with nanomachines
“Full scale invasion” so cliche lol
it was 80,000 :D
Both sides will learn to adapt against diverse equipment.
It is not FULL SCALE. Stop saying full scale.
"oohh broo it's not full scale"
then why ruśśians need koreans? why on the last russian victory parade there was only 1 tank? - t-34-85 XD
@obi666 It is still not full scale. Please try and understand the word FULL.
@ yes, I did, but not on kremlim website, maybe that's why u r saying it's not full scale war
Don't expect mercy this is
war zone.. Russia 🇷🇺
First of all it's not full scale war
It's SMO only a fraction of russian military
this is was puton says to not admit ruSSian army have been struggling for 3 years already?
they make the Senator just south of where I live in Brampton Ontario. Fitted out somewhere else though.
This is some poor and lazy propaganda. come on NED, is this the best you can do with the millions of your cia money?
Before you can maintain " technological edge" you have to gain it first. This is not a chicken or egg question. This is simple common sense even for mifrange 2 digit IQ person.
The actual value of advanced weapons can be measured only in real symmetric wars where sides are on equal grounds (so not iraq vs usa and similar), that's how everyone learned here but also famously in the 1st world war that a lot of "advanced weapons" are almost useless. There's no simulation to test that, especially because there's an evolution of tactics where one weapon seemingly useful after a few months becomes useless. It will be brutal when in the future entire drone swarms with autonomous connected AIs will attack armies and cities as even today in games AI is dominating humans in many cases.
🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺💪💪💪
who has been winning since 2023???????????????????
"The Bradley helped Ukraine retake territory" ?????? Where???? Bradley is a 40 year old upgraded jeep with a big gun. Cheaper targets then a tank but still can be taken out easy with a 200 dollar drone with an artillery shell taped to it. All these upgraded toys were made for an occupation of hostile areas and IED's, not for combat. Just look at all the western tanks. Every anti tank missile made over the last 40 years has come into the tank from the top, the weakest point and yet they have not strengthened the tops of tanks to this day. Now they have cheap drones that their easiest way of attack is from the top if they are not hit by artillery spotted by drones that also comes in from the top.
Давай поговоримо про рашисськи бмп и танки, которіе палають як сухе говно.
Украина проиграла еще до того, как они начались. Даже с помощью НАТО они проиграют. Вскоре эти страны увидят, что вся помощь ни к чему не приведет, и перестанут ее отправлять.
These videos are so scattered and random, its hard to tell what you're seeing at any given moment.
Dieu est avec la Russie
In that battle against the T-90, 2 Bradleys with FPV drone support participated. First, a drone hit the tank. Multiple hits on the tank (2 Bradleys fired all their ammunition at it) could not immobilize it, but most likely the tank's optics were damaged, perhaps something happened to the rotation mechanism after the FPV drone hit. Even after being hit by 2 drones, all 3 crew members left the tank. I think that this tank is quite repairable, since the Bradley is not capable of causing serious damage to the T-90. Propaganda uses this video, with cropped footage of the crew leaving the tank, in order to deceive by showing that the Bradley can withstand the T-90. But in fact, this is nonsense. This battle can be called luck of the Ukrainian Armed Forces, apparently the Russian crew was confused and could not take advantage of the extraordinary survivability of the T-90.
0:11 This have never been a full scale invasion, especially in the beginning almost the opposite.
They are trying to put this dissaster under the rug, or better yet, the ghost of Pyongyang story :D
Trump - Putin meeting scheduled...let NATO & Ukraine worry..
So much $$$ for destruction. If we use all this money for our country's we will have homeless free cities and great roads, great homes fore everybody.
Why is Bradley so vulnerable, showing a M113
Finally Senator of canada go to front line.. What a patriotic Politician.. Salute comrades
There’s my tax dollars going up in smoke.
Some peace negotiations sure be nice.
Come on Jan 20th!
Stop at 0'50" : repeat "russian agression" distorts the reality of documented facts. Distorting the reality of documented facts is an assault on historical truth. MilitaryTV missed the film despite warnings.
It looks like leaving the hatches open on AFVs or doors open on APCs, is a common habit in that part of the world.
How long begged Amo will last for Ukraine , We all know the result. It can be delayed but can't be changed.
Fight for Ukraines sovereignty 😂, oh sure, Ukraine was so sovereign and independent before the invasion 🫠
I just love how the Russians quickly put NATO signage on everything found!
Thumbs down for repeating BS.
We're all here for the pro-West cope. It's entertaining.
i remember feeling completely stuck, like no matter what i did, life wasn’t moving forward. nothing worked-journals, affirmations, vision boards. then i found Vibrations of Manifestation by Alex Lane, and it felt like everything clicked. especially chapter 3, where it dives into energy alignment-it’s like it was written just for me.
i hit a point where i couldn’t figure out why things weren’t working out for me. other people seemed to manifest success effortlessly, while i stayed stuck. then i came across Vibrations of Manifestation by Alex Lane, and the way it explains energy blew my mind. there’s a section in chapter 3 that really stands out-it helped me see how much power i already have.
What bull is he talking??
Last year, Russia liberated 4,000 square kilometers of its occupied territories.
About 100,000 still remain occupied
Let’s break down the story:
- Ukraine is running out of trained, experienced soldiers
- there are no wonder weapons that can change the inevitable outcome
- NATOstan proxy Ukraine lost the war
End of story.
I don't know,but after seeing the video(s) about those 2 soldiers who had a knife fight and the chubbier&smaller Russian had won its pretty much believable.
The Ukrainian soldier would been still alive if he retreats. Guy charged a house completely alone on the ground and the Russian was hiding (alone) because his squad got wiped out by drones on the first day. It pretty much happens on both sides or the Russian dude yeeted the other Ukrainian soldiers and not just that one(which is unlikely)
THE FULL MOON IS THE NEW MOON RU RU
Canada? 😂😂😂😂😂
Reclaim territory where? Mere discourse is not facts!
We are seeing the situation where destroyed equipment exceeds replacement equipment and this is even with the new western equipment being the best available not the old handed downs from storage depots across the NATO block.
Uh, did these geniuses just say ...
_RECLAIM TERRITORY_ ..????? lol.
You're not in Iraq or Syria bro.
Russia is bad ass i love russia urraa vladimir the greatest hypersonic supersonic putin ❤❤❤❤
FIRST!! 40 SEC AGOOO
I today award you Hero Of TH-cam ▶️
@ELputinruska hahahahahahahahaha
"Full scale invasion".?this does not sound neutral
Please give the name “Putins Piano” to the TOS systems
The T90 was hit by drone and then later on the 2 IFV engaged the scene but the tank was still driving and the drone was able to disable the firing capability of T90 both IFV did not damage the T90 if you watch the footage later on the crew come out unharmed and more 4 drones finished the tank
Against Russian aggression wow 😂😂😂😂that's
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
How many Russian tanks and IFV's have been destroyed?
Ye lots of them but economically and politicial they do not look like Germany France UK Austria Canada... so pretty sure who lost more 😂😂
🇺🇦💯🖐
3 years and suffered 800k casualties hahahaha America did 20 years in Afghanistan and Iraq and suffered 8k casualties yea you suck
You know Afghanistan hasn't had powerfull equipments like Ukraine that one 2 afganie don't have sniper to wear
Braadleeeeeyyy
😂😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Fakes and propaganda
Destroy vehicle who is abondone is not same as destroy vehicle in move with crew!All crew from time to time must live vehicle if something break or not move even a best defence vehicle or a tanks,but RUSSIA lost more then 3000x NEW tanks,know take some from museum as T-55,62,64,72 because a NEW tanks used a lot electronic parts from west&they not just mehanicical!
Only a complete idiot can believe the Ukrainians and Western media that they destroyed 3000 tanks! This looks like nonsense about chips from washing machines!
Helping Ukraine reclaim areas……….😂. Tell us how there are little green men from mars
Thats a 113, not a Bradley. This video is a joke.
Видео ни о чем. 🤷
Fuck yeah!!
#1
U late. Try next video
🙏🏽🙌🏿🙏🏽🙌🏿🕊️🕊️🕊️🕊️
Bradly is a clown vehicle
Russia just lost 50 vehicles in one assault a couple days ago. And that’s happening almost everyday to them several times over at different points of the front
.cute story. Nobody believes that propaganda Just like Ukrainform (desinform) claiming 800k Russian soldier losses while Ukra only losing 40 k... 🤣 Everyone knows it's the other way around, Ukra is out of men
It must be those icy roads in Moscow
@@FancyPantsOnFire no they didn't lol. photo evidence. I'll wait
bs, false information ,click bait channel
No vehicle is invincible
NO MERCY AND TAKE NO PRISONERS 😅😅
No wonder why Israel had ordered 10000 fpv drones from a surat gujarat India based pvt company
You arent winning you are in maximum cope mode when you can name individually all Bradleys killed in a short video, but THOUSANDS of Russian junk vehicles have been destroyed.
Its different when a vehicle fights for +2 years in a war
RUSSIA FATHER OF WEST 🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺
@@ayushbhattacharjee8985 who’s west?
Arma was right, Bradley's can only take one or two hits. lol
Bravo Russia.!!!