I previously owned two R3s and an R5 camera with a Canon BG-R10 Battery Grip. I purchased the Canon R5ii and sold one of my R3s, and I equipped the R5ii with the Canon BG-R20 Battery Grip to match the R3's size. The grip, loaded with two LP-E6P batteries, allows me to capture 8,900 shots at a high school football game at night and still have dual 76% battery life remaining. When shooting CRAW at ISO 4000-5000 under new stadium LED lighting at 30 FPS using a 512 CFexpress card, the noise levels are comparable to those of the R3. Regarding the anticipated Canon R1, it appears to be merely an upgraded R3ii with features from the R5ii. Consequently, I plan to sell my R3 and purchase another R5ii for my collection. By cropping a 45MP image by 50%, I now avoid the need for a 1.4x teleconverter and the associated loss of one light stop (f/4). For sports, landscape, or wedding photography, the R5ii is an excellent choice.
The r5 II has issues with low MBPS. IN 4K 120p it has 135 MBPS compared to the R3 at 1880 MBPS. So unless you are recording RAW or $K fine, the R3 has the batter video image quality. I also think the line skipped video hurts the image quality. So combined with line skipped and low MBPS , you get subpar video quality. I also question Clog2 at 135 mbps.
You didn’t stop yourself from explaining any details there are on those camera and the dynamic between those two beasts PLZ make more videos like this cuz this one helped so much to understand the capabilities of a true pro body camera that canon produces in this days ! ⚡️
I've had a R6 mk ii for about 15 month and I love it, but the rolling shutter distortion has always been a problem for certain sports. I've just placed an order for a R3. If I need higher MP I can upscale the relevant file or files, but that stacked sensor is what I'm after.
If You hold the two cameras up in front of Your eyes, one on each, it is easy to see if therre is a difference is viewfinder size, it will look odd though....;- )
I have both and have found the R5II a disappointment overall. A purchase i regret. I HAVE HAD THR r5Ii overheat on me a couple of times and shut off shooting hummingbirds in Arizona in 95f degree heat, and 4k video in about 80f degree heat. The one thing I like is the premature and 8k, but past that..... gonna stick with my R3. The R8, yes the R8 is a camera I would take per the the R5ii for wildlife.
@@DanAllouche Then you are fortunate. No, this is a disappointment camera body as far as a small body consumer bodies go. Going back to the R3 and debating on the R1. I mentioned it in one of my videos as the grip itself was hot in Arizona shooting hummingbirds and that was before it shut off LOL. . It has a way to go to be a good consumer body - and, it is as updated as it can be with the second update. 🤗
Yes, the r6 and r5 suffered from issues with bad auto wb.. the r3 fixed it and the r5ii is even better. The colors look very much like the r3, which is beautiful but there’s a touch more contrast and clarity to the image.
No benefit to the r3 in post.. interpreting as clog 2 does nothing for the image vs the r5ii that natively has clog2 in the body. When you look at the waveforms, while interpreting clog2, you’ll find they are similar to clog.. so no benefit in trying to switch to clog 2 in post.
No benefit to the r3 in post.. interpreting as clog 2 does nothing for the image vs the r5ii that natively has clog2 in the body. When you look at the waveforms, while interpreting clog2, you’ll find they are similar to clog.. so no benefit in trying to switch to clog 2 in post.
I previously owned two R3s and an R5 camera with a Canon BG-R10 Battery Grip. I purchased the Canon R5ii and sold one of my R3s, and I equipped the R5ii with the Canon BG-R20 Battery Grip to match the R3's size. The grip, loaded with two LP-E6P batteries, allows me to capture 8,900 shots at a high school football game at night and still have dual 76% battery life remaining. When shooting CRAW at ISO 4000-5000 under new stadium LED lighting at 30 FPS using a 512 CFexpress card, the noise levels are comparable to those of the R3. Regarding the anticipated Canon R1, it appears to be merely an upgraded R3ii with features from the R5ii. Consequently, I plan to sell my R3 and purchase another R5ii for my collection. By cropping a 45MP image by 50%, I now avoid the need for a 1.4x teleconverter and the associated loss of one light stop (f/4). For sports, landscape, or wedding photography, the R5ii is an excellent choice.
Thanks for sharing your experience!
The r5 II has issues with low MBPS. IN 4K 120p it has 135 MBPS compared to the R3 at 1880 MBPS. So unless you are recording RAW or $K fine, the R3 has the batter video image quality. I also think the line skipped video hurts the image quality. So combined with line skipped and low MBPS , you get subpar video quality. I also question Clog2 at 135 mbps.
I purchased the R3 . The discounted R3 was cheaper than the new R5mark2. The r3 has been great plus the battery life is excellent
You didn’t stop yourself from explaining any details there are on those camera and the dynamic between those two beasts
PLZ make more videos like this cuz this one helped so much to understand the capabilities of a true pro body camera that canon produces in this days ! ⚡️
Thanks for stopping by and watching this video! Glad you learned something from me
I will keep it up
I've had a R6 mk ii for about 15 month and I love it, but the rolling shutter distortion has always been a problem for certain sports. I've just placed an order for a R3. If I need higher MP I can upscale the relevant file or files, but that stacked sensor is what I'm after.
Yessss !
Does the R5 Mark II allow you to turn on a sound for the electronic shutter? In the earlier R5, full silent was the only option.
Yes.
It does allow you yes
such a good comparison on these! keep it up
i will love to see the best video settings on the r5 mark ii and why
Thanks for commenting, I’ll definitely make a video on the best settings
Thanks Dan for your great content hopefully you not forget to make video about all and best setting R3 for videographers ♥️♥️
Thanks for commenting! Appreciate your support
And yes it’s on my list
Thanks for sharing❤️ love your videos!
Glad you enjoyed! Thanks a lot
If You hold the two cameras up in front of Your eyes, one on each, it is easy to see if therre is a difference is viewfinder size, it will look odd though....;- )
I have both and have found the R5II a disappointment overall. A purchase i regret. I HAVE HAD THR r5Ii overheat on me a couple of times and shut off shooting hummingbirds in Arizona in 95f degree heat, and 4k video in about 80f degree heat. The one thing I like is the premature and 8k, but past that..... gonna stick with my R3. The R8, yes the R8 is a camera I would take per the the R5ii for wildlife.
The R5 didn’t overheat on me once in actual shooting, 35c degrees
Maybe update the firmware
@@DanAllouche Then you are fortunate. No, this is a disappointment camera body as far as a small body consumer bodies go. Going back to the R3 and debating on the R1. I mentioned it in one of my videos as the grip itself was hot in Arizona shooting hummingbirds and that was before it shut off LOL. . It has a way to go to be a good consumer body - and, it is as updated as it can be with the second update. 🤗
Such solid cameras... just hate how plasticy the Canons feel these days.
The R3 feels great… sure it’s not as tough feeling as a 1DX but It’s fine honestly
R3 and r6 mark ii is the better comparison. R5 mark ii is the top dog with all the issues right now.
R6II isn’t on this level, tried it and didn’t enjoy it at all
Don’t know what issues you’re referring to it’s a brilliant machine
@@DanAllouchethey’re probably referring to the issues that 0.03% of users are having.
People that think mp is everything. Dynamic range can be just as important, and the R5 II is beat
Great video. How are the colors from the R5 Mark ii? Hope there is a positive change compared to the original R5.
It’s in comparison to my R3 which is significantly better than original R5 and R6
Thanks for commenting!🙏
@@DanAllouche okay so a positive thing. Good to hear. Still miss the old canon DSLR colors!
Yes, the r6 and r5 suffered from issues with bad auto wb.. the r3 fixed it and the r5ii is even better. The colors look very much like the r3, which is beautiful but there’s a touch more contrast and clarity to the image.
@ ahh this is so good to hear! Thanks mate! Keep shooting!
Easy buy the r1
how it's possible you can compare those two cameras!!! It's obvious i think isn't it? but amateurs need this kind of things. Have fun
Sorry, I'll be SAVING my money. Like the old car, works just as well as a new one. 🙂
No benefit to the r3 in post.. interpreting as clog 2 does nothing for the image vs the r5ii that natively has clog2 in the body.
When you look at the waveforms, while interpreting clog2, you’ll find they are similar to clog.. so no benefit in trying to switch to clog 2 in post.
R3. Not even close.
I purchased the R3 . The discounted R3 was cheaper than the new R5mark2. The r3 has been great plus the battery life is excellent
They say it’s not discontinued yet, I believe it is.
The R3 is what was originally planned for the R1
Now the R1 is basically the R3 mark ii or 1.5
No benefit to the r3 in post.. interpreting as clog 2 does nothing for the image vs the r5ii that natively has clog2 in the body.
When you look at the waveforms, while interpreting clog2, you’ll find they are similar to clog.. so no benefit in trying to switch to clog 2 in post.