the entire idea of a self driving car is literally just an engineering student puffery stunt to wax their egos and try to show off. It's not possible beyond a graduate student project
What happens if someone really messed up, I mean a real sicko badguy, sent some freedom seeds into its sensors? Would it just shut down or go crazy? Would like to see a video
Why are we excited about losing low level jobs? Just another sector of the economy that's relatively easy to get into that will be gone. And you'll have to work harder and harder to get a decent job as a result. The only benefit I see is fewer jobs for immigrants
That's something the people who get excited about this tech don't understand, they seem to be under the assumption that now people in the low level jobs will be freed to "just go get" better jobs when they all get replaced
Agreed with most, but to be fair, GTA drivers are good because they are all controlled by the same engine that also controls the position of everything else, as in the driver has the exact location and motion data in 3D space. Cars just use visual cues with 2D cameras. Also, even though art AI is just iteration upon iteration, it has the visual data of everything online, and could theoretically be asked to make art that does no exist. which in a way is iteration but the inverse, which in a way is art at it's core.
It's hilarious how they broke down that Nio robot car promo in that it doesn't hit pedestrians by means of assumptive math... like what if it gets the math wrong lol
4:43 "What they call AI now" - No, dude, that WAS AI before all the LLM GPT stuff. It's AI in the classic sense of the term, although I do admit that machine learning has always been a better term for that stuff.
the reason why its galaxies apart is cause its not even a primitive version of the same thing. its a entirely different processes. neural nets is just predicting the output based on the input. if you don't have an input and output to train against, its not going to come up with an output out of thin air. its also why you need such large data sets. is because the ai is just basically a look up table for things its seen before and outputs its seen before. whatever gives the most similar values also outputs similar values. and you risk AI accidentally correlating things which don't correlate. i.e AI thinks stop signs are just hexagons with white and red. then it sees a sign that say do not enter or some obscure sign that kind of looks like a stop sign. (90% chance it looks like all other stop signs.) so it just thinks everything is good, stop and continue. but honestly this is something humans do too. but at least you don't have to train them 10 million times per instance of random occurrence to get a proper output.
you could just like, build normal automated electric subways powered by nuclear power plants or coal or oil or whatever and have police do ticket inspections. No, we need Gadgetbahns. Every other normal country builds railways will law enforcement. Why can’t we?
Watching a video of people watching commercials of things that don't exist so there's a stock market to invest in that magically makes your money worth more in the eyes of... investors?
No he has a point, an autonomous car is easy to make and doesn't need AI, what's not easy is to have an autonomous car on the same road with other human drivers. These companies are trying to compensate for that with AI but it will never work because you need human level AI, either that or you get rid of all the humans on the road so you can have an 100% controlled environment.
@@systemx6603 He doesn't have a point, let's just take one aspect of self driving cars: the sensors. In a real world scenario , the car has imperfect information from its sensors and has to rationally deduce what the best aciton is. In a video game like GTA, the programmer has full access to the entire game state at all time, there is no ambiguity at all and programming a car to drive in gta is ridiculously easier than making a real self driving car...
@@zenchess You're just saying the same thing I am saying, autonomous driving would be easy and not even need any complicated AI if the roads only had other autonomous cars and no pedestrians. The moment you introduce humans you need human level AI to account for the behavior of humans, something none of these scam companies have a hope of achieving any time soon or ever.
@@systemx6603 No, I'm not saying what you are saying. Autonomous driving (in the real world) is NOT easy, at all. Why do you think it took tesla years of ai research and testing and retrieving real world data to make it work. I'm not sure why you don't understand the difference between programming a car to drive in GTA and programming a car to drive in the real world. I mentioned that the sensor data the car has in both scenarios is completely different - in one case the game developer is in full control of the environment, in the real world you have insufficient data. Let's also mention that in GTA to steer a car is ridiculously easy, you can point the car in any direction with a line of code, in the real world you have to control real tires on a real world and it is far more difficult. I'm not sure this conversation can proceed if you're not going to recognize the massive difference in difficulty from programming a car to drive in a video game, and getting a car to work in the real world.
Ready Player One is an incredibly boring and depressing vision of the future. I have a positive view of the future of tech but most people have such a dense lifeless view on it.
You should because it’s not the technology it was what we do with it. Technology has been with us for the longest time now just looked different is all. The internet is a mind blowing thing just in practice it’s full of mouth breathers. You can’t blame the wrench you blame the dumbass who used it wrong
says that driving cars should be about human emotion yet he can't grasp the concept of human emotion towards pets..lol okay sam..go back to kissing dudes
@@russellwright4385 the artificially drawn cars in gta, will obviously stay in the artificial drawn lines on the games. A real self driving car has to control actual hardware like gears and wheels, and recognise what is and isn’t a lane line. Completely different things.
@@ao7290 the biggest issue would be sensors being able to correctly detect and communicate certain key parts of a real environment so that the "brain" of the abomination can do gta npc driving. so sam is spot on about the "ai" part. the real hurdles come from the sensor side, which wasn't the point he was getting at
![โรงเรียนห้ามรัก โดนจับได้ตาย...!! [เอิร์นไดเม่]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/4u02Sbr556Q/mqdefault.jpg)
An Israeli self driving car would be terrifying. I've seen what their pagers can do.
It is a ones in a lifetime experience.
😂😂😂😂😂
The car is neurotic and genocidal too lol?
@@Consumer0001 that's the gayest thing I've ever heard
all isreali cars are controlled by soulless intelligence
my theory is that self-driving cars are just controlled by some Indian dudes in a call center
V8 engines cure homosexuality
Hell yeah, brother. 🫡
Super chargers and turbos increase effects
So all guys with V8s are recovering homos ?
Nothing can fix homos, its like how you cant be a virgin again no matter what you call it.
@@WyattEmge Nah mate
techno globalists OD'd off their own farts after we invented a way to see porn on all our light rectangles
Just say Jews bro
@@CaptainStandiford its the jews
@@CaptainStandiford the soul behind the eyes of a jew isn't a human soul.
@@CaptainStandiford brazillians.
god i hate (((techno globalists)))
AI is just a marketing term.
Just Another Indian marketing term?
pretty much.
That can build a rocket engine
It's just like you! We can make you wholesale, goyim!
@@upwardspiral7441 Think we have to do the physical building actually
A self operated Train system makes more sense then cars.
the entire idea of a self driving car is literally just an engineering student puffery stunt to wax their egos and try to show off. It's not possible beyond a graduate student project
@@Consumer0001 trains are still immensely profitable.
True a train network is close-circuited and defined so would suit computers well. Anything can happen on the road with cars. It's too chaotic.
Let's have some acoustic software engineers program a corporate legal team's interpretation of the fucking trolley problem, what could go wrong?
_you can only watch_
Wonder what happens if someone in a f250 if trying to run it off the road
Sounds like a video for Whistlindiesel
It will brake
Should I do it for science with the 7.3?
What happens if someone really messed up, I mean a real sicko badguy, sent some freedom seeds into its sensors? Would it just shut down or go crazy? Would like to see a video
Why are we excited about losing low level jobs? Just another sector of the economy that's relatively easy to get into that will be gone. And you'll have to work harder and harder to get a decent job as a result. The only benefit I see is fewer jobs for immigrants
That's something the people who get excited about this tech don't understand, they seem to be under the assumption that now people in the low level jobs will be freed to "just go get" better jobs when they all get replaced
Agreed with most, but to be fair, GTA drivers are good because they are all controlled by the same engine that also controls the position of everything else, as in the driver has the exact location and motion data in 3D space. Cars just use visual cues with 2D cameras. Also, even though art AI is just iteration upon iteration, it has the visual data of everything online, and could theoretically be asked to make art that does no exist. which in a way is iteration but the inverse, which in a way is art at it's core.
When I used to work as a driver my company mandated mobile eye in their vehicles, it is the most annoying and cucking technology.
It's hilarious how they broke down that Nio robot car promo in that it doesn't hit pedestrians by means of assumptive math... like what if it gets the math wrong lol
It looks like ai used ai to teach ai
And nobody knows how they actually work because the AI are generated by AI...
4:43 "What they call AI now" - No, dude, that WAS AI before all the LLM GPT stuff. It's AI in the classic sense of the term, although I do admit that machine learning has always been a better term for that stuff.
the reason why its galaxies apart is cause its not even a primitive version of the same thing. its a entirely different processes.
neural nets is just predicting the output based on the input. if you don't have an input and output to train against, its not going to come up with an output out of thin air.
its also why you need such large data sets. is because the ai is just basically a look up table for things its seen before and outputs its seen before. whatever gives the most similar values also outputs similar values. and you risk AI accidentally correlating things which don't correlate. i.e AI thinks stop signs are just hexagons with white and red. then it sees a sign that say do not enter or some obscure sign that kind of looks like a stop sign. (90% chance it looks like all other stop signs.) so it just thinks everything is good, stop and continue. but honestly this is something humans do too. but at least you don't have to train them 10 million times per instance of random occurrence to get a proper output.
This guy fuckz
Galaxies away "" , the best D
Amazon and Walmart drone delivery is already a thing
When was this recorded?
@@clalam5241damn really? do they even still have this podcast ?
you could just like, build normal automated electric subways powered by nuclear power plants or coal or oil or whatever and have police do ticket inspections.
No, we need Gadgetbahns. Every other normal country builds railways will law enforcement. Why can’t we?
C O Y T I O U S
self driving cars are redundant, trams and buses trains these if managed correctly are all we need
They won't be managed correctly.
could you please name the episode
#43 bro
hey so here is the answer....... these cars are remotely driven
Brazilian ai must be picking up loose 1s and 0s
ones and zeroes
Watching a video of people watching commercials of things that don't exist so there's a stock market to invest in that magically makes your money worth more in the eyes of... investors?
bai ling is a borderline homosexual choice and its the only one he has....
Redditors psyopped is an oxymoron because reddit IS psyop
I really don’t give a shit what it’s called as long as it does what it’s advertised
Lex friedman dresses like a waiter
Comparing driving a real world car with programming a car to drive in GTA is pretty much the height of stupidity
No he has a point, an autonomous car is easy to make and doesn't need AI, what's not easy is to have an autonomous car on the same road with other human drivers. These companies are trying to compensate for that with AI but it will never work because you need human level AI, either that or you get rid of all the humans on the road so you can have an 100% controlled environment.
@@systemx6603 He doesn't have a point, let's just take one aspect of self driving cars: the sensors. In a real world scenario , the car has imperfect information from its sensors and has to rationally deduce what the best aciton is. In a video game like GTA, the programmer has full access to the entire game state at all time, there is no ambiguity at all and programming a car to drive in gta is ridiculously easier than making a real self driving car...
@@zenchess You're just saying the same thing I am saying, autonomous driving would be easy and not even need any complicated AI if the roads only had other autonomous cars and no pedestrians. The moment you introduce humans you need human level AI to account for the behavior of humans, something none of these scam companies have a hope of achieving any time soon or ever.
@@systemx6603 No, I'm not saying what you are saying. Autonomous driving (in the real world) is NOT easy, at all. Why do you think it took tesla years of ai research and testing and retrieving real world data to make it work.
I'm not sure why you don't understand the difference between programming a car to drive in GTA and programming a car to drive in the real world. I mentioned that the sensor data the car has in both scenarios is completely different - in one case the game developer is in full control of the environment, in the real world you have insufficient data. Let's also mention that in GTA to steer a car is ridiculously easy, you can point the car in any direction with a line of code, in the real world you have to control real tires on a real world and it is far more difficult.
I'm not sure this conversation can proceed if you're not going to recognize the massive difference in difficulty from programming a car to drive in a video game, and getting a car to work in the real world.
@@systemx6603you sound like you think humans driving is fine which is ridiculous…
Ready Player One is an incredibly boring and depressing vision of the future.
I have a positive view of the future of tech but most people have such a dense lifeless view on it.
You should because it’s not the technology it was what we do with it. Technology has been with us for the longest time now just looked different is all. The internet is a mind blowing thing just in practice it’s full of mouth breathers. You can’t blame the wrench you blame the dumbass who used it wrong
says that driving cars should be about human emotion yet he can't grasp the concept of human emotion towards pets..lol okay sam..go back to kissing dudes
sam hyde literally copying noam chomskiys take on AI, i thought he is more contrarian than that
Please repent! Jesus Christ loves you! He died for our sins! Please believe!
r/thefighterandthekid
roid rage
We've already created dystopia why continue to try to make utopia?
sam is completely wrong here
cool
So if it assumes all pedestrians move at an average of 2mph they're gonna smoke a ton of cyclists. Hey I'm starting to like these things
that was Awesome rant , gay computers , the best DDD
Whats wrong with Cardano?
sam is just seething because he's replaceable
haha, Sam really tried to compare self driving cars to GTA gameplay.
He successfully did so
@@russellwright4385 the artificially drawn cars in gta, will obviously stay in the artificial drawn lines on the games. A real self driving car has to control actual hardware like gears and wheels, and recognise what is and isn’t a lane line.
Completely different things.
@@ao7290 the biggest issue would be sensors being able to correctly detect and communicate certain key parts of a real environment so that the "brain" of the abomination can do gta npc driving. so sam is spot on about the "ai" part.
the real hurdles come from the sensor side, which wasn't the point he was getting at
@@russellwright4385 Convincing a retard doesn’t make you correct.
@@ao7290 it's funny how little you understand about everything. You're the kind of person Sam rants about constantly