So that's why X and Y are used, I always wondered why those two out of all letters were used. You have no idea how helpful this is, thanks Jason! -Matt
You are the reason I'm studying philosophy! It's ALL about education. Thank you. Hopefully I get an 'A' in symbolic logic. Applying to UC Berkeley this fall. I will tell my classmates about your online lectures.
Thank-you Dr. Cambell. I've learned more watching your videos then what I have been taught in the university. Qualitative research was perfect for the stage am at. Epistemology underbelt and that is kicking in still. And, now logic. All of it. So, thank-you and I will see all videos. From Concepción, Chile. Undergraduate English Pedagogy at UDLA. Professors like you we need downhere.
Thanks a lot for these vids! Its been almost a year since I took logic in college and I'm starting to forget some of it. I'm glad I can watch these vids to refresh my memory.
Even though you said this is a cursory introduction, it is a far more thorough introduction than I got in my discrete mathematics class on the subject.
@octave121511 If you go to my main channel drjasonjcampbell and look under my playlists I have tons of logic videos, from introductory to very advanced. Thanks for watching. Peace.
Wow. This was awesome. I am just starting my Logic class and thought I'd try to get ahead of the game . . . This was more than helpful! Thanks so much! :)
By George, I must say that - during the first five minutes or so - this was like chewing a headache. But after Donald Rumsfeld was mentioned the fog began to lift a little. Alas I fear I still have far to go, but hope to see you all ( whomever you are ) when I get there.
Nice video, It would improve the experience if you cited the videos you though were good as links from the video, or in the introduction. As a Phd you will appreciate that citations are as important as presentation and it would greatly increase the value of what was in any case a good video.
You stated that there are other youtube videos which offer a more in-depth introduction to predicate logic, could you please specify which videos you are referring to.
Your video is helping me a lot, but there is slight difference in the material, which it makes them hard follow,, but I can send you a PDF of the college book we are using
is the decision to subscript over use parentheses just stylistic? , like to say x loves y we can break it into property love w individual constants x and y == loves(x, y)
So that's why X and Y are used, I always wondered why those two out of all letters were used. You have no idea how helpful this is, thanks Jason!
-Matt
You are the reason I'm studying philosophy! It's ALL about education. Thank you. Hopefully I get an 'A' in symbolic logic. Applying to UC Berkeley this fall. I will tell my classmates about your online lectures.
Thank-you Dr. Cambell. I've learned more watching your videos then what I have been taught in the university. Qualitative research was perfect for the stage am at. Epistemology underbelt and that is kicking in still. And, now logic. All of it. So, thank-you and I will see all videos. From Concepción, Chile. Undergraduate English Pedagogy at UDLA. Professors like you we need downhere.
Thanks a lot for these vids! Its been almost a year since I took logic in college and I'm starting to forget some of it. I'm glad I can watch these vids to refresh my memory.
Your videos are really helpful!
Thank you soo much Sir !!
Even though you said this is a cursory introduction, it is a far more thorough introduction than I got in my discrete mathematics class on the subject.
@octave121511 If you go to my main channel drjasonjcampbell and look under my playlists I have tons of logic videos, from introductory to very advanced. Thanks for watching. Peace.
Wow. This was awesome. I am just starting my Logic class and thought I'd try to get ahead of the game . . . This was more than helpful! Thanks so much! :)
Thanks, Dr Campbell! This helps.
classy, you tell the the story how it is. good job, i needed this
thank you sir for what you are doing - from algeria
By George, I must say that - during the first five minutes or so - this was like chewing a headache. But after Donald Rumsfeld was mentioned the fog began to lift a little.
Alas I fear I still have far to go, but hope to see you all ( whomever you are ) when I get there.
Thank you very much for this Dr Campbell, hugely helpful.
So that's how you pronounce Zizek. Kudos for that and the videos. Philosophy is wonderful, enjoy yourself.
Nice video, It would improve the experience if you cited the videos you though were good as links from the video, or in the introduction. As a Phd you will appreciate that citations are as important as presentation and it would greatly increase the value of what was in any case a good video.
excellent. you made it easy to grasp. Thank you!
You stated that there are other youtube videos which offer a more in-depth introduction to predicate logic, could you please specify which videos you are referring to.
I think you deserve much more.
Thank you very much
In fact ...Ur Lessons helped me very
Thank you utmost respect. And I hope that Ward had submitted to me from logic
Your video is helping me a lot, but there is slight difference in the material, which it makes them hard follow,, but I can send you a PDF of the college book we are using
repetition is good, good, good. thx..
I appreciate that.
Jason, I just want to say that you really blew it for the redskins at qb. I couldn't be happier that Cousins is your eventual replacement.
goood teachingggg
thnx sir
plz improve the sound qaulity its realy slow
is the decision to subscript over use parentheses just stylistic? , like to say x loves y we can break it into property love w individual constants x and y == loves(x, y)
Thanx a lot for the upload sir. :)
Hi, could you please show the way to solve ∃x(¬Px ↔ (Qx ∧ ¬Rx))
you seem like an awesome guy!
really freakin helpful
good
I love your nose piercing; fucking awesome
a-t not a-w
mfw he said "Peter has knowledge" and my name is Peter q_q