ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 16 พ.ย. 2022
- NASA's launch of the Artemis 1 mission signals America's intent to return to the moon, and beyond. This CBS Reports documentary reveals the incredible endeavor of America's next great leap in space exploration and the collective will required to see it through.
#news #nasa #artemis
CBS News Streaming Network is the premier 24/7 anchored streaming news service from CBS News and Stations, available free to everyone with access to the Internet. The CBS News Streaming Network is your destination for breaking news, live events and original reporting locally, nationally and around the globe. Launched in November 2014 as CBSN, the CBS News Streaming Network is available live in 91 countries and on 30 digital platforms and apps, as well as on CBSNews.com and Paramount+.
Subscribe to the CBS News TH-cam channel: / cbsnews
Watch CBS News: cbsn.ws/1PlLpZ7c
Download the CBS News app: cbsn.ws/1Xb1WC8
Follow CBS News on Instagram: / cbsnews
Like CBS News on Facebook: / cbsnews
Follow CBS News on Twitter: / cbsnews
Subscribe to our newsletters: cbsn.ws/1RqHw7T
Try Paramount+ free: bit.ly/2OiW1kZ
For video licensing inquiries, contact: licensing@veritone.com
Click here to watch more CBS Reports documentaries: th-cam.com/play/PLEb3ThbkPrFai7SUKihl2flc6MTiqzz7n.html
✝Good Day Everyone, G-D BLESS HAVE A BLESSED REST OF THE DAY.
"Why does it cost so much?" I keep hearing.
The real question is; Can we afford NOT to?
Imagine the world we would be living in had we not spent the time, effort, and especially the cost for the Apollo program to begin with!
Think about all of the technologies, scientific and medical advances we would have never made!
All the basic comforts we all take for granted right now, from our transportation and energy systems to our basic communication technologies, things we wouldn't have likely figured out in a thousand more years, if at all, if we had never put ourselves up to the challenge of figuring out how to get humans to the Lunar surface and back safely.
We only went to the Moon for less than a decade, and spent around three times that on the effort, but we've essentially been coasting on the ancillary discoveries from that effort ever since.
Not just in the United States but around the World.
The return on the investment can't be quantified.
Just the inspiration of billions of children ALONE makes it worth the cost.
Think of all the pioneers of industries we use every day, every single one of them can trace their inspiration back to the late 60's/early 70's era.
Bill Gates, Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, you name them! They were all raised in a World when we were either currently or had recently been engaged in sending human beings to the Moon.
And, everything we learned technologically, from material science applications to computer hardware and software development, it all stems from that one endeavor.
We wouldn't just not have cell phones, flat screen LCD TV's but we wouldn't even have microwaves, if NASA engineers hadn't accidentally "cooked" a candy bar one of them had incidentally set down on a table in front of the Microwave transmitter device they were attempting to use for voice communication with future astronauts!
But, of course it goes well beyond those happy accidents, or the litany of so-called "ancillary" discoveries.
Because scientific progress doesn't belong to any one particular group of people.
And, even if we've only slowed down we may as well be moving backwards because that's what we'll look like we're doing anyway to everyone else!
(I'm just sayin' ✌️)
Edit; oh! And I almost forgot; NASA accounted for almost 5% of the Federal budget of the United States, during the Apollo program, JUST for the Apollo program, from 1969 to 72.
Nowadays, it's 1/10th of 1% of the Federal budget for ALL of NASA.
That's for everything; the space station, Artemis mission, Mars rovers, military and communication satellites, JPL, the James Webb, Hubble, and all other ground based and space telescopes, EVERYTHING.
"Why does it cost so much?"
No.
What kind of world would we live in if we hadn't stopped investing as much?
That's the real question!
Fiction.
Do we just “stay in the cave and focus only on the problems there, or do we also venture beyond the cave and see what we can discover” As NDT likes to say “Fund it All!” Go Artemis!!
I want to know what the deep oceans hold.
I'm so excited about this.. I love science.
LMAO
Super real .
yes. of course it is.
@@potatopilot1699 super is .definetly for sure real asf
it is also the largest rocket ever built by anyone, ever, along with being the most powerful rocket ever built by anyone ever.
@William Thomas different situation.
Not when Starship comes online
@William Thomas bro that criticism so pointless idk why you'd ever complain about it. How does that change anything.
Saturn V was larger and N1 was more powerful.
8.8 million **pounds** of trust. Lets hope this doesn't affect Artemis like it did the Mars Climate Orbiter.
12:50 ?. I suppose the reason they were chosen had nothing to do with being European descent but their qualifications as Military Pilots. ETA: The real reason is Military advantage, that is the mission.
I love this. I cannot wait for Artemis 2 to launch so i can go out with my telescope and look up at the moon knowing there are humans flying around it.
Everything has been pushed back again. They should bring back the original team what is left of them.
The reason why Apollo 🚀went to the moon .🌝.If we don't go someone else will . We will be left behind....🤷🏼♀️The same is true today📡📺
I recommend researching how this is a Pork project
0.07 percent of the federal government budget - per launch
I've watched a half dozen videos on the Artemis mission. Yet, not one has explained this unmanned rocket.
Are we building a base for the future humans?
No.
Are we dropping off construction materials?
No.
Are we landing on the moon?
No.
Haven't we sent humans to the surface of the moon 50 years ago?
Yes.
So, what is the purpose of Artemis 1?
You don't want all your eggs in one basket.
Artemis 1 does all the tests for the flight of a mission.
First liftoff,
orbit ascension burn,
TLI burn,
earth to moon attitude adjustments,
moon orbit capture burn,
moon orbit maintenence,
moon to earth return,
and finally skip-reentry flight path for orbital reentry.
Not to mention the life support systems of Orion.
@@aerostorm_ yes, well they put zero eggs in this basket.
@@jackderipper2233 they're testing the basket to ensure it can hold them.
The purpose of the mission is to make you look silly on the internet asking useless questions. Totally worth it
The purpose of Artemis I is to launch this rocket for the very first time and make sure it works, send Orion to the moon for the first time and make sure it works, make sure Orion go through re-entry and make sure everything works before they put people on it next time
Is NASA using their new plasma rocket engine yet.? Cut space travel time and fuel. To be sustainable.! Thanks. 🔥🥂📜🎩
Money shouldn’t be an object when it comes to our future. Just take some from our overpriced military budget.
Those 4 launches are 1 useless unneeded aircraft carrier and a stealth whatever
Why not use the same Apollo ship and technology they used in 1969 😂 😂 😂 lol 😂, NVM.
i mean this is cool and all but man nothing is different from the first ones.
Were doing pretty much everything different from the 17 Apollo missions. Theres far more details in "Going to the Moon" than you could believe.
NASA has lofty goals for the program to gain experience before going to Mars
😍😍😍😍😍😍😍😍🤠🤠🤠😎😎😎
How do u know the rocket is a she miss charlie blackwell thomson...? Lol! 😂 ithis makes me so happy and inspired that we are goin back too the moon because i was not even born untill 8 yrs after apollo and i have been obsessed with the mercury,, gemini , and apollo missions . its one of the most impressive missions the united states has ever been involved in . also i cant wait till the flat earthers and moon hoax freaks are able to see all the sites we went too and see the lunar rover , the surveyer , and the flag , and also the setup we used to shoot a lazor at the mmon from earth to measure the distance from earth to the moon . its all kust incredible ! God speed artimis!
Too expensive.
Worth it
That's what it takes to get a tiny capsule to the Moon.
But really after SLS NASA should really do a cutting edge redesign of the rocket system.
Not just rely on SpaceX.
Who knows if they will always be. there.
It can carry 27t . Cost billions nice job nasa
Starship = 2million SLS = 4.1 billion That's why SpaceX is the best.
50 years after the lie maybe we will really reach the Moon! Maybe!
AS it stands, they are not going back, I would bet its radiation issues
🤣
Get the space program partially back into the public sphere and out of the exclusive hands of a bunch of psychologically unstable billionaires
It is literally owned by the govt and even then what does little billy know about rocket science
You don’t seem to appreciate how much progress has been made by spacex. NASA struggles to find itself, and can only really send their limited resources to deep space exploration, because the commercial industry already has control over the leo range for a much cheaper price. NASA pushes the envelope, and then allows private companies to take over in their footsteps. Spacex is one of the only companies that has a viable and achievable way to get to Mars. Even nasa doesn’t have that. They will have to take spacex starships to get to Mars, because they wouldn’t be able to pay for the astronomical development costs for both a moon rocket and a transport to Mars. The current space age would not be possible without Elon musk and spacex, and Artemis wouldn’t even be able to land on the moon without spacex starship lander, as all the competing entries weaker, more expensive extra developmental projects when spacex was already working on it. NASA wouldn’t be able to afford Artemis without spacex taking over Leo. You seem to think that giving the money to a government enterprise, which is more rife with corruption and wasteful spending practices over a private company with a vested interest in profits, and therefor less wasteful and more accountable spending would be a good thing, but nasa would not be able to afford that. Stop living in an alternate reality.
@@KanyeTheGayFish69 it’s great that Space X was able to engineer on the back of the 50 or 60 years of engineering that came before it. It’s fine. Just don’t think the space program should be the sole purview of a psychologically unstable dudebro. Would prefer a fraction of what we spend on useless planes and obsolete aircraft carriers be diverted to space exploration
@@marcboss6 I’m not sure what obsolete aircraft your referencing, but aircraft carriers are not obsolete, the Gerald r Ford class is cutting edge in every way except the plumbing, and the Nimitz is still relevant and high tech. And just because someone has aspergers like Elon doesn’t make them psychologically unstable. Any power he has is soft. Twitter is a meaningless social platform that has nothing to do with Tesla or spacex. I don’t think you can find any connection between Twitter and spacex other than the person at the top, which is trivial because they have nothing else to do with each other.
@@marcboss6 nasa never had a self landing rocket that had to land on a tiny platform in the middle of the ocean. That was spacex.
"This is the most complex rocket ever built" which in itself proves how bad the new rocket is. It will be a failure in both cost and reliability.
fake
Maybe in 1969 Armstrong really landed in an Area 51 sound stage.
If that was true don't you think our competitors (The Russians) would have called called B.S. ? The China probe also took pictures of the landing sites . Once again they would have also called b.s. But they did not .Because we in fact did go.
Yeah! We’re spending billions to go to the moon. Yet, we still haven’t conquered world hunger. Shame!
So what have you done today to solve world hunger?
Please stop wasting money