MRI - MATRIX BACK TO BASIC

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 1 เม.ย. 2023
  • It’s been a while since I had a topic like this. Matrix is an important parameter when it comes to optimizing a sequence. I hope with this video you’re able to have a better practical understanding of matrix.
    Remember to check out and support my PATREON here: / bacmri
    Thanks for watching, following and support.
    #S_MAGNETIC_VLOG #MRI #SIEMENSHEALTHINEERS #MATRIX #MEDICAL_IMAGING #MRI_TECHNOLOGIST #MEDICINE #MRI_RADIOGRAPHER #MRIRADIOGRAPHER #RADIOLOGY #PATREON
    References:
    Luke Bergs - Tropical Soul (Vlog No Copyright Music): rb.gy/86ed

ความคิดเห็น • 60

  • @cw6360
    @cw6360 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I love every one of your videos. They continue to help me and I’ve been scanning for 32 years.

    • @Nguyen_MRI
      @Nguyen_MRI  8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you for kindly words coming from someone like you with a very long experience in this field ☺️

  • @michelvandijk2745
    @michelvandijk2745 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Love to see you explain WARP and VAT in what the technique does, and if it's really reducing metal artefacts.

  • @DrunkenViet
    @DrunkenViet ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you for the these videos. I just transferred from X-ray to mri at the hospital I work at, and there is sooo much to know

    • @Nguyen_MRI
      @Nguyen_MRI  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes it’s a never ending learning ☺️

  • @sumitkamble6897
    @sumitkamble6897 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Very important vedio and very very thankful for you to make a vedio 😊

  • @paulnoyal
    @paulnoyal ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great vedio 👏Thank you

  • @abrabr6720
    @abrabr6720 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you so much
    Great video
    Btw I totally agree with you, our Radiologist hate BIG FOV. We might get QA if we do so.

  • @sumitkamble6897
    @sumitkamble6897 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you so much

  • @atle5522
    @atle5522 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks very much!

  • @sheikhatif9022
    @sheikhatif9022 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    i love yours videos ❤️❤️

  • @TAHA-TOUABA-RADIOGRAPHER
    @TAHA-TOUABA-RADIOGRAPHER ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you so much pro

  • @dr.magnet9033
    @dr.magnet9033 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Yes, that's what I'm thinking.)

  • @Nguyen_MRI
    @Nguyen_MRI  ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Matrix. Is this something you have in mind whenever you optimize a sequence?

    • @aagoela
      @aagoela ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Definitely- would appreciate your thoughts on interpolation. I assume that’s why your video shows different resolution values for “acquisition” and “reconstruction”?

    • @Nguyen_MRI
      @Nguyen_MRI  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@aagoela th-cam.com/video/GeRCRNspcRo/w-d-xo.html

    • @Nguyen_MRI
      @Nguyen_MRI  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      th-cam.com/video/o80w7-p1jOA/w-d-xo.html

    • @Nguyen_MRI
      @Nguyen_MRI  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      th-cam.com/video/n0zHyO1JXr8/w-d-xo.html

    • @Nguyen_MRI
      @Nguyen_MRI  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I made several videos of interpolation in the past. ☺️

  • @selimakko9811
    @selimakko9811 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    👍🏻

  • @sumitkamble6897
    @sumitkamble6897 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Plz make one vedio for any MRA /MRV and how to set the measurement to both study.

  • @devkgupta
    @devkgupta ปีที่แล้ว

    Best book to understand mri basics physics

    • @paulnoyal
      @paulnoyal ปีที่แล้ว +1

      1)MRI in practice by Catherine Westbrook
      2)MRI from picture to proton

  • @arunssarun6542
    @arunssarun6542 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Pls do one video of functional mri

  • @fakenamefakesurname5005
    @fakenamefakesurname5005 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you for this video, so if i want to make the FOV bigger i also need to increase the base resolution in order to maintain the resolution

    • @Nguyen_MRI
      @Nguyen_MRI  ปีที่แล้ว

      Very correct. 👍

  • @jasonparreno2245
    @jasonparreno2245 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thankyou for your videos 🙏 very informative
    Uhm quick question does it apply as well if you are scanning a small FOV part like an elbow?
    Should I decrease the Base resolution?

    • @Nguyen_MRI
      @Nguyen_MRI  4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes this is the basic of resolution.

  • @aleiatar
    @aleiatar ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hi Bac! Great video as usual!
    I just want to focus on the first comparison.. In my opinion the second scan is far away better due to the higher SNR (1,36). When you zoom in, it seems that the second scan has much less noise. So the question is, don't you think that is much better increase the FOV and the base resolution to minimize noise instead of having a tighter FOV and less base resolution?
    I mean, if the acquisition matrix is ​​the same, might as well have an image with less noise, right?
    (obviously without considering the increasing of the time of acquisition)

    • @Nguyen_MRI
      @Nguyen_MRI  ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Yes but it all depends on coils and radiologist preferences. Imaging dedicated organs from my experience they don’t want big fov even though the resolution is the same. Also for pediatric imaging. I made this video just for a better understanding of the relationship between matrix and fov. Of course all pro and cons but the theory and practice are there.

    • @aleiatar
      @aleiatar ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Nguyen_MRI of course you're right! Anyway is something I've never thought about... It's just something to keep in mind!
      Thanks for the reply!

    • @Nguyen_MRI
      @Nguyen_MRI  ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@aleiatar me neither. No one told me this. I guess it’s an important key factor to keep in mind ☺️

    • @iracvillar5576
      @iracvillar5576 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      the resolution is the same, but in your opinion which is the best image without taking into account the fov?

    • @Nguyen_MRI
      @Nguyen_MRI  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@iracvillar5576 for this knee I want dedicated fov of 150-160. But again I would have optimise other parameters as well. This was just a demo of the relationship between matrix and fov.

  • @iracvillar5576
    @iracvillar5576 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    with the same pixels , what is your perception between higher or lower fov compared to the image quality?

    • @Nguyen_MRI
      @Nguyen_MRI  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      From my opinion I want dedicated fov for area of interest.

  • @zedrad1
    @zedrad1 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I used to not worry about it because I was on philips and FOV and Res were unrelated you just imputed the voxil size you want. Now going to semins I have to think about it again.

    • @Nguyen_MRI
      @Nguyen_MRI  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      True. I guess you get used to it fast 👍

    • @zedrad1
      @zedrad1 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      sure do, Now I am having to learn Siemens all over again on the 3T Vida with the absolute newest version. Any pointers?
      @@Nguyen_MRI

  • @sumeshraj7487
    @sumeshraj7487 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Can you please tell me how do we decide frequency direction for each plane?

    • @Nguyen_MRI
      @Nguyen_MRI  ปีที่แล้ว

      Depends on what you are imaging and what plane you’re at.

  • @user-es9hw6vu3l
    @user-es9hw6vu3l ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you so much all videos
    Can you please send the educational website of Siemens company, on which this video was designed

    • @Nguyen_MRI
      @Nguyen_MRI  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You find more educational content here: pep.siemens-info.com/en-us/404
      These video was design by me. Not with the vendor.

    • @user-es9hw6vu3l
      @user-es9hw6vu3l ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Nguyen_MRI
      Thanks
      What I need is to work on the ringer as an external app to do some testing. Not having a patient

  • @lmuscae1
    @lmuscae1 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Off topic. this is siemens nomenclature....T1 TSE COR P2 320. What does the P2 stand for? I have spent an hour on this and its driving me nuts. just need a nudge in the right directions and I can look it up. thanks.

    • @Nguyen_MRI
      @Nguyen_MRI  ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi. P2 here means pat 2. Acceleration of parallel imaging.

    • @lmuscae1
      @lmuscae1 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Nguyen_MRI Thanks! Your videos are great! I will spread the word!

    • @Nguyen_MRI
      @Nguyen_MRI  ปีที่แล้ว

      @@lmuscae1 thanks for your kindness.

  • @Help.for.Radiology.Tech8367
    @Help.for.Radiology.Tech8367 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Sir how to find out matrix size, formula?
    And
    What is mean by 512x512
    You mentioned in video
    And why write in this format?
    Kindly guide

  • @anniesshenanigans3815
    @anniesshenanigans3815 ปีที่แล้ว

    I guess my hearing is bad, because I did not follow what you meant about the image (looked like a wrist).

    • @Nguyen_MRI
      @Nguyen_MRI  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks for tuning in on my channel. I don’t think your hearing is bad. Probably my English also not an easy topic. Nevertheless, many great books out there to read for a better understanding. It’s for sure a knee which I demonstrated in this video.

    • @devkgupta
      @devkgupta ปีที่แล้ว

      Best book to understand mri basics physics....

    • @Nguyen_MRI
      @Nguyen_MRI  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@devkgupta there isnt just one. but many. here are some: www.amazon.com/MRI-Picture-Proton-Donald-McRobbie/dp/1107643236/ref=sr_1_1?crid=1E9SCCU8ZPXUA&keywords=from+picture+to+proton&qid=1680512252&sprefix=from+picture+to+proton%2Caps%2C161&sr=8-1
      www.amazon.com/MRI-Practice-Catherine-Westbrook/dp/1119391962/ref=sr_1_3?crid=202ER43DIEE8O&keywords=westbrook+mri+basic&qid=1680512271&sprefix=westbrook+mri+basi%2Caps%2C158&sr=8-3

  • @vickherrera425
    @vickherrera425 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Crack 🩻✔️