Equilibrium Made Easy: How to Solve Chemical Equilibrium Problems

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 ก.ย. 2024
  • What is dynamic equilibrium? How can you easily solve equilibrium problems in chemistry? Learn this and more...
    For a limited time, get $200 cash if you qualify! Check out:
    www.referyourc...
    #chemistry #equilibrium #madeeasy #ketzbook #tutorial

ความคิดเห็น • 79

  • @Exemplary832
    @Exemplary832 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Nonsense

    • @cryingbananajo
      @cryingbananajo ปีที่แล้ว

      So chemistry is nonsense to you?

    • @AdyI.R
      @AdyI.R 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hahhahaha

    • @edge_onchelsea
      @edge_onchelsea หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      the fact that this was pinned, lol

  • @lyra331
    @lyra331 3 ปีที่แล้ว +68

    hi! I am dyscauculic with ADHD and I've been for like, 3 years without understanding chemistry trying my hardest, usually I don't watch youtube classes cause they don't make any difference, I normally don't understand, but WOW for the first time i got something, like, in my life. I even cried a little. thank you so much, you're a hero professor!

    • @ketzbook
      @ketzbook  3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      glad to help!

    • @schneiderwanjia3433
      @schneiderwanjia3433 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Wooow

    • @Mhwdi-2
      @Mhwdi-2 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      N1gga why'd you cry? Thats so cringe 😬😂

  • @khushisoam8068
    @khushisoam8068 3 ปีที่แล้ว +37

    I never knew that I could learn the topic of 5 hrs in 12 mins ! TYSM

  • @brianottenbreit871
    @brianottenbreit871 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I see below that someone pointed out that deriving the rate of the forward and backward reactions cannot be done by looking at the coefficients., but rather must be experimentally determined. The equilibrium constant can, however, be found by the coefficients. Kr and Keq are fundamentally different as can be seen if you do the work to find the units.

  • @damtewbogale6794
    @damtewbogale6794 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The most comprehensive video about chemical equilibrium on YT

  • @obama8573
    @obama8573 3 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    The one who made this video is a legend 💯

  • @home-sauce
    @home-sauce 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    this is pretty important for the AP chem test

  • @Nicole-tb6iw
    @Nicole-tb6iw 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    thank you so much, it's brief and easily understood

  • @BeatriceAntwi-kj8ry
    @BeatriceAntwi-kj8ry ปีที่แล้ว +1

    For the last question, why wasn't the moles(0.95) changed into molar concentration by dividing by 10L?

    • @ketzbook
      @ketzbook  ปีที่แล้ว

      it is a 1.0 L container, not 10 L. If it were 10 L, we should divide by 10.

  • @katherinelee2690
    @katherinelee2690 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    literally thank u so much, this was so helpful

  • @saikumar.d7101
    @saikumar.d7101 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thank u sir ur video is too good
    Please make up like this cideos

  • @luke5385
    @luke5385 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    this is so high quality and well explained. ty!

  • @taranjotkaur4831
    @taranjotkaur4831 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    plz make a video on organic chemistry

    • @ketzbook
      @ketzbook  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      what specifically? OChem is a very big topic.

    • @taranjotkaur4831
      @taranjotkaur4831 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@ketzbook
      electrophillic nd nucleophillic subsitution reactions

  • @rosemin1973
    @rosemin1973 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    hey..with the last question i don't get why we had -x and not +x

  • @نغمة-ظ9س
    @نغمة-ظ9س 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Can you please make a video on hydrogen and proton nmr spectrum

  • @bettan369
    @bettan369 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    amazing explanation. thank you!

  • @moengpasela773
    @moengpasela773 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    how did u calculate initial molarity and equilibrium molarity

    • @ketzbook
      @ketzbook  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      th-cam.com/video/KLjWa9cE2uk/w-d-xo.html

  • @respectanyone117
    @respectanyone117 ปีที่แล้ว

    After struggling so much I finally found this video

  • @makaylahawkins9702
    @makaylahawkins9702 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    How do you get those initial molarities

  • @nnk2874
    @nnk2874 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I feel like you confused the molarity of CCl4 to be .176 when in fact in appears to be the value we used to plug into X. CCl4 should be .024 molarity. Therefore, in the fraction where you have Kc = (2(.024))^2 / .176 ---> .176 should instead be .024.

    • @ketzbook
      @ketzbook  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      nope, 0.176 comes right from the data in the question. It is correct.

  • @andreazuliani7004
    @andreazuliani7004 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I am finding this way more complicate than how explained in my class.. I don't understand all the x and those extra calculations here

  • @Remember_e
    @Remember_e 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The equilibrium concentration of CCl4 must be 0.024 moles.

  • @rassimsimou1594
    @rassimsimou1594 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Good

  • @pinkflower88
    @pinkflower88 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    7:45 can somebody explain what he just did here, why 0.88÷5, please explain

    • @rishmakumar3644
      @rishmakumar3644 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      He did this to get it into the concentration, i.e. [concentration (M or mol/L) = moles (mol)/volume (L)], since Kc is measured using the concentrations of each reactant and product. If he did not divide 0.88mol/5L to get 0.176mol/L then he would've only had the moles.
      He also converted the moles of CCl4 to concentration in the beginning too.
      Sorry if my explanation is a bit all over the place. Hope this helps

  • @pynthymmailangdkhar1403
    @pynthymmailangdkhar1403 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is this for class 12?

  • @hunnidasiago746
    @hunnidasiago746 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Surprisingly...my lecturer watches your videos...uses ur concepts...and your questions too😂...I'm getting my fees back

  • @atanursaparbaev9691
    @atanursaparbaev9691 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks very much!!!!

  • @geralddemafilez4926
    @geralddemafilez4926 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    i think you forgot to square the molarity of NO2

  • @chamasayasianjina2081
    @chamasayasianjina2081 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Where is the 0.024 coming from??

  • @anwarvictor9448
    @anwarvictor9448 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    great!!!!

  • @janetnkrumah542
    @janetnkrumah542 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks a lot sir

    • @ketzbook
      @ketzbook  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      you're welcome!

  • @cathystacy9810
    @cathystacy9810 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Cleveland clinic

  • @jishakjishak4698
    @jishakjishak4698 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for such a fine class

  • @aurangzaibkhan543
    @aurangzaibkhan543 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    You are great but 2.8+4.4=6.12and you say that it is 2+2+1.6=5.6

  • @joy_meme
    @joy_meme 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏

  • @taurus7261
    @taurus7261 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I have a question regarding the last problem. Why is that the reactant gained the +2x as its change in molarity when the whole reaction is product favored based on the value of Kc?

  • @janetnkrumah542
    @janetnkrumah542 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks a lot sir

    • @ketzbook
      @ketzbook  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Most welcome

  • @jeremiakasinda7695
    @jeremiakasinda7695 5 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Thank you allot, this will really help tomorrow in my Chemistry 1A exam.

  • @Anime_world_india78
    @Anime_world_india78 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Can you please make a video about physics
    Topic: simple harmonic oscillation (S.H.O)

  • @chandrashekarhb9349
    @chandrashekarhb9349 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Excellent and nicely explained. You are a good teacher.

    • @ketzbook
      @ketzbook  4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Glad it was helpful!

  • @rationalism_communism
    @rationalism_communism 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I was very confused but after watching lots of videos and the same scenarios come up, I leaned quadratic equations and now I get it. It took a week.

  • @nt-qb5pb
    @nt-qb5pb 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    we want more and more videos

  • @albertlonga6995
    @albertlonga6995 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I am enjoying , bcoz of what you are explaining it is easy to understand , thank you!

  • @RebelRelatives
    @RebelRelatives ปีที่แล้ว

    Gimme the I30N thee 8 GTI/R Killer
    But how can u start 5:04 😂😂😂😂 and im with you 600K for a Hatchback 5:54 yooo😂😂😂😂 i rather get an old RS3 or old A45 with +/- 150k km

  • @YinhlaHolenii
    @YinhlaHolenii 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Do more on chemical equlibrium and titration(acid and bases)

  • @kishamuringani9331
    @kishamuringani9331 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    can you please make a video mainly on examples of questions on equillibrium

  • @meebee5189
    @meebee5189 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sorry Im a little confused at 3:10 how did u derive the rate equation for the Haber process from the stoichiometric ratios? I see how you are trying to derive K from the rate constants but... the order of a reaction is not equivalent to the coefficients from the equation.

    • @ketzbook
      @ketzbook  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      most often the rate law can be taken from the coefficients of the balanced equation, although you are correct that there are many exceptions to that, and you need to do kinetic studies to determine it. However, I did not intend to go through exceptions in a video that focuses on the basics. Equilibrium is intricately tied to kinetics. One may incorrectly think, for example, that the equilibrium expression of an Sn1 reaction is different from that of an Sn2 reaction; however, both reactions include the activity of the nucleophile in the equilibrium expression because the true full rate law of an Sn1 reaction actually includes the nucleophile and the leaving group. That is just one exception.

  • @thepelicanman7436
    @thepelicanman7436 ปีที่แล้ว

    I f*cking hate physics sometimes

  • @BoonkiCoC14
    @BoonkiCoC14 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Jeez, did i just understand this? Yes i did, sir. Thanks a lot, my book has spent around 20 pages talking about this but it makes no fucking sense. Thank you!!!!

  • @MosesFaith-x9j
    @MosesFaith-x9j 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hi!I am chiamaka pls how did u get the value of x as 0.2
    I means what was the quadratic equation you used to have the value of x.Thanks

  • @KelvinMichembo
    @KelvinMichembo 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why dividing the conc of NO2 BY N2O4 instead of other way round since NO2 a product not a reactant in example 2???

  • @vickysilver8509
    @vickysilver8509 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks

    • @ketzbook
      @ketzbook  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      you're welcome!

  • @chandrasai1990
    @chandrasai1990 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    thanks from India class 11 preparation for jee mains

  • @joy_meme
    @joy_meme 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👌👌👌👌👌👌👌👌👌👌👌👌👌

  • @AfadapaDarlene
    @AfadapaDarlene 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Pls I understand nothing

  • @schneiderwanjia3433
    @schneiderwanjia3433 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks

  • @rajatdas5500
    @rajatdas5500 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️

  • @feifeiiii
    @feifeiiii 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    9:18

  • @lillymaewilcox31
    @lillymaewilcox31 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you so much, you're a life saver

    • @ketzbook
      @ketzbook  4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You're welcome!

  • @anni2165
    @anni2165 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Good & helpful explain👍
    This video help me a lot to understand this subtopic more
    Thank you