As a 1750 rapid player who plays the Sicilian, I can't stress enough how useful this is for me. You explain so clearly why certain setups work and others don't. Highly needed for sidelines in the Sicilians, where my knowledge is greatly reduced compared to something like a mainline Najdorf. This is basically a high-quality personal chess session. Thanks coach Danya
There’s nobody better at explaining why a move is good or why it’s bad. You can learn so much in just a few games watching Danya maneuver his pieces in any position. Impressive.
It's funny, I faced this opening today (1. e4 c5 2. f4 d5) as black and won the game. I was trying to remember this game but could only remember the opening. Only now I realise - I hadn't finished this video yet and was only halfway through. It still helped though! It was a crushing victory as well, winning a piece (due to threatening to pin his queen) and then breaking through with bishop and rook attacking f2. This was around 1760 level, 15+10.
After losing over and over again to the Grand Prix in the Sicilian, I started playing it myself as white. Best decision I ever made! This video was super helpful; thanks Danya!
It's amazing how you can just bring up all of these examples with similar moves and concepts. I wonder if you really just remember all of these off the top of your head or if you sometimes look up move sequences in something like chessbase during the video.
The 2nd game was a lot more interesting. I only really play the Caro Kann but it's interesting that the Sicilian you played ended up playing similar to how kingside development goes in the advance caro kann
I'm a Najdorf player, but I play 2...g6 against the closed. I figure 90% of the time the reason my opponent went 2. Nc3 was to flick the stereotypical Grand Prix Attack at me. I set my pieces and pawns up to get an iron grip on the f5 square so that the usual Grand Prix attacking plans don't work as well; I often have both g6 and e6 (gasp!) covering it. And the only reason I don't play the Accelerated Dragon is because of the Maroczy, which is how I meet the line myself with white (and I have an extremely strong score with it); 2. Nc3 rules this out, so in effect, I see it as white having move-ordered *themselves* out of meeting my setup in the most testing way.
Hey Daniel, trying to tell you for some time now and I hope you see it. If you want timestamps on youtube to work, you'll have to start with 0:00. For example "0:00 Game 1".
@TKD432 TH-cam has this feature called timestamps. You can create chapters for the video you created, for example "Game 1", "Game 2", "analysis". It is then shown on the red progress bar, so people have an easier time finding the stuff they might be looking for. Daniel is trying to use those timestamps for a few months now (you can see them if you check the description) but it never works because he has to start with 0:00.
I'm around 1100-1200 and have two questions about this game if someone could answer. 1. At 9:20, if white's pawn wasn't at f4 would you still move the knight to h6 since the bishop could take it and ruin the pawn structure? Or in that case would you go ne7 and ng6? In the game you showed us afterwards that you played you still put the knight on the rim immediately but I've heard you talk about previously how this could be problematic because you can just take with the bishop and at that point the kingside does look rather bare. 2. At 13:20, whats the play if white goes b4? Would you just capture the knight with the bishop?
1. Mostly coming from my experience playing similar structures in the Tal Variation of the Caro Kann, but I think part of the idea of h5 in similar structures is to prepare Na6 by allowing Rxa5 in response to Bxa5. The important thing to remember is that the reason people stress castling is because castling activates the rook and brings the king to safety. Rxa5 removes castling rights but activates the rook. And the king is relatively safe on e8 and can tuck itself away on f8 if need be. 2. I assume Bxd4, though Nxd4 is probably also playable thanks to the intermezzo Nxf3+. Either way, you win a pawn.
1500 here, for the first question its a bit too hypothetical of a scenario to answer since your plans can change completely after even one single move, for example if f4 didn't happen Danya's plan would probably be vastly different, but I like the thought of going ne7 to g6. For the second question: after b4 you can just trade the bishop for the knight and then win a pawn, resulting in you being 2 pawns up and completely winning, sometime its not about only winning an exchange or a while piece or checkmating, sometimes you have to play slow chess and overwhelm your opponent to the point where they are out of moves.
Hi, 2100 player here, 1. If White didnt have a pawn on F4, (which he should aim to do) you would continue with normal caro kann/french defence plans and getting your knight to C6 by going Nf7, Nc6, this in order to pressure the very important center pawns. But, since you have not yet castelled, you could still go nh6 as Danya did in this game, and if bishop takes. Then you have open file for your rook. Summary: both plans work, nh6 would be more aggressive. 2. B4 is a horrible move, just take the pawn in the middle and win it, B4 is also very bad because now the B4 pawn is overextended, so you are probably going to win that pawn aswell
@@dre4mz749 nf7? I haven’t seen that one before. I should clarify. I meant in terms of developing the king side knight, here he’s gone h6. I know he’s moved the h pawn ahead, so even if white didn’t have the pawn on f4 taking with the dark squared bishop wouldn’t make sense as he could just take back with the rook. But I guess I’m asking in an alternative scenario where the pawn doesn’t go to h5, is moving the knight to h6 typically a good or bad move knowing that whites bishop could take it and damage the pawn structure. And I’m referring to typical Caro-kann positions.
Funnily enough, the general structure and game plan for black are almost the same as in scandinavian where white goes 2. e5 instead of exd4. This is used to happen a lot when I was 1300, and I even see it above 1600 sometimes.
That happens when player are afraid of Scandi which is funny because it is a rather bad opening. I used to be a Scandi player when I was around 1400-1500 in rapid 10 and 15 min and realized my best games occured when my opponent goes e5, which transposes into a fairly common Advance Caro Kann setup. I'm now a Caro-Kann player and I must say you have to know what you're doing -let's say 5 first moves + main ideas like the c5 push- against Classical, Exchange and Advanced Variation (basically this is the one we can see in the video) but other than that it is a pretty good opening, more positional than active where you can learn a lot about spaces and pawn pushes, pretty easy to reach 1800 rapid if you follow habitual advices like the ones provided by Danya :)
He's got the point though, Four Knights Scotch is easy to learn and many moves that seem natural for black are either inaccuracies or blunders, people on lower levels don't see it that much and don't know how to respond. Definitely recommend giving it a try
6:30 why is Bf5 played prior to Nc6? i usually play Nc6 first to give white an option to play Nf3, then play Bg4 instead of Bf5. or does the bishop actually stand better on f5?
I used to play Sicilian Defense as black quite a lot. Recently I have mixed it up and reply with French Defense, Caro-Kann or Ruy Lopez opening with success.
I’m surprised that you may not be aware, but 1.e4 c5 2.f4 is officially called the McDonnell Attack. I personally appreciate that it has a different name, because obviously it allows for a whole bunch of counters that aren’t possible from the Grand Prix
The line with 1.e4 c5 2.f4 d5 3.exd5 Nf6 is called the Tal Gambit! Coincidentally I was black in this opening in a game earlier today. My opponent trapped their own queen on move 8, so I'd agree that it's good for black.
As a 1500 player, it is amazing to see how you dismantle players that are just above me. It is just so surprising to me how many of them just end up blundering pawns and pieces in one move. Having you walk us through the way you maintain tension and steadily keep applying pressure is really an invaluable resource.
Valuable observations on knight to the edge then pawn trapping knight & the rerouting of knight & bishop like in the Caro…🙏 One sort of criticism… sort of because what may be obvious to more advanced players isn’t so obvious to me. The phrase “in such positions” seems to be popping up more frequently in these videos, and I find myself at a loss to understand exactly what “in such positions” really means in a given context. It sticks out like a sore thumb because the usual explanations are so clear, precise, and understandable even to someone at my level. Just my impression. Love the content!
@@hellopleychess3190 I had the same thought, but white can go Nd4, attacking blacks queen and the pawn on e6, allowing white's g5 Knight to capture on d6 after the black queen moves.
It’s amazing isn’t it? As a 700 who began playing a few weeks ago I feel like I understand everything he’s saying, try and replicate the thought process in my games and fail miserably. It really is years of practice.
Danya paralyzed the white player! Going e5 for white ends up not developing a piece and overextending the pawns, which gives black a -0.76 advantage at 37 depth. Instead of playing c3, white had to play Be3 followed by an eventual c4 to not lose; however, finding that plan is just incredibly tough.
Not an expert here but to answer your questions, 1. Qb6 is simply more forcing than Rc8 so white is forced to react and likely take. Rc8 is however very much played in these kind of positions. 2. Didn't quite understand where Nh4 could have been played since h4 is always covered by the bishop on e7.
I was slightly disappointed seen him playing against the grand prix insted of playing with it, but good game and analyses nonetheless. Maybe play the gran prix another time?
Nice idea. It took me a while to find the refutation but it doesn't work as far as I can tell. f6, white captures with pawn, black recaptures with pawn. White sacrifices knight on e6 for pawn. Black captures knight with queen. Whites other knight goes to d4, kicking black Queen off the h3-c8 diagonal. Also blacks Queen is blocked by pawn on f6 so can't defend the h5 pawn. Black moves Queen and White grabs h5 pawn with his Queen and with check. Wherever black goes white plays f5. If black captures f5 pawn with light squared bishop then the black knight on g5 is hanging from the discovered attack by whites dark squared bishop. If black moves the knight then you have a monster outpost for whites d4 knight to jump to e6. At this point with a knight in e6, Queen on h5 and pawn on f5 I'd say there is probably a win there and most definitely compensation for the exchange sacrifice. That resulting position looks absolutely disgusting to play as with black, no pawns around the king, checks from the knight and queen, dark squared bishop is coming to life, the d file will come open for the other rook, king stuck in the centre etc, a massive attack. I mean he wouldn't have bothered calculating but intuitively I think he knew it would play into whites hands. Maybe there is a defence but you would have to play the correct move every move, I would not want to go into that, personally.
18:16, why did he say queen f3 was a nice move, black can just take the queen, ruin white pawn structure, and not lose the weak pawn by pushing it to c4. I also check it with the engine and it goes from +1.1 from white to -0.53. I don't even understand what queen f3, even threatens / accomplishes.
For some reason the more I watch videos the worst I get. I had this phase when I came out of a chess break when I was stuck at around 900 and won massively. Everything fell into place kind of. I gained 230 points within a few days... and it was so fun to play again that I started picking up tactics and opening theory again. Then I got this little hinge of elo anxiaty, turned off rated games and from there everything went to shit. Now I'm losing probably 60-70% of my games and I feel absolutely miserable. But I also can't stop playing... everytime I kind of hope that my mind remembers certain things about the game and that my moves progressively get better. But they seem to get worst and worst. I'm at a complete loss of how to approach this.
You need a proper break from chess, including no videos/puzzles. Your problem is more common than you might think. Good play requires clarity of mind and certain energy resources, which deplete quickly when you binge chess or chess content. Judging by your comment, you're experiencing a burnout, and that burnout is likely the only reason for your sudden drop in quality of play
So, now I see why people can get 1500 to 1600. They basically just memorized a lot of opening moves. When they get to their unfamiliar territories, they will not be able to handle anything.
audience : c4 c4. danya : _"i dont like c4 can somebody tell me why"_ *opponent start heading to weaken d4 square. there you go bois... that's why he is the GM while we are not
it’s very silly to say that learning good openings isn’t a good thing, it’s a part of the game too, and holding an advantage is probably a more important skill than recovering from terrible blunders at most levels
![[ENGSUB] UNPRODUCTIVE DAY ใช้ชีวิต (เปื่อยๆ) ด้วยกัน 1 วัน! | OUROAD CLOSEFRiEND SS2 EP.9](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/pyYKZ3kra9w/mqdefault.jpg)
The first couple mins of the video made me doubt everything I knew about the Sicilian 😂😂😂
Hahaha I was like "wait a minute, what"
Yeah I was like “how the hell is black gonna play this so it transposes from a scotch to a Sicilian?”
why
@@andrerodrigues2877 because the title of this video says "sicilian" and the first game is far from being a Sicilian
lmao true
As a 1750 rapid player who plays the Sicilian, I can't stress enough how useful this is for me. You explain so clearly why certain setups work and others don't. Highly needed for sidelines in the Sicilians, where my knowledge is greatly reduced compared to something like a mainline Najdorf. This is basically a high-quality personal chess session. Thanks coach Danya
E5>C5
@@epicwolves125 hell no
Okay pay the man
Thank you Daniel!
Wow some of the best explaining I've seen in Chess youtube. So clear and insightful for a beginner. Definitely subscribing.
Danya, please, please give us an openings video dedicated to the 4 Knights Scotch. 🙏🏻
There’s nobody better at explaining why a move is good or why it’s bad. You can learn so much in just a few games watching Danya maneuver his pieces in any position. Impressive.
I’ve been watching other content creators for so long and never watched danya now that I’ve seen this video man he’s a great teacher very pog
here for the grand prix again.. 17:00 pawn structure concept was really helpful as a caro kann player
That was great, thanks for the new upload sensei! 2 games for one vid was awesome haha
It's funny, I faced this opening today (1. e4 c5 2. f4 d5) as black and won the game. I was trying to remember this game but could only remember the opening. Only now I realise - I hadn't finished this video yet and was only halfway through. It still helped though!
It was a crushing victory as well, winning a piece (due to threatening to pin his queen) and then breaking through with bishop and rook attacking f2. This was around 1760 level, 15+10.
This is really great instruction on this structure, thanks Daniel.
I live for this shit
Can't get enough of these
After losing over and over again to the Grand Prix in the Sicilian, I started playing it myself as white. Best decision I ever made! This video was super helpful; thanks Danya!
Gracias senior
As MoistCritical once said, Daniel is a prophet! haha love the instructive content
As usual, this series is incredibly instructive
Let’s go!!! As a Vienna player, this is my main opening against c5
Same
Love these uploads sir
Danya said everything is groovy!
Could you play the grand Prix yourself? Would love to see it
2 games in one video? Today is a good day
the GOAT teacher of chess
It's been a long time since we've been blessed with a 2 game video, its a good day :D
Fucking Finally i was waiting for this so much. Danya always said against gran prix d5 is string but never made a video about why lmao love it
thanks
Danya has a speedrun video with a similar position. Learned the position from that. I have won many games with this exact plan. Cheers.
It's amazing how you can just bring up all of these examples with similar moves and concepts. I wonder if you really just remember all of these off the top of your head or if you sometimes look up move sequences in something like chessbase during the video.
Uau! Because your explanations you get one more subscriber. Thank you for the vídeos.
Need a whole video on thus
The 2nd game was a lot more interesting. I only really play the Caro Kann but it's interesting that the Sicilian you played ended up playing similar to how kingside development goes in the advance caro kann
I'm a Najdorf player, but I play 2...g6 against the closed. I figure 90% of the time the reason my opponent went 2. Nc3 was to flick the stereotypical Grand Prix Attack at me. I set my pieces and pawns up to get an iron grip on the f5 square so that the usual Grand Prix attacking plans don't work as well; I often have both g6 and e6 (gasp!) covering it. And the only reason I don't play the Accelerated Dragon is because of the Maroczy, which is how I meet the line myself with white (and I have an extremely strong score with it); 2. Nc3 rules this out, so in effect, I see it as white having move-ordered *themselves* out of meeting my setup in the most testing way.
Ye I always play 2.g6 vs NC3. But I am a dragon player
18:18 anyone else notice black hung mate in 1 with Qe6 and the GM missed it with Qxf8#?
Yep
Anyone else notice how checks work
Danya is the best, a really good teacher.
Hey Daniel, trying to tell you for some time now and I hope you see it.
If you want timestamps on youtube to work, you'll have to start with 0:00. For example "0:00 Game 1".
@TKD432 TH-cam has this feature called timestamps. You can create chapters for the video you created, for example "Game 1", "Game 2", "analysis". It is then shown on the red progress bar, so people have an easier time finding the stuff they might be looking for. Daniel is trying to use those timestamps for a few months now (you can see them if you check the description) but it never works because he has to start with 0:00.
I'm around 1100-1200 and have two questions about this game if someone could answer.
1. At 9:20, if white's pawn wasn't at f4 would you still move the knight to h6 since the bishop could take it and ruin the pawn structure? Or in that case would you go ne7 and ng6? In the game you showed us afterwards that you played you still put the knight on the rim immediately but I've heard you talk about previously how this could be problematic because you can just take with the bishop and at that point the kingside does look rather bare.
2. At 13:20, whats the play if white goes b4? Would you just capture the knight with the bishop?
1. Mostly coming from my experience playing similar structures in the Tal Variation of the Caro Kann, but I think part of the idea of h5 in similar structures is to prepare Na6 by allowing Rxa5 in response to Bxa5. The important thing to remember is that the reason people stress castling is because castling activates the rook and brings the king to safety. Rxa5 removes castling rights but activates the rook. And the king is relatively safe on e8 and can tuck itself away on f8 if need be.
2. I assume Bxd4, though Nxd4 is probably also playable thanks to the intermezzo Nxf3+. Either way, you win a pawn.
1500 here, for the first question its a bit too hypothetical of a scenario to answer since your plans can change completely after even one single move, for example if f4 didn't happen Danya's plan would probably be vastly different, but I like the thought of going ne7 to g6.
For the second question: after b4 you can just trade the bishop for the knight and then win a pawn, resulting in you being 2 pawns up and completely winning, sometime its not about only winning an exchange or a while piece or checkmating, sometimes you have to play slow chess and overwhelm your opponent to the point where they are out of moves.
Hi, 2100 player here, 1. If White didnt have a pawn on F4, (which he should aim to do) you would continue with normal caro kann/french defence plans and getting your knight to C6 by going Nf7, Nc6, this in order to pressure the very important center pawns. But, since you have not yet castelled, you could still go nh6 as Danya did in this game, and if bishop takes. Then you have open file for your rook. Summary: both plans work, nh6 would be more aggressive. 2. B4 is a horrible move, just take the pawn in the middle and win it, B4 is also very bad because now the B4 pawn is overextended, so you are probably going to win that pawn aswell
@@dre4mz749 nf7? I haven’t seen that one before. I should clarify.
I meant in terms of developing the king side knight, here he’s gone h6. I know he’s moved the h pawn ahead, so even if white didn’t have the pawn on f4 taking with the dark squared bishop wouldn’t make sense as he could just take back with the rook.
But I guess I’m asking in an alternative scenario where the pawn doesn’t go to h5, is moving the knight to h6 typically a good or bad move knowing that whites bishop could take it and damage the pawn structure. And I’m referring to typical Caro-kann positions.
Danya has actually talked about the first question in his previous caro kann videos, you should check them out
I recently picked up the kings indian defense and have been doing well at 900 so far
How it go now
Funnily enough, the general structure and game plan for black are almost the same as in scandinavian where white goes 2. e5 instead of exd4. This is used to happen a lot when I was 1300, and I even see it above 1600 sometimes.
That happens when player are afraid of Scandi which is funny because it is a rather bad opening. I used to be a Scandi player when I was around 1400-1500 in rapid 10 and 15 min and realized my best games occured when my opponent goes e5, which transposes into a fairly common Advance Caro Kann setup. I'm now a Caro-Kann player and I must say you have to know what you're doing -let's say 5 first moves + main ideas like the c5 push- against Classical, Exchange and Advanced Variation (basically this is the one we can see in the video) but other than that it is a pretty good opening, more positional than active where you can learn a lot about spaces and pawn pushes, pretty easy to reach 1800 rapid if you follow habitual advices like the ones provided by Danya :)
"Four knights Scotch is a powerhouse at this level." To be fair, anything Daniel plays can be a powerhouse with perfect moves lol.
He's got the point though, Four Knights Scotch is easy to learn and many moves that seem natural for black are either inaccuracies or blunders, people on lower levels don't see it that much and don't know how to respond. Definitely recommend giving it a try
6:30 why is Bf5 played prior to Nc6? i usually play Nc6 first to give white an option to play Nf3, then play Bg4 instead of Bf5. or does the bishop actually stand better on f5?
More times than the beginner has tried, failed the master has 😊😊
Goat
I used to play Sicilian Defense as black quite a lot. Recently I have mixed it up and reply with French Defense, Caro-Kann or Ruy Lopez opening with success.
Damn Daniel. We’re not just going to ignore your high pitch voice scratch on 7:53 😜
I’m surprised that you may not be aware, but 1.e4 c5 2.f4 is officially called the McDonnell Attack.
I personally appreciate that it has a different name, because obviously it allows for a whole bunch of counters that aren’t possible from the Grand Prix
The line with 1.e4 c5 2.f4 d5 3.exd5 Nf6 is called the Tal Gambit! Coincidentally I was black in this opening in a game earlier today. My opponent trapped their own queen on move 8, so I'd agree that it's good for black.
As a 1500 player, it is amazing to see how you dismantle players that are just above me. It is just so surprising to me how many of them just end up blundering pawns and pieces in one move. Having you walk us through the way you maintain tension and steadily keep applying pressure is really an invaluable resource.
Please do QGD semi Tarrasch with double pawn tension or Sicilian - modern variation.
Scily is a delayed dragon essentially
Valuable observations on knight to the edge then pawn trapping knight & the rerouting of knight & bishop like in the Caro…🙏
One sort of criticism… sort of because what may be obvious to more advanced players isn’t so obvious to me. The phrase “in such positions” seems to be popping up more frequently in these videos, and I find myself at a loss to understand exactly what “in such positions” really means in a given context. It sticks out like a sore thumb because the usual explanations are so clear, precise, and understandable even to someone at my level. Just my impression. Love the content!
15:40 sensei danya
His knight was trapped. When he moves the d2 knight to f3 isnt the other knight out of escape squares and you can play f6? 11:50
I also found it
@@hellopleychess3190 I had the same thought, but white can go Nd4, attacking blacks queen and the pawn on e6, allowing white's g5 Knight to capture on d6 after the black queen moves.
Is the pawn H5 idea something that black can use in the CK?
Danya makes beating 1600's look so easy
It’s amazing isn’t it? As a 700 who began playing a few weeks ago I feel like I understand everything he’s saying, try and replicate the thought process in my games and fail miserably. It really is years of practice.
@@tacticalchunder1207 Continue grinding, it will feel very rewarding!
When play like that against Four Knights Scotch (speaking of first game) I'd smash them too and I'm just 1000
When you hear Bum bum bum you know that things are gonna get serius
Can we see some more vienna gambits in the future pls ?
DANIEL
I like your videos you're the best❤
When are the smith morra vids gonna come out
Danya paralyzed the white player! Going e5 for white ends up not developing a piece and overextending the pawns, which gives black a -0.76 advantage at 37 depth. Instead of playing c3, white had to play Be3 followed by an eventual c4 to not lose; however, finding that plan is just incredibly tough.
I'm trying to get good at the queen's gambit, scandinavian modern and the Dutch defense.
7:25 what about Rc8?
10:00 what if white didn't play Ng5 and instead played Nh4 after Black's Bg6?
Not an expert here but to answer your questions,
1. Qb6 is simply more forcing than Rc8 so white is forced to react and likely take. Rc8 is however very much played in these kind of positions.
2. Didn't quite understand where Nh4 could have been played since h4 is always covered by the bishop on e7.
@@pramanverma3749 Oops, missed the dark-square bishop
10:39 was that a himym reference?
12:05 f3 trapping his knigh?
Let’s gooooo
I was slightly disappointed seen him playing against the grand prix insted of playing with it, but good game and analyses nonetheless.
Maybe play the gran prix another time?
It seems like the games have gotten less and less competitive as the rating has gone up interestingly, at least in the case of the first game
1660 but didn’t hang a piece on move 6 can you really be a 1660?
For Scicilian why not f6 instead of nh6?
I think this is mcdougal attack or McDonnell
Very nice video but how Is it a grand Prix attack
don't you trap the knight with f6 at 12:00?
Nice idea. It took me a while to find the refutation but it doesn't work as far as I can tell.
f6, white captures with pawn, black recaptures with pawn. White sacrifices knight on e6 for pawn. Black captures knight with queen. Whites other knight goes to d4, kicking black Queen off the h3-c8 diagonal. Also blacks Queen is blocked by pawn on f6 so can't defend the h5 pawn. Black moves Queen and White grabs h5 pawn with his Queen and with check. Wherever black goes white plays f5. If black captures f5 pawn with light squared bishop then the black knight on g5 is hanging from the discovered attack by whites dark squared bishop. If black moves the knight then you have a monster outpost for whites d4 knight to jump to e6. At this point with a knight in e6, Queen on h5 and pawn on f5 I'd say there is probably a win there and most definitely compensation for the exchange sacrifice.
That resulting position looks absolutely disgusting to play as with black, no pawns around the king, checks from the knight and queen, dark squared bishop is coming to life, the d file will come open for the other rook, king stuck in the centre etc, a massive attack.
I mean he wouldn't have bothered calculating but intuitively I think he knew it would play into whites hands.
Maybe there is a defence but you would have to play the correct move every move, I would not want to go into that, personally.
@@torikipitt750 and @Sartorius White can go Nd4 directly with tempo on the queen, then capture on e6 with the g knight
@@mkb5743 yeah this is much simpler
The Knight seems trapped, but White has an intermezzo move. Knight d4! Attacking the queen and freeing a square for the knight to retreat.
@@Rithmy congrats, I read your message with danya's voice 😄
Daniel san
daniel so fine
White plays Be3 and Danya takes it before he has time to consciously think about it. That's from grinding tactics all his life.
Or, he already thought about Be3 as it's an obvious move that doesn't work for an obvious reason
Can you please consider making a video playing horde varient, koth, 3 check,etc something in the future? Will be very helpful for us.
18:16, why did he say queen f3 was a nice move, black can just take the queen, ruin white pawn structure, and not lose the weak pawn by pushing it to c4. I also check it with the engine and it goes from +1.1 from white to -0.53. I don't even understand what queen f3, even threatens / accomplishes.
daddy danya
Most 1000s don’t play this poorly in the opening wtf. I mean it happens but this was crazy.
Yeah, when 1000 plays like that I'm not surprised but 1600, bruh. And it wasn't blitz or anything like that
French defense ❤️
I cant belive the first guy was 1600 player
For some reason the more I watch videos the worst I get.
I had this phase when I came out of a chess break when I was stuck at around 900 and won massively. Everything fell into place kind of. I gained 230 points within a few days... and it was so fun to play again that I started picking up tactics and opening theory again.
Then I got this little hinge of elo anxiaty, turned off rated games and from there everything went to shit. Now I'm losing probably 60-70% of my games and I feel absolutely miserable. But I also can't stop playing... everytime I kind of hope that my mind remembers certain things about the game and that my moves progressively get better. But they seem to get worst and worst.
I'm at a complete loss of how to approach this.
You need a proper break from chess, including no videos/puzzles. Your problem is more common than you might think. Good play requires clarity of mind and certain energy resources, which deplete quickly when you binge chess or chess content. Judging by your comment, you're experiencing a burnout, and that burnout is likely the only reason for your sudden drop in quality of play
Just stop for a while, it's a game don't ruin your pleasure to play :)
I did my own research and now I play 1. g4
Cmon Danya you could ve played Belgrade gambit...
3000+ rated player plays a 1600: “let’s play another one, that was easy.” 😂
Danya Senesi is the best.
If you put some pressure on these peoples, they will blunder some pieces. That's the bottom line, cause the prophet Danya said so .
DANYA 3:16
So, now I see why people can get 1500 to 1600. They basically just memorized a lot of opening moves. When they get to their unfamiliar territories, they will not be able to handle anything.
i don't think that's the case
I'm drunk, I love u danya, hope I understand something
1100 here. The waters always get less muddied when Danya explains a position. I understand the logic....now to figure out how to apply it in game!
audience : c4 c4.
danya : _"i dont like c4 can somebody tell me why"_
*opponent start heading to weaken d4 square.
there you go bois... that's why he is the GM while we are not
Lichess 1300s play the 4 night scotch with better accuracy than this. I think a 1300 lichess player is better than a 1600 chess-dot player
Everyone is playing f4 against the Sicilian lately, it's becoming a bit ridiculous.
They want to avoid main lines, which is interesting altough not the soundest approach
Why can't I face 1600's that play this poorly
I hate to break it to you, but you are. You just don't have a GM over your shoulder pointing out why the moves are so bad.
@@maxparkinson297 well, the first game was just a case of a simple opening blunder that i wouldn't expect to see much even on much lower levels
you promised us a sicilian but gave us a caro-kann
True ! xD
But then he explained a good choice for black against the Grand Prix
Playing openings because you get easy advantages out of them is so bad for learning. Kinda a blemish on your videos.
it’s very silly to say that learning good openings isn’t a good thing, it’s a part of the game too, and holding an advantage is probably a more important skill than recovering from terrible blunders at most levels