Better late than never. But these political decisions had to be made 2 years ago. Too many chamberlains in W Europe and US, and no Churchill or FDR in sight.
@@anat6360I think the point is that the range is long enough for Ukraine to hit russias rear. To hit the stuff supporting russias fronts. I think the term long range means. Long range for this type of missile. Thankfully Ukraine have superb drones to hit targets that are really at a long range.
@@anat6360This is actually the point made by Jake Broe in his latest video. “Long Range” means ICBMs with a range of up to 6k miles. ATACMS are short range; it’s just that they’re slightly longer range than the munitions previously authorised.
@@9ragis These ATACMS are in short supply and would hardly made any difference At most , thf US could spare a hundred or 2 at the most. Compare that to Russia which has launched close to 6000 missiles to date after 3 yrs. Now you know why Ukraine power grid is now graded by 85% with the latest massive strike a couple of days ago.
Imagine ,if every week, during the Vietnam war that the USA threatened China and the USSR with nuclear escalation, for supplying 100% of all the weapons against them
A interesting very knowledgeable guest, who like so many from his background, talks sense, unlike the amateur politician who have just caused so many more deaths and damage due to their inability to understand war, and what is required, drip feeding Ukraine enough to just about defend not attack, 💪🇺🇦🇺🇦💪
Really, trump cares about what people think, yet he is defined by many intelects as a narrsiscits a hole. Who doesn't care what people think, giving him this legendary tick skin. You see, there are just opinions by various sides. And both are never right but never exactly wrong. The continuation of the Us empire is all that matters, not the fictional drawn up personalities of presidents or rules ? For the public or stories and distractions of lawsuits etc. This whole biden handing the rains over to trump under such circumstances is just yet another clumsy distraction of which I'm certain peace making after a huge arms export and expenditure these past years about land. Land being the most useful justifier for all these actionable actions. And of course, governments keeping us safe and legitimising themselves as they steer us clear of ww while keeping the legitimacy of banks and paper in circulation. All just an entirely pre corindated arranged game of mutually exchange cooperation and essentially blissful security for a particular class set 😂
Why's everyone calling them "long distance" missiles?? According to info LONG distance weapon has a reach of more than 5500 km! The ATACM's have a reach of up to 300 km. It's a real difference! So I wouldn't even call them medium range weapons. Russia is constantly sending missiles all over Ukraine, all the way to the Polish border. So I don't understand the restrictions having been there at all.
you do realize russia is 9000KM from east to west. atacms can reach 100km into russia from the front lines. so 99% of russia is not under threat...... the only danger is that this will end up getting kyiv nuked....
It's neat to see someone be able to expostulate so confidently on international politics without actually researching a single detail. Very encouraging. I'm motivate to write a book on the amplitude of focal acuity if i can keep my eyes clenched tightly enough.
Front Line is my fav interview source on Ukraine news. Kate is brilliant and this guy is very good too! Pleas put "Front Line" int the title. I'm still going to watch other Times content, but Front Line should be marked!
Why have ukrainian troops attacked their own people since 2014 (those who disagreed with the coup) and killed tens of thousands? Why are the ukrainian Armed Forces fortifying cities but not evacuating their civilians? Hiding behind a "human shield" of civilians is a war crime! What heroism are you talking about?
@@Oleg_lvanov In the dark recesses of the world where speaking against the rulers brings denunciation and imprisonment they may have told you this, but you live in darkness, and there is no escaping it.
Yes I agree that the use of American , French or the UK 's missals into Russia will not make a difference. These restrictions should not have been in place in the first place.
Russian casualties are going to sky rocket now these missiles can be tactically used by Ukraine. the question how long can Russia bare such huge losses for such little gain
Forever He is a dictator. His people are mere sheep. We are not talking western values. British people, French people, German people would have been out on the streets en masse for 10% of the current losses. Not good old Russians though………they believe in the USSR and by golly they want it back…..all of it……no matter the cost.
The future doesn't look good for Russia. It has no industry to speak of, a demographic crisis, skill shortages, its best leave, it relies on fossil fuels which nobody will want in a few decades time. It's clueless government has failed to invest in and diversify its economy with its oil and gas wealth, prefering instead to squander it on a puerile war based on some medieval dynastic claim veiled in chauvanistic myth-making.
... like boiling a frog, perhaps? As for you-know-who, please God the gentleman is correct. A former member of his Cabinet said that "he was ready to withdraw from NATO, but somebody distracted him," for goodness sake! He's a "loose cannon" in my opinion, so we're all waiting for the axe to fall! God help us!
Involving other countries' troops is called a world war, not cowardice. And the answer may be about these countries. What country are you from that you don't know such simple things?
So they say they intercepted 5 out of 6. If true, that's a pretty good outcome, may even get higher. They will take a few hits, but not likely to change the course.
@@tudvalstonenothing Russia says is true, They have no defence against western technology, That's why they go for the nuke threat straight away, But don't worry, Putins master in China has already ordered him, No Nukes
@@tudvalstone Not the first time the ATACMS were used.They were used quite frequently at the start in the disputed regions especially Crimea. The Russians have even recover recover a complete ATACM with minimal damage to study it in detail. They already have the software and means to counter the Himars and ATACMS. However no anti missile system is foolproof . 1 or 2 missiles might still get through if fired in sufficient quantities.
Consider , if lifting ban on long range missiles and anti personal mines is seen to have an impact on Russias ability to prosecute the war. This will not go unnoticed in various western capitals but, crucially, US Military Chiefs of Staff will point this out to Trump who will use it as a lever in negotiations next year.
I agree. It could be a lever.. Both President Trump and President Musk are more likely to withdraw satellite intelligence and Starlink from Ukraine rather than pressure Russia. Bear in mind, in 2008, Trump faced bankruptcy and was bailed by Putin. That is in a book and Trump hasn’t threatened suing the author, which kind of supports the storyline that Trump is very compromised.
It is called target mapping software which is to enable the missile to achieve some degtee of stealth by flying as close to the ground as possible through gaps in the defensive radar. Without this US proprietary software and programming , the Storm Shadows , Scalps and Taurus are utterly useless.
Considering that the guest is a former Major General, I would say that he has a better insight than the majority of people, who for whatever reason think that they are far more qualified.
@@geofo60 With respect, I disagree. Generals are frequently wrong and are blinkered by their own prejudices and motivations. Many have been relieved of their command due to their delusional thinking. The fools are retired, thank God. The man in the street frequently sees with more clarity than the military man, who sees only a few colors of a wide, complex spectrum.
I see the the Russian bots are in the comments. You think I'm joking. He knows comments like this will scare the public. He won't use nuclear weapons but I still wouldn't goad him." I don't think he'll use them " will suffice. "He's bluffing" may unstable him even more.
Well , Putin is bluffing .....until he really fires a nuke.The UK can always call his bluff with their Storm Shadows but make sure Stairmer reads and understand the change in the Russian nuclear doctrine that was signed into law 2 days back.
@@Andrew-PoTate-O He isn't bluffing until he launches one The UK could always call his bluff with their Storm Shadows. The world is waiting with abated breath.
I think some one thought American escalation isn't a thing anymore because Putin need Trumps good will for a peace deal or effectively Ukrainian surrender. But if the US gives this permission now, Britain, France and Germany (And the rest of Europe) can do it to. Witch means the weapons from Europe are more effective from now on without the need for Europeans needing to "escalate" when the US abandons democratic tradition. At least we Europeans can from now on donate weapons ment for Russia. Literally!
Slava Ukraini! May Our Lady of Vyshhorod, Andrey Sheptytsky, Blessed Theodor Romzha, Blessed Vasyl Velychkovsky and all Ukrainian saints, First Testament Prophets (Elijah, Ezekiel, Joel, Jeremiah, Isaiah, Amos etc), Jewish holy men and women, St Michael, Raphael and Gabriel, all the angels, St Anne, St Joachim, St Joseph, St Charbel Maklouf, St Benedict, St Seraphim, St George, St Catherine, St Mary MacKillop of Australia, ask the Almighty to help Ukraine. May it be freed from Russian oppression. May all who have died RIP and may relatives and friends be comforted.
Is St John Maximovitch Of Shanghai and San Francisco considered a Ukrainian Saint? I'm not sue, though I know that he was born in Adamovka (I know there is a church named for him in that area) Ukraine and spent his formative years in the Kharkiv/Poltava area. If he is, I will be happy to request his intercession as well. Slava Ukraini Heroyam Slava!
You really should take a look at Part 6 of 'Roses Have Thorns' - The Odessa Massacre' what a lovely bunch some of these Ukrainians are, the aggression was always from the Ukrainian Government.
Already they are more than 10 American and British missiles launched and my city (next to a large American military airfield) hasn't being nuke by Putin.😢😅😂
Yeah, heard it all before I'm afraid. Russian long range strikes haven't forced Ukraine to capitualte and Ukrainian long range strikes won't force Russia to capitulate although they will make things more difficult and costly for em. Russia is winning and will continue to win, Ukraine simply doesn't have the resources (even with Western aid) and most especially the manpower to win an attritional war. Only chance is to keep hanging on in the hope of some kinda black swan event leading to a collapse of political will within Russia itself
Storm shadow and US missile are good missiles but far better weapons Russian and already pointed to the European capitals and American cities Putin has far better positions than other
The international community should gift Putin an award for being 'The most boringly repetitive man on the planet!'. And perhaps he should pay attention to one of his country's most well-known tales, that of Peter and the Wolf. Cry wolf too many times...
@@markwelsh3957 I am sure you are referring to Stairmer !Were you aware he was left out of the group photo at the on going G20 Summit together with old Joe ? That is how boring is he !
@larrywongthupeng201 I didn't know that so thanks. I personally don't think Starmer is any worse than any of the other cretins we've had in power in the last ten years but at least he doesn't keep threatening to nuke everyone every other week. Unlike a certain Russian despot.
Perhaps the US on behalf of all the Western allies is the only leading super power against the East and Asia therefore needs to be at the forefront. The US Atacm missiles can prove to Russia it's superiority in terms of long range strikes and as a bonus North Koreans can see for themselves. Atacms and Himars missiles maybe just the tip of the iceberg with due respect to all the allies. Any nuke treaty violations and threats are not new any more, they are ongoing and endless.
Interesting analysis. I am from Russia and I have a question for you: Let's say there are North Korean troops in the Kursk region (a region of Russia). Let's say that the information about Russia and the DPRK having hypersonic weapons technology is true (or that they exchange such technologies). Analyze what will happen if Washington's missiles destroy Kim's troops. Will they want to attack US territory? Will Russia agree to help the DPRK, as the US is now helping ukraine?
@@Oleg_lvanov I will never understand the Russian mentality. You’ve had someone in power for over 20 years who is not doing good for your country. You Russians should be living like the Swiss, with all your vast natural resources. Instead, a small circle of people is profiting. You’ve done so much harm to other countries-occupying them, forcing them into the Soviet Union, and keeping them under oppression. You’ve partially occupied Georgia. Now you’ve attacked Ukraine because it wants to live differently-all just to preserve the power of a former KGB president? And please, don’t bring up NATO expansion and Russia’s security. The countries around you fear you; that’s why they wanted and want to join NATO. What if you freed yourselves from your oppressors and invested your country’s wealth in your people and society instead of politicians and their oligarchs?
Unbearable, listening to this guy explain how the inadequate small amount of weapons systems will not be a game changer ! no kidding 50 tanks for example will not make much of a difference in a war with an 800 mile front. 🙃
Not one, it's blatantly obvious it's just a propaganda channel. These missiles are going to make minimal difference just like every other "game changer" that was previously sent.
@@rogerwilco5918 Isn't that how America ended its debacle in Afghanistan? In Vietnam? They beat up on the little guy and when the fight takes too long they just bug out.
@Tiglath-PileserXIX Yes, Trump surrendered to the Taliban and released 5000 Taliban and isis prisoners. But after we beat the North Vietnamese every time we met on the battlefield, they signed a peace treaty and recognized South Vietnam as a sovereign state. Then, two years after we left, the russian-backed Communists invaded again. Ever noticed how Russia is always on the side of the Invaders?
The Western European nations should start sending combat troops to support Ukraine. Ukraine is running out of troops and the existing troops are battle worn.
We should be asking more important questions than how important the limited atacam range extension is. Like what is an appropriate response if a nuclear weapon is used? Or are we waiting for it to happen then deciding a response, e.g reactionary not pre prepared, let’s discuss what to say if Russia fires a 1st nuke, where are we escalating to ? if its on a nato member it is y if its more than 1 on a nato member its z. Then Russia know where their escalation ends and his threat is retaliated with i hope not but if you do we will be responding to your 1st fire 1st use of a nuke. As we can only retaliate to a 1st nuke it requires Russia to throw the first nuke before we can retaliate, lets pressure Russia with their threat to go for 1st use undermines global security lets get China and India’s response to a Russian 1st use of a nuke build pressure to let all Russians know their 1st use is the cause of our reaction. So their threats are re buffed.
In other words, you won’t respect Russia unless they back up their words with actions. Well if that’s what you want, let’s hope you reap what you sow with your irresponsible comments.
It’s like the German Army in January 1945. The Ukrainians are being driven back on all fronts - including in the Kursk province of Russia, which they had opened with much hope and fanfare in August. More importantly, they are running out of soldiers. This is not a war of territory but of attrition. The only resource that counts is soldiers and here the calculus for Ukraine is not positive.
Low morale and desertion, as well as draft-dodging, are now significant problems for Ukraine. These factors are exacerbating already serious recruitment issues, making it hard to supply the front lines with fresh troops. History knows of no example were taking on Russia in an attritional contest has proved successful. Let’s be clear: this means there is a real possibility of defeat - there is no sugar-coating this. The situation is perilous and as bad as it has ever been for Ukraine. Western powers cannot afford another strategic disaster like Afghanistan which, in the words of Ernest Hemingway, happened “gradually, then suddenly”. There are limits to the losses Ukraine can take. We do not know where that limit lies, but we’ll know when it happens. Crucially, there will be no victory for Ukraine. There is not, and never has been, a western strategy except to bleed Russia as long as possible. We need a realistic answer to what an acceptable settlement, now looks like - as well as the extent to which it is achievable, and whether the west is really going to pursue it. And then for western leaders to act accordingly. A starting point could be accepting that Crimea, Donetsk and Luhansk are lost - something an increasing number of Ukrainians are beginning to say openly. So, it is time for Nato and the U.S. in particular to articulate a viable end to this nightmarish ordeal.
Weakness is what leads to wars. Aggressors feel emboldened becasue they don't face any strength against them.
Absolutely! But why didn't the dithering imbecile Joe Biden realize that! And where has NATO been.? ? Do they actually exist?
Better late than never. But these political decisions had to be made 2 years ago. Too many chamberlains in W Europe and US, and no Churchill or FDR in sight.
Sadly, so.
The allowed range is 350 km. The weapons provided earlier cannot strike more than 300-400 km max. How is it a long range?
@@anat6360I think the point is that the range is long enough for Ukraine to hit russias rear. To hit the stuff supporting russias fronts.
I think the term long range means. Long range for this type of missile.
Thankfully Ukraine have superb drones to hit targets that are really at a long range.
@@anat6360This is actually the point made by Jake Broe in his latest video. “Long Range” means ICBMs with a range of up to 6k miles. ATACMS are short range; it’s just that they’re slightly longer range than the munitions previously authorised.
@@9ragis These ATACMS are in short supply and would hardly made any difference At most , thf US could spare a hundred or 2 at the most.
Compare that to Russia which has launched close to 6000 missiles to date after 3 yrs. Now you know why Ukraine power grid
is now graded by 85% with the latest massive strike a couple of days ago.
Imagine ,if every week, during the Vietnam war that the USA threatened China and the USSR with nuclear escalation, for supplying 100% of all the weapons against them
A interesting very knowledgeable guest, who like so many from his background, talks sense, unlike the amateur politician who have just caused so many more deaths and damage due to their inability to understand war, and what is required, drip feeding Ukraine enough to just about defend not attack, 💪🇺🇦🇺🇦💪
Really, trump cares about what people think, yet he is defined by many intelects as a narrsiscits a hole. Who doesn't care what people think, giving him this legendary tick skin. You see, there are just opinions by various sides. And both are never right but never exactly wrong.
The continuation of the Us empire is all that matters, not the fictional drawn up personalities of presidents or rules ? For the public or stories and distractions of lawsuits etc.
This whole biden handing the rains over to trump under such circumstances is just yet another clumsy distraction of which I'm certain peace making after a huge arms export and expenditure these past years about land.
Land being the most useful justifier for all these actionable actions. And of course, governments keeping us safe and legitimising themselves as they steer us clear of ww while keeping the legitimacy of banks and paper in circulation. All just an entirely pre corindated arranged game of mutually exchange cooperation and essentially blissful security for a particular class set 😂
How do you know he’s knowledgeable? To claim that you would also have to claim you are.
Why's everyone calling them "long distance" missiles??
According to info LONG distance weapon has a reach of more than 5500 km! The ATACM's have a reach of up to 300 km. It's a real difference!
So I wouldn't even call them medium range weapons.
Russia is constantly sending missiles all over Ukraine, all the way to the Polish border. So I don't understand the restrictions having been there at all.
Exactly. This is a modern short range system.
you do realize russia is 9000KM from east to west. atacms can reach 100km into russia from the front lines. so 99% of russia is not under threat...... the only danger is that this will end up getting kyiv nuked....
@@whowhy9023modern? Aren't they 30 years old?
Wonder weapons?
Just enough to cause trouble
Another good conversation, thank you
It's neat to see someone be able to expostulate so confidently on international politics without actually researching a single detail. Very encouraging. I'm motivate to write a book on the amplitude of focal acuity if i can keep my eyes clenched tightly enough.
Front Line is my fav interview source on Ukraine news. Kate is brilliant and this guy is very good too! Pleas put "Front Line" int the title. I'm still going to watch other Times content, but Front Line should be marked!
They say what you want to hear
@@des_smith7658 Not sure what that means. Although, I allways wanted to hear it.
Excellent info!
Bravo Sir, finally someone besides John Bolton, HR McMaster to say the truth
Ukraine is a good example for the whole world...much respect for the Ukraine defenders and his people...
Why have ukrainian troops attacked their own people since 2014 (those who disagreed with the coup) and killed tens of thousands? Why are the ukrainian Armed Forces fortifying cities but not evacuating their civilians? Hiding behind a "human shield" of civilians is a war crime! What heroism are you talking about?
He's obviously got a bunker
End this agression of Putin
USA and NATO are the aggressive lot, not Putin
@@robertwaim6376 lol
Putin: I will end the war. Victoria from US started in 2014. Boris (UK) prolong the war.
The emergence of Russian Empire
Ukraine is losing
Great great interview!❤
I guess that Kerch bridge in Crimea is going to get some attention now
Ukraine has tried to destroy the bridge but cant get pass the air defences.
Ukrainians say that the Crimean bridge does not exist at all and that it is an animation of the Kremlin. I believe them😁
@@perfectionboxDid not know the Kerch bridge is still there ? Ate you sure about It ?
@@Oleg_lvanov In the dark recesses of the world where speaking against the rulers brings denunciation and imprisonment they may have told you this, but you live in darkness, and there is no escaping it.
@@mrjerzheel That should not be much of a problem for ATACMS.
Putin has sown the wind...
So biden gave permission for the US to go to war against Russia, and Putin is to blame?
Yes I agree that the use of American , French or the UK 's missals into Russia will not make a difference. These restrictions should not have been in place in the first place.
The enemy is finished now and they know it .
Yes NATO has been routed.
@@mlikely72Here's 50 cents wumao 😂
Who's the enemy .... ahh you mean the USA
@@mlikely72NATO hasn't even set foot on the battlefield, you tool!
Here, take a long swig of kool-aid.🥤
@@lorenzcassidy3960but Russia will respond now 😮😢
Not only his lies, but him as well !!
Russian casualties are going to sky rocket now these missiles can be tactically used by Ukraine. the question how long can Russia bare such huge losses for such little gain
Forever
He is a dictator.
His people are mere sheep.
We are not talking western values.
British people, French people, German people would have been out on the streets en masse for 10% of the current losses.
Not good old Russians though………they believe in the USSR and by golly they want it back…..all of it……no matter the cost.
Until troops and weapons run out. They have deep reserves and he’s prepared to take huge losses.
Dream on
nope... too few missiles, too many troops
These missiles are not used against soldiers on the field, it wont make much difference to casualties, unless a barracks was hit.
A frozen conflict plays into Russian hands. Gives Russia breathing space.
The Russian economy is knackered, this would just prolong the collapse.
It is ukraine and NATO countries that are screaming about freezing. Russia is winning and is not going to go for it.
Minsk tried to freeze it. That went well.
The future doesn't look good for Russia. It has no industry to speak of, a demographic crisis, skill shortages, its best leave, it relies on fossil fuels which nobody will want in a few decades time. It's clueless government has failed to invest in and diversify its economy with its oil and gas wealth, prefering instead to squander it on a puerile war based on some medieval dynastic claim veiled in chauvanistic myth-making.
@@stephenhill545. Minsk 1 &2 and China’s , Qatar and Turkiyé attempts all thwarted by Bojo and Rishi !
Come on we cannot wait too long!
asy to fight from the keyboard, go and put your face to the front hero of papier-mâché
Putin sputters and writes a memo.
Not just a memo, a memo with an exclamation mark!
And it was a strongly worded memo!!
Never underestimate your foe , rather “Sign Up” and Go ! But will you ?
too much enthusiasm and arrogance where it will probably end badly
They've already used UK missiles.
... like boiling a frog, perhaps? As for you-know-who, please God the gentleman is correct. A former member of his Cabinet said that "he was ready to withdraw from NATO, but somebody distracted him," for goodness sake! He's a "loose cannon" in my opinion, so we're all waiting for the axe to fall! God help us!
It's a matter of not tipping those Putin sensibilities to extreme.
Walk it by degrees...
I don't care about the sensibilities of an evil being who enjoys the death and suffering of human beings.
Too little, too DAMN LATE!!
Times Rádio koniec klamstiev To je prekrutene
It's not hard to know. You are there to say.
Santa came early! Deck the halls with ATACMS and Shadows... Falalalalala lalala 🎶🎵 🎅
No reason why other countries couldn't send their forces into Ukraine itself. Pure cowardice.
Involving other countries' troops is called a world war, not cowardice. And the answer may be about these countries. What country are you from that you don't know such simple things?
I hope you're at the front and not cozy on the couch acting brave
@@stephenhill545 🤣🤣🤣
The Cowardly act is the countries that won't even fight their own Proxy War...
Kiddo 🤣🤣🤣.............
Russia has already moved on to the 'it won't make any difference anyway' stage
So they say they intercepted 5 out of 6. If true, that's a pretty good outcome, may even get higher. They will take a few hits, but not likely to change the course.
@@tudvalstone Russia says a lot of things.
@@tudvalstonenothing Russia says is true, They have no defence against western technology, That's why they go for the nuke threat straight away, But don't worry, Putins master in China has already ordered him, No Nukes
@@tudvalstone Not the first time the ATACMS were used.They were used quite frequently at the start in the disputed regions especially Crimea. The Russians have even recover recover a complete ATACM with minimal damage to study it in detail.
They already have the software and means to counter the Himars and ATACMS.
However no anti missile system is foolproof . 1 or 2 missiles might still get through if fired in sufficient quantities.
lol "the tive stages of grief" 😂
Is this where the war mongers meet?
Consider , if lifting ban on long range missiles and anti personal mines is seen to have an impact on Russias ability to prosecute the war. This will not go unnoticed in various western capitals but, crucially, US Military Chiefs of Staff will point this out to Trump who will use it as a lever in negotiations next year.
It's too late
@@philryder6399 Trump is nothing but Putin's asset
I agree. It could be a lever..
Both President Trump and President Musk are more likely to withdraw satellite intelligence and Starlink from Ukraine rather than pressure Russia.
Bear in mind, in 2008, Trump faced bankruptcy and was bailed by Putin. That is in a book and Trump hasn’t threatened suing the author, which kind of supports the storyline that Trump is very compromised.
8 HOURS LATER AND ALREADY DATED - FIRST, MASSIVE STORM SHADOW STRIKE.
Just give the Trump Corporation all the rights to rebuild Ukraine if Ukraine wins back all its territory and wins the war
Вы заблуждаетесь. Трамп списал Украину. И не хочет вкладывать в нее ни доллара
Ukraine doesn't have long range 3000+ mile missiles it only has short range ones like atacms or SS
That just mean Russia will equal the new threat
James!
Wrong, missles can be used outside of Kursk!!! This is not news.
I think stormshadow uses US satellites for guidance to target as far as parts in them I don't know.
Out-dated...
It is called target mapping software which is to enable the missile to achieve some degtee of stealth by flying as close to the ground as possible through gaps in the defensive radar.
Without this US proprietary software and programming , the Storm Shadows , Scalps and Taurus are utterly useless.
Finally an "expert" who says they don't know what a Trump Presidency will mean for Ukraine.
Times Radio... ending lies? That's twisted.
guest is delusional. having the neighbors pit bull growl at you for three years does not lessen the wound when it finally bites you.
Considering that the guest is a former Major General, I would say that he has a better insight than the majority of people, who for whatever reason think that they are far more qualified.
@@geofo60 With respect, I disagree. Generals are frequently wrong and are blinkered by their own prejudices and motivations. Many have been relieved of their command due to their delusional thinking. The fools are retired, thank God. The man in the street frequently sees with more clarity than the military man, who sees only a few colors of a wide, complex spectrum.
Ukončíte už túto nezmiselnu agresiu
A son of the devil - any infamous liar in the world.
Slava Ukraini 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦
Salami Ukraine 🇺🇦
Slava Uranus
Do u think he would push the nuke button honestly
I see the the Russian bots are in the comments. You think I'm joking. He knows comments like this will scare the public. He won't use nuclear weapons but I still wouldn't goad him." I don't think he'll use them " will suffice. "He's bluffing" may unstable him even more.
He can
Well , Putin is bluffing .....until he really fires a nuke.The UK can always call his bluff with their Storm Shadows but make sure Stairmer reads and understand the change in the Russian nuclear doctrine that was signed into law 2 days back.
@@Andrew-PoTate-O He isn't bluffing until he launches one The UK could always call his bluff with their Storm Shadows. The world is waiting with abated breath.
Не ядерное можно? По заводам, которые производят ракеты.
@@Привет-с3п he can't
Theo boy who cries wolf is about to get eaten by said wolves!
But you overlooked the Bear…
Some mothers do have um propaganda.
I think some one thought American escalation isn't a thing anymore because Putin need Trumps good will for a peace deal or effectively Ukrainian surrender. But if the US gives this permission now, Britain, France and Germany (And the rest of Europe) can do it to. Witch means the weapons from Europe are more effective from now on without the need for Europeans needing to "escalate" when the US abandons democratic tradition.
At least we Europeans can from now on donate weapons ment for Russia. Literally!
unlike biden, europe will not continue with this folly.
Putin response another red line 😂
I don't even know why I find myself listening to these fools.
Slava Ukraini
Self gratifying mindless repetitive platitudes don’t make any tangible difference.
Slava Ukraini! May Our Lady of Vyshhorod, Andrey Sheptytsky, Blessed Theodor Romzha, Blessed Vasyl Velychkovsky and all Ukrainian saints, First Testament Prophets (Elijah, Ezekiel, Joel, Jeremiah, Isaiah, Amos etc), Jewish holy men and women, St Michael, Raphael and Gabriel, all the angels, St Anne, St Joachim, St Joseph, St Charbel Maklouf, St Benedict, St Seraphim, St George, St Catherine, St Mary MacKillop of Australia, ask the Almighty to help Ukraine. May it be freed from Russian oppression. May all who have died RIP and may relatives and friends be comforted.
Is St John Maximovitch Of Shanghai and San Francisco considered a Ukrainian Saint? I'm not sue, though I know that he was born in Adamovka (I know there is a church named for him in that area) Ukraine and spent his formative years in the Kharkiv/Poltava area. If he is, I will be happy to request his intercession as well. Slava Ukraini Heroyam Slava!
You really should take a look at Part 6 of 'Roses Have Thorns' - The Odessa Massacre' what a lovely bunch some of these Ukrainians are, the aggression was always from the Ukrainian Government.
Its like this... if putler is going to use nuclear weapons, then he is going to use them Anyway..
So brave up
I hope you're at the front and not cozy on the couch acting brave
@renatomondini3970
100% you won't have a choice
Already they are more than 10 American and British missiles launched and my city (next to a large American military airfield) hasn't being nuke by Putin.😢😅😂
TR…lol yeah priceless.
Yeah, heard it all before I'm afraid. Russian long range strikes haven't forced Ukraine to capitualte and Ukrainian long range strikes won't force Russia to capitulate although they will make things more difficult and costly for em. Russia is winning and will continue to win, Ukraine simply doesn't have the resources (even with Western aid) and most especially the manpower to win an attritional war. Only chance is to keep hanging on in the hope of some kinda black swan event leading to a collapse of political will within Russia itself
Who's this guy?
Who is Pjutin?
Storm shadow and US missile are good missiles but far better weapons Russian and already pointed to the European capitals and American cities Putin has far better positions than other
What
English please
His or Biden's.
Which ones
De-Escalation puppets...
- Waiting for KICK-BACK?
( Sweden )
The international community should gift Putin an award for being 'The most boringly repetitive man on the planet!'. And perhaps he should pay attention to one of his country's most well-known tales, that of Peter and the Wolf. Cry wolf too many times...
@@markwelsh3957 I am sure you are referring to Stairmer !Were you aware he was left out of the group photo at the on going G20 Summit together with old Joe ? That is how boring is he !
@larrywongthupeng201 I didn't know that so thanks. I personally don't think Starmer is any worse than any of the other cretins we've had in power in the last ten years but at least he doesn't keep threatening to nuke everyone every other week. Unlike a certain Russian despot.
Driems driems
Perhaps the US on behalf of all the Western allies is the only leading super power against the East and Asia therefore needs to be at the forefront.
The US Atacm missiles can prove to Russia it's superiority in terms of long range strikes and as a bonus North Koreans can see for themselves.
Atacms and Himars missiles maybe just the tip of the iceberg with due respect to all the allies.
Any nuke treaty violations and threats are not new any more, they are ongoing and endless.
Interesting analysis. I am from Russia and I have a question for you: Let's say there are North Korean troops in the Kursk region (a region of Russia). Let's say that the information about Russia and the DPRK having hypersonic weapons technology is true (or that they exchange such technologies). Analyze what will happen if Washington's missiles destroy Kim's troops. Will they want to attack US territory? Will Russia agree to help the DPRK, as the US is now helping ukraine?
You realize the UK missiles are much more capable, longer ranges etc.
@@Oleg_lvanov
I will never understand the Russian mentality. You’ve had someone in power for over 20 years who is not doing good for your country. You Russians should be living like the Swiss, with all your vast natural resources. Instead, a small circle of people is profiting. You’ve done so much harm to other countries-occupying them, forcing them into the Soviet Union, and keeping them under oppression. You’ve partially occupied Georgia. Now you’ve attacked Ukraine because it wants to live differently-all just to preserve the power of a former KGB president? And please, don’t bring up NATO expansion and Russia’s security. The countries around you fear you; that’s why they wanted and want to join NATO. What if you freed yourselves from your oppressors and invested your country’s wealth in your people and society instead of politicians and their oligarchs?
@@3454okay if you live in the UK, look in the mirror before you lecture a Russian.
Unbearable, listening to this guy explain how the inadequate small amount of weapons systems will not be a game changer ! no kidding 50 tanks for example will not make much of a difference in a war with an 800 mile front. 🙃
👍
The Blaggard of Bakhmut is back again with more fairy tales.
Question; has Times Radio ever been right about any aspecct of this war?
Not one, it's blatantly obvious it's just a propaganda channel. These missiles are going to make minimal difference just like every other "game changer" that was previously sent.
Yes
@@VintageClips-rf7kt Yes , all the time and I will like to try what these dudes are smoking !
No, just another liberal elite mouthpiece to misinform the public.
@@rodpanhard Please link to where anyone has claimed this will be a game changer.
I disagree. Trump will end this war.
Is he going to surrender again like you did in Afghanistan and Syria?
@@rogerwilco5918 Surrender is just another word for "ending the war".
@Tiglath-PileserXIX 😆 wow
Yes, it's how cowards and traitors do it.
@@rogerwilco5918 Isn't that how America ended its debacle in Afghanistan? In Vietnam? They beat up on the little guy and when the fight takes too long they just bug out.
@Tiglath-PileserXIX Yes, Trump surrendered to the Taliban and released 5000 Taliban and isis prisoners.
But after we beat the North Vietnamese every time we met on the battlefield, they signed a peace treaty and recognized South Vietnam as a sovereign state. Then, two years after we left, the russian-backed Communists invaded again.
Ever noticed how Russia is always on the side of the Invaders?
Times Radio lol.
❤Ukraine ❤
It is in the US interest to defeat Ruzzia so..
Re-upload.
Next bit of the calculus? Do you know what calculus is? Perhaps you meant calculation.
The Western European nations should start sending combat troops to support Ukraine. Ukraine is running out of troops and the existing troops are battle worn.
Men are running out of Ukraine
@@des_smith7658 Ukraine is still full of men who dont fight.
We should be asking more important questions than how important the limited atacam range extension is. Like what is an appropriate response if a nuclear weapon is used? Or are we waiting for it to happen then deciding a response, e.g reactionary not pre prepared, let’s discuss what to say if Russia fires a 1st nuke, where are we escalating to ? if its on a nato member it is y if its more than 1 on a nato member its z. Then Russia know where their escalation ends and his threat is retaliated with i hope not but if you do we will be responding to your 1st fire 1st use of a nuke. As we can only retaliate to a 1st nuke it requires Russia to throw the first nuke before we can retaliate, lets pressure Russia with their threat to go for 1st use undermines global security lets get China and India’s response to a Russian 1st use of a nuke build pressure to let all Russians know their 1st use is the cause of our reaction. So their threats are re buffed.
I think a non- nuclear nato state is as likely as a ukrainian target for a russian nuke. the launch will be from belarus, not russia.
The suspense is terrible, I hope it lasts
Why am I banned?
Why do you exist?
@@thomasmartin8202 Because I think?
@@dalecrocker3213A clear misunderstanding of the quote. You confuse causation with correlation.
@@HumansAreShitFactories Hmmm. Since existence consists only of myself and everything else, the two might well be synonymous.
@ You’re compounding your misunderstanding, and you’re proud of it.
Caedite eos. Novit enim Dominus qui sunt eius.
You cannot simply buy a victory in Ukraine.
You lie
Your guest thinks Trump has a conscience 😅
Boring
Dont talk silly .
This channel is the worst on YT. Pure garbage.
Everybody's a liar but the News Network
Another pompous fool.
What part hurt your feelings the most?
So much armaments but not progress, it can be tons of money and plenty of weapons but something is wrong, nothing happens, is this corruption too…
In other words, you won’t respect Russia unless they back up their words with actions.
Well if that’s what you want, let’s hope you reap what you sow with your irresponsible comments.
Bot
Controlled 🇷🇺
We don’t need to threat russia or remind what we already said to putin about consequences if he goes nasty
🫵🇺🇸
😂😂😂😂 You're so naive 😁😁😁😁
A brainwashed Russian would think that. A pariah state with a decimated military and about to go bankrupt. 😂😂😂
Another headline that displays Unfounded optimism.
Then go elsewhere troll 🫵🤣
I'm increasingly skeptical of Times Radio and their headlines.
@@sierrawander7108 Its important to always question those who tell you who to hate.
@YUDNSAY then look at yourself.
@@danielstapler4315Have you seen Russian TV, 😅,It's like ah fuxxing clown show
More fantasy and speculation.
more banal comments
On 🤡Pootin part for sure, 💪🇺🇦🇺🇦💪
Its a game changer now like every time they have said it! lol
@@NathanChisholm041And still, the mighty Russian army can't even take the donbas 😅
Ah that’s ok then, let’s poke the bear a bit more..
Lies and false propaganda from Times Radio
Ok Ivan, CALM DOWN comrade,😂😂
@ yes Kevin
It’s like the German Army in January 1945. The Ukrainians are being driven back on all fronts - including in the Kursk province of Russia, which they had opened with much hope and fanfare in August. More importantly, they are running out of soldiers. This is not a war of territory but of attrition. The only resource that counts is soldiers and here the calculus for Ukraine is not positive.
Low morale and desertion, as well as draft-dodging, are now significant problems for Ukraine. These factors are exacerbating already serious recruitment issues, making it hard to supply the front lines with fresh troops.
History knows of no example were taking on Russia in an attritional contest has proved successful. Let’s be clear: this means there is a real possibility of defeat - there is no sugar-coating this.
The situation is perilous and as bad as it has ever been for Ukraine. Western powers cannot afford another strategic disaster like Afghanistan which, in the words of Ernest Hemingway, happened “gradually, then suddenly”.
There are limits to the losses Ukraine can take. We do not know where that limit lies, but we’ll know when it happens. Crucially, there will be no victory for Ukraine. There is not, and never has been, a western strategy except to bleed Russia as long as possible.
We need a realistic answer to what an acceptable settlement, now looks like - as well as the extent to which it is achievable, and whether the west is really going to pursue it. And then for western leaders to act accordingly.
A starting point could be accepting that Crimea, Donetsk and Luhansk are lost - something an increasing number of Ukrainians are beginning to say openly.
So, it is time for Nato and the U.S. in particular to articulate a viable end to this nightmarish ordeal.
This is a propaganda ch. Also, a channel where idiots get to talk their delusions.
Russia has butter heading towards the price of gold,the economy is going down ,Gasprom is running at a loss ,they are finished just a matter of time .
Your comments make a lot of sense. Thanks.
Ukraine lacks proper management
You guys are delusional..
Did you hit your quota of messages for today? One potato 🥔 for you
@Anthonythumb haha funny, I'll have a big mac and large fries, please...