سر۔ جاری رکھیں۔ اس سلسلے کو۔ یہ فکری جمود جب تک نہیں ختم ہوگا تب تک کوئی ترقی کی امید نہیں یہاں۔ بہت ہی محفوظ اور محتاط طریقہ سے بات کی آپ نے۔ پہلے گھنٹے میں ہی آپ کی وڈیو پر آگئے ہم۔ اس سے آپ اندازہ کر لیں کہ ہم کس طرح ویٹ کرتے ہیں۔
@@manahil558 میرا خیال ہے کہ سب کے لئے فقط سوالات ہی قائم کر دیے جائیں تو جواب تلاش کرنے عوام نکل ہی پڑتی ہے۔ سر اگر محتاط طریقہ سے وہ سوال ہی قائم کر دیں جس کا حل کسی نظام سے بھی عوام کو تلاش کرنا پڑے تو وہ نتیجہ کی طرف پہنچ جائیں گے
It's such a shame that in this 21st century that the difference has to be explained. But well done Dr TR. I note that you have recently embarked onto dangerous territory. As you would be well aware, in the Land of the Pure, any difference of opinion which touches religion can be dangerous. Hope you stay safe. You can't rely on the state to defend you. Unless of course there's money in for them.
Sir I have been following u since 2019. The thing that attracted me towards watching ur videos is the selection of topics. Like in this video LECTURe u have taken " BARA Mazidar" topic. People love to understand and know about such interesting concepts. Thank u❤
Yes methodology is very important. I'd like to remember a methodology of Sir Syed.... He said " Qur'an is the word of God and Science is the work of God. So they can not contradict."
Sir thank you very much for another enlightening video. In my POV, we should understand the domains where theology and science should be applied. Unfortunately we have mixed them both badly. I hope someday, with the help of scientists and scholars like yourself, theologians will find a perfect blend between science and theology. Regards.
Thank you very much Dr. Taimur for your enlightening lectures that provide clarity of thought and perspective. One thing, in my opinion, which might help your viewers capture the essence of your perceptions better will be the use of the word "Fitrat" as the Urdu equivalent of "Nature" instead of "Qudrat ", which you currently prefer. The word "Qudrat " implies "power "especially (of.God , or a super natural entity) .
Dear Dr. Taimur, I really appreciate your effort. When it comes to such domains, yes we can consult science and progress although it also has its own drawbacks which is another topic. I have been watching your vlogs closely and what I have noticed is that you only make content which sells e.g., related to hard sciences. I am curious why not Ethics? or Morality which is where science goes blind and only religion is the solace. You cannot put metaphysical ideas into a test tube. Anyhow the assumptions of science are also of metaphysical nature e.g., the existence of dark matter which no one could explain, and due to this dark matter, our principles or theories HOLD! Kind Ali
The fact that this needs to be explained to people in this day and age means that we're living through dark times here in Pakistan. Most of these are high-level concepts. Unfortunately, most people who understand the premise of such discussions leave the country before they can make friends and influence people here in Pakistan. We're lucky to have Dr. Taimur here with us, even though I can't agree with the good Doctor on everything yet.
Sir, it would be a great help if you would activate the transcript function for your Urdu-channel so the english-speaking audience could understand what you are saying, because the topics you cover are very interesting.
Stay safe. To THEM it doesn't matter what you declare yourself. THEY only care about your ability to question THEIR traditions and beliefs and judge you based on that.
Asalam walkium sir I am a student from sindh. I have just completed my intermediate. Now I want to do my bachelor's degree in economics. Sir kindly guide me which subfield of economics is good or Bs and Bsc
I believe we should listen to the Prof Seyyed Hossein Nasr, an Iranian perennial Traditional Philosopher. He explained very well. According to him modern science is totally against the nature and Humanity. Also please one can clarify the articles of Prof Alexander Dugin, a Russian traditionalist and Philosopher. Modern Science is purely materialistic and theology is purely spiritual. Basic difference. Communism, Fascism, Liberalism, Capitalism and modern technology all are the part of Modernity. And modernity neglects the traditions and Theology. Actually Modernity is pure nihilism. One cannot serve god and money together.
Critique 2: Islamic Theology is different because Ulema are not supposed to compare prevalent scientific theories with scientific concepts of Abrahamic scriptures rather they are only to proffer any objection by religion on moral grounds - which in Islam includes 'Shirk' as well.
@Taimur Sir, would it be right to say that science is more advanced than religion? As religion has failed to come up with solutions to the modern-day concerns and querries. While science has attempted its best to answer almost every phenomena.
What does Science tell us about origin of consciousness? What's the proven reason why we sleep? Till this day, many questions like these are not answered. What are you talking about, mate...
And would you like to please elaborate, what measures does Science provides: To prevent the cutting of genitalia of young kids and changing their genders... To prevent rape and adultery and thus increase in divorces, broken families, depression, suicide and other crimes executed by members from such broken families...
@@mluqman-kq9ny I've used the term "attempted" . Well, science has attempted to delve deep into the origin of such mysterious phenomena. What about your religion? Has it even dared to think about coming up with an answers to questions like these? What your scholars do is to declare something as "haram " or "halal" . Or even to launch a self-designed verdict against those who are trying to pull us out of this darkness.
@@Tamimmwt Please remain calm. I didn't want to trigger you. Learning knowledge (not only of Deen) is the duty of every Muslim. And for your kind information, Islam didn't start 1400y ago. It started from beginning of mankind. Hazrat Adam (A. S) was first human, Messenger of Allah S.W.T and Muslim (one who submits to will of Allah S.W.T). All the knowledge comes from Allah S.W.T. Whether knowledge in Scriptures or scientific knowledge or whatever knowledge. And another thing is that Quran itself ignites its readers to think and reflect on universe again and again... That's why Muslims in the Medieval period gave the scientific knowledge that forms the basis of many modern sciences. Read about that if you have some time. Islam doesn't stop you from thinking logically and learning worldly knowledge. Muslims due to corrupt political system and lack of facilities for research and learning are currently passing through a very difficult time. Even then, here's contribution of some Muslims in recent times. th-cam.com/video/KMQVo36JjzM/w-d-xo.html Just keep on learning without any bias. Thanks mate.
Critique 3: Islamic theologian has no requirement of 'hifz' furthermore he has to master the whole journey of the Islamic (incl all Abrahamic - Judeo-Christian) theology as it has developed in the last 5000 years (time when Abraham left Mesopotamia and arrived in the Levant.
Critique 1: Methodology is the same because both are products of Philosophy. Difference is the objective whereby theology is questioning the nature of religion with a moral objective while science is looking at material things. Example: Alcohol is banned because it damages moral fiber of society. Quran has not listed Liver Failure as even the by-product.
Sir please let me clarify whether i m right or wrong. Scientist can read scripture either for deductive and inductive reasoning or to develop theory at abstract level, however his theory will not be called valid until and unless empirical evidences are not provided. Science will only acknowledge the empirical evidences. .
Sorry sir, Your example is not correct because disease treatment is not the fundamental topic of theology, it is the topic of medical science. The topic of physical science is matter and energy, whether in this world or any other world. Politics and economics are social sciences and social sciences deal with the society. Religion also deals with the society. Politics and economics are not just like physical size having same formula same definition and same laws. The term exploitation is related to ethics and not to science.
Science has no concern with these questions. Because science deals with the questions of how and what. Above mentioned questions are related with the question of why. Question of why is out of the domain of science. Hamza Hassan From Minhaj university
سائنس کا تو میدان ہی نہیں ہے (why کیوں )سائنس کا میدان ہے what,How آپ نے ایک جملہ بولا ہے ۔کیا آپ کی تھی تھیوری یہ سمجھا سکتی ہیں کہ کس طرح ہو رہی ہیں اور کیوں ہو رہی ہیں ،اس اپنے جملے کو بیان کر دیں شکریہ
Jo log is baat ko yaqeen kartay hain "Allah kayenat kaa khaliq hai or wirf wahi ibaadat kay layeq hai" Unhain yeh baat samajhni paregi kay "Science us kayenaat ko parhnay, samajhnya, ghaur or fikr karnay ki zubaan hai" "Zubaan" say muraad tareeqa, zariya "ilm" Baut asaan si baat hai Science ka concept Allah kay banaye nizam kay khilaaf kaisay ho sakta hai Yeh tabhi ho sakta hai Jab aapki science ko basis yaa foundation ghalat ho yaa bahut intial stage main ho. So In a nutshell Science amd theology alag ho hi nahin sakti. Or Iska proof main Pakistan kay khaas shahar ko saamnay rakh kar de sakta hun. Bahut asaan lafzon main. Editor mujhay connect kar saktay hain.
Sir Taimur. Salamoona. I have greatest regard for you and your views. Having said that, I cannot resist saying that the first and the greatest source of Islamic theology is the Holy Quran. But where it is in the Holy Quran that when two atoms of H and one of O combine they form water. Where the Holy Quran has mentioned the uses and misuses of uranium? And do you know why it is mum on these scientific facts? Because it is not a book of science. It only governs the relationship between Almighty Allah and human beings on the one hand and between one human being and another on the other hand. It is a code of laws governing our lives. Zabita Hayat. And has nothing to do with science. Do you know when the Holy Prophet fell ill towards the end of his life and would catch severe fever, what would his family members do to control the fever? Would they start reciting this or that Sura of the Holy Quran to reduce the fever? No. They would take out a piece of cloth, dip it in water and apply that to his body and the fever would decrease. This method is still used as a conventional treatment. What I want to say is that the Holy Quran is a way of life. It has nothing to do with science and other worldly uloom but it also does not restrain us from getting the knowledge of science, business and economics, etc. Before parting with my post I would humbly advice you to concentrate on your speciality and leave theology to the people like Mudoodi, Maulana Muhd Ishaq, Eng M Ali Mirza, Syed Jawad Naqwi and Ghamdi, etc
Critique 4: Scope of Allah's books (Torah to Quran) has been many a times explained by the Almighty and that is to raise the alarm about the Day of Reckoning - period. Allah further endows Law and Hikmat as guidance to those who look for success in the eternal life. Sifting through scripture for scientific or medicinal solutions to human worldly problems (excluding moral challenges) is actually a denigration.
The first argument is wrong on which you are trying to make an agreement between them. Science says alcohol is harmful for your body? Theology says it's bad for the soul. Science has no day of judgment for drinkers while theology does. Its ok or i can tell you why science and theology aren't in agreement and will not be in agreement as both are different in their ends.
Right but both are opposed to its consumption. Hence, the conclusions are the same while the reasoning is obviously different. That is my point. That it is the methods of both that differentiate them. Not their conclusions.
No, I don't agree with your point. Science and theology have different conclusions and different methods and different ends. Science starts from the senses then it focuses on matter and then reaches the laws of nature. Theology starts with Scripture focuses on the soul and reaches God. When we observe things we observe in a rational way through their ends. Suppose there is no end to what will happen with the theology conclusion? Suppose there is no matter what will happen with science conclusions?
Sir, very strange if someone tells that there is an alien head and who will one day destroy earth and will take us to their planet and segregation people basis their work...one might say what crap story... But technically most religion talk same😀 God at the end giving judgement and people getting heaven and hell
How? Please elaborate. As far as I understand, Philosophy questions everything and tries to find answers. It challenges you to think. Religion asserts answers based on the beliefs and assumptions of a few and feeds on the ignorance of many. The Scientific method takes on the challenge and tries to find answers based on empirical data, experimentation and observations of all forms. It is still the most reliable way to understand reality. Also, science doesn't focus on the WHYs of things but HOWs. You can make up a million reasons behind things but only the ones that can be proven are considered.
Dr sahab kya aap ye sabit kar sakte hain k islam me allah aur uske rasool ne mazhabi kitabon me saari duniya dari k uloonm k hone ka dawa kiya hai aur bilkul doosre dunavi uloom hasil karne unpe yaqeen karne aur amal karne se rok dete hain? Ajeeb baat to ye hai k quran ko aap log hidayat ki bajaye science ki kitab sabit karne pe tule hue hai..kya aap jawab de sakte k duniya k nizaam k qanoon aur cause and effect ka banane wala koi hai..ya phir sab aise hi ban gaya
Theology is not about stock exchange, FTSE 100, dental plaque, cancer treatment, its about who I am, what would happen after death. I think theology and ad science are completely different.
Sir,I think,you are well listen on undisputed issues, while on the topics of dispute I would affect your fan following,there are multiple topics till unraveled by you, which should do in vlogs and podcasts,we wish you to listen on generic topic with respect to socialist viewpoints, religion is a matter of absolutely right and wrong.....
@@MuhammadIlyas-kp2rp you can edit your comments on TH-cam so you don't have to make a separate comment to fix your error. That's something you do on WhatsApp or Twitter
The scope and domains of religious and science are different. e.g. The knowledge of nuclear physics has enabled us to produce nuclear weapons. However, science is unable on advice us on if we should go for its production or use.
Theology and science fine but Islam is a. Deen and does not come under religion. It is. A challenge to religion. Not a personal relation with divine but a divine dictated system. Otherwise we'll done
Sir with due respect, I'd like to tell you that the stages of embryological development of humans were better & easier understood through Quranic verses... It was said by Keith L. Moore, the greatest embryologist of his time. It's in his interview. You can check it yourself.
Did u read about the critics of quranic embrylogical verses too? Did u know that K. L Moore wrote 2 different books The Developing Human: Clinically Oriented Embryology and The Developing Human; With Islamic Additions to capture Arab and muslim audience. Did u know his islamic addition wali book is signed by Osama Bin Laden too. Did u know Galen told the same 4 steps in 200 A.D. and Aristole too. and it was present in yahudi texts too. And quranic descrption of embryology has alot of faults in it. I would recommend u watch Urdu Freethinker video on Quran embryology, I guess u would want to see other prespective too. Thanks @mluqman-kq9ny
Another thing u will see that these similarities are made after science discover any knowledge independent of the religion. And this forceful extraction of science from religious text are not special with Holy Quran. You can search for scientific miracles of bible, talmud, geeta and other scriptures. All these religions are very confident in claiming that their text present science. I hope u will think about it a little bit.
@@beastgene7211 I've already thought about them, dear... Islam isn't 1400y old... It's from day one... From the very beginning of mankind. Hazrat Adam (A. S) was the first human, father of all mankind, first Messenger of Allah S.W.T and First Muslim (one who submits to the will of Allah S.W.T)... The point is that Talmud and Bible were also revealed from Allah S.W.T on Hazrat Moosa(A. S) and Hazrat Esa (A. S)... They definitely contain some part that is original but there's a lot of changes made into these books... Quran is unique in this aspect that from day one, it's not only preserved by writing but also by memorization. And please listen that interview, Keith L Moore himself accepts that Quran helped him organize the knowledge in better way. And he also says that this book cannot be written by a man. Forceful extraction? Not my friend. The truth is truth no matter you accept it or not. It follows the path that is straight... Straight to success in both the worlds. May Allah S.W.T bless you with guidance towards the truth.
تیمور رحمان ۔۔۔کو سوشلزم ، تایخ اور فلاسفی پر کافی سنا ہے ۔۔۔بہت اچھی اپروچ اور وژن سے بات کرتا ہے ۔۔۔۔لیکن جب مذہبی ٹاپک پر گفتگو کرتا ہے ۔۔۔تو بلکل احمقانہ ۔۔۔طرز استدلال اختیار کرلیتا ہے ۔۔۔۔اس پہلے اسلام مکمل ضابطہ حیات میں بھی ۔۔۔اور اس کلپ میں بھی !!!! بھائی جان اسلام یا مزہب ۔۔۔کی بنیاد مورالٹی ہے ۔۔۔۔ باقی دوا ، مادہ ، کائنات سب جزیات ہیں ۔۔۔اصل پر بات کیا کرو ۔۔۔۔مورال ویلیوز ۔۔۔اور اس سے جڑے قوانین ۔۔،۔ امید ہے اگلا کلپ اس پر ہوگا ۔۔ 👍
I can say I didn't waste even a second watching this video. I learned.❤
Aap fake Syed ho
o bhai cutting karwa ly...teri side burns daikhi ni jati...itna chutiya lagta hai tu
شکریہ سر اس طرح کی بہترین وڈیوز اپلوڈ کر کا❣️🥀😘
Very nice ❤thank you so much Dr Taimur Rehman Saheb
Excellent conversation but ignorant society doesn't accept such analysis
Very correct in my thinking.
Scientific approach!
What a clearity of thought
سر۔ جاری رکھیں۔ اس سلسلے کو۔ یہ فکری جمود جب تک نہیں ختم ہوگا تب تک کوئی ترقی کی امید نہیں یہاں۔ بہت ہی محفوظ اور محتاط طریقہ سے بات کی آپ نے۔ پہلے گھنٹے میں ہی آپ کی وڈیو پر آگئے ہم۔ اس سے آپ اندازہ کر لیں کہ ہم کس طرح ویٹ کرتے ہیں۔
Right but in this mohtat and mehfoz tarika he can't convey his ideas or what he wants to say easily!
@@manahil558
میرا خیال ہے کہ سب کے لئے فقط سوالات ہی قائم کر دیے جائیں تو جواب تلاش کرنے عوام نکل ہی پڑتی ہے۔ سر اگر محتاط طریقہ سے وہ سوال ہی قائم کر دیں جس کا حل کسی نظام سے بھی عوام کو تلاش کرنا پڑے تو وہ نتیجہ کی طرف پہنچ جائیں گے
It's such a shame that in this 21st century that the difference has to be explained. But well done Dr TR. I note that you have recently embarked onto dangerous territory.
As you would be well aware, in the Land of the Pure, any difference of opinion which touches religion can be dangerous.
Hope you stay safe.
You can't rely on the state to defend you. Unless of course there's money in for them.
Thank u for the new video
Sir i really liked your video
Sir I have been following u since 2019. The thing that attracted me towards watching ur videos is the selection of topics. Like in this video LECTURe u have taken " BARA Mazidar" topic. People love to understand and know about such interesting concepts. Thank u❤
Yes methodology is very important.
I'd like to remember a methodology of Sir Syed....
He said " Qur'an is the word of God and Science is the work of God. So they can not contradict."
سر بہت زبردست کیا بات ھے۔
Great Sir!
Sir the great!
Big fan of your work
Zabardast lecture sir. Bahut sari confusion door hua.
Shukriya
informative
Appreciate Sir❤
Sir thank you very much for another enlightening video. In my POV, we should understand the domains where theology and science should be applied. Unfortunately we have mixed them both badly. I hope someday, with the help of scientists and scholars like yourself, theologians will find a perfect blend between science and theology. Regards.
Thank you very much Dr. Taimur for your enlightening lectures that provide clarity of thought and perspective. One thing, in my opinion, which might help your viewers capture the essence of your perceptions better will be the use of the word "Fitrat" as the Urdu equivalent of "Nature" instead of "Qudrat ", which you currently prefer. The word "Qudrat " implies "power "especially (of.God , or a super natural entity) .
Good point. Thanks.
It’s revelation vs observation and experimentation.
God bless you brother have a good time
Much appreciated sir
23:34 these words make you a great man 😊
Thanks Professor
Very balanced and informative
Sir thanks . Fe Aman Lillah❤
Excellent sir.
Ye bat jorury tha jo bolna chaiye🇧🇩
Well done Dr shaib....pls deliver more lecture on dogma and science but carefully😊
Dear Dr. Taimur,
I really appreciate your effort. When it comes to such domains, yes we can consult science and progress although it also has its own drawbacks which is another topic. I have been watching your vlogs closely and what I have noticed is that you only make content which sells e.g., related to hard sciences. I am curious why not Ethics? or Morality which is where science goes blind and only religion is the solace. You cannot put metaphysical ideas into a test tube. Anyhow the assumptions of science are also of metaphysical nature e.g., the existence of dark matter which no one could explain, and due to this dark matter, our principles or theories HOLD!
Kind
Ali
The fact that this needs to be explained to people in this day and age means that we're living through dark times here in Pakistan.
Most of these are high-level concepts. Unfortunately, most people who understand the premise of such discussions leave the country before they can make friends and influence people here in Pakistan.
We're lucky to have Dr. Taimur here with us, even though I can't agree with the good Doctor on everything yet.
Sir, it would be a great help if you would activate the transcript function for your Urdu-channel so the english-speaking audience could understand what you are saying, because the topics you cover are very interesting.
How is that done?
@@Taimur_Laal You’ll have to add English Subtitles.
@@Taimur_Laal Sir Subtitles will do fine.
Ur lectures are excellent
Nice sit
Will you make a one video on type of content you read or consume, such as books and movies and many more things make a atleast 30 minutes video please
What is the ideology of science and technology?
Stay safe. To THEM it doesn't matter what you declare yourself. THEY only care about your ability to question THEIR traditions and beliefs and judge you based on that.
U r proud of intellectuals
❤❤❤
I just say wow 👌
Wow ❤
Asalam walkium sir
I am a student from sindh. I have just completed my intermediate. Now I want to do my bachelor's degree in economics. Sir kindly guide me which subfield of economics is good or Bs and Bsc
I would love to hear your thoughts on particularly Hegelianism, psychoanalysis and Marxism
Sir will make one conservatism and key principles❤
Sir, kindly upload videos on Revisionism
Very nicely explained but somewhat lengthy
In this modern world Theological mindset always follow medical science since long as a proirity for healthcare.
1. Is there a difference between theology and religion?
2. There is a difference between Clergy and Ulema (Scholar)
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
I believe we should listen to the Prof Seyyed Hossein Nasr, an Iranian perennial Traditional Philosopher. He explained very well. According to him modern science is totally against the nature and Humanity. Also please one can clarify the articles of Prof Alexander Dugin, a Russian traditionalist and Philosopher. Modern Science is purely materialistic and theology is purely spiritual. Basic difference. Communism, Fascism, Liberalism, Capitalism and modern technology all are the part of Modernity. And modernity neglects the traditions and Theology. Actually Modernity is pure nihilism. One cannot serve god and money together.
Critique 2: Islamic Theology is different because Ulema are not supposed to compare prevalent scientific theories with scientific concepts of Abrahamic scriptures rather they are only to proffer any objection by religion on moral grounds - which in Islam includes 'Shirk' as well.
@Taimur Sir, would it be right to say that science is more advanced than religion?
As religion has failed to come up with solutions to the modern-day concerns and querries. While science has attempted its best to answer almost every phenomena.
What does Science tell us about origin of consciousness?
What's the proven reason why we sleep?
Till this day, many questions like these are not answered.
What are you talking about, mate...
And would you like to please elaborate, what measures does Science provides:
To prevent the cutting of genitalia of young kids and changing their genders...
To prevent rape and adultery and thus increase in divorces, broken families, depression, suicide and other crimes executed by members from such broken families...
@@mluqman-kq9ny I've used the term "attempted" . Well, science has attempted to delve deep into the origin of such mysterious phenomena. What about your religion? Has it even dared to think about coming up with an answers to questions like these?
What your scholars do is to declare something as "haram " or "halal" . Or even to launch a self-designed verdict against those who are trying to pull us out of this darkness.
@@Tamimmwt Please remain calm.
I didn't want to trigger you.
Learning knowledge (not only of Deen) is the duty of every Muslim. And for your kind information, Islam didn't start 1400y ago. It started from beginning of mankind. Hazrat Adam (A. S) was first human, Messenger of Allah S.W.T and Muslim (one who submits to will of Allah S.W.T).
All the knowledge comes from Allah S.W.T. Whether knowledge in Scriptures or scientific knowledge or whatever knowledge.
And another thing is that Quran itself ignites its readers to think and reflect on universe again and again...
That's why Muslims in the Medieval period gave the scientific knowledge that forms the basis of many modern sciences. Read about that if you have some time.
Islam doesn't stop you from thinking logically and learning worldly knowledge.
Muslims due to corrupt political system and lack of facilities for research and learning are currently passing through a very difficult time.
Even then, here's contribution of some Muslims in recent times.
th-cam.com/video/KMQVo36JjzM/w-d-xo.html
Just keep on learning without any bias.
Thanks mate.
Benches of thanks.
Sir, why Einstein don't declare newton as kafir?? But a Muslim scholar declair other.. Also quantum physicists don't declare jihad against Newtonian..
Best
Critique 3: Islamic theologian has no requirement of 'hifz' furthermore he has to master the whole journey of the Islamic (incl all Abrahamic - Judeo-Christian) theology as it has developed in the last 5000 years (time when Abraham left Mesopotamia and arrived in the Levant.
Critique 1: Methodology is the same because both are products of Philosophy. Difference is the objective whereby theology is questioning the nature of religion with a moral objective while science is looking at material things. Example: Alcohol is banned because it damages moral fiber of society. Quran has not listed Liver Failure as even the by-product.
Sir please let me clarify whether i m right or wrong. Scientist can read scripture either for deductive and inductive reasoning or to develop theory at abstract level, however his theory will not be called valid until and unless empirical evidences are not provided. Science will only acknowledge the empirical evidences.
.
I'll make a video about it.
Yes. You're right
Scientific law means a thing thats proven by experiment.
Sorry sir,
Your example is not correct because disease treatment is not the fundamental topic of theology, it is the topic of medical science. The topic of physical science is matter and energy, whether in this world or any other world.
Politics and economics are social sciences and social sciences deal with the society.
Religion also deals with the society. Politics and economics are not just like physical size having same formula same definition and same laws.
The term exploitation is related to ethics and not to science.
First Like ☝️
Please read the books of imam al ghazali or molana wahiduddin khan both of them are great scholars.
I have read them both
May I say, "What a nonese".
Science has no concern with these questions. Because science deals with the questions of how and what. Above mentioned questions are related with the question of why. Question of why is out of the domain of science.
Hamza Hassan From Minhaj university
سائنس کا تو میدان ہی نہیں ہے (why کیوں )سائنس کا میدان ہے what,How آپ نے ایک جملہ بولا ہے ۔کیا آپ کی تھی تھیوری یہ سمجھا سکتی ہیں کہ کس طرح ہو رہی ہیں اور کیوں ہو رہی ہیں ،اس اپنے جملے کو بیان کر دیں شکریہ
Jo log is baat ko yaqeen kartay hain
"Allah kayenat kaa khaliq hai or wirf wahi ibaadat kay layeq hai"
Unhain yeh baat samajhni paregi kay
"Science us kayenaat ko parhnay, samajhnya, ghaur or fikr karnay ki zubaan hai"
"Zubaan" say muraad tareeqa, zariya "ilm"
Baut asaan si baat hai
Science ka concept Allah kay banaye nizam kay khilaaf kaisay ho sakta hai
Yeh tabhi ho sakta hai
Jab aapki science ko basis yaa foundation ghalat ho yaa bahut intial stage main ho.
So
In a nutshell
Science amd theology alag ho hi nahin sakti.
Or
Iska proof main Pakistan kay khaas shahar ko saamnay rakh kar de sakta hun.
Bahut asaan lafzon main.
Editor mujhay connect kar saktay hain.
Sir Taimur. Salamoona. I have greatest regard for you and your views. Having said that, I cannot resist saying that the first and the greatest source of Islamic theology is the Holy Quran. But where it is in the Holy Quran that when two atoms of H and one of O combine they form water. Where the Holy Quran has mentioned the uses and misuses of uranium? And do you know why it is mum on these scientific facts? Because it is not a book of science. It only governs the relationship between Almighty Allah and human beings on the one hand and between one human being and another on the other hand. It is a code of laws governing our lives. Zabita Hayat. And has nothing to do with science. Do you know when the Holy Prophet fell ill towards the end of his life and would catch severe fever, what would his family members do to control the fever? Would they start reciting this or that Sura of the Holy Quran to reduce the fever? No. They would take out a piece of cloth, dip it in water and apply that to his body and the fever would decrease. This method is still used as a conventional treatment. What I want to say is that the Holy Quran is a way of life. It has nothing to do with science and other worldly uloom but it also does not restrain us from getting the knowledge of science, business and economics, etc. Before parting with my post I would humbly advice you to concentrate on your speciality and leave theology to the people like Mudoodi, Maulana Muhd Ishaq, Eng M Ali Mirza, Syed Jawad Naqwi and Ghamdi, etc
Critique 4: Scope of Allah's books (Torah to Quran) has been many a times explained by the Almighty and that is to raise the alarm about the Day of Reckoning - period. Allah further endows Law and Hikmat as guidance to those who look for success in the eternal life. Sifting through scripture for scientific or medicinal solutions to human worldly problems (excluding moral challenges) is actually a denigration.
The first argument is wrong on which you are trying to make an agreement between them. Science says alcohol is harmful for your body? Theology says it's bad for the soul. Science has no day of judgment for drinkers while theology does. Its ok or i can tell you why science and theology aren't in agreement and will not be in agreement as both are different in their ends.
Right but both are opposed to its consumption. Hence, the conclusions are the same while the reasoning is obviously different. That is my point. That it is the methods of both that differentiate them. Not their conclusions.
No, I don't agree with your point. Science and theology have different conclusions and different methods and different ends. Science starts from the senses then it focuses on matter and then reaches the laws of nature. Theology starts with Scripture focuses on the soul and reaches God. When we observe things we observe in a rational way through their ends. Suppose there is no end to what will happen with the theology conclusion? Suppose there is no matter what will happen with science conclusions?
Hindu Brahman Nahi Balke .. Pandit, Shastri, Maharaj Ka Lafaz Istemal Karte Hai...
Cheeta cheeta
Prof. Cheeta
Sir, very strange if someone tells that there is an alien head and who will one day destroy earth and will take us to their planet and segregation people basis their work...one might say what crap story... But technically most religion talk same😀 God at the end giving judgement and people getting heaven and hell
Theology/Religion: Answers that can never be questioned.
Philosophy/Science: Questions that can never be answered.
what? which kinda science asks questions which can't be answered?
How? Please elaborate.
As far as I understand, Philosophy questions everything and tries to find answers. It challenges you to think.
Religion asserts answers based on the beliefs and assumptions of a few and feeds on the ignorance of many.
The Scientific method takes on the challenge and tries to find answers based on empirical data, experimentation and observations of all forms. It is still the most reliable way to understand reality.
Also, science doesn't focus on the WHYs of things but HOWs. You can make up a million reasons behind things but only the ones that can be proven are considered.
Good 💯
Dr sahab kya aap ye sabit kar sakte hain k islam me allah aur uske rasool ne mazhabi kitabon me saari duniya dari k uloonm k hone ka dawa kiya hai aur bilkul doosre dunavi uloom hasil karne unpe yaqeen karne aur amal karne se rok dete hain?
Ajeeb baat to ye hai k quran ko aap log hidayat ki bajaye science ki kitab sabit karne pe tule hue hai..kya aap jawab de sakte k duniya k nizaam k qanoon aur cause and effect ka banane wala koi hai..ya phir sab aise hi ban gaya
Theology is not about stock exchange, FTSE 100, dental plaque, cancer treatment, its about who I am, what would happen after death. I think theology and ad science are completely different.
Sir,I think,you are well listen on undisputed issues, while on the topics of dispute I would affect your fan following,there are multiple topics till unraveled by you, which should do in vlogs and podcasts,we wish you to listen on generic topic with respect to socialist viewpoints, religion is a matter of absolutely right and wrong.....
It*
@@MuhammadIlyas-kp2rp you can edit your comments on TH-cam so you don't have to make a separate comment to fix your error. That's something you do on WhatsApp or Twitter
The former's content is largely myth...
what do you mean?
Pehlay ground floor tyaar karen warna gear phir se ulta dorae ga, Sir😏😏
The scope and domains of religious and science are different.
e.g.
The knowledge of nuclear physics has enabled us to produce nuclear weapons.
However, science is unable on advice us on if we should go for its production or use.
Theology and science fine but Islam is a. Deen and does not come under religion. It is. A challenge to religion. Not a personal relation with divine but a divine dictated system. Otherwise we'll done
Sir with due respect, I'd like to tell you that the stages of embryological development of humans were better & easier understood through Quranic verses...
It was said by Keith L. Moore, the greatest embryologist of his time.
It's in his interview. You can check it yourself.
Did u read about the critics of quranic embrylogical verses too? Did u know that K. L Moore wrote 2 different books The Developing Human: Clinically Oriented Embryology and The Developing Human; With Islamic Additions to capture Arab and muslim audience. Did u know his islamic addition wali book is signed by Osama Bin Laden too. Did u know Galen told the same 4 steps in 200 A.D. and Aristole too. and it was present in yahudi texts too. And quranic descrption of embryology has alot of faults in it. I would recommend u watch Urdu Freethinker video on Quran embryology, I guess u would want to see other prespective too. Thanks @mluqman-kq9ny
Another thing u will see that these similarities are made after science discover any knowledge independent of the religion. And this forceful extraction of science from religious text are not special with Holy Quran. You can search for scientific miracles of bible, talmud, geeta and other scriptures. All these religions are very confident in claiming that their text present science. I hope u will think about it a little bit.
@@beastgene7211 I've already thought about them, dear...
Islam isn't 1400y old...
It's from day one...
From the very beginning of mankind.
Hazrat Adam (A. S) was the first human, father of all mankind, first Messenger of Allah S.W.T and First Muslim (one who submits to the will of Allah S.W.T)...
The point is that Talmud and Bible were also revealed from Allah S.W.T on Hazrat Moosa(A. S) and Hazrat Esa (A. S)...
They definitely contain some part that is original but there's a lot of changes made into these books...
Quran is unique in this aspect that from day one, it's not only preserved by writing but also by memorization.
And please listen that interview, Keith L Moore himself accepts that Quran helped him organize the knowledge in better way. And he also says that this book cannot be written by a man.
Forceful extraction?
Not my friend.
The truth is truth no matter you accept it or not. It follows the path that is straight...
Straight to success in both the worlds.
May Allah S.W.T bless you with guidance towards the truth.
تیمور رحمان ۔۔۔کو سوشلزم ، تایخ اور فلاسفی پر کافی سنا ہے ۔۔۔بہت اچھی اپروچ اور وژن سے بات کرتا ہے ۔۔۔۔لیکن جب مذہبی ٹاپک پر گفتگو کرتا ہے ۔۔۔تو بلکل احمقانہ ۔۔۔طرز استدلال اختیار کرلیتا ہے ۔۔۔۔اس پہلے اسلام مکمل ضابطہ حیات میں بھی ۔۔۔اور اس کلپ میں بھی !!!!
بھائی جان اسلام یا مزہب ۔۔۔کی بنیاد مورالٹی ہے ۔۔۔۔ باقی دوا ، مادہ ، کائنات سب جزیات ہیں ۔۔۔اصل پر بات کیا کرو ۔۔۔۔مورال ویلیوز ۔۔۔اور اس سے جڑے قوانین ۔۔،۔
امید ہے اگلا کلپ اس پر ہوگا ۔۔
👍
Do Daoists also believe that their "scripture", Tao Te Ching came from a divine source? It's probably false however I'm not sure about it.
❤❤❤❤