Hi Jaithep! I hope you’re well. I just want to ask if xt4, fringer adaptor and sigma 18-35 works well interms of autofocus with kids that are running around? But realistically they’re not always running around im just saying when they’re running around and im video recording them. Can you please rate it 1-10? I only shoot to capture family memories and dont shoot professional. I would like to know if its worth to get this body instead of sony a6400/a6600.. i have currently 3 canon mount lenses such sigma 18-35, canon 50mm 1.8 and canon 10-18. Thinking of upgrading my canon 200d.. i hope you can help me. Thank you!
For me, The autofocus system is not as good as Sony but still usable(with some custom adjustment in the focus setting menu) In my opinion The sony autofocus and stabilization are better in your shooting situation but I’ve never tried to use the A6600 with the canon adapter yet. For the native lenses the sony’s focus system is so good. Fuji has a better color production and the film simulation is fantastic. It can shoot 4k 60p at 10 bits with just a little bit crop. The recording bitrates is higher than SonyA6600. Hope this help :)
If you are filming kids running around, Fuji might be better. Or maybe get the A7C (only downside is 8 bit video). Problem with Sony apsc is the poor rolling shutter performance. Your kids will look like jello. For slow scenes it's still ok. I also upgraded from my 200D to a Fuji X-T4 using Fringer and Sigma 18-35 as my main gear. But these days I only use manual focus. I'm also experimenting with using Viltrox speedbooster. After the 1.29x crop fix in 4k60p, the Fuji behaves like a M43 camera (crop factor 1.94x, after speedboosting 1.37x). The Sigma 18-35 will behave like a 25-48mm full frame equivalent. Autofocus is unusable with speedbooster though.
![[TH] VCT Masters Shanghai Playoffs DAY 2 // PRX vs G2 | EDG vs TH](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/T5j2XVcDFs0/mqdefault.jpg)
Wow, great behind the scenes work. The lighting is on my point and the transitions are smooth. I liked your video and subscribed to your channel!
Hi Jaithep! I hope you’re well. I just want to ask if xt4, fringer adaptor and sigma 18-35 works well interms of autofocus with kids that are running around? But realistically they’re not always running around im just saying when they’re running around and im video recording them. Can you please rate it 1-10? I only shoot to capture family memories and dont shoot professional. I would like to know if its worth to get this body instead of sony a6400/a6600.. i have currently 3 canon mount lenses such sigma 18-35, canon 50mm 1.8 and canon 10-18. Thinking of upgrading my canon 200d.. i hope you can help me. Thank you!
For me, The autofocus system is not as good as Sony but still usable(with some custom adjustment in the focus setting menu)
In my opinion The sony autofocus and stabilization are better in your shooting situation but I’ve never tried to use the A6600 with the canon adapter yet. For the native lenses the sony’s focus system is so good.
Fuji has a better color production and the film simulation is fantastic. It can shoot 4k 60p at 10 bits with just a little bit crop. The recording bitrates is higher than SonyA6600.
Hope this help :)
@@kongadlibs awww yes your thoughts really helped me! Thank you so muchhh!!! God bless
If you are filming kids running around, Fuji might be better. Or maybe get the A7C (only downside is 8 bit video). Problem with Sony apsc is the poor rolling shutter performance. Your kids will look like jello. For slow scenes it's still ok.
I also upgraded from my 200D to a Fuji X-T4 using Fringer and Sigma 18-35 as my main gear. But these days I only use manual focus. I'm also experimenting with using Viltrox speedbooster. After the 1.29x crop fix in 4k60p, the Fuji behaves like a M43 camera (crop factor 1.94x, after speedboosting 1.37x). The Sigma 18-35 will behave like a 25-48mm full frame equivalent. Autofocus is unusable with speedbooster though.