Seerah of Prophet Muhammad 97 - Maria the Copt & Death of Ibrahim ~ Dr. Yasir Qadhi | 19th Nov 2014

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 1 ต.ค. 2024
  • The final child that our Prophet salla Allahu alayhi wa sallam was blessed with was Ibrahim. Ibrahim only lived for a year and a half, and passed away in the arms of the Prophet.
    In this video, Shaykh Dr. Yasir Qadhi covers the the 8-10th year of Hijrah and the death of his son Ibrahim. Also covered are the topics of:
    -Maria the Coptic (Maria al-Qibtiyya) who was gifted to the Prophet (pbuh) by Juraih ibn Meena (Cyrus of Alexandria), the Patriarch from Egypt, as a custom of that time
    -Death of Ibrahim, the son of Prophet (pbuh)
    -Traditions and customs of previous generations such as slavery and multiple wives (ie, Multiple wives of Abraham, Moses, David, Solomon in the bible)
    -Concept of prisoners of war (POW) in Islam
    It is imperative and necessary to discuss these topics in today's information age and the Internet era within an Islamic framework. Join Dr. Yasir Qadhi as he kicks off a frank discussion in the confinement of an Islamic environment.
    Join Shaykh Dr. Yasir Qadhi in this interesting and sorrowful lecture to listen to the story of Mariya the Copt, mother of Ibrahim, and the life and death of Ibrahim, and the theological controversy surrounding him.
    Watch the entire series here: • Seerah of Prophet Muha...
    Study the biography of the single greatest human being that ever walked the surface of this earth, whom Allah sent as a Mercy to Mankind.
    This lecture was recorded on 19th November 2014

ความคิดเห็น • 433

  • @ZahirulAlomShohan
    @ZahirulAlomShohan 9 ปีที่แล้ว +139

    One of the most difficult topic to digest from the Serrah, I agree with shaykh that these issues should be cleared among Muslims but what frightened me the most is that 90% Muslims are not aware of these issues and when they will hear it from a islamphobe their iman will be shaken! I know some who said I'll not be a Muslim if it is true. May Allah guide us and help us to strengthen our Imaan Ameen...

    • @farzanaafrosefaria2891
      @farzanaafrosefaria2891 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Zahirul Alom Shohan can u please explain me about this matter ..

    • @revolution7058
      @revolution7058 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Zahirul Alom Shohan very true and dont blame 90% muslims it is BS of our brainwashed molvis who dont allow questioning and any thing against against prophet Pbuh will be a punishable offence

    • @revolution7058
      @revolution7058 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      So you dont do this anymore meaning we are denying Quran, no?

    • @afia9641
      @afia9641 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Let me ask you something, in the entire video, did he deny the fact that Muhammad NEVER got married to Maria Al Qibtiya??? We know the fact that she was a concubine and bore him a son (Ibrahim) without Nikha. And since Muhammad's actions are considered to be followed by muslims as "sunnah" till end of times, muslims cant say keeping concubines is haram.

    • @fajarmangadan2476
      @fajarmangadan2476 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Zahirul Alom Shohan get a life dude

  • @AntiZionist101
    @AntiZionist101 5 ปีที่แล้ว +68

    I think Yasir Qadhi is a great scholar. All these young over zealous Dawah TH-camrs who say he is not a scholar are foolish. They are more busy "refuting" people instead of gaining knowledge.

    • @zionisthindurepublican7989
      @zionisthindurepublican7989 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Agreed and I always all those TH-camr mullahs to give their Asnaad ie education or academic background to make those illogical erroneous judgments ... I never hear back

    • @sarahflowers2003
      @sarahflowers2003 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Muhammad Kiru anyone who advocates for this corrupt and misguided scholar is either Shia, lustful or just plain brainless!!! Or an undercover agent or non Muslim if the shoe fits😈😈😈

  • @thereality815
    @thereality815 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    FREE FREE PALASTINE❤

  • @k.acharmy3826
    @k.acharmy3826 3 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    AlhamdulilLah Friday 7th October 2021. I am tempted to slow it down now that I am nearly finishing the whole Seerah. How beneficial and enjoying learning these important matters of our Deen.
    Jazakum-ul-Lah Khairan 💓

  • @abubakr8232
    @abubakr8232 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Episode 97 Notes:
    Important Events in the Personal life of the Prophet SAW
    - Mariyya Bint Sham’un RA
    The Prophet SAW was gifted Mariyya RA by Al Muqawqis, the governor of Alexandria, alongside her sister Sirin Bint Sham’un. These two girls were Christian and they were gifted to the church by their nobleman father. Both sisters were exceedingly beautiful. Sirin was a concubine for Hassan Ibn Thabit RA and bore him one son.
    Mariyya RA was a concubine for the Prophet SAW and later on, she converted to Islam. Mariyya RA never become one of the Ummahatul Mumineen because the Prophet SAW never married her. However, In 8 AH Maria RA bore the Prophet SAW one son, who was Ibrahim RA and in doing so she became Umm Walad. This essentially meant that she was given special rights, one of which includes her being freed upon the Prophet SAWs demise. After the Prophet SAW passed away, she lived for only a few years and then passed away in the Khilafah of Umar RA. Umar RA led her Janazah and buried her in Jannat Al Baqi.
    - Death of Ibrahim RA
    Ibrahim RA had a wetnurse and lived for less than 18 months. The Prophet SAW upon finding out that Ibrahim RA was ill, visited Maria RA and he held Ibrahim RA, in his hands and cried. The Prophet SAW crying shocked one of the Sahabah RA who was present. The Prophet SAW responded to this Sahabi RA, that “The eyes cry and heart is sad but, we only say what pleases Allah SWT”. Ibrahim RA passed away in 10 AH and he performed Salaat Al Janazah for him. Ibrahim RA was buried in Jannat Al Baqi. When Ibrahim RA died, there was a solar eclipse which caused the people to state that, the sun is even bereaved at the demise of Ibrahim RA. Upon hearing this, the Prophet SAW held a sermon telling the people that, the solar eclipse is completely unrelated to any man’s demise.
    Fun Trivia fact: According to the Bible, Prophet Solomon had 1000 wives/concubines and that the Prophet David had 700.
    Fun Trivia fact: Slaves cannot become eunuchs in Islam
    Fun Trivia fact: There were rumours about Maria RA that she was being visited by Mabur. So the Prophet SAW sent Ali RA to investigate this. Ali RA found out that Mabur was a eunuch and thus the rumours were false.
    Fun Trivia fact: Aisha RA and Hafsa RA were very jealous of Maria RA’s beauty.
    ==========================================================
    Disclaimer for my Notes of Sheikh Yasir Qadhi’s Seerah of the Prophet Muhammad Sallallahu Alaihi Wasallam Series:
    Assalamualaikum Warahmatullahi Wabarakatuh, these are my notes on Sheikh Yasir Qadhi’s Seerah series.
    Please note: I HIGHLY recommend that you all watch YQ’s Seerah series, as I DON’T cover every single detail the Sheikh mentions. I made these notes primarily for myself but, decided my fellow brothers and sisters may benefit from them too. I no doubt will have made mistakes in my notes. All the good in these notes is from Allah SWT and all the mistakes are from myself. But, I was very meticulous and tried my best to make sure everything is accurate as the Sheikh mentions it.
    You also will see I have added “Fun Trivia facts” under each of my notes. These FTFs are information YQ said that was off topic or not necessary to include in my notes for the episode. But, they were still worth mentioning hence the inclusion as FTFs. FTFs aren’t always HAPPY pieces of information. Sometimes they are very sad trivia. I just want to say that FTF is the phrase I used for them all collectively when making the notes.
    One thing I wanted to do but am too lazy to do is, maybe someone could take the FTFs from under each “Episode” and make an Islamic reminder/information IG/TikTok account and post them daily or something. Could be a great form of Sadaqah Jaariyah.
    Please keep me in your Duas and ask Allah SWT to forgive all our sins during this blessed month and beyond! Ameen

  • @mustaphasowe5927
    @mustaphasowe5927 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Mashallah we love our prophet SAW. Nothing strange in this episode. Remember whatever He did was Allah's will.

  • @manofihsan8300
    @manofihsan8300 9 ปีที่แล้ว +60

    I'm glad the sheikh dealt with this topic because this story may cause problems for some believers who don't understand the context.

    • @manofihsan8300
      @manofihsan8300 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Salaaam

    • @mohsinrehman3026
      @mohsinrehman3026 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I wish to be the slave of Muhammad

    • @alicrdn
      @alicrdn 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      what is the context here in having kid with a slave who was not prophets wife?

    • @mohsinrehman3026
      @mohsinrehman3026 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@alicrdn do you even read Quran?

    • @mr.kaplan7840
      @mr.kaplan7840 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sudarshan Chatterjee You’re pussy you can’t say it to anyone’s face. Jesus wasn’t white btw.

  • @saleena5655
    @saleena5655 6 ปีที่แล้ว +50

    When I heard of this story, I was so confused and conflicted. But i think the main thing to take away from the concubine stories- is that they were ‘morally permissible’ back then. It was a different place and time- one and a half thousand years ago. I’m sure there are things that are ‘normal’ now, that in a thousand years time, will be shocking to people.

    • @afia9641
      @afia9641 5 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      @saleena Yasmin, if that is the case, then Muhammad shouldnt have said his actions (sunnah) should be followed till end of times. He himself kept concubines, didnt he know that wont be acceptable in future???

    • @issy02tubez
      @issy02tubez 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @M J are u dumb, it didn't mention anything about rape there.

    • @HK-ic2pu
      @HK-ic2pu 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @M J dude , i immediately read the surah after reading this comment , i've seen no word "rape" or something like that rather it talks about marriage ...... why are u lying ?

    • @afia9641
      @afia9641 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @M J , the translation doesn't say word " rape" but the verse 4:34 basically says sex is allowed with POWs (women captured in war).

    • @sudarshanchatterjee6911
      @sudarshanchatterjee6911 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@afia9641 which is basically rape. If u capture women in war and have sex with them its not only rape, but also war crime. Muhammad was a bloody criminal and should be remembered in the history with hitler

  • @mohd.yousufali3952
    @mohd.yousufali3952 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    When there is authentic version from Imam Bukhari that it happened due to having honey, then why should we accept the other version which is controversial?
    Professor Yousuf
    Sydney

    • @iplaygames7288
      @iplaygames7288 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Exactly my question also I don't have a problem if it happened or no but if there is an authentic narration confirming it happened due to honey then we should go for that one,,,,

  • @mamoonarandhawa1287
    @mamoonarandhawa1287 6 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Asslam o Alaykum,
    May Allah Pak reward you for your efforts of spreading knowledge. This is first time I have heard that Surah Atahreem's verses were about this story. Previously, all the studies of tafseer I have done (including the tafseer of surah Atahreem done by brother Nauman Ali Khan) described the event of Prophet (S) swearing about not eating honey. May Allah grant us clarity in knowledge and ability understand His wisdom.

    • @jesan733
      @jesan733 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Honey is clearly metaphorical.

    • @tafri961
      @tafri961 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Behnchod, tum ko Maria ki jagah ana chaiye tha .. tb pta chale Kitna Ganda Dhanda hy.. kisi orat ko bech na or khari na ..

  • @alispokenenglish
    @alispokenenglish 5 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Alhamdulillah.
    ZasakAllah.
    What shaik said is 100% right.
    Our prophet (pbuh) was a human but the best human in the world.

    • @alispokenenglish
      @alispokenenglish 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @M J it's easy to blame someone. First you should know Prophet Muhammad's (pbuh) life and understand the Quran. Then you have to say.

    • @afzalurrahaman8604
      @afzalurrahaman8604 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      . @ ডুড, হি ওয়াজ সেন্ট বাই গড এট দ্যাট টাইম টু কনফ্রন্ট দ্য রেপিষ্টস লাইক সুদর্শন চ্যাটার্জী গোমূত্রখোর

    • @sudarshanchatterjee6911
      @sudarshanchatterjee6911 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@afzalurrahaman8604 আমি কি খাই না খাই সেটা লইয়া হাদিস নাই, বাট তোর খানকিরপোলা নবী যে মাগী চোদদো এটার হাদিস আছে নডিরপোলার ইসলামের মায়রে সকাল বিকাল চুদি

    • @md.awwalmuhtady6625
      @md.awwalmuhtady6625 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@sudarshanchatterjee6911 ঐ হিন্দু, তোমার ধর্ম non-abrahamic।
      so সেটার মধ্যে সীমাবদ্ধ। তোমার মতো মুখ দিয়ে গোবর বের না করে European রা হাদিস আর কুরাআন অনেক গবেষণা করছে। তোমরা হিন্দুরা কি করছো! না করছো আলোচনা না করছো গবেষণা। শুধু করে বেড়িয়েছো মুখ নষ্ট।

  • @alialfarook04
    @alialfarook04 8 ปีที่แล้ว +44

    Alhamdoulillah...the analysis has increased by love for Prophet PBUH.

    • @fajarmangadan2476
      @fajarmangadan2476 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      In 33:50 quran,apart from slaves mohd was allowed to have sex with his cousins also...is that too without marrying them???pls comment
      coz it was also said in 33:50 side by side with having sex with slaves without marraige.

    • @alial-farook2658
      @alial-farook2658 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +Fa-j 00 subhanallah

    • @sawabking8841
      @sawabking8841 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      alhamdu lillah

    • @decendantofkhan1736
      @decendantofkhan1736 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +Fa-j 00 go and read tafsir ibn kasir

    • @fajarmangadan2476
      @fajarmangadan2476 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      Affan Khan ??

  • @skywalker477
    @skywalker477 9 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    It was really helpful and very very useful and i learn so many things from this lecture Jazakallaho khair , please give us more and more such lecture .

    • @afia9641
      @afia9641 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Let me ask you something, in the entire video, did he deny the fact that Muhammad NEVER got married to Maria Al Qibtiya??? We know the fact that she was a concubine and bore him a son (Ibrahim) without Nikha. And since Muhammad's actions are considered to be followed by muslims as "sunnah" till end of times, muslims cant say keeping concubines is haram.

    • @HK-ic2pu
      @HK-ic2pu 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@afia9641 did u respond like this to all the positive comments ?

  • @wassezafer926
    @wassezafer926 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    AK/BAF my dear Ustaad Dr. Qadhi. This is Allah's mercy upon all of us. Ma Shaa Allah what an amazing person you are. May Allah swt reward you and us maximum returns. Ameen

  • @AbdullahPunctureWale-II
    @AbdullahPunctureWale-II 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Once again, I dont understand... Why people make things so complicated... Whoever criticizes they should relax and think.... This world got rid of slavery due to ISLAM.... Probably this is the only religion insisted on freeing slaves as a salvation from sins... !!! Regarding Hasfa (RA) Incident, its just quite understandable.. she getting upset... Nevertheless, Our Nabi (SWS) has more right to seek his share of pleasure, as Allah bestowed upon him.... I love him more than every... May my mom and dad be fidayed on him.... Allahu akbar....

    • @abdoolcaderfarhan443
      @abdoolcaderfarhan443 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah .. relax.. and we should follow the path of our prophet... Lol 😂... Then what is definition of fornication or adultery and did prophet allow nikah mutah ...😎.. how many lives are fuck up in Islamic country caught having sex... Which is which.. if we follow the Sunnah of prophet .... This should not be illegal.. period...

    • @jesan733
      @jesan733 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      The British forced the muslims countries to abolish slavery, actually. They were the last ones in the world to do so.

    • @shakil150
      @shakil150 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jesan733 you liar your countrys brutal slavery history is well documented in your country's history book.

    • @jesan733
      @jesan733 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@shakil150 could you explain how your comment shows that I'm a liar? Again, the British forced the muslim countries to abolish slavery.

  • @adbtqi
    @adbtqi 9 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Dr.Haitham al Haddad said that the story about Maria and hafsa is weak ie not authentic

  • @mustaphasowe5927
    @mustaphasowe5927 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    The Seerah is helping me a lot to assimilate better the quran content.

  • @anfalhussain7190
    @anfalhussain7190 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    One of the best seerah series in English language

  • @rabiatusodangi6592
    @rabiatusodangi6592 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Jazakallahu khair Sheikh Yasir, I'm gaining lots of knowledge from the seerah.
    But just to set the record straight,
    In Nigeria where I live, Bokoharam are not abducting and abusing only Christians but Muslims as well. May the Almighty Allah punish them.

  • @ssam007
    @ssam007 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Very nice explanation. So much clarified

  • @BestonAb
    @BestonAb 9 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    How do we know that some of these stories from the Seerah aren't fabricated or exaggerated? I'm not trying to whitewash anything but, If I'm not mistaken, the only book that Allah (swt) has promised to preserve is the Qur'an. We accuse Christians of corrupting their religious texts. How can we be sure Muslims haven't done the same somewhere down the road?

    • @marcusarkane
      @marcusarkane 9 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Thats the science of Hadeeth preservation, Chain of narrators, reliability of narrators.
      Most of hitory is recorded by people hundreds of years after the incident, Hadith is the first verified historic account ever.

    • @huzaifahkat2772
      @huzaifahkat2772 9 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      The stories are narrated the same way the Qur'an and hadeeth are narrated, with chains of narrators. Therefore to determine which stories are genuine and which are not, one has to examine the chain of narrators. There are many fields of study in Islamic tradition to distinguish trustworthy narrators apart from those who are not. There's ilm rijaal (science of men) where every narrators background is recorded, so we know who narrates the story, there's jarh wa ta'deel (i'm no sure what the literal translation for the words are) where one determines the trustworthiness of the narrators, there's muhaqqiqeen, the people who goes into deep study of those two fields to extract the trustworthy information from the many narrations that we have. However, unlike the science of hadeeth, some weak narrations are included in the seerah with some conditions (e.g. authenticity is not too weak, fiqh cannot be derived from it etc.)
      The seerah books that we can find at the average bookstore here mostly follow those guidelines (provided they are written by muslims). And in this particular lecture series , Sheiks Yasir did inform us whenever he tells the story from a weak chain, strong chain, sahih bukhari, unknown source etc. And whenever the story orginated from saheeh narrations, sheikh often mentions the fiqh and ahkaam benefits that we can derive from it. For weak narrations, he simply mention it for the sake of continuity of the storyline.

    • @yoservs
      @yoservs 9 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      just be sure that you're not selective on what you like or dislike. we may not like many things of the seerah based on modern day criteria, eg slavery or polygyny, concubines, etc, but it doesn't mean there were different perspectives of these issues in the past. these were normal practices of the arabs of the day, as well as the prophets (AS) that went before. w.r.t. to the importance of hadith, remember the process of the salaah is not explained in the Qur'an, all that fiqh comes from interpretation of hadith.

    • @BestonAb
      @BestonAb 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      marcusarkane Huzaifah Kat, Saaid R
      Great responses and info guys. I understand better now, I just have to learn how they combine a Hadith from one source with other Ahadith in order to fill in the gaps and corroborate the story. I think the seerah is usually put together by combining various sources in order to give a complete picture. 

    • @21972012145525
      @21972012145525 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      Salam ale kum, this is a very good (and legit) question! Please take the time to watch these three lectures from Yasir Qadhi. Mashallah, they were really informative and really helped me out and understand Isnad, Ijaza, authenticity, and Bukhari.
      th-cam.com/video/usOOYuu5TKs/w-d-xo.html
      th-cam.com/video/zEnDHniHQLM/w-d-xo.html
      th-cam.com/video/OTD6t3pfx4E/w-d-xo.html

  • @jamieammar6131
    @jamieammar6131 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    In the Islamic world, there were two types of slaves. When you say Mamluk, they were one type. Fair skinned, often Muslim. Most of them were prisoners of war or conquest. They were treated better. They became Kings, Janissaries. The second type who were of darker skin. Central and western African. They were treated badly. Not as Bad as the US but bad enough. They led the Zanj revolt during the Abbasid caliphate. And most of them were caught and sold by slave dealers in Africa.
    Even during the rule of the Mamluks, which was 14th Century, a physician named Ibn al Akfani wrote a book about how to buy slaves from the market and how to examine them. It mentions that the slaves were sold in the markets of Cairo, buck naked. You can give that a read. "Purchasing a Slave in Fourteenth-Century Cairo: Ibn al-Akfānī's Book of Observation and Inspection in the Examination of Slaves."

    • @Muwahid999
      @Muwahid999 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What matters is the saying of Allah and his Messenger Prophet Peace be upon him . Islam condemns racism. Although few people engage in such sinful behaviour .

    • @Muwahid999
      @Muwahid999 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      And btw , i know that critics bring up some hadiths and misinterpret them to insinuate they condone racism (correct interpretation : after knowing full context makes things clear)

    • @Muwahid999
      @Muwahid999 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Kindly have a conversation about this with Muslim Lantern . He will give you satisfactory answers.

    • @Muwahid999
      @Muwahid999 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Last sermon of Prophet Peace be upon him is enough to condemn racism.

    • @jamieammar6131
      @jamieammar6131 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Muwahid999 What is a Muslim lantern haha. I'm not talking about religion, it's history.

  •  6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I am still learning n I hope Allah will give me the higher understanding manner behind all of this. Insyaallah

  • @mahmudmalik5883
    @mahmudmalik5883 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    The story of Prophet's son reminding me the incident where one of the renowned scholars death in Bangladesh. The time he died there happened an earthquake at the same time.People were saying that this happened because of the scholars death then after sometimes this story was shared by someone and people understood their mistake.

  • @Didisayhi
    @Didisayhi 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    Hi Jew here.. I love your lectures!!! You are so open minded!!!

    • @Farhan_in_Delhi
      @Farhan_in_Delhi 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Consider islam, my brother 😊😊

    • @Didisayhi
      @Didisayhi 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Farhan_in_Delhi why?

    • @peterjohnninotiania6499
      @peterjohnninotiania6499 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Didisayhi study other religions first before deciding to convert.

    • @mazumdar2379
      @mazumdar2379 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@peterjohnninotiania6499 well other religions are filled with idols

    • @peterjohnninotiania6499
      @peterjohnninotiania6499 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@mazumdar2379 ?? So what is the connection ?

  • @ahmedelhawary8207
    @ahmedelhawary8207 9 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    May ALLAH bless you Imam, I am one of your millions online students who follow your amazing knowledge series.
    Forgive my English, i am from Egypt country of Maria :)...
    Two Questions Please
    1- How come some dare to guess the Prophet's son might was gona be a prophet if he to grow up when it was set very clear that Prophet Muhammad is the last one ?
    2- The guessing of Maria turned a Muslim while the lifetime of prophet then by the second she did she is no more a slave and so prophet turned the relation to official marriage ? - you taught us it is not allowed to have a Muslim milkyaqeen - ?

    • @a981R
      @a981R 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      As-salamu Alaikum. As for your first question, I would say that Allah said there would be no Prophet after Muhammad because he knew that Ibrahim would die as a baby, and that some people guessed that IF Allah had chose for Ibrahim to live, he would have been a Prophet. Since he didn't live, and therefor didn't become a Prophet, they have technically not rejected the Seal of Prophethood. Of course, all assumptions of "if this had happened, then that would have happened", is 'Ilm al-Ghaib, and only Allah knows for sure. As for your second question, I am not sure, and I am curious as well. Perhaps it is Haram for a milk-yameen to be a Muslimah, but not an Umm al-Walad?

    • @jesan733
      @jesan733 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@shafqatishan437 gifted or simply sold. With "war" being defined very loosely. The usual method should rather be called "raid". E.g. small rural African villages were raided by slave traders to capture young girls and teens in order to eventually sell them in slave markets for muslim elites.

  • @misakeemarine136
    @misakeemarine136 9 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Salaam aleikum brother Yasir ,
    A lot of muslims including myself are confused as to how the sahaba could have physical relations with the captured women when Islam does not even allow looking at any woman. Also can you please elaborate on the relationship between Prophet saws and Maria , am unable to understand the basis of the relationship.

    • @a981R
      @a981R 9 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      As-salamu Alaikum. It is Haram for a Muslim to even look at a woman, only if the woman is not a relative, wife, or a milk-yameen, i.e., a concubine. The relationship between the Prophet and Maria was that of an owner and his concubine, therefor any physical relations between the Prophet and Maria, or any Muslim man and his concubine, are completely Halal. Of course, in this time and age, the whole institution of slavery is illegal. and this is affirmed by pretty much every Muslim scholar I have heard of.

    • @misakeemarine136
      @misakeemarine136 9 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      a981R jazakallah brother for your explanation , i have researched in the 3 weeks since i posted my comment and am of the conclusion that if Allah makes it Halal we accept it and if he says anything is Haraam we do not accept it.This was the most humane way of treating captives of war instead of jail . These women were brought into society . There are many things which Allah says is Haraam for example alcohol and we accept it , today we know the health risk with alcohol. Conclusion Allah is most wise and knows what is best for us.

    • @a981R
      @a981R 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Misakee Marine Al-hamdu lillah; a very wise conclusion.

    • @afia9641
      @afia9641 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Misakee Marine, Let me ask you something, do you really think that was most human way of treating captives of war? Keep them in your home (instead of jail as you said) and have SEX with them??? Why do you think having SEX with those captive women was allowed? If a man gives woman a shelter (panah) , is it mandatory to have sex with her???

    • @tayyababatool8201
      @tayyababatool8201 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@afia9641 H.muhammad had a son with maria

  • @adilmirza7324
    @adilmirza7324 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Alhamdullilah. Shiek is incredible in addressing such issues. And he is right that nothing is better than truth when we are being bombarded by islamophobes.
    I just realized that :
    Most people find this problematic because they cannot make out the difference between zina and concubine.
    Most people understand zina as any sex outside of marriage. And when they hear about the concubine, for them it is like zina.
    So i think it will help immensely if we just define zina more clearly in the light of concubines. And state the differences between zina and concubines.

  • @bullseye9723
    @bullseye9723 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    what yasir qadhi is saying is wrong the hadith he is quoting from is weak hadith!!!.......here is the sahi hadith regarding that issue that is in sahi bhukari:
    Narrated `Aisha:
    The Prophet (ﷺ) used to stay (for a period) in the house of Zainab bint Jahsh (one of the wives of the Prophet ) and he used to drink honey in her house. Hafsa and I decided that when the Prophet (ﷺ) entered upon either of us, she would say, "I smell in you the bad smell of Maghafir (a bad smelling raisin). Have you eaten Maghafir?" When he entered upon one of us, she said that to him. He replied (to her), "No, but I have drunk honey in the house of Zainab bint Jahsh, and I will never drink it again." Then the following verse was revealed: 'O Prophet ! Why do you ban (for you) that which Allah has made lawful for you?. ..(up to) If you two (wives of the Prophet (ﷺ) turn in repentance to Allah.' (66.1-4) The two were `Aisha and Hafsa And also the Statement of Allah: 'And (Remember) when the Prophet (ﷺ) disclosed a matter in confidence to one of his wives!' (66.3) i.e., his saying, "But I have drunk honey." Hisham said: It also meant his saying, "I will not drink anymore, and I have taken an oath, so do not inform anybody of that."(Sahih al-Bukhari 6691)..!!! what is more sahii than sahi bukhari!!!
    he heavly depends upon bin ishaq who is criticised and rejected by majority of the scholars in isla becoz bin ishaq contains chain of narrators who are weak in memeory and doesnt have proper authentic chain of narrators!! and bin ishaq uses narrators who are rejected by bhukhari and muslim!!! thats why anti-islamic people use bin ishaq books and insult our islam!!! pls dont get decieved by such stories!!! and i am not saying yasir qadhi a bad scholar.. what i am saying he depends upon bin ishaq who is rehect by majority fo scholars and the reason is given above: and you can as normal think how we get so much of personal detalis after 300 years!!!
    what yasir qadhi is saying totally wrong and the stroy doen't even exist in any of the 6 authentic books in islam!!!you can watch this video: th-cam.com/video/JNBu5tHbJ5o/w-d-xo.html
    ---------------------------*&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&--------

    • @azhaniaorgena6941
      @azhaniaorgena6941 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      That's so stupid. In fact, it proves that Islam is truly a cult of Muhammad. To think that Allah is always sending perfectly timed convenient revelations to please Muhammad. Think about this, Allah found it serious enough to send a revelation to tell Muhammad its ok to drink honey. Yet Allah didn't think slavery is evil enough for him to even send a single verse to condemn or abolish slavery? That is some crazy shit that can only be believed by people in a cult.

    • @jesan733
      @jesan733 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ant Man, have you ever heard of metaphors? Honey is clearly a metaphor, and it's so obvious that it's in use today in everyday English language. It makes no sense to have this huge fight over actual honey, and what would be the purpose of the real hadith concerning Maria if it wasn't true? But the bad optics were recognized and a metaphorical version was created and graded sahihi.

  • @hadisuabubakar9530
    @hadisuabubakar9530 7 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Sheikh THANK YOU for letting the world to know that BOKO HARAM Is Haram

  • @fearlessmindsetfamily5269
    @fearlessmindsetfamily5269 5 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Subhanallah, reading old comments and asking question about slavery at time of our prophets s.a.w back then they were allowed. As Muslim we should have that Yaqeen! Right now we are not allowed, Alhamdulillah the first time I heard about Maria, including war captives, I was only 14years of age and Alhamdulillah never questioned because I had a sheikh like sheikh Yasir Qadhi explained and that was enough for me!
    If we make questions everything in terms of our deen too much, then our mind sheytan can whisper more questions! ALLAH knows the best! And Our Prophet S.A.W warned as too much questions!
    ALLAH knows the best

    • @sudarshanchatterjee6911
      @sudarshanchatterjee6911 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Cant u just not be honest with urself and ask more question whether this muhammad dude was actually a prophet or not?

    • @maganhassan2627
      @maganhassan2627 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think it's fine to ask questions but having doubts & judge something just because it doesn't make sense to you that's a different issue I think this is important when it comes to islam & prophet muhammad (peace be upon him)

    • @Muwahid999
      @Muwahid999 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@sudarshanchatterjee6911 You need proofs of Prophethood we've got many

    • @Muwahid999
      @Muwahid999 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@sudarshanchatterjee6911 goto Muslim Lantern for proofs

    • @Muwahid999
      @Muwahid999 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@sudarshanchatterjee6911 Also "Many Prophets one message " channel for proofs

  • @kebbaceesay168
    @kebbaceesay168 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Sensitive topic Mashaa’Allah! May Allah reward you for the lectures, specially this one !
    We have to understand, there’s time and place . I love Prophet Muhammad (SAW)

  • @maps1997
    @maps1997 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Subhanallah سُـبْـحَـانَ ٱلله
    اَلْحَمْدُ لِلّٰهِAlhamdulillah
    اللّٰهُ أَكْبَر‎AllahuAkbar
    لَا إِلَٰهَ إِلَّا ٱللهْ. Laa ilaaha illallaah
    4 words Allah loves the most
    مَا شَاءَ ٱللَّٰهُ ‎مَا شَاءَ ٱللَّٰهُ ‎مَا شَاءَ ٱللَّٰهُ ‎

  • @abdullahlakay8448
    @abdullahlakay8448 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    May Allah reward Sheikh Yasir

  • @Rafay7969
    @Rafay7969 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Sabr is when you control your tongue and your actions, not your emotions

  • @Herman47
    @Herman47 9 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Mr. Qadhi, would you ever accept an adult human being as a gift?
    Muhammad gave Sirin to someone else. Is it moral to give another human as a gift to someone else?
    Do you think Muhammad's other wives were unhappy when Muhammad committed adultery with his sex slave, Maria?
    Do you think your own mother would like being someone else's sex slave? If not, why do you think the concubines of Ali, Omar, Muhammad and other Muslims wanted to be sex slaves?

    • @hylianlegends
      @hylianlegends 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      You didn't listen to the lecture

    • @fajarmangadan2476
      @fajarmangadan2476 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      hylianlegends​ I did! Its full of bullshit and Yasir trying to sugar coat Mohd's hypocracies and immoral activities..simple as that.whats the big deal.

    • @hylianlegends
      @hylianlegends 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      ok

    • @fajarmangadan2476
      @fajarmangadan2476 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      decendant of Khan as long you being a Muslim i dont need to bother or wonder .

  • @feistymind4915
    @feistymind4915 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    27:00 rumours about maria and the servant mabur
    44:00 when ppl thought the sun is crying cuz of the death of ibrahim
    54:21 tafseer verses from sura tahrim

  • @baharhaider390
    @baharhaider390 9 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Slavery is unlawful (1) in the absence of the Caliph of the Muslims AND (2) unless it results from captives following a lawful war. Even so, there was always the alternative to {let the captives go free, either with or without any ransom} (47:4). Furthermore, the Ottoman Caliphate had declared - long before the US Abolition - that it prohibited slavery in its realm. Further preliminary remarks before addressing the questions: It should be clear that Islam raised the status of slaves higher than that of free men in unislamic societies even by modern standards. The author of _The House of Saud_, an American journalist, recounts how the staff and management of the New York Waldorf-Astoria hotel were horrified that King Faysal in an early US visit had not only allowed his black servant into the state dining room but had seated him at his very table - a "white-only" table in a "white-only" room! They had no idea that even slaves in Islam had to be FED and CLOTHED with the same food and clothing as their owner as the Prophet upon him peace, had stipulated in his "last pilgrimage" speech: "And your slaves! see that you feed them such food as you eat yourselves and dress them with what you yourself wear. And if they commit a mistake which you are not inclined to forgive then sell them, for they are the servants of Allah and are not to be tormented!" In another hadith he said, upon him blessings and peace: "Be kind to slaves as to your own children...and those that say their prayers are your brethren." A contemporary commentator said:
    "The masters were obliged not to put slaves under hardship; slaves were not to be tortured, abused or treated unjustly. They could marry among themselves - with their master's permission - or with free men or women! They could appear as witnesses and participate with free men in all affairs. Many of them were appointed as governors, commanders of army and administrators. In the eyes of Islam, a pious slave has precedence over an impious free man." Al-Tabataba'i, Tafsir (16:338-358).
    What ignorant times we live in, in which a nation that used a legally-enforceable concept of "white-only" since its inception and then went on to use it for two centuries, now crusades against Islam and the rest of the world over self-proclaimed civilizational values. Islam restored dignity to slaves and enhanced their social status both by ancient and modern standards. Islam made no distinction between a slave or a free man, all were treated with equality. It was this fact that attracted non-Muslim slaves to Islam in droves. As someone said, it is sad to see that those who never cease to be vociferous in their unjust criticism of Islam remain blind to this principle of equality when even in this age there are countries where laws are made that discriminate against the vast majority of population to keep them in practical servitude.

    • @jamilamohamed444
      @jamilamohamed444 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      bahar haider These are lies which were spread by the hypocrites who were always there then and now. Since Aysha , the Scholar among women have told if Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) would have concealed any verse it would not be more the verse about Zaynab because Allah exposed all the errors of his prophet as a lesson to his followers. So those incidents more than what has been confirmed in the Quran told by Tabari was nothing but extra stories , because Tabari (Iran) liked to record everything he heard like Ibn Kathir even from the Israliayat stories which the authenticity was not confirmed

    • @MohsinAbbaas
      @MohsinAbbaas 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      +jamila mohamed so Imam Jarir At-Tabari was a hypocrite!? what a load of bullshit!? He was a great Sunni Scholar of Fiqh (Islamic Law & Sciences) and also a renowned Mufassir! Basically you're in denial of the Truth.

    • @SaadiaAliKhan908
      @SaadiaAliKhan908 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      +Mohsin Abbaas Tareekh at-Tabari was a voluminous text compiled by Imam Ibn Jarir at-Tabari (may Allah be pleased with him). Imam at-Tabari followed the classic methodology of early Islamic historians, a process which differed greatly from modern day historical writers. Islamic historians would simply compile all the known narrations about a certain event, regardless of how authentic or reliable each of those narrations were. They would copy the Isnads (chains of transmitters) into their books, in order that the Muhaditheen (scholars of Hadith) could determine which narration was Sahih/Hasan (authentic/good) and which was Dhaeef (weak) or even Mawdoo (fabricated). In other words, the historians compiled the narrations, and the Muhaditheen authenticated them.Therefore, based on the above, we find that Tareekh at-Tabari is simply a collection of narrations on certain events; some of these narrations are accurate, whereas others are not. The authenticity of each narration depends on the Isnad (chain of transmitters): if the narration was transmitted by reliable narrators, then it would be accepted as valid, but if it was transmitted by unreliable people, then the narration was to be disregarded. As such, we find that it is ignorant of the enemies of Islam that they assume that we Sunnis accept every narration in Tareekh at-Tabari as valid, when in fact this is not the case nor has any Sunni scholar ever accepted this-not even Imam at-Tabari himself! Imam at-Tabari clearly says in the introduction of his book that the narrations found in his book are only as good as the people who narrate them. The compiler of the book does not view all of the narrations as authentic. Tabari says in a disclaimer in the introduction of his book:
      I shall likewise mention those (narrators) who came after them, giving additional information about them. I do this so that it can be clarified whose transmission (of traditions) is praised and whose information is transmitted, whose transmission is to be rejected and whose transmission is to be disregarded…The reader should know that with respect to all I have mentioned and made it a condition to set down in this book of mine, I rely upon traditions and reports which have been transmitted and which I attribute to their transmitters. I rely only very rarely upon (my own) rationality and internal thought processes. For no knowledge of the history of men of the past and of recent men and events is attainable by those who were not able to observe them and did not live in their time, except through information and transmission produced by informants and transmitters. This knowledge cannot be brought out by reason or produced by internal thought processes. This book of mine may contain some information mentioned by me on the authority of certain men of the past, which the reader may disapprove of and the listener may find detestable, because he can find nothing sound and no real meaning in it. In such cases, he should know that it is not my fault that such information comes to him, but the fault of someone who transmitted it to me. I have merely reported it as it was reported to me.(Tareekh at-Tabari, Vol.1, Introduction)
      To conclude, Ibn Katheer said:
      In these volumes, he [Tabari] reported the various narrations as they were transmitted and by whom. His discussion is a mixed bag of valuable and worthless, sound and unsound information. This is in keeping with the custom of many Hadith scholars who merely report the information they have on a subject and make no distinction between what is sound and what is weak.(Ibn Katheer, al-Bidayah wa al-Nihayah, Vol.5, p.208)

  • @omartechnologies
    @omartechnologies 9 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Dr. ***** , You're amazingly cool! And indeed nothing awkward about it at all.

    • @afia9641
      @afia9641 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Let me ask you something, in the entire video, did he deny the fact that Muhammad NEVER got married to Maria Al Qibtiya??? We know the fact that she was a concubine and bore him a son (Ibrahim) without Nikha. And since Muhammad's actions are considered to be followed by muslims as "sunnah" till end of times, muslims cant say keeping concubines is haram.

    • @HK-ic2pu
      @HK-ic2pu 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ​@@afia9641 the sunnah has been authentified after the dead of the Prophet Muhammadh S.A.W and not in the course of his life , the sunnah is based on hadith and in this episode the Quran wasn't complete , revelations still descending on earth . so basically scholars have made haram to have a sexual intercouse without marriage after that all the informations about islam has been completed . Thats all i have and if u don't want to believe cuz of this , that's not my problem .

  • @Blackviking11
    @Blackviking11 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    salam alikom good job but but 1..maria was muslim before she came too profet mohamed . 2... the mamlok in egypt was killd av how ? was that the kalifa ? 3.. surat al -tahrim came becuseeee ? allah a3lam

    • @afia9641
      @afia9641 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Let me ask you something, in the entire video, did he deny the fact that Muhammad NEVER got married to Maria Al Qibtiya??? We know the fact that she was a concubine and bore him a son (Ibrahim) without Nikha. And since Muhammad's actions are considered to be followed by muslims as "sunnah" till end of times, muslims cant say keeping concubines is haram.

  • @yasirshowka7107
    @yasirshowka7107 9 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    i was waiting for this video thank you so much and may allah reward you for sharing it.

    • @afia9641
      @afia9641 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Let me ask you something, in the entire video, did he deny the fact that Muhammad NEVER got married to Maria Al Qibtiya??? We know the fact that she was a concubine and bore him a son (Ibrahim) without Nikha. And since Muhammad's actions are considered to be followed by muslims as "sunnah" till end of times, muslims cant say keeping concubines is haram.

    • @sadiasaeed8012
      @sadiasaeed8012 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Capital letters please:Allah.

    • @Muwahid999
      @Muwahid999 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@afia9641 I see you've spammed this many times here... i will try to res-pond here.

    • @Muwahid999
      @Muwahid999 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) did not marry Mariyah al-Qibtiyyah, rather she was a concubine who was given to him by al-Muqawqis, the ruler of Egypt. That took place after the treaty of al-Hudaybiyah. Mariyah al-Qibtiyyah was a Christian, then she became Muslim (may Allaah be pleased with her).
      Islam permits intimacy with wife or concubine. . It's not debatable . Whatever Allah commands is moral. Secondly , concubines were taken on both sides . In wars if one side uses nuclear weapons for example , it becomes necessity to use on other side as well

    • @afia9641
      @afia9641 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Muwahid999 its not spamming. I brought the same question up but to different people

  • @Bubble-Clinic-Organics
    @Bubble-Clinic-Organics 9 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Thank you.

  • @fizashaikh4240
    @fizashaikh4240 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Alhumdulillah, Jazakumullaha khair brother.

  • @BKAYS
    @BKAYS ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Subhanallah ❤

  • @sohailchaudhry4820
    @sohailchaudhry4820 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Just wondering why Allah couldn't outlaw slavery. Strange.

  • @fahadiit9144
    @fahadiit9144 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    The verse was about honey

  • @technicallokaya6726
    @technicallokaya6726 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Who is watching this today (2020/2021)

    • @yiemz5723
      @yiemz5723 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Me

    • @Sum-5
      @Sum-5 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Me

    • @umairkhan-cj9gj
      @umairkhan-cj9gj 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I m Watching in 2024

  • @sawabking8841
    @sawabking8841 6 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    JazakAllah Yasir sahib. I have shared this video with many muslims. MashaAllah I can say that most have left Islam after watching this. We have been fed a sugar coated version of Islam all our lives. The reality was bitter. Good to know people are finding out the truth about our beloved prophet.

    • @zah1238
      @zah1238 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Allah is Free of Needs, we need Allah and Islam is The right way to worship Allah. Prophet Muhammad pbuh is The Best of all Allah's Creation living and dead.

    • @sudarshanchatterjee6911
      @sudarshanchatterjee6911 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Good

  • @PassingWayfarer
    @PassingWayfarer 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    The story that Shaykh is narrating about Maria is weaker compared to the honey story, which is authentic.
    "The opening verses of Sūrat al-Tahrim describe an incident in which the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, prohibited himself from something in order to please his wives. The classical commentators provide two opinions: one is strong and authentic, and the other is weaker and provokes controversy.
    It has been authentically narrated on the authority of Aisha, may Allah be pleased with her, that the Prophet prohibited himself from drinking honey to please his wives. Aisha and Hafsa were upset that the Prophet was spending more time with his wife Zainab on account of a honey drink she would serve him, so they secretly agreed to pretend to be offended by the odor. The Prophet did not want to offend his wives, so he swore an oath never to drink it again. Allah revealed the verses telling the Prophet not to prohibit what is lawful.
    Aisha reported: The Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, would spend time with his wife Zainab bint Jahsh and he would drink a concoction of honey. Hafsa and I agreed that whomever the Prophet visited first, we would say, “I notice a strong odor of mimosa gum on you.” The Prophet visited one of them and she said this to him, so the Prophet said:
    I have taken a honey drink at Zainab’s house and I will not do it again.
    The verse was revealed:
    Why do you forbid yourself from what Allah has made lawful for you? (66:1)
    Source: Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim 1474, Grade:Sahih
    The authenticity of this narration is agreed upon according to Al-Bukhari and Muslim. Al-Bukhari included it in his explanation of Sūrat al-Taḥrīm. Moreover, Aisha was the direct witness about whom the verses speak, so she would know best what really happened.
    An alternative explanation of the passage has been narrated by others. In this version, the Prophet prohibits himself from being intimate with his concubine wife to please his other wives. In particular, it is alleged that Hafsa became upset when the Prophet was intimate with Maria the Copt in her house and on her bed, saying:
    O Messenger of Allah, in my house and on my bed?
    Source: Tafsīr al-Ṭabarī 66:1
    This narration comes on the authority of Zaid ibn Aslam who was from the third generation and not a witness to the events in question. Hence, Ibn Hajar rules that this narrations’s chain of authorities is incomplete (mursal) in Fatḥ al-Bārī 9/288. For this reason, the explanation was not universally agreed upon by the classical commentators.
    Al-Qurtubi mentions first the story of Aisha followed by narrations that include Maria, then he says:
    The most correct of these opinions is the first of them, and the weaker of them are the others.
    Source: Tafsīr al-Qurṭubī 66:1
    In other words, the authentic explanation is the one given by Aisha and the stories that include Maria are weak by comparison.
    Ibn Al-Arabi concludes:
    Indeed, the only authentic narration is that it was about honey, that the Prophet drank it with Zainab, and Aisha and Hafsa pretended to be offended by it. There occurred what occurred and the Prophet made an oath never to drink it again. He confided that to his wife and the verse was revealed regarding all of them.
    Source: Aḥkām al-Qur’ān 66:1
    In sum, the story about the dispute between Hafsa, Maria, and the Prophet does not have a strong basis in Islam. It is part of the apocryphal traditions that are of varying and questionable degrees of authenticity. Rather, the strongest explanation of the passage, passed down by the direct witness Aisha through an unbroken chain of authorities, is that the verses were revealed about a honey drink.
    Success comes from Allah, and Allah knows best" (By Abu Amina Elias)

    • @azhaniaorgena6941
      @azhaniaorgena6941 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      You got to have a chicken brain to really believe that. So Allah found it important to send a revelation all the way down to let Muhammad know its ok to drink honey? Yet Allah didn't find it important to send even a single verse to abolish slavery or at least condemn it? That thing in your head is called a brain, it is very powerful...use it.

    • @atif439
      @atif439 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ameen

  • @daliarana7112
    @daliarana7112 7 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Why didn't he just marry Maria? What was the reason of why he didn't marry her? Why did he need to have Maria, when he had many wives? Why couldn't he have just waited for Hafsa to come back? Also, why did he need Maria as a "slave", why didn't he free her?

    • @afia9641
      @afia9641 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      +Dalia Rana, good questions....muslim men will come up with all type of justifications in answer to your questions....but to me, none of their explanation ever made sense. This so called scholar is also trying to sugar coat Muhammd's brutal treatment towards women.

    • @MyBlackhawk007
      @MyBlackhawk007 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @M J He still could have set them free and could have kept his hands to himself. The fact Mariah was a domestic workers and he took advantage of her sexually was sickening because the issue that is happening now in the middle east is that domestic workers are being raped and used as slaves. A lot of Muslim men especially Arabs are imitating Mohammad's predatory behaviour. Also this Sheikh is a liar, the Arab slave trade was just as evil as the Atlantic slave trade. The Arabs used to castrate the men and turned the women into sex slaves. The slave women were humiliated and weren't allowed to cover their breasts, this was done to make sure they wouldn't be confused with free women. Very sickening

    • @shasal1623
      @shasal1623 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@MyBlackhawk007
      Prophet Muhammed peace be upon was trying to enforce all sections of society.
      Prophet accepted Maria Tibtiyya publicly that how we know the story.
      And have a son called Ibrahim named after prophet Ibrahim pbuh.
      Everyone knows this publicly.
      The concept of marriage in Islam is different.
      Islam doesn't say women is the property of husband for life.
      It's not ,Men and women are living for the purpose given by Allah.
      So they marry each other to help one another to live for the purpose of life.
      If one's partner is a disbeliever,He/she can try to make them and if they won't help in faith they can divorce.
      About marrying slaves and prisoners of war.
      At that time it is very common to take random and prisoners of war.
      Or even slavery.
      Prophet pbuh did was to step by step reducing the damage of it and eventually abolishing it.
      Freed the slaves.
      Allow the companions to take prisoners as wives only if they agree.
      And then later reduced marriage limited just 4 person and equally distributing wealth over them.
      Marriage for us is to help one another and not just for sexuality.

    • @Princess-sk6kc
      @Princess-sk6kc 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Maria wasn’t even his only slave he had so many of them. Some black, some Arab, some Roman

    • @shakil150
      @shakil150 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@MyBlackhawk007 Please give the reference or evidence regarding your comments. Don't misguide anyone through such kind of loose comments without providing any reference or evidence

  • @Trademm
    @Trademm 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I just checked my blood sugar , I need to consult doctor now. Too much of sugar

  • @mohammedmustafa9677
    @mohammedmustafa9677 9 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Is the concept of right hand possess mentioned in several verses of Quran abrogated by this modern secular world today?if yes,i need that verse frm quran.if u can't prove anything from Quran,then the concept of right hand possess is applicable even today,each time jihad is waged

    • @parkerflop
      @parkerflop 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      There are prerequisites to it. This is detailed in the fiqh books.

    • @parkerflop
      @parkerflop 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Show an authentic hadith they they were killed in front of Safiya's eyes.
      Nothing wrong with marrying young. Aisha RA had a wonderful happy marriage, went on to be a community later, repented for her involvement in the wars afterwards and was a well known teacher.
      He spent a good deal, if not the vast majority of his wealth on the poor.

    • @decendantofkhan1736
      @decendantofkhan1736 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Mustafa M Saffiya ( ra ) were killed because those were deserved to be killed

  • @decendantofkhan1736
    @decendantofkhan1736 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Hey if Maria ( ra ) is to be with prophet muhmaad ( sws ) in Jannah that will be again more good

    • @EthioKenya
      @EthioKenya 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Not muhmmad its Muhammad s.a.w. What are your sources of this seraa to disapprove this sheikh?

    • @sudarshanchatterjee6911
      @sudarshanchatterjee6911 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Maria was not muslim

    • @mohsinrehman3026
      @mohsinrehman3026 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@sudarshanchatterjee6911 her namaz Janaza was done by Omar. So she accepted Islam at some point in her life. We simply don't know at what point

  • @sabrinayounisaden6413
    @sabrinayounisaden6413 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    jazaakaAllahu

  • @badarashfaq3134
    @badarashfaq3134 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Adulatory is gunah e kabeerah. Having sex with slave is for sure is an act of adulatory. If prophets of old testament were having concubines is not an excuse for Mohammed as they were also doing against the will of God. Sheikh sahib must be kwoing about the biblical account but being a Muslim scholar he is forced to be hypocrite on some issues though i give him due respect in many aspects. He tries to speak the truth to his possible extent.

    • @invinciblebeast7073
      @invinciblebeast7073 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Adulatory is indeed a gunah e kabeerah but what Allah has made halal is halal and nothing can make it haraam! If Allah has made sex with milkulyameen halal then it indeed is halal and there is nothing haraam in it nor it is considered to be zina. And if the prophets before him had sex with their concubines then too it would have been halal as a prophet is masoom and he doesn't go against the will of Allah S.W.T and Allah doesn't appoint any Tom Dick or Harry to be a propthet as he is Aalim Al Gaib and He S.W.T knows who can spread His message to the masses! So even prophets before our Prophet PBUH were not sinful IF they had concubines and had sex with them as they can't go against the will of Allah!

  • @ahmedw5
    @ahmedw5 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Yasir Qadhi made a mistake. The death of Ibrahim is in fact mentioned to be on the same day as the eclipse in Sahih Muslim aswell:
    Ziyad b. 'Ilaqa reported:
    I heard Mughira b. Shu'ba saying that the sun eclipsed during the lifetime of the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) *on the day when Ibrahim died* . Upon this the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) said: Verily the sun and the moon are the two signs among the signs of Allah. They do not eclipse on account of the death of anyone or on account of the birth of anyone. So when you see them, supplicate Allah, and observe prayer till it is over. [Sahih Muslim Book 4, Hadith 1995]

  • @abudujana13
    @abudujana13 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    JazakAllah khair

  • @khadijabenassou8996
    @khadijabenassou8996 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Yasir Qadi STOP talking.
    Following pagan ahadith books claiming it's from
    Allaah ❤❤❤The Almighty The Creator of all is SHIRK SHIRK SHIRK.
    Allaah ❤❤❤The Almighty The Creator of tells you The Qoraan is FULLY DETAILED by Allaah ❤❤❤The Almighty The Creator of all.
    Why are you ignoring The Word of Allaah ❤❤❤The Almighty The Creator of all.
    It's enough. It's Time.
    Allaah ❤❤❤The Almighty The Creator of all Will INTERVENE.
    Woe to the mouchrekeen.
    Don't believe me...just watch

  • @jamesotis6493
    @jamesotis6493 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    David and Solomon are not prophets according to the Bible. False equivalence

    • @HawkLad
      @HawkLad 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      “Brethren, I may confidently say to you regarding the patriarch David that he both died and was buried, and his tomb is with us to this day. And so, because he was a prophet and knew that God had sworn to him with an oath to seat one of his descendants on his throne, he looked ahead and spoke of the resurrection of the Christ, that He was neither abandoned to Hades, nor did His flesh suffer decay,” (Acts 2:29-31)

    • @Arabian_Abomination
      @Arabian_Abomination 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      David is a prophet but we say that David sinned and then was forgiven after he repented. Where is the God of Muhammad to rebuke him?

  • @fmnishad1
    @fmnishad1 9 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    What is milkyaqeen means?

    • @amuslimguy
      @amuslimguy 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Concubine (literally, "what the right hand possesses").

    • @fmnishad1
      @fmnishad1 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Sorry I can't open the link

  • @Reverse-sg5rn
    @Reverse-sg5rn 9 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    great lecture

    • @afia9641
      @afia9641 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Let me ask you something, in the entire video, did he deny the fact that Muhammad NEVER got married to Maria Al Qibtiya??? We know the fact that she was a concubine and bore him a son (Ibrahim) without Nikha. And since Muhammad's actions are considered to be followed by muslims as "sunnah" till end of times, muslims cant say keeping concubines is haram.

    • @HK-ic2pu
      @HK-ic2pu 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@afia9641 you really have a problem dude

    • @afia9641
      @afia9641 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      ​@@HK-ic2pu , My problem is I USE my OWN brain and think and differentiate between right and wrong . I will NEVER EVER accept having sex with concubines NO MATTER who comes and tells me God allows it. And God has given me that brain which has ability to think and analyze. Unfortunately God doesnt give that BRAIN to everyone

    • @khurramnawab8675
      @khurramnawab8675 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@afia9641 there are some add-on in tafsir ibn khatir where prophet Muhammad giving a proposal to Maria qibtiya to became a free women or his wife, she choose to remain his slave that what I read there, if you need I will provide the details of it

    • @afia9641
      @afia9641 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@khurramnawab8675 Does it make sense to you that a prophet giving an "OPTION" to a woman to be his (sex) salve ??? If Maria wanted to have sex with Muhammad, would u say it was not Muhammad's fault because Maria was the one who wanted it??? If a man is offered and accepts your loved one (sister, daughter) as his slave, would u have any respect for that man???
      Also, the basic tenant of a husband wife relationship is LOYALTY and trust between them. By having multiple partners (so called wives) , what example did Muhammad set as a "ROLE MODEL" for rest of the humanity??
      Instead of reading the stupid books by "so called" scholars, use your brain .

  • @Aalee
    @Aalee 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So does that mean Mariam (ra) had become among the wives of prophet after she converted to Islam ?

  • @1concept
    @1concept 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Jazak Allah khair brother

  • @sharinshafi3344
    @sharinshafi3344 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Shaykh, can you clarify why Allah (swt) also asked Ayisha (R) to repent in Surah Tahrim? It was Hafsa(R) who spilled the bean, right? Then why was Ayisha(R) asked to repent?

  • @NorAidahMokhtar
    @NorAidahMokhtar ปีที่แล้ว

    Dear sheikh, what is ur comment about the concubines of the sultans of the ottoman empire. Is that allowed in Islam during that era?

  • @saleemuddka
    @saleemuddka ปีที่แล้ว

    Only Um-mul-mominin could not marry again; so your logic is not seems correct.

  • @wanderingstar5270
    @wanderingstar5270 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Topic on Islamic concubines: aMeRiCaN sLaVeRy! REEE

  • @iamergashevshahzod
    @iamergashevshahzod 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Alhamdulillah

  • @PURPLEHUMAN-sr8io
    @PURPLEHUMAN-sr8io 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    i don’t understand why it’s a problem for someone!

  • @gohan22411
    @gohan22411 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    part 96 and 97 appear to be the same however part 96 is 1h 30 and this one is 1h13 m. what happened

  • @revolution7058
    @revolution7058 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I have to tell you you did a good job to speak about it as it was doubting me a lot brother

    • @afia9641
      @afia9641 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Let me ask you something, in the entire video, did he deny the fact that Muhammad NEVER got married to Maria Al Qibtiya??? We know the fact that she was a concubine and bore him a son (Ibrahim) without Nikha. And since Muhammad's actions are considered to be followed by muslims as "sunnah" till end of times, muslims cant say keeping concubines is haram.
      Is it moral to have human being given as "gifts"??? if you say it was a common practice in that culture, was Muhammad a common man to follow that practice? Muhammad prohibited propel from many practices which were norm in that time, why didnt he prohibit people from having sex with war captives and having multiple wives???This so called scholar is trying to sugar coat Muhammd's brutal treatment towards women.

    • @HK-ic2pu
      @HK-ic2pu 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@afia9641 no one responded to you and u have waited 4 a whole year , poor boy

    • @AbdullahPunctureWale-II
      @AbdullahPunctureWale-II 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@afia9641 BRUTAL?? You being too biased... The answer is NO... He was perfectly well within the limit set by Allah's hudood.... !!! You should be thankful to allah's mercy that to prove our imaan he is not asking us anything else.... than just follow his words... which seem to be custom made for people like you and me.... both extremes.... If you this is Brutal, today FLESH industry is modern day slavery without any moral standards.... and so do BANKING system... THINK..... THINK... THINK....

    • @afia9641
      @afia9641 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@AbdullahPunctureWale-II , it is definitely brutal to receive a human as a gift and then keep her as sex slave. Maria Al Qibtiya was not Muhammad's wife and bore him a son. Islam even allows muslim men to have sex with captives of war women without nikha. This is called rape.

    • @PassingWayfarer
      @PassingWayfarer 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@afia9641 What a jobless loser! Came back after one year to reply to a comment lol. Get a life and stop obsessing over Islam 😑

  • @FieldMarshalRommel23
    @FieldMarshalRommel23 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Very intersting, you have gained some respect for your religion from me.

  • @rossanovaprincedada9337
    @rossanovaprincedada9337 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    IF YOU OU BRANG THAT SHIT OVER HERE IN USA , YOU DIE !

  • @qathemhajjar7909
    @qathemhajjar7909 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Liar, a son or a daughter that’s not from a wife is not a son or a daughter, do not get inheritance or carry name of father.

    • @DayDreamer1230-n1i
      @DayDreamer1230-n1i 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      he is a faqih and Qadhi(judge of an islamic court) and you are not. You are the liar and he is not.

  • @husenkiky182
    @husenkiky182 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm really confused. And may Allah protect my faith and increase the love for our prophet (pbuh).
    but why is it said that our prophet (pbuh) never touched a women except for her wives? But maria (may Allah bless her) was not a wife?

    • @sumayatamenne2775
      @sumayatamenne2775 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      It was said he never touched someone who was not permissible to him and Maria was, as Allah mentions in the Quran that men are permitted to be with those whom their right hands possess.

    • @jesan733
      @jesan733 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Why are you confused? S-x slavery was a motivational cornerstone for over 1300 years. If you won battle, you get s-x slaves, if you lose battle, you get houris. Win-win, with an extra win for the smart guy who came up with the idea.

  • @hafsanudrath1400
    @hafsanudrath1400 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Assalam u alaikum.. one doubt.. what if she has no child.. then when is a concubine free..

    • @cocojasmine
      @cocojasmine 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You should ask instead why having human being in your possession against their will is allowed? And what kinds of god allows sleeping with slaves against theirs will because they are owned. Keep asking questions and you will be out from islam:)

  • @sadhriel
    @sadhriel 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    I may be ibrahim... or masruh... or imam Mahdi, life is confusing right now... with all these shayateen around us.

    • @sadhriel
      @sadhriel 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Abu lahab - habib
      Umm jamil - khanom
      Uzza - sakib
      Uttba - amin
      Uttayba - yasin
      Fakhita - tanya
      Enemies of Islam and my family names besides.

  • @farhanqureshi2518
    @farhanqureshi2518 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Well what you are saying is not true I always thought this guy was a fitna, now i am sure. He is lying blatantly do your research you'll find it easily that this is a fabricated story that he is explaining like he has seen it himself.

    • @jagoman85
      @jagoman85 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Im noticing the same time and again. Using fabricated hadith ahead of authentic ones. He doesnt even mention the honey hadith

    • @farhanqureshi2518
      @farhanqureshi2518 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@shafqatishan437 yes he's spent years but that doesn't mean he's correct. The narration he is explaining has been refuted by most ulma as incorrect. He is putting it as fact he is saying it's in the quran when it is not. It is in one tafseer of quran which is a highly controversial tafseer that didn't exist until about 800 or so hijri.

    • @jagoman85
      @jagoman85 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ​@@shafqatishan437 Sorry, he did mention the honey hadith, but he said "it didn't fit", in HIS opinion. Other scholars (not just 'internet scholars') say the complete opposite to what he says.
      Furthermore, the version YQ is pushing, has a much weaker chain of narration (does not go back to the Sahaba), whereas the honey hadith comes DIRECTLY from A'ishah
      quran.com/66:1/tafsirs/en-tafisr-ibn-kathir
      quran.com/66:1/tafsirs/en-tafsir-maarif-ul-quran
      quran.com/66:1/tafsirs/171 (The Mariah version)
      He should retract this video, and apologise. It's not an issue of whether you like YQ or not. He is wrong here, and it should be known. Do you not agree?

    • @jesan733
      @jesan733 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jagoman85 nobody knows if Aisha was actually behind this honey version, but even if she was, then perhaps she and fellow companions recognized the bad optics of Muhammad's behavior and decided to tell a metaphorical version. Because the honey version is clearly metaphorical. And even today, women can be called "honey". The real version makes much more sense than the metaphorical version.

    • @jagoman85
      @jagoman85 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jesan733 The "Real" version. How scholarly of you. There's nothing at all to supposed it being metaphorical.

  • @hibafatima6233
    @hibafatima6233 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great lecture

    • @afia9641
      @afia9641 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Let me ask you something, in the entire video, did he deny the fact that Muhammad NEVER got married to Maria Al Qibtiya??? We know the fact that she was a concubine and bore him a son (Ibrahim) without Nikha. And since Muhammad's actions are considered to be followed by muslims as "sunnah" till end of times, muslims cant say keeping concubines is haram.
      Is it moral to have human being given as "gifts"??? if you say it was a common practice in that culture, was Muhammad a common man to follow that practice? Muhammad prohibited propel from many practices which were norm in that time, why didnt he prohibit people from having sex with war captives and having multiple wives???This so called scholar is trying to sugar coat Muhammd's brutal treatment towards women.

  • @nadiasiddiqui8320
    @nadiasiddiqui8320 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    But is it permissible to have a free lady who is not a prison of war to take as wife

    • @NRFP
      @NRFP 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      No but it dipend on situation watch imran hossain najor video

  • @malikimadhabdeutsch9332
    @malikimadhabdeutsch9332 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    23:19 what to do then with them?

  • @Montario226
    @Montario226 9 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Jazakh Allahu khairan brother Yasir.

  • @azmd888
    @azmd888 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    At 20:50, what bokoharam did was haram 😀😀

  • @Mapmap58
    @Mapmap58 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Mary the Copt

  • @daliarana7112
    @daliarana7112 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Question, why is that POW can't be used as slaves in this time since the battle was fought in the name of jihad. What made this time different than before, besides the obvious answer that we do not do that any more. Also you see the POW, (the captives, the women slaves, the concubines, whatever name it is) I don't see why they would be okay with sleeping with same men that killed their family. It doesn't seem logical, and like how is that so many sahaba practiced azl on the female captives of war, when I personally think that many of them would not be open to doing such an act. This obviously implies that I am sayin they are raping them, I AM not accusing them of that. But it just doesn't many sense that many of female captives were open to act of azl by the same soldiers that killed their ppl.

    • @afia9641
      @afia9641 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Muslims cant say they cant have concubines anymore because according to them, all prophet's actions were sunnah and cant be called haram. If it is immoral to practice slavery in current times, polygamy should also be banned because it is immoral too. women should also get equal share in inheritance and woman's testimony should also be considered equal to men, There are many more points, these are just a few

    • @fahadiit9144
      @fahadiit9144 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Al azl wasn't rape there. What happened at banu mustaliq was mutah marriage with the women consent. Just look up that history. None of them were raped

    • @alifarrukh9542
      @alifarrukh9542 15 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Dear Brother, first of all, you opened three different topics in one comment, first one is about Prophet Muhammad and Maria, Second is about slavery and third is about Azl, I cannot answer all three here, only the first one being more sensitive, I would like to answer briefly, the burden of proof is on the critics of Islam that they need to prove that Maria was not wife and was not halal for prophet and they need to prove that Maria wanted to get rid of Prophet. If Maria is halal, then what is wrong to have intimacy with her, secondly, wives of prophet were offcourse human and they had a jealousy factor, and prophet out of irritation said something that he will not look Maria again and its the prophet internal matter, in whatever way someone deals with it.

  • @InNazareth
    @InNazareth 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Dear respected Yasir Qadi you earned my respect for being honest about the event that happened and also being honest with the verse in the Quran but still I am not convinced that it was not a sin. So I hope maybe after few years you will come back and tell us that it was sin.

  • @FarhodiOktam
    @FarhodiOktam 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    mashaAllah

  • @DavonBertoli
    @DavonBertoli 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I strongly disagree with all of this, it has nothing to do with backprojecting God is timeless and his laws should apply to all time at least the basic equality among his humans, so this does not make sense.

  • @muslim9246
    @muslim9246 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    “And whomsoever Allaah wills to guide, He opens his breast to Islam; and whomsoever He wills to send astray, He makes his breast closed and constricted, as if he is climbing up to the sky”
    [al-An’aam 6:125]

  • @nikhatparveen1934
    @nikhatparveen1934 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Jazzak Allah khair sheikh

  • @nazimarohom5274
    @nazimarohom5274 ปีที่แล้ว

    جزاك الله خير شيخ

  • @fathimashanaz4412
    @fathimashanaz4412 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Jazakallah khair Sheikh

  • @rossanovaprincedada9337
    @rossanovaprincedada9337 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    WE RUNNING THE ISLAM HERE IN USA

  • @teddypunu7814
    @teddypunu7814 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That's true that Abraham, Moses, David, Salomon has many wives and even they are prophets they are just human who did sin ... Christian learned the good examples from those prophets and reject the bad ones ... we only follow and worship Jesus who is the true God and true human that never did sins ..... and based on Al Quran itself Isa never did sins while Muhammad was the contrary ... so why follow and make Muhammad a role model instead of Isa ????? 🤔🤔🤔

    • @farkhandaali5270
      @farkhandaali5270 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      May Allah Grant you the true guidance.

    • @HawkLad
      @HawkLad 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It wasn't sin by biblical or islamic standards. Prophet Muhammad is sinless but Jesus and Mary were never "touched by satan" while everyone else in human history was, according to Quran. That doesn't mean Muhammad SAW has committed sin. Look at his prophecies, btw.

  • @nurdan7237
    @nurdan7237 9 ปีที่แล้ว

    turkçe yorumlu yokmu

  • @mazumdar2379
    @mazumdar2379 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    TY

  • @stiryotype4695
    @stiryotype4695 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    you seem to be trying to tell muslims that the prophet was just a human being with human needs. at the same time you are making the argument that he never did anything haram....how does that fit in with him being a normal human being?

    • @afia9641
      @afia9641 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      good quesiton

    • @mohsinrehman3026
      @mohsinrehman3026 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      He never did anything which is haram in Islam. Straight up your facts

    • @runegaming3122
      @runegaming3122 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@mohsinrehman3026 why is it not haram to have sex with your slave girl in your wife's bed? is God that unaware of the feelings of women? how could he allow the prophet to do this AND then threaten ayesha and hafsa with divorce in a verse of the Quran and warn them that Muhammad will get better wives than them who will be virgins when the only thing hafsa did was express her anger to ayesha...just think about what's happening here..it'll all make sense if u think with an open mind

    • @mohsinrehman3026
      @mohsinrehman3026 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@runegaming3122 @@runegaming3122 @runegaming31 ask God why it is not haram to have sex with slave girl in wife's bed. Allah banned these type of Questions in Quran clearly declaring that "he's not justified for his actions/orders to anyone, but everyone has to be justified infront of him for their actions".
      And again having sex with slave woman is halal in Islam so it doesn't matter at whose wife's bed it is happening. It wasn't just hafsa's property it was also Prophet's as well.
      And Prophet has every right to threaten his wives to divorce if they disobay him. It was his wives fault. They were treating Prophet as they're same as regular men and dishonoring Prophet. Which is a big sin in Islam. Allah declared that in Quran that Muhammmad is not just a man but also the most beloved creation and Prophet of him so he won't accept any disrespect for him from any of his wives and Prophet's wives were also demanding luxuries life from Prophet which Prophet didn't accept because he was the role model for everyone (Poor and rich), So Prophet was in every condition to threaten their wives to divorce. Also hafsa told a secret between her and Prophet to Ayesha which was also a sin as i said he wasn't just a normal person he was a Prophet and if Prophet order you to have it as a secret then exposing it to some other person is a sin.
      So both of his wives committed sin which they repent later on. Also if you read bible Ahraham told his son Ishmael to divorce his wives for the same reason as Prophet Muhammad's. So it is compulsory for Prophet's wives to obay him in every way for he's not just a normal man he's also the Prophet of God

    • @runegaming3122
      @runegaming3122 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@mohsinrehman3026 look at the long paragraph you had to type to try to justify this nasty behaviour...you can justify anything with these types of mental gymnastics..stop lying to yourself and see what is actually going on

  • @harissohail8122
    @harissohail8122 ปีที่แล้ว

    17:50

  • @harissohail8122
    @harissohail8122 ปีที่แล้ว

    6:25

  • @formalinhypocrite9756
    @formalinhypocrite9756 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    He speaks so rapidly, Bro, slowly slowly, we want to understand.

    • @korrasmuscles
      @korrasmuscles 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      For a native English speaker...very easy to understand. Maybe get better at English "bro"!