How to implement Linear Regression from scratch with Python

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 14 ต.ค. 2024
  • In the second lesson of the Machine Learning from Scratch course, we will learn how to implement the Linear Regression algorithm.
    You can find the code here: github.com/Ass...
    Previous lesson: • How to implement KNN f...
    Next lesson: • How to implement Logis...
    Welcome to the Machine Learning from Scratch course by AssemblyAI.
    Thanks to libraries like Scikit-learn we can use most ML algorithms with a couple of lines of code. But knowing how these algorithms work inside is very important. Implementing them hands-on is a great way to achieve this.
    And mostly, they are easier than you’d think to implement.
    In this course, we will learn how to implement these 10 algorithms.
    We will quickly go through how the algorithms work and then implement them in Python using the help of NumPy.
    ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ CONNECT ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
    🖥️ Website: www.assemblyai...
    🐦 Twitter: / assemblyai
    🦾 Discord: / discord
    ▶️ Subscribe: www.youtube.co...
    🔥 We're hiring! Check our open roles: www.assemblyai...
    ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
    #MachineLearning #DeepLearning

ความคิดเห็น • 82

  • @Artificial_Intelligence_AI
    @Artificial_Intelligence_AI ปีที่แล้ว +11

    This channel is amazing ❤. This is the type of content a lot of instructors forget to teach you when you’re learning ML but this girl explains everything very well from scratch. Congratulations for your content and I hope to watch more of your videos, you deserve more views for this incredible job.

  • @afizs
    @afizs 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I have used Linear Regression many times, but never implemented from scratch. Thanks for an awesome video. Waiting for the next one.

    • @AssemblyAI
      @AssemblyAI  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That's great to hear Afiz!

  • @tienshinhan8189
    @tienshinhan8189 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I rarely bother commenting because I'm rarely impressed. This video was amazing. I love that you're showing theory and OOP. Usually I see basic definitions and code all in one script.

    • @AssemblyAI
      @AssemblyAI  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Wow, thank you!

  • @bendirval3612
    @bendirval3612 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Wow, that really was from scratch. And the hardest way possible. But it's perfect for teaching python. Thanks!

    • @AssemblyAI
      @AssemblyAI  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You're very welcome :)

  • @GeorgeZoto
    @GeorgeZoto ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Another amazing video! Slight typo in the definition of matrix multiplication and =dw part as well as an omission on the constant 2 (which does not effect calculations much) in the code when you define the gradients but other than that this is beautiful 😃

  • @lamluuuc9384
    @lamluuuc9384 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    I think there is a problem of missing the 2 multiplication in calculating dw, db in the .fit() method:
    dw = (1/n_samples) * np.dot(X.T, (y_pred-y)) * 2
    db = (1/n_samples) * np.sum(y_pred-y) * 2
    If we follow the slides, it's not absolutely wrong but it can affect the learning rate

    • @priyanshumsharma4276
      @priyanshumsharma4276 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No, after derivation, there is no square.

    • @zh7866
      @zh7866 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The comment suggests multiplication with 2 based on derivation rule NOT square

    • @jhicks2306
      @jhicks2306 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Agree with this! Also, thanks, Misra, for the awesome video series.

    • @surajsamal4161
      @surajsamal4161 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@priyanshumsharma4276 he's not talking about the square he's talking about the square which came down cause of derivative

  • @MU_2000
    @MU_2000 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Thank you for this video. Before i wached it i spend a couple of day to understand how to make custome code without frameworks ))

  • @ayo4590
    @ayo4590 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you so much, this video really helped me get started with understanding machine learning algorithms. I would love if you could do a video on how you would modify the algorithm for multivariate linear regression.

  • @KelvinMafurendi
    @KelvinMafurendi 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great explanations indeed. The transition from theory to implementation in Python was awesome!
    Say, is this a good starting point for a beginner in Data Science or I should stick to the out-of-the-box sklearn methods for now?

  • @l4dybu9
    @l4dybu9 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Thank u so much for this video. 💖💖
    It's makes us feel more confident when we know how to do it drom scratch than using libraries ✨

    • @AssemblyAI
      @AssemblyAI  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That's great to hear!

  • @haseebmuhammad5145
    @haseebmuhammad5145 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I was seeking such kind of lectures. Lectures are awesome

  • @markkirby2543
    @markkirby2543 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This is amazing. Thank you so much for all your clear explanations. You really know you stuff, and you make learning this complex material fun and exciting.

  • @kamranzamanni6826
    @kamranzamanni6826 21 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Thanks for making it easy to follow along!

  • @1000marcelo1000
    @1000marcelo1000 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Amazing video! I learned so much from it! Congrats!!!
    Could explain more detailed all of this and show next steps like "where" and "how" this can be implemented further in some scenarios?

  • @luis96xd
    @luis96xd 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Amazing video, I liked the code and the explanations, it was easy to read and understand, thanks! 😁👍👏💯

  • @harry-ce7ub
    @harry-ce7ub 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Do you not need to np.sum() the result of np.dot(x, (y_pred-y)) in dw as well as multiply by 2?

  • @sajinsanthosh9536
    @sajinsanthosh9536 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    followed the tutorial exactly right, but still different. Using trial version. Thank you*

    • @AssemblyAI
      @AssemblyAI  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      You're welcome :)

  • @KumR
    @KumR 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wow... Awesome.. Do you have something like this for Deep learning algo ?

  • @1Rashiid
    @1Rashiid 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

    perfect explanation! Thank you.

  • @srinivasanshanmugam9527
    @srinivasanshanmugam9527 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for this video, May I know , why we need to run in a for loop for 1000 iterations?

  • @mohamedsadeksnoussi8479
    @mohamedsadeksnoussi8479 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The content is really insightful, but for dw and db, should it be (2/n_samples) instead of (1/n_samples) ?

    • @adarshtiwari7395
      @adarshtiwari7395 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      did you figure out why she used the equations without 2 in the video?

    • @mohamedsadeksnoussi8479
      @mohamedsadeksnoussi8479 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Hi@@adarshtiwari7395, unfortunately no. But (2/n_samples) appears to be correct.
      I checked out other resources and all of them used (2/n_samples).
      You can even try it by yourselves, (1/n_samples) doesn't affect the model behavior (performance), but from my point of view, it's incorrect.

    • @prashantkumar7390
      @prashantkumar7390 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@adarshtiwari7395 It doesn't change our actual optimisation problem, I mean when the mean_square_loss is minimised, any scalar*mean_square_loss will be minimised. Hence using 2 or not doesn't make a difference at all.

    • @mohammedabdulhafeezkhan4633
      @mohammedabdulhafeezkhan4633 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@prashantkumar7390 But it is better to use 2 in the equation, even though it's a constant and doesn't affect the outcome in a major way.

    • @prashantkumar7390
      @prashantkumar7390 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@mohammedabdulhafeezkhan4633 it doesn't affect the outcome AT ALL.

  • @compilation_exe3821
    @compilation_exe3821 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    YOU guys are AWWWWESOME

  • @m.bouanane4455
    @m.bouanane4455 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The gradient calculation lacks the multiplication by coefficient 2, I guess.

  • @AndroidoAnd
    @AndroidoAnd 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I am not sure if you copied this code from Patrick Loeber. He has a youtube video with the same code posted years ago. If you did, please give credit to Patrick.
    This is the name of his video: Linear Regression in Python - Machine Learning From Scratch 02 - Python Tutorial

  • @rajesh_ramesh
    @rajesh_ramesh 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    the gradient part actually misses the coefficient 2 in both differentiations (dw, db) and y - y^

  • @LouisDuran
    @LouisDuran 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    WHat check could be added in the case that the model is not converging to the best fit within the n_iters value?

  • @rbodavan8771
    @rbodavan8771 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    how you designed your video templets is awesome.
    but it would be good for learner if you also post it on kaggle notebook and link it each other. sometimes it's happened to me like best to read then watch. let me know your thought

    • @AssemblyAI
      @AssemblyAI  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You can find the code in our github repo. The link is in the description :)

  • @AbuAl7sn1
    @AbuAl7sn1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    thanks lady .. that was easy

  • @parthaguha4705
    @parthaguha4705 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Awesome explanation😇

    • @AssemblyAI
      @AssemblyAI  ปีที่แล้ว

      Glad you liked it!

  • @kreativeworld2073
    @kreativeworld2073 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you so much.
    It really helped me understand the entire concept:)

  • @سعیداحمدی-ل1ث
    @سعیداحمدی-ل1ث 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    ادامه بده دختر کارت عالیه ممنون ازت

  • @2122345able
    @2122345able 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    where is the part where gradient decent is being coded , how the code will know when to stop ?

  • @tiagosilva856
    @tiagosilva856 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Where did you put the "2" of the mathematical formula in dw and db on phyton?

    • @mgreek31
      @mgreek31 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      the 2 is a scaling factor that can be omitted.

    • @tiagosilva856
      @tiagosilva856 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@mgreek31 ty. I understand. But omitting that don't change the performance? M.S.E still be the same if we don't ommite the "2"?

    • @mgreek31
      @mgreek31 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@tiagosilva856 MSE will still be the same. intuitively if you multiply the 2 in the formula it scales the x for all values of x, therefore removing it will affect the whole dataset in the same way as if nothing happened

  • @traagshorts4617
    @traagshorts4617 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    How did you fit the dimensions for the test and weights in the predict function

  • @MahmouudTolba
    @MahmouudTolba 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    your code is clean

  • @MartinHolguin-d3k
    @MartinHolguin-d3k ปีที่แล้ว

    your explanation is amazing and I see how linear regression works however this only works with 1 feature
    and if you want to implement it with more than one it will fail.

  • @surendrakakani7014
    @surendrakakani7014 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have taken input(200 ,1) while executing above program i am getting y_pred as (200,200) can and geting dw shape as (1,200) but dw should be (1,1) right any body explaing is that correct

  • @okefejoseph6825
    @okefejoseph6825 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Is there a way I can get the slide?

  • @gechimmchanel2917
    @gechimmchanel2917 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Has anyone encountered the same situation as me when given a larger dataset with about 4 weights and 200 rows, the result predicts -inf or NaN , anyone have a way to fix this??

    • @gechimmchanel2917
      @gechimmchanel2917 ปีที่แล้ว

      [-inf -inf -inf] -inf
      [-inf -inf -inf] -inf
      [-inf -inf -inf] -inf
      result của weight and bias :))

  • @سعیداحمدی-ل1ث
    @سعیداحمدی-ل1ث 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    لطفا ویدیو های بیشتری بسازید

  • @akifarslan6022
    @akifarslan6022 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Güzel video

  • @shivamdubey4783
    @shivamdubey4783 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    can you plzz explain why we took x.T transpose

    • @0xmatriksh
      @0xmatriksh 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It is because we are doing dot product of two matrices here. So we need two matrices to be in the form of mxn and nxp, that means the number of columns in first matrix should be same as the number of rows in second matrix.
      And here,
      Suppose number of rows of X is n(which is same as y)
      But the n is number of rows for both of them so we transpose X to make n in column to match the n of mxn and nxp(like explained above) to successfully dot product them

  • @alexisadr
    @alexisadr ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you!

  • @omaramil5103
    @omaramil5103 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you ❤

    • @AssemblyAI
      @AssemblyAI  ปีที่แล้ว

      You're welcome 😊

  • @prigithjoseph7018
    @prigithjoseph7018 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi can you please upload, presentation file also

  • @Salma30b
    @Salma30b 2 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Why don't our teachers teach us like this?? Like 15 minutes of this video is all it took to understand hours of lecturing

  • @jinxiong2973
    @jinxiong2973 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    how to improve my attention span , I have good ideas and soft that I tNice tutorialnk up , the problem is putting it down in fruit loops and knowing

  • @ge_song5
    @ge_song5 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    what's her name?

  • @hiteshmistry413
    @hiteshmistry413 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you very much, You made Linear Regression very easy for me. Here is how the linear regression training looks like in action "th-cam.com/video/2QqLl_wpfSo/w-d-xo.html"

  • @timuk2008
    @timuk2008 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    J'(m,b) = [df / dm df/db] ===> m is the w

  • @hannukoistinen5329
    @hannukoistinen5329 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Forget Python!!! It's just fashionable right now. R is much, much better!!!

  • @saideeppandey3788
    @saideeppandey3788 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Pls note x.wtranspose because w is (1,n)