Alva Noe's work (in the tradition of Maurice Merleau-Ponty, James Gibson, John McDowell, etc) is a vital part of one of the two great philosophical revolutions that must take place. Anyone in consciousness studies needs to sit up and listen to this man.
It’s not so much that observable enactive agency is a fair index of ‘understanding’- something presumed to lie inside the head- it’s that ‘understanding’ IS one and the same thing an enaction- all is doing.
![[UNCUT] "บอสณวัฒน์" แฉ! แหล่งซุกเงินแก๊งบอส ขยันผิดที่ไม่กี่ปีก็เข้าคุก l คนดังนั่งเคลียร์ l17ต.ค.67](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/BL56qIfXYZM/mqdefault.jpg)
Alva Noe's work (in the tradition of Maurice Merleau-Ponty, James Gibson, John McDowell, etc) is a vital part of one of the two great philosophical revolutions that must take place. Anyone in consciousness studies needs to sit up and listen to this man.
Gibson and Merleau-Ponty are right. But not McDowell. Alva doesn't subscribe to McDowell's core idea: perception as conceptual.
@@PettruchioL
That is correct. I definitely misspoke years ago when I included him.
Hahaha, why did Prinz posit his leg on the table in this way?
This man never ceases to amaze me. :)
I can't watch anymore. If only there was a way to put a box on the table.
It’s not so much that observable enactive agency is a fair index of ‘understanding’- something presumed to lie inside the head- it’s that ‘understanding’ IS one and the same thing an enaction- all is doing.
Kermit! hahaha