One of my favourite careers, i was so invested in his fights, the collazo fight had me and my mate on the edge of our seats it was that close, his tyzu win was spectacular, his win vs castillio was great, his war vs thaxton was a great fight, only lost against the 2 best of our era and a loss when he should of left it alone. Ricky was a proper kad who was mega exciting to watch. Great career.
@@boxing What?? You made the thumbnail - you made the title right? So, you know what time it is! Your question is funny because it's within seconds - actually probably less than a second in which the decision to watch a video is made. Hence why you make titles and thumbnails to catch people's attention! It's the reason words like 'Brutal' are used so much. But you don't know that right? LMAO But since you want me to spell it out. The pic and title combo is what matter. You got a pic of an older and respectfully a not so healthy looking Ricky Hatton next to a younger one and you put DEAD in the title. A LOT of people are gonna double take cos of that - cos that's how Obit posts look. But this is all news to you right? Also since you brought it up, there a loads of people who don't even watch videos but still comment. Similarly it only takes 3/4 words to gain or lose someone's interest. But here you are with your almost 1 million subbed channel acting like you don;t understand any of this. Clearly - you do! I like your channel, I'm subbed but I've seen you lot go more clickbait of late and you really don't think need to, since the quality of your interviews is generally very high. But if you feel you must , go ahead. But I'm gonna comment and it's good for your engagement, so you don't mind. 🤣
I can honestly say, hand on heart - and while also agreeing with much of your post - I did not include the word 'dead' to get clicks or mislead anyone. In the UK - Northern England specifically - 'dead' is often used as a superlative, eg 'dead good' etc. And the thumbnail is simply a screen grab from the interview itself and a photo from Ricky's IBHOF induction - which is the focal point of the interview. You make many salient arguments but in this one particular case, I protest our innocence.
@@boxing Ha! Well I am happy to give you the benefit of the doubt. Perhaps I was too sensitive - because I have seen a few of your titles recently that were definitely clickbait-ey. I'm from London, UK, so I am aware of the expression. Like I said, your content is really good - one of the few I think is really consistent. And you're doing a job that mainstream media can't, so keep it up! You just don't need to put extra sauce on stuff to get us! If this one wasn't one of those times fair play. Cheers!
One of my favourite careers, i was so invested in his fights, the collazo fight had me and my mate on the edge of our seats it was that close, his tyzu win was spectacular, his win vs castillio was great, his war vs thaxton was a great fight, only lost against the 2 best of our era and a loss when he should of left it alone. Ricky was a proper kad who was mega exciting to watch. Great career.
Ricky did have a rival, Junior Witter, don't know why that fight never happened.
High risk, low reward. There was no bigger Witter fan than me (Danny) back in the day.
Witter would have beaten Hatton imho
The 1st 3 words of title and thumbnail, hmmm. Yoou lot goign for the clickbait championshi innit?
Lol, who is only gonna read the first 3-4 words? Plus what's the issue with the thumbnail?
@@boxing What?? You made the thumbnail - you made the title right? So, you know what time it is! Your question is funny because it's within seconds - actually probably less than a second in which the decision to watch a video is made. Hence why you make titles and thumbnails to catch people's attention! It's the reason words like 'Brutal' are used so much. But you don't know that right? LMAO
But since you want me to spell it out. The pic and title combo is what matter. You got a pic of an older and respectfully a not so healthy looking Ricky Hatton next to a younger one and you put DEAD in the title. A LOT of people are gonna double take cos of that - cos that's how Obit posts look. But this is all news to you right?
Also since you brought it up, there a loads of people who don't even watch videos but still comment. Similarly it only takes 3/4 words to gain or lose someone's interest. But here you are with your almost 1 million subbed channel acting like you don;t understand any of this. Clearly - you do!
I like your channel, I'm subbed but I've seen you lot go more clickbait of late and you really don't think need to, since the quality of your interviews is generally very high. But if you feel you must , go ahead. But I'm gonna comment and it's good for your engagement, so you don't mind.
🤣
I can honestly say, hand on heart - and while also agreeing with much of your post - I did not include the word 'dead' to get clicks or mislead anyone. In the UK - Northern England specifically - 'dead' is often used as a superlative, eg 'dead good' etc. And the thumbnail is simply a screen grab from the interview itself and a photo from Ricky's IBHOF induction - which is the focal point of the interview.
You make many salient arguments but in this one particular case, I protest our innocence.
@@boxing Ha! Well I am happy to give you the benefit of the doubt. Perhaps I was too sensitive - because I have seen a few of your titles recently that were definitely clickbait-ey. I'm from London, UK, so I am aware of the expression. Like I said, your content is really good - one of the few I think is really consistent. And you're doing a job that mainstream media can't, so keep it up! You just don't need to put extra sauce on stuff to get us! If this one wasn't one of those times fair play. Cheers!