Astro 4.10: Accelerating content site development

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 10 ก.ย. 2024
  • Astro 4.10 is one of the biggest releases in Astro's history.
    Here we go over the release's major new features; from ways to achieve more advanced routing, to build performance improvements, and new ways to use environment variables.

ความคิดเห็น • 15

  • @bholmesdev
    @bholmesdev 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    Between container APIs and rewrites, Astro's REALLY looking like the future of servers. So here for it

  • @nested9301
    @nested9301 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Astro makes so much sense that any framework out there

  • @pantium98
    @pantium98 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    astro is all time my favorite framework. it's really good

  • @jungjoo
    @jungjoo 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    wow. container apis very cool. I will migrate all my old rails project with astro

  • @Mind6
    @Mind6 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Big ❤❤❤❤ !!!

  • @Mind6
    @Mind6 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What, you were in Montreal?! Damn, I would have liked to know and be there!!

  • @markokraljevic1590
    @markokraljevic1590 หลายเดือนก่อน

    where is this in docs?

  • @markokraljevic1590
    @markokraljevic1590 หลายเดือนก่อน

    what is his name and github profile?

  • @JustSteveKing
    @JustSteveKing 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Can't to test out Astro with a Laravel project sometime 🔥

    • @amitto-music
      @amitto-music 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Holla!
      No disrespect, but I don't see the point of that combo. Per Astro docs:
      If you try to hydrate an Astro component with a client: modifier, you will get an error.
      Astro components are HTML-only templating components with no client-side runtime...
      So Blade with Livewire is already a superior combo.
      I understand the use of Svelte, React, and Vue with Inertia, it's very powerful and that makes a lot of sense, but Astro/Laravel seems like overkill for no apparent reason except for playing.
      Maybe I'm wrong, I dunno.
      All the best.

    • @JustSteveKing
      @JustSteveKing 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@amitto-music honestly, it's more just to see it be done! It sounds like InertiaJS but better - so I'd love to try it

    • @amitto-music
      @amitto-music 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@JustSteveKing I get it.. Playtime :)
      I tend to think that Astro will be sort of like an alternative to Laravel in the future, that's why I said I don't see it as a combo, since both Laravel and Astro leverage server-rendering first.
      Just some random thoughts :)

    • @furycorp
      @furycorp 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@amitto-music You are somewhat incorrect about Astro being HTML only template components (although that was once more true) -- in current versions you can run SSR sites as well as SSG (static generation) and have a server-side aspect to them and Astro will hydrate components on the client side in whatever framework you like.

    • @amitto-music
      @amitto-music 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@furycorp I just copy/pasted text from their official documentation about being html-only so if I'm wrong, they are too :)