Blockchain Today and Tomorrow (2018)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 25 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 16

  • @gandhirohit
    @gandhirohit ปีที่แล้ว +20

    wtf, why does this have only 600 views? two of the greatest minds right here.

    • @SachinDolta
      @SachinDolta ปีที่แล้ว +2

      It's also posted on other channel where it had many views

    • @lasedreva
      @lasedreva ปีที่แล้ว

      @SachinDolta which channel..I can't find any

  • @respondo
    @respondo ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Brilliance on display 👍

  • @neutron417
    @neutron417 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    timeless discussion

  • @EncarnaciónPeschel
    @EncarnaciónPeschel 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great analysis, thank you! A bit off-topic, but I wanted to ask: My OKX wallet holds some USDT, and I have the seed phrase. (alarm fetch churn bridge exercise tape speak race clerk couch crater letter). How can I transfer them to Binance?

  • @fire17102
    @fire17102 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    26:47 powerful

    • @fire17102
      @fire17102 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      35:19 + leadup

    • @fire17102
      @fire17102 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      1:07:55 irl Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy

  • @jamestan4659
    @jamestan4659 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    @13:55 he just predicted Staking. unbelievably accurate

  • @JacobGriscom
    @JacobGriscom 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Naval betting that AI won't be creative...otherwise, holding up well 6 years in.

    • @oviatabuna
      @oviatabuna 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      AI is actually NOT creative. It's just mixing things together and spewing a new version of them. Creativity is more than that. Naval says this a lot lately as well.

    • @rationaloptimist5747
      @rationaloptimist5747 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@oviatabuna AGI will be creative, though

    • @oviatabuna
      @oviatabuna 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@rationaloptimist5747 do we even know what AGI even means other than "universal explainer"? as David Deutsch describes it??

    • @rationaloptimist5747
      @rationaloptimist5747 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@oviatabuna Well, according to David Deutsch, if there is AGI, it will be a person, meaning a universal explainer, as you said. But that also means that AGI will be creative because a person or a universal explainer is creative.

    • @oviatabuna
      @oviatabuna 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @rationaloptimist5747 I don't disagree. I'm saying we don't know how AGI would look like yet. We're just speculating at this point.
      Don't you think there is a chance that:
      1) it will be so intelligent that we won't even know it exists. Our monkey mind won't be able to comprehend its actions.
      2) Will it ever exist? I mean, having a machine that has so much data that it will understand so much of the known/ unknown universe that it will solve humanities biggest issues?
      I would say there is a decent chance it will NOT happen in our lifetime. So, other than for writing an SF novel, there is no point speculating about its creative potential.