very good for me to know how to use these system designing the system use, thanks again in advancement, thanks the "how-to" is not applicable it is good "how-to" tutoring for it and no cash
Hi, Thanks for the video. How did you select the inductance value as 36uH? Can you please explain? As per my understanding, the inductance value is calculated from the number of turns wound on the core.
Thanks for watching, what part are you referring to, can you timestamp? There is the material properties, there is the SPICE circuit for the excitation and then there is the 3D geometry that all get put together.
I think there are some errors in the loss calculation formula of video 8min20second; For example, PL=118 when B=0.012T, but your table shows 121, there are some wrong data behind, I don't know what the problem is。
Ok thanks for pointing it out. I mean 121 is not that far from 118, but if you find a problem and a solution please share it for future viewers, thanks for watching!
You should probably just take your own notes but they have various presentations on their website like courses.ansys.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/MAXW_GS_2020R2_EN_LE01.pdf
Hi, thank you for posting! Where can I install Ansys Maxwell from? Is Ansys Maxwell a part of Ansys Electronics Desktop or is it a standalone software? Thank you!
No I don't think so, PEMag is very old and basically obsolete I believe. You'll need to manually make the geometry as I show in this tutorial: th-cam.com/video/EXr0lcjaCqI/w-d-xo.htmlsi=ZcwrzWZDNF8tNgs6 Also checkout the playlist in the description for all the videos including one on Q3D
@@CircuitAnalysis yes I did and simulate following your tutorial. Thank you very much for it. I just need to find out why my inductance is higher than Al*n*n. You have any idea what could be? For example, material with 68uh/n2 with 50 turns should be 170uH but simulation is showing around 192uH as I remember.
@@fabioposser2 Well you're in the right ballpark so that's good. To be clear, you have a copper coil and a ferrite core with 68uh/n2? I mean inductors generally have a 10% tolerance so I would say you probably have everything setup correctly but you might be able to fine tune it with a combo of: 1) Check your mesh and try making it finer 2) Make sure you don't have any tiny artifacts of the mesh where the coil is intersecting the core. 3) Try switching up the core material properties and see how it changes, also you could try a non-liner core model like with B-H curve data or something, although that shouldn't really help since you don't need to model any saturation effects.
@@CircuitAnalysis ok, I will try to check the mesh first. I created this material like you teach. It's seems that is considering something around 53,2 turns instead of 50 as I have. If I reduce the 68 is reduce the result also. In the reality the choke have aroun 175uH measured with LCR equipment.
very good for me to know how to use these system designing the system use, thanks again in advancement, thanks the "how-to" is not applicable it is good "how-to" tutoring for it and no cash
Thanks for watching, glad you liked it!
hi thanks for posting how ı can assign copper thickness for coil conductors in transient solution?
Hi, Thanks for the video. How did you select the inductance value as 36uH? Can you please explain? As per my understanding, the inductance value is calculated from the number of turns wound on the core.
Thanks for watching, what part are you referring to, can you timestamp? There is the material properties, there is the SPICE circuit for the excitation and then there is the 3D geometry that all get put together.
I think there are some errors in the loss calculation formula of video 8min20second; For example, PL=118 when B=0.012T, but your table shows 121, there are some wrong data behind, I don't know what the problem is。
Ok thanks for pointing it out. I mean 121 is not that far from 118, but if you find a problem and a solution please share it for future viewers, thanks for watching!
hello, do u have any reference for the simulation ,I would like to refer to this document
You should probably just take your own notes but they have various presentations on their website like courses.ansys.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/MAXW_GS_2020R2_EN_LE01.pdf
Hi, thank you for posting! Where can I install Ansys Maxwell from? Is Ansys Maxwell a part of Ansys Electronics Desktop or is it a standalone software? Thank you!
Yes it is part of the Electronics Desktop. Ansys bought it a while ago and rolled it into their package.
Hello My simulation is showing error. It is saying " In one solid conduction path, at least two external terminals should be specified."
It sounds like you should define a terminal at each end of your conductor. Thanks for watching!
It's possible to export from pemag as 1 coil? To be used on q3d parasitics analysis.
No I don't think so, PEMag is very old and basically obsolete I believe. You'll need to manually make the geometry as I show in this tutorial: th-cam.com/video/EXr0lcjaCqI/w-d-xo.htmlsi=ZcwrzWZDNF8tNgs6
Also checkout the playlist in the description for all the videos including one on Q3D
@@CircuitAnalysis yes I did and simulate following your tutorial.
Thank you very much for it.
I just need to find out why my inductance is higher than Al*n*n. You have any idea what could be?
For example, material with 68uh/n2 with 50 turns should be 170uH but simulation is showing around 192uH as I remember.
@@fabioposser2 Well you're in the right ballpark so that's good. To be clear, you have a copper coil and a ferrite core with 68uh/n2? I mean inductors generally have a 10% tolerance so I would say you probably have everything setup correctly but you might be able to fine tune it with a combo of:
1) Check your mesh and try making it finer
2) Make sure you don't have any tiny artifacts of the mesh where the coil is intersecting the core.
3) Try switching up the core material properties and see how it changes, also you could try a non-liner core model like with B-H curve data or something, although that shouldn't really help since you don't need to model any saturation effects.
@@CircuitAnalysis ok, I will try to check the mesh first.
I created this material like you teach.
It's seems that is considering something around 53,2 turns instead of 50 as I have. If I reduce the 68 is reduce the result also.
In the reality the choke have aroun 175uH measured with LCR equipment.
@@CircuitAnalysis I let the scroll on finest mesh, and also lenght from 0.01 as you suggested to auto. Let's see the outcome soon.
Hi, I need some help in Ansys Electronics for my work, how can I cantact you?
You can ask questions right on this chat, thanks for watching!