It is really interesting hearing about how you 'think' poker in terms of playing this particular scenario many many times to work out your percentages of when to bluff and what influences that decision. I literally play the cards I get each hand in isolation and really don't or wouldn't even consider bluffing in this spot (55) - I would almost always assume with that many callers someone almost certainly has an ace. I should also point out I'm a losing recreational player ($250 in 12 months) exclusively on micro stakes bounty tournaments hehe
I’m going to say he had 55 and maybe 66. 55 makes sense. 3 bet in position, granted he should definitely see bet flop but deep in a 1k he’s probably thinking same thing you are. Scared of the two high cards. You both check to the river and he gets his lucky card.???? Thoughts?
They are gonna bet spades on turn. Spades obviously missed, but they are not gonna have those spade misses now, because they didn't bet. So you want to have spades to unblock their other suits with more air/misses now.
@@mattmachuso1455 Yes. And we don't want that. Blockers are very technical at this level and I dont say I always get them, but this is what I think he meant
What did you think of this episode?
It is really interesting hearing about how you 'think' poker in terms of playing this particular scenario many many times to work out your percentages of when to bluff and what influences that decision.
I literally play the cards I get each hand in isolation and really don't or wouldn't even consider bluffing in this spot (55) - I would almost always assume with that many callers someone almost certainly has an ace.
I should also point out I'm a losing recreational player ($250 in 12 months) exclusively on micro stakes bounty tournaments hehe
Love these videos. Keep 'em coming lex!
Glad you like them!
Thanks bro, that's very helpul.
Glad you liked it!
Love the videos lex
ty!
Why are we not considering 44 in the range in the second hand? Isn’t that well within his calling range multi-way and slow play against Lex?
OFC
They mentioned 44 at least 3 or 4x...
I’m going to say he had 55 and maybe 66. 55 makes sense. 3 bet in position, granted he should definitely see bet flop but deep in a 1k he’s probably thinking same thing you are. Scared of the two high cards. You both check to the river and he gets his lucky card.???? Thoughts?
resonable. i thought its top or mid set and he dont wanna loose costumers
i dont see people 3b 66 55 deep itm as CO. maybe once in 20 spots...
Very interesting
12:18 why look for spades first when you wanna bluff there? I don't get it
They are gonna bet spades on turn. Spades obviously missed, but they are not gonna have those spade misses now, because they didn't bet. So you want to have spades to unblock their other suits with more air/misses now.
@@FizzyToni Because if we hold non spades that missed they hold less non spades that missed?
@@mattmachuso1455 Yes. And we don't want that. Blockers are very technical at this level and I dont say I always get them, but this is what I think he meant
@@FizzyToni Thanks it does make sense now
How did tje 44 hand ended?
lex min 3-bet and opponent called 72o
@@ninovalentijn so he won with pokcet 44 vs pair of 2?
@@ffallenaangel sick huh?
Are you trolling? It's in the video
@@ninovalentijn amazing
hearing the two of you talk poker is like two blind man talking about colors
That doesnt sound like a compliment
i cant understand shit the other guy is saying. i know its good, but the way hes talking is difficult to understand,