Is USB the only option for DSD?

แชร์
ฝัง

ความคิดเห็น • 124

  • @chrislee4946
    @chrislee4946 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I’m an audiophile car audio enthusiast or hobbyist per se but this channel has taught me so much and Paul is excellent at explaining techniques and everything else! Love the channel @psaudio

  • @justanotheryoutubeuser5029
    @justanotheryoutubeuser5029 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hey paul! Just got myself the sprout 100 and just want to thank you and your son scott for bringing it to the market. Came from a marantz pm5005 and the difference was astonishing. I cant stop listening, the depth, detail, unreal power it delivers is just great. I cant afford those high end stuff that others have and this gave me a taste of what high end audio is. Great job really!
    As for the topic, i use usb all the time and have a separate dac (ifi idac2). I love that thing and its just better than anything i ever had (that not saying a lot as im poor lol). Anyway, you guys at ps audio rock! Never stop doing what your doing.

    • @ggrotz4863
      @ggrotz4863 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Right there with you Just. Lovin' the Sprout

  • @markverheijden3016
    @markverheijden3016 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This is the most clear explaination I heard. Thnx.

  • @garygray3834
    @garygray3834 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Another great video 👍 thx Paul

  • @mvsrpharma
    @mvsrpharma 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks Paul

  • @PebblesChan
    @PebblesChan 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ps Audio should send I2S using USB Type C connectors so you can’t plug them in upside down.
    Also, if you send substitute a DSD bitstream in lieu of video signals using Alt DP Mode, you could also add simultaneous USB bi-directional functionality.
    Just a thought.

  • @mp3o
    @mp3o 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    You observed that USB is the "worst sounding" of the digital transfer options. Surely poor sound quality would be a function of the hardware/firmware/software of the sending device, rather than the connection medium. Digital protocols (including USB, HDMI, AES/EBU, S/PDIF, etc.) just ship bits from point A to point B. As long as the bits themselves are OK, the ports and cables are "innocent bystanders".

  • @gstanley75
    @gstanley75 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great discussion. Can you do a part 2 and talk about transport of DSD over a network?

    • @joeygsaudiochannel3972
      @joeygsaudiochannel3972 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I'm doing exactly that that with my Sony/PS Audio rig over Ethernet Cables and HDMI I2S Cables. I have to ways to access true DSD files and play them back "Native" DSD. I can use my Sony's remote control (pain in the ass but it works) or Audirvana.

  • @entity279
    @entity279 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Denafrips also supports DSD via I2S on their DACs
    But there are (sadly) only a few DACs and even fewer transports which support I2S

    • @allansh828
      @allansh828 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      entity279 Do you have any PCIe add-in card to have I2S on PC?

    • @entity279
      @entity279 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@allansh828 Nope. I only a CD transport which does I2S at the moment
      I tend to avoid PCs as much as possible for audio

    • @luisrodrigonunezolguin7038
      @luisrodrigonunezolguin7038 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Fat Rat One question: I have a Sony UHD blue ray with separate audio and video output, and passing it to the Yamaha Aventage Receiver can it perfectly read the DSD files from my hard drive (plugged into the BD's usb). Does that mean that that exclusive audio output HDMI is an I2S?

  • @mostirreverent
    @mostirreverent ปีที่แล้ว

    Is it better to send my DSD over PCM files from my Mac using a USB cable to my galvanically isolated USB input on my DAC, or to use a USB to XLR cable to the DAC (assuming such a cable exists)?

  • @scottscottsdale7868
    @scottscottsdale7868 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey Paul.... good video.

  • @luisrodrigonunezolguin7038
    @luisrodrigonunezolguin7038 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    One question: I have a Sony UHD blue ray with separate audio and video output, and passing it to the Yamaha Aventage Receiver can it perfectly read the DSD files from my hard drive (plugged into the BD's usb). Does that mean that that exclusive audio output HDMI is an I2S?

    • @joeygsaudiochannel3972
      @joeygsaudiochannel3972 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Nope and will be DSD over PCM as Paul described in the Video. Only PS Audio PerfectWave Transports and Ted's DSD Jr./Sr. DAC's along with Sony Universal Disc Players and AVR's are capable of stripping off the SACD layer of a disc or play a file over a DLNA Network or via it's own USB inputs.

    • @luisrodrigonunezolguin7038
      @luisrodrigonunezolguin7038 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Joey G's Audio Channel Ok, and thanks for your clarification.

  • @stevefick3919
    @stevefick3919 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I've been thinking about buying the Sony UBP-X800M2 Blue Ray player as an audio only player. It supports DSD and SACD. It also has 2 HDMI ports 1 for audio only. Not sure if it's I2S or not, though.
    Supposed to be the best for audio playback. It's only $400 Cdn. Any thoughts? My PS Audio Stellar Gain Cell DAC won't have any problem with I2S.
    Great vid, Paul.

    • @markclancy5371
      @markclancy5371 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hdmi are not i2s as standard there is a hack module you can get to extract the 2 channel dsd.but not multi channel dsd.ive got sony ubp-x700 that just hdmi into my pioneer av that is dsd64 only but it's not i2s.

    • @luisrodrigonunezolguin7038
      @luisrodrigonunezolguin7038 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Mark Clancy thanks, I had the same question

    • @matthewsallman1700
      @matthewsallman1700 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@markclancy5371 The Sony and Oppo SACD players I have had all will pass multichannel DSD over the HDMI cable to a receiver that accepts multichannel DSD.

    • @markclancy5371
      @markclancy5371 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@matthewsallman1700 didn't say that just said not i2s which isn't really hdmi.to get i2s you need an hack board.but is it true dsd and not converted to pcm like coaxial cables do with dop.

  • @tebbywafer1665
    @tebbywafer1665 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    what about IIS to your dac?

  • @smos63
    @smos63 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hi,
    Toslink cannot transfer DSD. Spdif has enough bandwidth to transfer up to 1x DSD (dsd64) through DOP. For more data (i.e. dsd128, dsd256, dsd512 etc) I think that USB is the only viable option.

    • @Nick_2i
      @Nick_2i 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I believe the Aune X8 is capable of dsd128 over coaxial.

  • @j.s9875
    @j.s9875 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have a fosi q4 , and i dont know if usb is better than optical.

  • @GuitarZombie
    @GuitarZombie 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Long Live Analog

  • @allansh828
    @allansh828 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Does Roon Advanced Audio Transport sound better than UPnP streaming?

    • @captainwin6333
      @captainwin6333 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      The phrase certainly does. If they added the shortened term 'Pro' to the phrase, it would sound an even better phrase.
      *Shout out to their marketing department. I'm available most days and twice on Sundays.

  • @hassabsaeed9993
    @hassabsaeed9993 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    is the PS audio transport discontinued ? i cant find it in your website ?

    • @matthewsallman1700
      @matthewsallman1700 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes, it was discontinued, but he has said they are developing a new version.

    • @hassabsaeed9993
      @hassabsaeed9993 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Fat Rat Thanks , that's make sense

    • @hassabsaeed9993
      @hassabsaeed9993 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@matthewsallman1700 Thanks , appreciate your response

  • @ThinkingBetter
    @ThinkingBetter 4 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    USB doesn’t make audio bad. It doesn’t make video bad. It doesn’t make images bad. It doesn’t make your power point presentation bad. Data is data and USB can reliably transfer all bits unharmed. Paul has a point about USB if you decide to power your DAC through the USB cable from a computer, cause that can induce some noise in your analog output. But just don’t do that!!! Always use a DAC that has a separate quality power supply and make sure your gear is grounded to avoid common mode current noise, and USB can be absolutely excellent for audiophile systems. USB does not only allow for capability negotiation but it also allows for jitter free asynchronous audio transfer, which is much better than one-way SPDIF.

    • @Music_On_Records
      @Music_On_Records 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      well said

    • @paulstubbs7678
      @paulstubbs7678 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It's just a pity the USB designers didn't do asynchronous audio as the default in the first place, rather than the kludge they saddled us with.

    • @entity279
      @entity279 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Protocols have strengths and weaknesses and it's an incorrect simplification to just say "Data is data and USB can reliably transfer all bits unharmed". There are error detection and correction codes in use (with limited if mostly effective capabilities) , there are potentially re-transmissions happening, clock inaccuracies and such

    • @fookingsog
      @fookingsog 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Firewire 1394a/b can do it as well as Lighting Cable...cable structure has a large bearing on noise rejection!!!

    • @wilcalint
      @wilcalint 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I think when Paul refers to "USB" he is really referring to pre USB 3.x days and he has little experience in the performance of the newer implementation of it. Most computers built after 2013 feature USB 3.x ports.

  • @akayann
    @akayann 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have just discovered the existence of .DSD files and wonder if there are fake ones just like there are fake flacs? thxxx

  • @BughunterX
    @BughunterX 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    So its not possible for a DAC to receive native DSD from a computer or did i got it wrong? Which transports actually can deliver such signal? As much as i know SACD players have no digital out because of copyprotection......

    • @matthewsallman1700
      @matthewsallman1700 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Many SACD players can pass DSD over HDMI - normally to an AVR that has HDMI inputs. Digital Rights Management is built into the HDMI interface which lets this happen. However if a computer, and not a licensed disk player, is involved the DRM are not managed and you must use some form of PCM.

    • @BughunterX
      @BughunterX 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@matthewsallman1700 Hallo. Unfortunately there is no seperate DAC known to me with an HDMI input. I just ordered an Ares 2 that can handle native DSD through Optical, Coaxial and USB. But what is it good for it there is no such devise that actually can deliver native DSB through these connectors:(

    • @BlownMacTruck
      @BlownMacTruck 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      What? Any DSD DAC with a usb input can decode dsd from the computer it’s connected to.

  • @wilcalint
    @wilcalint 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    “DSD can’t be played from a server”. I’m not quite sure what he is talking about here. I can create DSD content, store it on a DLNA server and “stream” it back over a LAN to any number of DSD capable media players.
    DLNA is a a standard and has been around since 2003
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Living_Network_Alliance
    Media players based on ffmpeg can capture and play DSD content. Audacity is an Audio capture and editing platform based on ffmpeg. VideoLAN (VLC) Media Player is based on ffmpeg. I also understand that the MicroSoft Media Player uses ffmpeg code
    ffmpeg.org/
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FFmpeg
    www.videolan.org
    www.audacityteam.org/
    ffmpeg is an Open Source Code software package. There is no license fee to use all or some of the code. It is widely used as most video and audio editors and players today are really just ffmpeg with lipstick. Having said that someone creating a media player or editor could choose to not use, or prohibit DSD, record or playback content.
    If the DSD file(s) are stored on a server that has either a Samba or NFS share, and your DSD capable media player can access that share, then the DSD file(s) can be streamed and played. VideoLAN (VLC) and Kodi are media players that are capable of this. And that can be done with live streams as well.
    kodi.tv/

    • @graxjpg
      @graxjpg 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks for this. I love the heavy comments in these videos!!!

    • @ilovecops6255
      @ilovecops6255 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It could be SERVER MESSAGE BLOCK. Is this the articly you wanted..
      Server Message Block provides file sharing, network browsing, printing services, and interprocess communication over a network.
      The SMB protocol relies on lower-level protocols for transport.
      The Microsoft SMB protocol was often used with NetBIOS over TCP/IP (NBT) over UDP, using port numbers 137 and 138, and TCP port numbers 137 and 139. NBT for use by NetBIOS is supported on Windows Server 2003, Windows XP, Windows 2000, Windows NT, and Windows Me/98/95. NetBIOS is not supp
      UNIX includes filre and directory permissons. NFTS has ACCESS CONTROL LISTS. The can wrist s schee script for Linux to automats backup from shares on computers and cop the giles to s server and then make a TAR backup. It eliminates everyhtign stopping ONE POINT of failure if everyon euses a commen servers. THNAKES YUOES AND THUMBBES UPS. I uses audacity beon LINUX because I cant afford WUndows 7 and higher. nOW i KNOW ABOUT FFMPEG. thank you I leanr new thinge every dayes! THANKES YUO AND THUBMMBES UPS!

    • @wilcalint
      @wilcalint 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@graxjpg Paul does a very good job of launching a spirited discussion then petty much lets the issue get taken up in the discussion. Rarely will he intervene. This particular issue should be of interest to all.

    • @graxjpg
      @graxjpg 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Bill Kenney I can imagine why! I feel more safe and comfortable now learning audacity as my first daw.

    • @joeygsaudiochannel3972
      @joeygsaudiochannel3972 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I'm using a Sony UBP-X1000ES with HDMI Video to I2S Adapter Boards and can access my DSD files either by USB memory stick files plugged into both my Sony AVR &. my Sony X1000ES. The DSD & PCM I2S are fed to the two I2S inputs of my DirectStream Sr. DAC. I get the 64fs, 1Bit DSD message on the DSD's Blue Screen when I spin SACD's or DSD files.
      DLNA works great with Audirvana (Beta).

  • @timothystockman7533
    @timothystockman7533 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I was surprised that you didn't directly mention clock stability. In all transfer methods other than I2S the clock must be embedded and extracted. Perhaps you answered this indirectly when you said that I2S sounds the best.

    • @sebsoud
      @sebsoud 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      These days, every usb dac (or it's really crap) has its own clock, it buffers received data and reconstructs the flow. The old synchronous method is not used since years.

    • @timothystockman7533
      @timothystockman7533 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@sebsoud The DAC can provide the clock in USB mode since USB is bidirectional and therefore can have flow control, but for S/PDIF, Toslink, etc., the DAC must follow the source's clock since it has no way of controlling the flow.

    • @sebsoud
      @sebsoud 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      For usb it's useless, there's less problem without this.

  • @pierreterracher3911
    @pierreterracher3911 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    USB use the DAC clock to sync.

  • @2006zachery
    @2006zachery 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I don't think USB transfer is the worst. USB is just transferring the data, binary bits. It keeps the integrity of data, the protocol makes sure there is no adding, no deletion, no modification.

    • @mickolesmana5899
      @mickolesmana5899 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah, watching him I often put a grain of salt. As long as the cable isn't bad enough (which is 99.9% of USB cables in the market) that the error rate caused a significantly failed checksum, you should be fine. Last time in the forum, someone argues since it is asynchronous it would affect the audio. Yeah sure human can outspeed a Ghz+ processor

  • @madcrabber1113
    @madcrabber1113 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Geerfab Audio BOB is another option.

  • @NeilDSouza7
    @NeilDSouza7 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Is USB the only option for DSD?
    You can hand carry your DSD in plastic bag and shove it into your DAC

  • @mtabernig
    @mtabernig 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    M dsl, hdmd wtf, are we taking about....., what about a clean analog signal?

  • @cac2244
    @cac2244 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Listened to the whole thing and have no clue whatsoever what the question and even less the answer was..lol.

    • @spencer476
      @spencer476 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Then you should listen again. It is all there, and then some.

  • @byrdshot4846
    @byrdshot4846 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I'm pretty Savvy with computers and have been an audio file for 50 years. But I'm confused with all these acronyms?

    • @BradMaestas
      @BradMaestas 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Welcome to high-end digital audio! There are a number of file formats now in use: traditional PCM via AIFF or WAV, compressed lossless FLAC and ALAC, DSD (direct stream digital) which uses single bit depth but with a very high sample rate, and now MQA which is sort of a DRM FLAC that requires authorized software/hardware to 'unfold' it. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Direct_Stream_Digital

    • @BradMaestas
      @BradMaestas 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glossary_of_digital_audio

  • @birgerolofsson2347
    @birgerolofsson2347 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I only use usB when I'm forced to and there isn't another option.

    • @googoo-gjoob
      @googoo-gjoob 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      and even then, i _pout_ first

  • @RealHIFIHelp
    @RealHIFIHelp 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    USB is inferior compared to the other signals Paul mentioned. It has a more square/edgy type of sound, not being so analog/natural. It can still sound pretty okay.
    Coax is the very best way to go in terms of sound quality and not using too much money.
    I suggest that everybody that has a PC streamer use a gustard u16 external clock and an uptown audio iso regen together. And have a GPS coax cable connected to the gustard. These 2 boxes give you 10x better value for your money. These 2 boxes are so good that a 1000 dollar system can sound like a 10.000 dollars system, and a 10.000 dollars system will sound like a 100k system. And when that is done, get some really good custom made LPSU for those boxes. (crucial)
    When you have these things set up, everything you own sounds sooooooo much better and you save so much time and many years of frustration. (The gustard takes control over the clock and processes the signal externally, this creates a magical sound where the timing gets crazy good and you can turn the volume up to about the double) The isoregen regenerates the USB signal which funny enough also affects the coax signal.
    The people I know that paid about 2k for this, now own setups that are beating everything in the stores usually costing 5-10x more. (no one really knows about it, because the default LPSU for the Gustard and Isoregen and really bad, like most other LPSUś on the market)
    I2s is not worth using your time on. It has a lot of potential and looks good on paper. But integrating it with a good LPSU, is a whole other thing that nobody really knows how to do.
    If you have a good USB setup and want to use a USB cable, I suggest the cheap Oyaide usb cable, and a really short version of it around 50cm. (that is some of the best USB sound for the money)

    • @markwilson2647
      @markwilson2647 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      lol

    • @RealHIFIHelp
      @RealHIFIHelp 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Jup not many will get it and react in that way.

    • @RealHIFIHelp
      @RealHIFIHelp 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      For the normal people that do not get it:
      Everything you do on a cd or DAC or streamer affects the clock. So this and that part that gets upgraded and the clock becomes more stable. And if you buy a more expensive cd, the cd usually performs better because the clock is more stable.
      This solution I have provided removes the internal clock, so you are separating it from the rest of the system.
      You can either then play the normal game most people do by paying more to get more good sound.
      Or you can bypass the whole game, and do this, so that everything you do on your system has a 10x effect, so that you do not have to use as much money.
      That should make it easy to understand for most people.

  • @johnsweda2999
    @johnsweda2999 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    if using USB you really want to use a reclocker is a must! USB has a 46 nanoseconds delay causes issues something cheap like ifi ipurifier3 USB clean up the signal as well lowest noise pollution by 100 times and eliminates jitter does PCM DSD and DxD about $150

  • @Wanghealer
    @Wanghealer 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Only if the e has an accent :)

  • @deepee1544
    @deepee1544 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Does anyone else not care one bit about DSD? I sure don't.

    • @random_ramblings
      @random_ramblings 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Haha I got '10' reasons to love dsd.

  • @angelwars3176
    @angelwars3176 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    "Computers and servers struggle with DSD and breeze along with PCM"
    That's because DSD is not really digital Paul.
    Use a DAP and forget pissing around with cables. The DSD goes straight to the DAC. Job done big tick.

    • @BughunterX
      @BughunterX 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ain´t DAP basically computers too?

    • @angelwars3176
      @angelwars3176 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@BughunterX configured specifically to deal with pcm digital and DSD.

    • @gainothing
      @gainothing 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      DSD (direct stream digital) everything in form of files is digital.. yes you can play dsd with dap but dac in the dap is not comparable to stand alone dac.. and to stream to standalone dac usb is the best option

  • @intika.official
    @intika.official 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    With all my respect to Paul... This remind us that main purpose of PS Audio is to be profitable, and they have to advertise for their product in a way or an other... the way used in this video is a shame! especially for pple how don't know how the technology works and rely on such missleading video. Shame on you ! USB Dacs quality are variable indeed BUT the USB transmission itself have no impact whatsoever (other than powing the dac with the usb cable, and it is discutable as well because most usb dsd decoding have noise correction with a perfect efficiency most of the time).Missleading in the hi-res audio domain is a norm apprently PS audio is no exception.

  • @AccuphaseMan
    @AccuphaseMan 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    DoP is an actual joke. You're playing yourself if your using it. Most DSD dacs don't even do real DSD.

    • @joeygsaudiochannel3972
      @joeygsaudiochannel3972 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Unless it's a Sony Universal Player and PS Audio DirectStream DAC Jr. or Sr.

    • @SaurikSI
      @SaurikSI 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I think you don’t know what DoP is, it just adds a PCM header to the DSD data without even touching it, so there’s not a difference sound-wise between using DoP and native DSD.