Thank you! Please don't stop creating content!!! Your videos are the only reason I keep progressing. It's sooo good!! You have a true talent of teaching and explain complex concepts.
The occasional prompts to visit MDN web docs to read up on lessons being taught are nice. That website can get real overwhelming with the terminology used. When you simply it it’s goes a long way to make the information digestible.😅. The repetition of seeking out answers for yourself will help when landing my first junior position. Thank you Sir
I need to do this more - sense how intimidating reading any documentation is if you haven’t done it much before. It can be totally overwhelming 🤯 I’ll be sure to bring in documentation as much as I can even in “newer” series 😊
Yeah similar to arrays, I’d love to either make a more complex set of exercises or put them as part of a larger project so there’s a bit more practical context. We’ll be using them a lot in the series so that will help too 😄
Instead of Object.Keys(objectName) could we use Object.getOwnPropertyNames(objectName) as when I saw the output of the result in MDN both of them did the same thing and if there is a difference could you tell me what it is please.
Great question! We don’t cover this in JS since it’s pretty niche and advanced but I has to do with something called “property descriptors”. We can set some properties to not show up in keys() and other places similar to how Symbols work. getOwnPropertyNames includes the the ones set as “non-enumerable” except Symbols whole keys does not include either “non-enumerable” keys. If you look up property descriptors on MDN you can find more if you’re interested 😊
Thank you! Please don't stop creating content!!! Your videos are the only reason I keep progressing. It's sooo good!! You have a true talent of teaching and explain complex concepts.
Very clearly explained. Helpfull visual explication. Thank You
Excellent course, thank you very much Nader
Now I am ready for coding! great lecture brother 👏
Thanks David! Glad you found it useful as this is a big topic, haha! 😊
The occasional prompts to visit MDN web docs to read up on lessons being taught are nice. That website can get real overwhelming with the terminology used. When you simply it it’s goes a long way to make the information digestible.😅. The repetition of seeking out answers for yourself will help when landing my first junior position. Thank you Sir
I need to do this more - sense how intimidating reading any documentation is if you haven’t done it much before. It can be totally overwhelming 🤯 I’ll be sure to bring in documentation as much as I can even in “newer” series 😊
incredibly well made video, thank you. this is exactly what I was looking for
Thank you for the video, Nader. Would you making a video on more complex Object examples.
Yeah similar to arrays, I’d love to either make a more complex set of exercises or put them as part of a larger project so there’s a bit more practical context. We’ll be using them a lot in the series so that will help too 😄
Great explanation, callback function are very hard to understand, I hope you make video about it. thank you
Thanks Sakid! I actually have a few videos using them through the map, filter and reduce methods on arrays (callback functions). That might help! 😊
@@TechWithNader Thank you Nadeer I will check them
Instead of Object.Keys(objectName) could we use Object.getOwnPropertyNames(objectName) as when I saw the output of the result in MDN both of them did the same thing and if there is a difference could you tell me what it is please.
Great question! We don’t cover this in JS since it’s pretty niche and advanced but I has to do with something called “property descriptors”.
We can set some properties to not show up in keys() and other places similar to how Symbols work. getOwnPropertyNames includes the the ones set as “non-enumerable” except Symbols whole keys does not include either “non-enumerable” keys.
If you look up property descriptors on MDN you can find more if you’re interested 😊
sir is there a video where all the oops concepts are explained using javascript?
sir is there video on call,bind & apply ?
Hey Abhishek! That’s coming very soon over the next few videos. Going to cover classes and oop in general right after the “this” keyword 😄
Thank you, good man.
Exciting lecture Objects seem like 3D arrays lol
2.5D maybe
Yup exactly! Some languages even call things like this an "associative array" haha! 😃
Just thank you!
You're very welcome, Frank! 😊
Thanks