Etudes after Paganini Caprice Op. 3 00:05 - 02:48 - Etude in A minor (After 5° Caprice) 02:51 - 05:53 - Etude in E major (After 9° Caprice) 05:57 - 08:03 - Etude in C major (After 11° Caprice) 08:06 - 10:20 - Etude in B♭ major (After 13° Caprice) 10:22 - 12:48 - Etude in E♭ Major (After 19° Caprice) Missing - Etude in G minor (After 16° Caprice)
@@micoveliki8729 Schumanns etude in G minor is based on the Paganinis caprice no. 16 for sure. But that etude is not even in the video, but is in the book of etudes after Paganini. Plus I think, you are talking about the book opus 10. This video is opus 3 .... so please dont mix it and confuse others, thank you and if ur still not sure, check videos of Magaloff or Jean Pierre-Matty or simply check the sheet music and dont be fooled, because Schumanns etude in op. 3 doesnt start with the very beginning of Paganinis caprice.
@@Forgetit2697 Liszt still had a lot of respect for Schumann's renditions though it seems. His first version of his Paganini Etudes (Op. 140) straight up had Schumann's transcription of the 16th caprice as an ossia.
@John Harlowe Wouldn't be surprised. Clara was miffed at a lot of things Liszt did. Liszt and Robert had a lot of respect for each other but Clara did not approve.
Thank you so much for posting this. I first heard this song on piano tiles 2 and instantly wanted to play it. I can't even read sheet music but Ill sure try to figure it out.
@@calebhu6383 That's all speculation and individual preference based on the audience and individual who heard them play. Clara was, of course, a documented virtuoso, but I don't think we should be so quick to judge that Robert wasn't just as good or better. Clara was, however, judged in the same league as Liszt and even CV Alkan.
@@vnwa7390 Clara's father told Robert that he had the potential to become the finest pianist in Europe, which is pretty much a we know about his potential.
I thought 1 was a bit fast.In no 2 forte apparently means piano and staccato means legato. No.3 nicely played. No.4 I really really liked this interpretation!. No.5 was brilliant too!
Yes, That scene features no 1, although it is harder on the guitar. And besides, Steve plays it at the correct tempo, this version, for me, is too fast!
Первое произведение сыграно блестяще, остальные приемлемы только в случае наличия общепринятого заглавия через тире, например, второе произведение прошло бы под названием Лист - Демус Этюд ми мажор и тогда импровизируй сколько хочешь, никаких претензий.
There is nothing more worthy of ridicule than those who castigate composers for being a dreaded virtuoso. How are these posers different than the faux fanatics of any other genre? These are the hipsters of classical/romantic era music. So obsessed with appearances while referring to others as shallow and vain.
![Schumann: Six Études after Paganini Caprices, Op. 10 [Alvanis]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/jfxndAAsr38/mqdefault.jpg)
Etudes after Paganini Caprice Op. 3
00:05 - 02:48 - Etude in A minor (After 5° Caprice)
02:51 - 05:53 - Etude in E major (After 9° Caprice)
05:57 - 08:03 - Etude in C major (After 11° Caprice)
08:06 - 10:20 - Etude in B♭ major (After 13° Caprice)
10:22 - 12:48 - Etude in E♭ Major (After 19° Caprice)
Missing - Etude in G minor (After 16° Caprice)
ty
Thanks
I think its after the 6th not 16th
@@micoveliki8729 Schumanns etude in G minor is based on the Paganinis caprice no. 16 for sure. But that etude is not even in the video, but is in the book of etudes after Paganini. Plus I think, you are talking about the book opus 10. This video is opus 3 .... so please dont mix it and confuse others, thank you and if ur still not sure, check videos of Magaloff or Jean Pierre-Matty or simply check the sheet music and dont be fooled, because Schumanns etude in op. 3 doesnt start with the very beginning of Paganinis caprice.
Studies after the Caprices of Paganini
0:00 1. Caprice
2:49 2. Caprice - Allegretto
5:58 3. Caprice - Andante
8:06 4. Caprice - Allegro
10:23 5. Caprice - Lento - Allegro Assai
D. Schreiber
ty
It shouldn’t be called caprice. It’s etudes on caprices of Paganini, not caprices on caprices of Paganini lol 😂 but thanks anyways
Questa Musica 🎶 ti strappa il cuore ❤️ dal petto ❤❤❤Giuseppe Perego Monza 16.2.1962 l
Virtuoso Schumann is crazy :D
So wait...Schumann wrote his before Liszt wrote his. Very fascinating.
Except Liszt's is superior.
+Frédéric François Chopin
Sure !
@@Forgetit2697 Liszt still had a lot of respect for Schumann's renditions though it seems. His first version of his Paganini Etudes (Op. 140) straight up had Schumann's transcription of the 16th caprice as an ossia.
@@Forgetit2697 I wouldn't be so quick to judge Liszt's superior. Although Liszt's is much more interesting
@John Harlowe Wouldn't be surprised. Clara was miffed at a lot of things Liszt did. Liszt and Robert had a lot of respect for each other but Clara did not approve.
Sconvolgente ❤❤❤Giuseppe Perego Monza 16.2.1962
Maestro Demus is eating up these etudes. Paganini smiles from above.
Paganini might be more suited to be smiling from below, not above.
Thank you so much for posting this. I first heard this song on piano tiles 2 and instantly wanted to play it. I can't even read sheet music but Ill sure try to figure it out.
Grande Maestro Jorge Demus ❤❤❤Giuseppe
Schumann is amazing. Jesus.
Sorprendente
Sconvolgente
Magnifico
Impossibile
Wonderful - A splendid addition to the Liszt version: Demus has unfailing technique in bringing off these pieces.
wow I knew only about the liszt paganini etudes but these are just as awesome
Thank you for the sharing:)
Never knew Schumann as a virtuoso pianist. Wonderful.
Actually, it was his wife Clara Schumann (nee Wieck) who was the prodigy in the household
@@brantnuttall Schumann was also very good until he damaged his hand. Clara was always the better pianist, of course.
@@calebhu6383 That's all speculation and individual preference based on the audience and individual who heard them play. Clara was, of course, a documented virtuoso, but I don't think we should be so quick to judge that Robert wasn't just as good or better. Clara was, however, judged in the same league as Liszt and even CV Alkan.
@@vnwa7390 Clara's father told Robert that he had the potential to become the finest pianist in Europe, which is pretty much a we know about his potential.
@@brantnuttall Schumann was also a fantastic pianist. No way he would have been able to write such music without being also a good pianist..
My favorite piano couple. Robert, and Clara Schumann. Sometimes when I hear Roberts playing, I can tell they were a couple. Lolol
I thought 1 was a bit fast.In no 2 forte apparently means piano and staccato means legato. No.3 nicely played. No.4 I really really liked this interpretation!. No.5 was brilliant too!
0:28
The sixth etude is missing. Did he not record it?
composed in 1832
Anyone hearing the Crossroads duel in there??
Yes, That scene features no 1, although it is harder on the guitar. And besides, Steve plays it at the correct tempo, this version, for me, is too fast!
Caprice 5
Demus butchers the first etude. It seems that his left hand cannot keep up with his right.
Étude No. 1 - Caprice No. 5
Étude No. 2 - Caprice No. 9
Étude No. 3 - Caprice No. 11
Étude No. 4 - Caprice No. 13
Étude No. 5 - Caprice No. 19
Mother of God... :O
Первое произведение сыграно блестяще, остальные приемлемы только в случае наличия общепринятого заглавия через тире, например, второе произведение прошло бы под названием Лист - Демус Этюд ми мажор и тогда импровизируй сколько хочешь, никаких претензий.
2:50
sorry i cant understand.
did schumann compose this etude or somebody played schumann's work after he played etude?
That´s a Schumann composition.
The original pieces are compositions by Paganini for solo violin, which have been arranged as piano etudes by Schumann
Why do people always play the Liszt arrangements and completely ignore Schumann's? Schumann in general is very underrated
It shouldn’t be called caprice. It’s etudes on caprices of Paganini, not caprices on caprices of Paganini lol 😂
No. 1 seems too fast.
There is nothing more worthy of ridicule than those who castigate composers for being a dreaded virtuoso. How are these posers different than the faux fanatics of any other genre? These are the hipsters of classical/romantic era music. So obsessed with appearances while referring to others as shallow and vain.
n1 very slow :)
Compared to Kavakos, perhaps.
just another lingling wannabe in the comment section dont mind me...