Tim Dodd - Everyday Astronaut | Munro Live Podcast

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 1 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 190

  • @cerrillosstore3913
    @cerrillosstore3913 ปีที่แล้ว +34

    I love to see Sandy and Tim get together. I feel privileged to have been on board with both when they were unknown and new to TH-cam. It's great that both have gotten the prestige they deserve. Thanks for sharing!

  • @corycombs9802
    @corycombs9802 ปีที่แล้ว +66

    This was a very unexpected interview!

    • @bobrick8176
      @bobrick8176 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Don’t forget to like!! :D

    • @travelwithtesla
      @travelwithtesla ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Sandy and Tim? What the heck??? You know, this is actually the best of both worlds! 😝💯

    • @MrWingman2009
      @MrWingman2009 ปีที่แล้ว

      Two of my very most favorite youtubers! Pop corn time 🤩

  • @EwanM11
    @EwanM11 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Tim is incredibly eloquent. What a pleasure to listen to.

  • @MarkS-23
    @MarkS-23 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    Great discussion. Tim's enthusiasm is made of rocket fuel. Thanks for having him on.

  • @alanrogers7090
    @alanrogers7090 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    Wonderful interview by two of my favorite people.

  • @StormyDog
    @StormyDog ปีที่แล้ว +19

    Amazing podcast. The best hour spent lately. Thank you Sandy and Tim!

  • @alanrogers7090
    @alanrogers7090 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    My grandfather was born in1900 and passed away in 1994. He saw the first cars and saw men walk on the moon. What a life.

    • @donjones4719
      @donjones4719 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      He was around for the first real airplane flight in 1903 and theoretically could have flown the Atlantic in 3 hours on the supersonic Concorde. The 20th century was incredible.

  • @budgetaudiophilelife-long5461
    @budgetaudiophilelife-long5461 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    🙋‍♂️GREAT TO SEE THIS INTERVIEW WITH SANDY AND TIM 🤗 THANK THE MUNRO TEAM FOR ALL THE HARD WORK 😅💚💚💚

    • @billybobbob3003
      @billybobbob3003 ปีที่แล้ว

      AMERICA IS A DEMCRACY WHICH MEANS YOU HAVE THE ABILITY TO BUY AND DRIVE WHATEVER TYPE OF FUCKING VEHICLE YOU WANT AMERICA TRYING LIMIT PEOPLES OPTIONS WHEN IT COMES TO MOBILITY IS THE DUMBEST NAIVE FUCKING THING YOU CAN POSSIBLY EVER DO, ALSO THESE PEOPLE TRYING TO PUSH EV FOR AS A SINGLE SOLUTION FOR EVERYTHING IS A NAIVE FUCKING FOOL ASWELL THERE IS NO SINGLE TOOL FOR ALL FUCKING JOBS ASSUMING EVERYONE LIVES IN A HOUSE WITH A 240V OUTLET LEVEL 2 CHARGER IS A FUCKING NAIVE FUCKING FOOL ALSO..

  • @br4550w
    @br4550w ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Yes! This is what we want!❤. Not sure how you two got hooked up, but I like it

  • @seldoon_nemar
    @seldoon_nemar ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Dam, Sandy's hitting all my favorites this month, first Chace over at Edison and now this?! 💯

    • @munrolivepodcast
      @munrolivepodcast  ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Stay tuned on the main channel! We have something you'll be interested in coming VERY soon 👀

    • @creedsixteen891
      @creedsixteen891 ปีที่แล้ว

      I was just thinking that when I read your message 😁

  • @danneil8778
    @danneil8778 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    two of my favorites, together at last.

  • @mikadavies660
    @mikadavies660 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Different interview.... I was going to listen for a short while but was intrigued to listen to all of it...Brilliant guys! Thanks!!

  • @dominikheinz2659
    @dominikheinz2659 ปีที่แล้ว

    Please one more podcast with Tim before his moonlight and one right after🎉🎉🎉 thanks it was a pleasure to listen!❤

  • @COSMEREAUDIO
    @COSMEREAUDIO ปีที่แล้ว +3

    1:02:00 congrats to India ❤

  • @bobrick8176
    @bobrick8176 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Amazing!! Two of my favorite people in one podcast

  • @DouglasJMark
    @DouglasJMark ปีที่แล้ว +2

    What’s better than one of my favourite TH-camrs on the Internet? Two of them! Thank you so much and I hope to see you both back together again soon. Lots of love to all.❤❤❤

  • @1944chevytruck
    @1944chevytruck ปีที่แล้ว +3

    WOW! AWSOME!

  • @davidbarnes4150
    @davidbarnes4150 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    This is a great interview. The real future in real time discussion.

  • @jimdetry9420
    @jimdetry9420 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    That was fun. I'd like to see Sandy do a podcast with Tony Seba.

  • @DavidCNavas
    @DavidCNavas ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Awesome match, have always enjoyed listening to both of you.

    • @munrolivepodcast
      @munrolivepodcast  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Glad you enjoyed it

    • @DavidCNavas
      @DavidCNavas ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@munrolivepodcast More than I can express. Dad always loved listening to you -- huge car geek, and I've always been a huge space geek, and we had talked about electric cars since the late 90s. He passed away a year ago and I'm having trouble with his estate, so this was a really pleasant diversion.

  • @ricardoabh3242
    @ricardoabh3242 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Very nice interview

  • @thomascharlton8545
    @thomascharlton8545 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Great discussion. Thanks Sandy and Tim.

  • @creedsixteen891
    @creedsixteen891 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Awesome conversation. Thanks for sharing.

  • @COSMEREAUDIO
    @COSMEREAUDIO ปีที่แล้ว +5

    ❤Awesome interview, I have seen Sandy has indicated that he is working on an anti-gravity device before in a live stream, hope it comes out soon but that will be the end of SpaceX starship rocket and all other rockets as well.

    • @snookmeister55
      @snookmeister55 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Sure. Anti gravity by Munro & Associates. Keep the humor going.

    • @andrewsaint6581
      @andrewsaint6581 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      ​​@@snookmeister55with USA dod, he said.
      Lets wait and see.
      If you've learned anything from this chat it's that saying "no chance" before trying, is a less than optimal mindset.
      Electric starter motor.
      Self landing rocket boosters.
      Welding rocket fuselages and the rest.
      Can't be done.
      Until it is.
      It's a matter of time.
      That's how the future works.

    • @johnchristopher20
      @johnchristopher20 ปีที่แล้ว

      Antigravity has been around for along time; technology transfer is a step by step process to make it look organic. Using Sandy is brilliant. It can’t all come through Elon. NASA has been cover for the German pre war technology to stay top secret or every possible nation would be developing it, like nuclear weapons proliferation occurred.

    • @snookmeister55
      @snookmeister55 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@andrewsaint6581 Yes, exactly as I wrote. Theory.

    • @hardcoreherbivore4730
      @hardcoreherbivore4730 ปีที่แล้ว

      Recent results from the LHC seem to suggest anti-gravity as unlikely to be feasible.

  • @Ed-ui2qe
    @Ed-ui2qe ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great interview! Thanks!!

  • @caseydbani1419
    @caseydbani1419 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Different generation, same cool. Enjoyed it!

  • @nononsenseBennett
    @nononsenseBennett ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great interview. Tim's an interesting man.

  • @janhofmann3499
    @janhofmann3499 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Didn’t expect to see Tim here and hope that he will be in the studio next time!

  • @johnpaula1400
    @johnpaula1400 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great!!

  • @COSMEREAUDIO
    @COSMEREAUDIO ปีที่แล้ว +3

    15:30 I agree Sandy, wormhole travel is the real future, rest all are near future

  • @stevenbell8842
    @stevenbell8842 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have been watching for years. Keep up the good work!

  • @jakubruzicka1686
    @jakubruzicka1686 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Interesting and unexpected video, Thank you for that!

  • @ChrisBigBad
    @ChrisBigBad ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you Gentlemen! That was very nice.

  • @Clearphish
    @Clearphish ปีที่แล้ว +3

    2 of my favourite people!

  • @jaimefernandez3444
    @jaimefernandez3444 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Please release the full video before clips! I could not wait to watch the full thing

  • @scottiverson7829
    @scottiverson7829 ปีที่แล้ว

    Fun talk!!! Look forward to the next (post orbital) visit!

  • @x_ph1l
    @x_ph1l ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great discussion. As an engineer, I enjoyed this a lot!

  • @mervynleach1362
    @mervynleach1362 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The trouble for the motor manufacturers is that to change from ICE to EV requires a huge amount of investment. Add to that the new EV cars will be loss leaders until you can get a large number manufactured and sold to recover the costs of the changeover. At the same time, you'll be selling less ICE vehicles on which you make a lot of profit. Most businesses will try and delay the process as much as possible. Kudos to Ford who have split their company to clearly show how much they are losing on each EV. Even new EV companys like Rivian and Lucid are struggling wihtout huge cash support.

  • @yas4435
    @yas4435 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Enjoyed this interview very much and so good to see you guys talking together I was wondering when this meat up might’ve happened so I’m so glad thank you so much❤

  • @lesbendo6363
    @lesbendo6363 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great interview/discussion. We met in Vancouver and I did test drive the lightening. I was impressed. 🇨🇦 P.S. You could open a Canadian office to house you over seas engineers. All the tech companies have office in Vancouver.

  • @Burtonis
    @Burtonis ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Unexpected and Outstanding!

  • @russellharbin8020
    @russellharbin8020 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Great interview. Tim is an interesting guy.

  • @mcdonnellpadraic
    @mcdonnellpadraic ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Sandy is good at interviews.

  • @PedroRafael
    @PedroRafael ปีที่แล้ว

    Very interesting conversation. Didn't know about Munro being connected with nasa stuff. Really cool.

  • @EricP36
    @EricP36 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Great episode!

  • @vimmentors6747
    @vimmentors6747 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    To paraphrase others:
    1) We already have flying cars. They are called helicopters.
    2) It makes no sense to go up. Collisions mean death. Mechanical failure means death.
    3) If you run out of room at grade, you need to build underground.

  • @legostud
    @legostud ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Flying cars will never take off until we figure out how to make them quiet. People already complain about plane noise flying over their houses, imagine a highway of planes flying over your house.

  • @alanrogers7090
    @alanrogers7090 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    As Elon has said, "At Tesla we don't make slow cars."

  • @lobotomite3248
    @lobotomite3248 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Awesome interview/episode

  • @colesonafrank5329
    @colesonafrank5329 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for an interesting and thoroughly enjoyable chat.

  • @Arturo-lapaz
    @Arturo-lapaz ปีที่แล้ว

    The conversation about flying cars is important, because it puts two aspects in view: a) it needs to be able to take off and land in a small area, b)noise considerations indicate that the propusion be electrical powered with a storage battery.
    The solution, limits the "aircar's" range by practical weight limitations.
    Here are some of the considerations:
    The rotor(s) diameter is determined by the parking size, the power is determined primarily by the total weight and by the rotor diameter:
    Power = √( W³)/D ×√(2÷π÷dens) + 3/4×W×tipspeed×Cd/CL
    Here is
    W..... Weight
    D..... rotor diameter
    π .... 3.1416
    dens.....air density :
    1.225 kg/m³ at sea level
    ½ at 21800 ft altitude
    tipspeed of the rotor
    CD/CL rotor blade drag to lift ratio. ~ 1/80
    consistent units are essential :
    meters, Newtons, Watts, m/sec kg etc
    for example weight is mass in kg times 9.80665 m/s² earth gravity. = Newtons
    POwer is shaft power required just to hover.
    What is remarkable is the enourmous influence of weight.
    For an electric vehicle the battery weight is around 4 kg per kWh stored energy, hopefully reduced to 3.
    There is a stark contrast to ICE' fuel weight, which uses 3/4 of the other fuel component as free oxygen from the atmosphere.
    Batteries must store the equivalent 3/4 internally.
    Together with the high power sensitivity of VTOLs on weight, to realize a longer range electric flying car is an unsolved challenge, so far.
    Metall-air batteries might be worth pursuing for this application.

  • @ken-mb5cp
    @ken-mb5cp ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Good show

  • @MarcoNierop
    @MarcoNierop ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome! I love Tim Dod's videos about rocketery stuff and especially his live streams, where he always finds a way to fuck up at the moment of truth LOL! Anyway, very nice interview and learned a few things.. as always with Munro Live 🙂 Keep up the good work!

  • @TG-rf2iu
    @TG-rf2iu ปีที่แล้ว

    So glad I didn’t miss this

  • @history-stamp
    @history-stamp ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I was shocked when I flow into Zurich. The metro, subway, directly below the air terminal.

  • @Arturo-lapaz
    @Arturo-lapaz ปีที่แล้ว

    22:40 Erich von Däniken lives in Beattenberg, not
    far from were I used to live, a prominent citizen has many exhibitions along the von Däniken walk with a huge park way below in Interlaken . Theme: Ancient Astronauts, endorsed by Dr Wernherr von Braun.

  • @Madchuck42
    @Madchuck42 ปีที่แล้ว

    The OG's of explanation

  • @9-and-3
    @9-and-3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I see Tim ... I hit play! :)

  • @robertpastor4061
    @robertpastor4061 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome..

  • @jrockerstein
    @jrockerstein ปีที่แล้ว

    I want both of these guys on starship going around the moon!!

  • @markcannaday6928
    @markcannaday6928 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wow! I open TH-cam and two of my favorite podcasters are on chewing the fat. I guess I should have expected this because both of them challenge the "rules". This is time well spent.

  • @binauralauto3621
    @binauralauto3621 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks Tim and Sandy for getting together and speaking through these issues. It's amazing how stuck the automotive industries is and I truly hope they adapt. I'm in the EV charging industry and it's almost as bad as working with the big 3. They just don't get it.

    • @russr1411
      @russr1411 ปีที่แล้ว

      You say you work in the EV charging industry, how do you plan on this industry or EV industry at large to make EV's the transportation of the future? I have worked with electric utilities for a number of years and the electrical grid, especially in summer during air conditioning season, can barely stand on its own, the utilities give discounts so they can turn off your air conditioner in summer to help manage the demand. So here we go, we all purchase the 10KW chargers and the residential demand could easily skyrocket. We can count on the sun to shine and winds to blow to make this work, sounds like we will have to add a large number of natural gas peaking units, rip out and replace or very seriously upgrade electrical grid. Including most of the residential networks. I have been told we will need to rotate the demand of the charging, sounds good, I am sure we will come up with that electrical storge bank, we are counting on. I have never ever talked with an electrical engineer that says we are even close to an EV revolution. It was always the joke discussion in the break room. I do not want transportation to put at risk comforts of living, it does not have to.

  • @EnerGeezerSquirrel
    @EnerGeezerSquirrel ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Maybe no Lightning ads are shown where Sandy lives but I've seen a few here in Quebec, (Montreal area) some even in French!
    Good idea to deviate from mostly-auto podcasts. It's *always* interesting to overhear intelligent conversation. More please! (more variety of guests, of course, since the talk's always smart if Sandy's involved no matter the subject)
    Sandy's often describing his resumé as having worked on "...everything from Barbie to the I.S.S.!" A short video aimed at STEM ready minds might attract young females to science if he did a piece on what was involved, if he's not under an NDA. Other specific projects might serve the same purpose? Just a thought...

  • @budgetaudiophilelife-long5461
    @budgetaudiophilelife-long5461 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    🤗👍🤩🤩😎 JUST FINISHED WHILE EATING 🥣 MY LUNCH 🧐LEARNED ALOT 💚💚💚

  • @Arturo-lapaz
    @Arturo-lapaz ปีที่แล้ว

    15:34 Munro is refering to the Einstein- Rosen bridge, due to sufficient space curvature , vastly different locations might be closer directly due to the folding of space , allowing much shorter travel times at subluminar velocities, cross wise.

  • @jacobuserasmus
    @jacobuserasmus ปีที่แล้ว +2

    13:03 I still think there is a good chance that tunnels will take over roads. VTOL also becomes less useful with autonomous vehicles. If you can create a tunnel at the same cost as a road per km (even double as the maintenance will be less). Things become very interesting, imagine a world without the ugly black roads everywhere, no parking lots. You simple take an autonomous vehicle in a tunnel.

  • @timboatfield
    @timboatfield ปีที่แล้ว

    *Nearly 10K!*

  • @filthE-
    @filthE- ปีที่แล้ว +2

    We already have VTL aircrafts called helicopters. Sure you can electrify them, but the air disturbance is going to be super load and disruptive. The majority of the noise from helicopters is from air not engine.

  • @lobotomite3248
    @lobotomite3248 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Please interview Ben from Unchartedx. He has made a series covering precision manufactured ancient pre-dynastic vases. He has been on an episode of Rogan not too long ago.

  • @nathanprice4568
    @nathanprice4568 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    when I was a kid back in 1960s 18 cents a gallon would be like 2 pennies per mile now 2kwh (30cents) for one mile is much better than 7 dollars a gallon ( 20 miles ) and less smoke and noise too

  • @marknevar8234
    @marknevar8234 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Don't you need an additional piece of hardware to power the house? It's fairly expensive if I remember. Sandy makes it seem like it works as delivered.

  • @markdudar6632
    @markdudar6632 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good job guys real good

  • @KevinT3141
    @KevinT3141 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great collaboration, thanks!
    On the flying cars: The average driver can't navigate safely in two dimensions, I do _not_ want them to be given three.

    • @Arturo-lapaz
      @Arturo-lapaz ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Oh go jump into the lake or learn to fly, safety in the air is far better than driving among DUI, like Pelosi's husband.
      As a accident free flight instructor I am biased, proud that none of my former students has had serious incidents .
      Besides auto pilots and autonomous flying vehicles rely on tried and proven technology and the vehicle density in the air, is not concentrated in about one dimension and is vastly lower

    • @KevinT3141
      @KevinT3141 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Arturo-lapaz Swimming's not safe either. Thanks for what you do, not just anyone can be a teacher.

  • @myredeyelife7010
    @myredeyelife7010 ปีที่แล้ว

    Listening from Dewitt, Iowa

  • @tobias..6688
    @tobias..6688 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    My comment feeds the algorithm 🚀

  • @surrealengineering7884
    @surrealengineering7884 ปีที่แล้ว

    4:30 BMW did it exactly like that, they sold it as "active hybrid" which was just he top engine 3 series with an electric boost motor.
    But by then the word "hybrid" was already associated with "lame". But they are really cool (but expensive to fix)

  • @TyDyck
    @TyDyck ปีที่แล้ว

    ❤️

  • @howardholt3530
    @howardholt3530 ปีที่แล้ว

    I was in the 7th grade when Sputnik went up. By high school the science teachers were getting all kinds of support from the federal government.

  • @donjones4719
    @donjones4719 ปีที่แล้ว

    People criticize the idea of relying on billionaires to fund advanced space flights like Polaris and Dear Moon but historically society relied on rich people funding or endowing large science projects. Until the 60s (maybe the 50s) the US government wasn't funding science and medicine at anywhere near the level it is now. Major telescopes and hospitals and medical schools were founded by millionaires. Universities with big endowments had the research labs that did the big breakthroughs in discovering penicillin and the physics principle that led to radio astronomy. I'm always happy to see people like Elon & Jared & MZ not competing to see who has the biggest yacht or the most elaborate mansions.

  • @PlushGrenade
    @PlushGrenade ปีที่แล้ว

    is there plans to do a live showing of the next Startship launch at The Sphere in Vegas?

  • @jrockerstein
    @jrockerstein ปีที่แล้ว +1

    How did this interview happen!?!?🎉❤❤❤

  • @mikecoleman2003
    @mikecoleman2003 ปีที่แล้ว

    The math on whether we are not alone never seems to take into account "time". Assume a "civilization" can last several thousand years (before destroying itself), the likelihood that aliens exist at the same time as we do drastically decreases. Even if they do the distances are too vast to reach each other even with so-called warp drives. Time and distance are the true barriers to "ever" see an alien despite the extremely vast number of stars.

  • @bicycledave
    @bicycledave ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Detroit is responsible for removing rail systems all over the country. You’re right Sandy. There’s no way you’re going to put in a rail system. Not in the motor city.

    • @robertimrie3710
      @robertimrie3710 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      And the solution is flying cars? To me that is like saying nuclear is a better solution than renewables, despite being more expensive and problematic. Maybe it's because I am not American and I don't believe private enterprise is the only solution to every problem Cars are great but Americans have turned a love affair into stalker territory. I am sure rail or a subway to the airport could be done, it just requires the will and belief to make it happen. Having what amounts to a private helicopter service from the airport to the city is an extravagance for people who are already flying first class. Brisbane Australia introduced our airtrain service to our airport in 2001despite relatively reliable and efficient access to the airport by private car. The train provides a practical alternative that is particularly suited to people travelling alone. It compliments the other modes while minimising vehicle movements to the airport.

    • @echoeversky
      @echoeversky ปีที่แล้ว

      Fun fact: we gonna need nuclear power.

    • @nathansuss
      @nathansuss ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@echoeverskywhat why

    • @solararch2001
      @solararch2001 ปีที่แล้ว

      Running buses on an asphalt right of way, instead of a train on tracks, is better because, if there’s a problem with the vehicle, you can easily move it off the road or go around it, whereas, if you have a problem with a train car on the track… the entire system comes to a screeching halt. Everyone is stuck for excruciating periods of time. A train track is inflexible obsolete infrastructure for transporting people in cities.
      People love trains because they offer an elegant way to get on and off the vehicle, unlike entering a bus in the front. We need to make buses like trains cars, and use a paved asphalt roadway instead of tracks, with regular rubber tires. Combine the best of a train with the best of a bus. That would be the best solution.

    • @vimmentors6747
      @vimmentors6747 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​So Detroit helped to accidentally accelerate progress? Because rail is on the way out. Very few people will choose mass transit over robotaxis unless government uses policy to make robotaxis artificially hard and expensive.

  • @craighermle7727
    @craighermle7727 ปีที่แล้ว

    Part of the adoption issue, is that there are still states like New Hampshire, that are trying to slow down EV adoption in whatever way they can. There were more gas stations put online in the city I live in the last 12 months than there are useable or worth-using charging stations in the entire state. There was also legislation recently introduced in New Hampshire against the adoption of renewable energy, because "it will change our way of life". I'm not making that up. Oddly New Hampshire has one of the highest rates for electricity in the Continental US, with virtually 100% reliance on fossil fuel to turn the turbines. New Hampshire is also the only state in New England that still uses a fired peaker power plant.

  • @Arturo-lapaz
    @Arturo-lapaz ปีที่แล้ว

    Talk about Tiahuanaco, The famous explorer of those ruins was also the man who in 1904 introduced the first car , a Mercedes , into Bolivia.
    Check Wikipedia.

  • @didiersavard6809
    @didiersavard6809 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great interview. The UFO and aliens stuff was a little much. Alien in mexico was debunk a couple of years ago and without finding new physics, even gravity wave don't move at the speed of light and the universe is very big. The distance to Alpha Centauri is gigantic. And it's one close one. Remember, light year is the distance at the speed of light for one year and going 10% of it is a big maybe right now. Warp drive is one possibility to go faster, but it's still need to be possible, and right now it's not there. Earth is the only place we have, the ONLY one. Let's fix that.

  • @RCdiy
    @RCdiy ปีที่แล้ว +5

    VTOL is a pipe dream until air traffic control is completely automated. Not VTOL the technology but the concept of having takeoff and landing all over the place. The entire RC Model Aircraft hobby was almost wiped out by the FAA with the new regulations regarding where and how they can fly.

    • @23428jp
      @23428jp ปีที่แล้ว

      Driving a car now is too dangerous as it is what with pot smoking, drinking, texting, cell phone addiction and all the other ways drivers are distracted and unable to be safe on the road. Imagine what it would be like with flying cars crashing through your ceiling, crushing you in your yard or anywhere outside 24/7.... We'd all have to live underground to be halfway safe...

    • @williammann7247
      @williammann7247 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​which is why most of them are self controlled with no passenger control inpurlt.

    • @williammann7247
      @williammann7247 ปีที่แล้ว

      input. I hate autocorrect.

  • @echoeversky
    @echoeversky ปีที่แล้ว

    After Tim's starship flight he should hit the ancient buildings circuit.

  • @danapeck5382
    @danapeck5382 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Slide rule users designed all the coolest aerospace hardware. I often wonder if CFD somehow limits intuition

    • @andrasbiro3007
      @andrasbiro3007 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It's more like the cultural change. During the world wars and the next few decades innovation was a national security issue. Then in the 70's and 80's it started to be about making money, managers took over, and everyone started to focus on quarterly reports, instead of the long term mission. With short term thinking you can't take risks, and without that you can't innovate, so you have to cut costs by making everything cheap, outsourcing jobs to poor countries, and underpaying your workers.
      That strategy seems to work well for a while, just long enough to make the changes irreversible. Then you are left with a skeleton of a company which may keep going on pure inertia, then collapses. Smart managers jump ship before that, so their resume will show the company was doing well under their management and collapsed after they left, so they get hired by the next company, and the cycle starts over. Until they run out of good companies.

  • @Mrbfgray
    @Mrbfgray ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Flying car will be just as restricted as any other helicopter, NO ONE will put up with the mini hurricanes coming from nextdoor in the hood.
    Airport to city center should be a thing tho.

    • @andrasbiro3007
      @andrasbiro3007 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      They are not as loud, and far cheaper to operate. But the other issues remain, so likely the sky will never be filled with flying cars. Tunnels make much more sense.

  • @mebran1193
    @mebran1193 ปีที่แล้ว

    I love driving in silence

  • @spelare2
    @spelare2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Good interview but VTOL wont happen where the sound will be disturbing.
    We have had enough with the waterjets already.
    I am riding Norton bikes by the way…an commando and es2.

    • @snookmeister55
      @snookmeister55 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You assume VTOL must be noisy.

    • @Jens.Krabbe
      @Jens.Krabbe ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@snookmeister55I wasn’t aware of a technology to push air without making noise 🤔

    • @snookmeister55
      @snookmeister55 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Jens.Krabbe not silent, not necessarily disturbing noise either

  • @theOrionsarms
    @theOrionsarms ปีที่แล้ว

    DCX wasn't made by Lockheed Martin, but by Martin Marietta corporation in 1991, if I remember correctly , Lockheed get into a merger with Martin Marietta after few years , and become Lockheed Martin(before that was only Lockheed) , also propulsive landing was developed for the lunar lander used in the Apollo program many years before , wasn't Neill Armstrong almost killed by a malfunction of training equipment used to simulate propulsive lunar landing in 1967?

  • @paul_gradenwitz
    @paul_gradenwitz ปีที่แล้ว

    I wonder why Tim never considered that for a warp drive to be controlled we have to send the controlling information, that requests space to warp, through space that is not warped. What ever that information is, any kind of force, that acts to space curvature, is a gravitational force and moves with light speed. Thus you can't instruct space to warp for you without your information to curve space move as fast or faster than you. That stops all ideas of warp speed.

  • @cucubogdy
    @cucubogdy ปีที่แล้ว

    Think about how long it took humanity to be able to communicate by radio. We just became a modern civilization in the past 100 years. Maybe there are many more civilizations out there that are still working on evolving and one day sooner or later they might be able to receive or transmit something that we can understand. Could be 100 years from now or thousands but more likely than not it will happen.

  • @Purplebass
    @Purplebass ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Tesla should make a slow car. 16 yr olds dont need an 8 second car unless they are on the track.

  • @robertbritt6134
    @robertbritt6134 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    To answer Tim’s question, Inertia.
    Ad to that a lack of imagination and comfortable complacency

  • @wardsellars8805
    @wardsellars8805 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Flying cars will be constrained by the FAA and by noise codes. Propellers supporting a flying car make a lot of noise. Imagine a helicopter flying low over your house 30 times a day. There will be a lot of pushback on that

  • @cawfeedawg
    @cawfeedawg ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I really miss our ludicrous future😒

  • @skataskatata9236
    @skataskatata9236 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    5:20 Sandy is wrong: " NASA never had a rocket ship that lands"
    they had one in 1969. it landed on the moon...