@@FASTgraphsplease let us normal” subscribers have access to it too. Many of the recent features are only only available for premium subscribers which is ofc reasonable but this one should be for all subscribers.
Great insight Chuck! Hope that you live forever and keep delivering valuable info on the best companies to invest in. When my monthly income allows, I am jumping in into fast graphs, because I think the tips I'll get will be a lot more worth than the subscription price.
Can you do an update on MPW? I share views you provided on the stock in the previous videos. We had a dividend and a lot of good news. Stocks looks to be on a good path to it's old price.
Chuck, first thank you for these series. I learn a lot from these techniques you teach. Doing the manual research of financial ratios takes a lot of time. Second, long time reader and follower you from Seeking Alpha. Newly subscriber to Fast Graph. Should have done it sooner. I look at BABA and it does not make sense with its current valuation. I'm currently a proud bag holder. What are your thoughts on Chinese stocks in general or Mr. Market does not want to deal with the CCP? I look at NIO, XPEV, and PDD and sales estimate are high. Does this mean these stocks are too risky for the short term but investible in the long term?
It is difficult to say why the market behaves in certain ways at certain times. However, in the long run sanity prevails. Regarding Chinese stocks there is obviously political risk, some investors also have concerns about the legitimacy of the numbers. Nevertheless, I agree that the valuations look extremely attractive, assuming all the numbers are legit. I believe your last sentence in your comment poses an interesting hypothesis in question. Hope that helps, and thanks for subscribing, regards, Chuck
What screener was used to find these 10 stocks? Is this a screener within the FastGraphs program? Thinking of subscribing because this is one of the best analytical tools I've seen.
Thanks for the question. I used several screeners in FAST Graphs. 1st I went to the preset screens and ran every preset screen with the word growth, there are several. I also used the regular screener wearing custom look for growth about 15%. Thanks for considering a subscription, I am the cofounder and therefore obviously biased, but I concur that it is 1 of the best analytical tools available. Regards, Chuck
I bought PLTR in May/November 2022 and suffered through the pain for the next year plus. all the while anybody who was a “value investor” said it was a trash company that was still overvalued. What they missed was the actual products they offer. People who only look at graphs and numbers very often miss the big picture. Glad I held on, wish I had added more in early 2023 when it went under $7. It is still a very undervalued company.
I don’t mean to be rude or imply that “value investors” as a category are wrongheaded. Quite the contrary. I simply believe that fair value cannot be determined without also understanding the business- the goods/services it offers, how it compares to competitors, who its customers are and what goods/services do they desire? Often this due diligence takes too much time and effort so investors choose one or the other valuation method. Both are incomplete pictures.
@@andrews2441 Thanks for the reply . For starters, you are correct when you say that valuation is relative. The important question is relative to what? The only rational answer to that question is relative to cash flow production or earnings production, which are simply different ways of saying the same thing. At the end of the day, a investor in the stock can only receive value from the amount of cash flows (earnings) that the business generates on their behalf. Just as you would calculate a dividend yield, you should also calculate an earnings or cash flow yield. Simply because the amount of cash flow (earnings) the company generates on the shareholder’s behalf produces a true yield or return. That is why most investors utilize the discounted cash flow valuation methodology. Secondly, I always suggest that investors conduct comprehensive research and due diligence to learn as much about the business behind the stock as possible. Regarding graphs, FAST Graphs are completely different than most price or momentum-based graphs. FAST is an acronym for fundamentals analyzer software tool. What makes them different is that they look at the business fundamentals 1st and foremost. The forecasting calculators utilize the best current consensus thinking of leading analysts following the stock that in theory at least have looked under the hood to understand the business and its cash flow generating future potential. Consequently, they represent a good starting point that investors can evaluate. Note, I did not say totally rely on, instead I said evaluate. Keep in mind that a significant portion of the analyst expectations come from guidance that the management of the company provides. Finally, NVDA did in effect look fairly valued a year ago based on analyst expectations going forward. However, you are correct in recognizing that expectations have increased rather dramatically since a year ago. The point being that NVDA’s was reasonably valued, not undervalued, based on actual numbers the company produced. Nevertheless, at the end of the day the investor’s ability to forecast future growth in earnings achievements of the company in question will prove to be the true determinant of valuation. FAST Graphs are simply an analytical tool to think with that can aid investors in drawing those conclusions more efficiently, effectively and faster. Just like any task, it is always easier when you possess the correct tools. Regards, Chuck
GPN is one of the biggest misteries in investment in the last 7 years. Btw, don't own the stock, do own fiserv. Alternatives to aptiv, i would say Lear and french company Valeo!
There is no mystery with GPN, 7 years ago it was overvalued and now it’s undervalued. The time divide is now not 7 years ago. Fi is a great company but it does not pay a dividend, furthermore, it is fully valued at today’s prices while GPN is undervalued.
Chuck, canadian banks tracks P/E 12 for decades now. Why Fastgraphs calculate estimated rate of return to PE 15? Last time TD had P/E 15 was 18 years ago. On the other hand, ADP never drops below PE 15, so why Fastgraphs calculate estimated rate of return to PE 15? ADP stock spent something like 99% of the time above PE 15. Would not make more sence to calculate expected rate of return using long term normal PE for these stocks? This is something which really frustrate me with Fastgraphs. Solution is simple. Adding new column with estimated rate of return using normal valuation multiple, aka 5, 10 or 20Y average PE. And we seriously need easy way how to look for companies below orange and blue lines. Premium screens include that, so why not regular screens?
The 15 P/E ratio is a fair valuation reference for most companies, but not all companies. However, FAST Graphs already produces the historical normal P/E ratio (the blue line on the graphs). Nevertheless, these are valuation reference lines that you can measure and analyze. FAST Graphs do not attempt to dictate fair value, instead they reveal it. Here are 2 articles and video that will add more detail: fastgraphs.com/blog/investors-should-not-pay-more-than-a-15-p-e-ratio-when-buying-a-stock-ben-graham/ “ and “ fastgraphs.com/blog/why-a-15-p-e-ratio-is-fair-value-for-most-companies/. Nevertheless, the feature you are asking for is already in development. Regards, Chuck
I take away EXPE, FSLR, YOU and FOUR to investigate from this video. Aptiv and Uber will lose against Tesla, Palantir is military/intelligence stuff, block is shady and Fedex too boring.
I have no clue of what you're talking about (about 90% of it). You may as well be speaking French. But! You do sound like you know what you're talking about. You obviously been doing this a long time, and must be very successful.. at this reading the tea leaves thing. I tell ya, the way you fortune tellers can read palms and shapes of the clouds is a skill apart from us mere mortals. ..So! I tell ya what I'm gonna do, I'm gonna buy a share of one of them dang stocks and see what happens. I'm gonna find out if you're the real deal, or one them traveling snake oil salesman on an episode of Bonanza. If you are, expect a visit from Haas and Little Joe😬...... I'll buy that APTIV one, since that's your first one (I assume that's your favorite one).
@FASTgraphs Don't kid yourself, there's an element of gambling to all of it. I've been watching a lot of these 'emphasis on graphs' videos (not just yours), and it's all akin to looking at the clouds and seeing lions, tigers, and bears. Yeah, you can see them shapes, but they're still just clouds.. You seem like you got it all figured out, so congratulations.
I am sorry, but I do not know what you are trying to say. 1 of the major things I talk about are company's earnings. If you are referring to stock price and how it reacts you are correct that is not something I worry about. I care about the value of the business behind the stock, because I know in the long run stock price will take care of itself.
Mr Valuation = 🐐
Excellent video as always! Chuck, you are a national treasure! We need MORE videos from FASTGraphs!
Do you have any plans to add ETFs to this tool? It would be nice
Coming soon don't have an exact date other than this year for sure
@@FASTgraphsplease let us normal” subscribers have access to it too. Many of the recent features are only only available for premium subscribers which is ofc reasonable but this one should be for all subscribers.
Great video, more of these plz🔥
Great insight Chuck! Hope that you live forever and keep delivering valuable info on the best companies to invest in. When my monthly income allows, I am jumping in into fast graphs, because I think the tips I'll get will be a lot more worth than the subscription price.
I am near retirement and appreciate you covering investing at an older age. ((subscribed ))
Another outstanding video on how to analyze stocks. Thank!
Can you do an update on MPW? I share views you provided on the stock in the previous videos. We had a dividend and a lot of good news. Stocks looks to be on a good path to it's old price.
Chuck, first thank you for these series. I learn a lot from these techniques you teach. Doing the manual research of financial ratios takes a lot of time. Second, long time reader and follower you from Seeking Alpha. Newly subscriber to Fast Graph. Should have done it sooner. I look at BABA and it does not make sense with its current valuation. I'm currently a proud bag holder. What are your thoughts on Chinese stocks in general or Mr. Market does not want to deal with the CCP? I look at NIO, XPEV, and PDD and sales estimate are high. Does this mean these stocks are too risky for the short term but investible in the long term?
It is difficult to say why the market behaves in certain ways at certain times. However, in the long run sanity prevails. Regarding Chinese stocks there is obviously political risk, some investors also have concerns about the legitimacy of the numbers. Nevertheless, I agree that the valuations look extremely attractive, assuming all the numbers are legit. I believe your last sentence in your comment poses an interesting hypothesis in question. Hope that helps, and thanks for subscribing, regards, Chuck
What screener was used to find these 10 stocks? Is this a screener within the FastGraphs program? Thinking of subscribing because this is one of the best analytical tools I've seen.
Thanks for the question. I used several screeners in FAST Graphs. 1st I went to the preset screens and ran every preset screen with the word growth, there are several. I also used the regular screener wearing custom look for growth about 15%. Thanks for considering a subscription, I am the cofounder and therefore obviously biased, but I concur that it is 1 of the best analytical tools available. Regards, Chuck
Great info as always❤
Can you please do an insight on SNOW and CRWD?
Really like the graph of Global Payments Inc!!
I'll try and do better
nice job Chuck, bought oc on your recommendaton when near $100
Thank Mr evaluations.
*Valuation
Great video sir, can you do valuations on SGML and DUOL. I'm thinking about buying some with EXPE. Thanks in advance.
This software is yours? It looks amazing.
Great video. Hopefully people do their research as several of these companies are minefields.
Thanks brother!
Thanks Mr. V
Thank you
That was some real alpha! Thanks
I would love to listen to your analysis on Nvidia
Thank you😊
I bought PLTR in May/November 2022 and suffered through the pain for the next year plus. all the while anybody who was a “value investor” said it was a trash company that was still overvalued.
What they missed was the actual products they offer. People who only look at graphs and numbers very often miss the big picture. Glad I held on, wish I had added more in early 2023 when it went under $7.
It is still a very undervalued company.
Just curious, please give your definition of undervalued. Thanks
@@FASTgraphs it’s all relative, right? Would you have said NVDA was undervalued a year ago? It certainly was.
I don’t mean to be rude or imply that “value investors” as a category are wrongheaded. Quite the contrary. I simply believe that fair value cannot be determined without also understanding the business- the goods/services it offers, how it compares to competitors, who its customers are and what goods/services do they desire? Often this due diligence takes too much time and effort so investors choose one or the other valuation method. Both are incomplete pictures.
@@andrews2441 Thanks for the reply . For starters, you are correct when you say that valuation is relative. The important question is relative to what? The only rational answer to that question is relative to cash flow production or earnings production, which are simply different ways of saying the same thing. At the end of the day, a investor in the stock can only receive value from the amount of cash flows (earnings) that the business generates on their behalf. Just as you would calculate a dividend yield, you should also calculate an earnings or cash flow yield. Simply because the amount of cash flow (earnings) the company generates on the shareholder’s behalf produces a true yield or return. That is why most investors utilize the discounted cash flow valuation methodology.
Secondly, I always suggest that investors conduct comprehensive research and due diligence to learn as much about the business behind the stock as possible. Regarding graphs, FAST Graphs are completely different than most price or momentum-based graphs. FAST is an acronym for fundamentals analyzer software tool. What makes them different is that they look at the business fundamentals 1st and foremost. The forecasting calculators utilize the best current consensus thinking of leading analysts following the stock that in theory at least have looked under the hood to understand the business and its cash flow generating future potential. Consequently, they represent a good starting point that investors can evaluate. Note, I did not say totally rely on, instead I said evaluate. Keep in mind that a significant portion of the analyst expectations come from guidance that the management of the company provides.
Finally, NVDA did in effect look fairly valued a year ago based on analyst expectations going forward. However, you are correct in recognizing that expectations have increased rather dramatically since a year ago. The point being that NVDA’s was reasonably valued, not undervalued, based on actual numbers the company produced. Nevertheless, at the end of the day the investor’s ability to forecast future growth in earnings achievements of the company in question will prove to be the true determinant of valuation. FAST Graphs are simply an analytical tool to think with that can aid investors in drawing those conclusions more efficiently, effectively and faster. Just like any task, it is always easier when you possess the correct tools. Regards, Chuck
Love your work! Wish there was a mobile app
Thanks, we would like to develop one
I'm a confirmed FastGraphs student
Does FG cover UK & EU stocks?
yes all international exchanges are available approx 80,000 symbols
Requesting Vertex and Dexcom.
Excellent ...surely looking at most of these for investment.
Can we have please a SOFI episode?
Can you look at SNOW????
Good future growth expected but stock is extremely over valued currently
I always come away from these instructional videos wiser and more cautious.
I’m sorry to ask again. I’m wondering if you could comment on MPW? (An update). Happy 4th of July!🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🎉
Now $69.68 7/8/2024 Rivian / VW deal caused a down turn.
GPN is one of the biggest misteries in investment in the last 7 years. Btw, don't own the stock, do own fiserv. Alternatives to aptiv, i would say Lear and french company Valeo!
There is no mystery with GPN, 7 years ago it was overvalued and now it’s undervalued. The time divide is now not 7 years ago. Fi is a great company but it does not pay a dividend, furthermore, it is fully valued at today’s prices while GPN is undervalued.
Chuck, canadian banks tracks P/E 12 for decades now. Why Fastgraphs calculate estimated rate of return to PE 15? Last time TD had P/E 15 was 18 years ago.
On the other hand, ADP never drops below PE 15, so why Fastgraphs calculate estimated rate of return to PE 15? ADP stock spent something like 99% of the time above PE 15. Would not make more sence to calculate expected rate of return using long term normal PE for these stocks?
This is something which really frustrate me with Fastgraphs. Solution is simple. Adding new column with estimated rate of return using normal valuation multiple, aka 5, 10 or 20Y average PE. And we seriously need easy way how to look for companies below orange and blue lines. Premium screens include that, so why not regular screens?
The 15 P/E ratio is a fair valuation reference for most companies, but not all companies. However, FAST Graphs already produces the historical normal P/E ratio (the blue line on the graphs). Nevertheless, these are valuation reference lines that you can measure and analyze. FAST Graphs do not attempt to dictate fair value, instead they reveal it. Here are 2 articles and video that will add more detail: fastgraphs.com/blog/investors-should-not-pay-more-than-a-15-p-e-ratio-when-buying-a-stock-ben-graham/ “ and “ fastgraphs.com/blog/why-a-15-p-e-ratio-is-fair-value-for-most-companies/.
Nevertheless, the feature you are asking for is already in development. Regards, Chuck
Hey Chuck, BMY is looking really sexy at these levels, what do you think?
I am working on an update
@@FASTgraphs I am very much looking forward to it!! Thank you, Mr
Chuck!❤❤❤❤🎉🎉🎉
FSLR!
Plez,Plez, move that mic. closer
Nobody likes that PE shrinkage
What people should not like is unjustified P/E expansion. P/E shrinkage will often bring crazy valuations in line.
I appreciate this info, but as a FG subscriber I suggest not using stock video footage - it's overused and unnecessary
Thanks for the feedback
i ruined your 666 likes. sorry sir.
I take away EXPE, FSLR, YOU and FOUR to investigate from this video.
Aptiv and Uber will lose against Tesla, Palantir is military/intelligence stuff, block is shady and Fedex too boring.
Block is fraud, be careful, read papaer before you invest.
What paper
I have no clue of what you're talking about (about 90% of it). You may as well be speaking French. But! You do sound like you know what you're talking about. You obviously been doing this a long time, and must be very successful.. at this reading the tea leaves thing. I tell ya, the way you fortune tellers can read palms and shapes of the clouds is a skill apart from us mere mortals. ..So! I tell ya what I'm gonna do, I'm gonna buy a share of one of them dang stocks and see what happens. I'm gonna find out if you're the real deal, or one them traveling snake oil salesman on an episode of Bonanza. If you are, expect a visit from Haas and Little Joe😬...... I'll buy that APTIV one, since that's your first one (I assume that's your favorite one).
If you don’t know why you’re investing in a stock, then you should not be investing. In fact, you would be gambling if you did.
@FASTgraphs Don't kid yourself, there's an element of gambling to all of it. I've been watching a lot of these 'emphasis on graphs' videos (not just yours), and it's all akin to looking at the clouds and seeing lions, tigers, and bears. Yeah, you can see them shapes, but they're still just clouds.. You seem like you got it all figured out, so congratulations.
@bonanzatime You should stick to CD's if you believe that .
@@FASTgraphs CDs are a waste of time. And you know it.
@@bonanzatime then learn about true investing
It’s all clear. But you never describe stocks behavior at earnings… earning might throw stocks very low….even after your analyzing tool
I am sorry, but I do not know what you are trying to say. 1 of the major things I talk about are company's earnings. If you are referring to stock price and how it reacts you are correct that is not something I worry about. I care about the value of the business behind the stock, because I know in the long run stock price will take care of itself.
Thank you!