regrettably, it has no contra-distinction... char lang. . kidding. . 🤣 nosebleeding here. . hey, they were able to convey a concrete viewpoint and a compendium of the topic appurtenant thereto. .
If I may ask, why would our very own constitution construct an exclusive group for "marginalized" people? In which, we can actually create something better without naming "these people" as "marginalized". For me, to label people as marginalized is already discrimination. We discriminate our own people by labeling them? Hmmm... Just wondering.
its a reality though and that's not even the main point of the problem, "their label". They represent a group in society that are underrepresented and voice is much little in the politics and society itself.
Yung nandito ka lang naman para sa takteng module
Amazing cross-examination by the 2nd speakers. 👌🏼
Asan na kayo ? Sana ganito katalino ang gobyerno ng Pilipinas
Atty. Piñol is now a content creator sa Tiktok... Cia yung Hey Attorney...
i love th speakers the 2nd from affirmative and negative both of them are really good in debates
for me the best speaker from affirmative one 2nd speaker
that "ridiculous" and "shame" comment though
banat banatan....medyo na nose bleed po ako but I learned a lot from the rebutts, cross examinations and comprehensive principles
My brain is ready for explosion .charoooot
magaling dn ito magsalita c negative side 3rd speaker
i love debate so much
2nd speaker of negative side picked up her team by her 2 minutes cross examination. Such a brilliant woman.
San Beda College Manila
I really do agree. Very smart and the way she acts is very relaxed, loosen, and confident. I love her.
The girl in the negative side (2nd speaker) is really pleasantly irking me with her cross examination. 😂😂
True...
@@ninefour5428 ibig sabihin magaling talaga sya
Para sa module. Pangitaon ko ini, bahala ma nosebleed. 🙂
ANC
I love the way about the cross-examination
the lady in red never let her finish her sentence
Speaker
2
social justice for the win
nonsense!
Di ko Alam pinag tatalunan niyo napunta Lang ako dito dahil sa activity namin :/
It is actually written on the screen po.
Two minutes cross exammation
Watching from p'que city
hello anc, when will you post the episode last friday, about whether to abolish sk or not? we supposedly will use it in our debate class in VSU,
Ano po prize pag nanalo?
regrettably, it has no contra-distinction... char lang. . kidding. . 🤣 nosebleeding here. . hey, they were able to convey a concrete viewpoint and a compendium of the topic appurtenant thereto. .
i would like to invite you to a chess game
"I'm not dead"
PAÑOL 😍💞
nosebleed ko
I don't find the first speaker of the affirmative side, sound...more like, exaggerating
Cross examinations
is there a link on a debate about k-12 ??
@ 27:18 hats off to the Kuya at the back. Hahaha
Sayang naging topic namin to sa comparative politics.
If I may ask, why would our very own constitution construct an exclusive group for "marginalized" people? In which, we can actually create something better without naming "these people" as "marginalized".
For me, to label people as marginalized is already discrimination. We discriminate our own people by labeling them?
Hmmm... Just wondering.
its a reality though and that's not even the main point of the problem, "their label". They represent a group in society that are underrepresented and voice is much little in the politics and society itself.
Mala panelo buhos
San Beda College Alabang
San Beda College Manila
hindi ko maintindihan pota. change channel na me. :D
arjay2002ph ako din wala ako naintindihan ahaha
ako dn pero nakinig prn ako😃😃😃
Lol
Nice fight. :)
te arvvyy ! ganyan ka din kagaling nun sa laban nyo ! :)
ahahahha.. Nakakhiya salamat po :)
yer alwayssss welcome ate ! pag kami na lalaban paturo ah :)
paita ning bugok ug english oi wa gyd koy nasabtan🤣🤣
is there debate about religion haha just kidding
There is.
Usap usap university
"NOOOOooooooo" HAHAHA
I'm in awe.