Tamron14-150mm F3.5-5.8 -Compact Superzoom

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 14 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 35

  • @stephanweiskorn6760
    @stephanweiskorn6760 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Excellent video 😮!

  • @ronyzmiri
    @ronyzmiri 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Finally a fresh review of the Tamron! Thanks!

  • @ljaraz
    @ljaraz 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I have been shooting with this lens for 4 years using 3 different cameras. My experience is that it is a very good lens especially for the price. I have taken thousands of photos with it and it performed well in all cases. I shoot raw so their is no problem with any corrections needed. I would highly recommend it.

    • @mattisulanto
      @mattisulanto  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks for sharing. It's not a bad lens at all, especially if you shoot RAW, but I feel, that the incompatibility with in camera corrections is a disappointment. But, that's only my opinion😀

  •  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hello Matti! I want to know why you can't access auto-caption on some videos?

    • @mattisulanto
      @mattisulanto  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I'm wondering the same, but I don't know what do about it. I have to find out how to make it work with every video.

    •  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@mattisulanto Thanks! The summary is good, but I stay at Pana 14-140.

  • @MrFirstdance2000
    @MrFirstdance2000 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    If you were able to request, as a Lumix ambassador, the next lens for Lumix what would it be and why?

    • @mattisulanto
      @mattisulanto  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That's a tough one, but for MFT I'd probably like a 17mm F1.4 and for the S series fullframe I'd like a 35mm F2. Both because there are no such lenses in the Lumix line up and I like that focal length.

    • @MrFirstdance2000
      @MrFirstdance2000 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@mattisulanto Excellent choice! The closest thing to that now is the Sigma 16mm F1.4 which you did a wonderful review of! Still a nice Pana-Leica 17mm would be special! Okay, go ahead and request it :)

  • @EJGentleman
    @EJGentleman 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I think this is a great lens if you can get it used, however, I still prefer my current 14-140 Lumix lens, with weather proofing, etc.

    • @mattisulanto
      @mattisulanto  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks for sharing.

    • @olacfpv
      @olacfpv 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      The lumix 14-140 is one of my favorite ! Why not making a review about it ?

    • @Paul_anderson_creative
      @Paul_anderson_creative 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Agreed 14-140ii is sharp end to end, small and compact... Love it!

  • @notavailable1843
    @notavailable1843 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Matti, would you be able to recommend a lens for shooting video of fast moving objects (lots of panning) with a power zoom for Lumix cameras? I do plane spotting I’m having a difficult time with getting useable video that is sharp and in focus, and without any jerking.

    • @mattisulanto
      @mattisulanto  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I'm not sure if I can recommend a lens for that, because I don't shoot that kind of stuff.

  • @rickylu2908
    @rickylu2908 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great review!

  • @MichaelGerrard
    @MichaelGerrard 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The Lumix 14-140mm has to be better? It is about the same size too, isn't it?

    • @mattisulanto
      @mattisulanto  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I haven't used the mark II version, but I used the first version long time ago and that was a pleasant surprise back then. Both the Lumix and Tamron are about the same size.

  • @jeffslade1892
    @jeffslade1892 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Stabilisation. A telephoto lens is defined as one above standard focal length, on MFT that is one above ~25mm. An Olympus back will allow you to chose body or lens stabilisation. On those lens-IS seems to work better than body-IS above super-telephoto, say ~60mm and up. The E-M5ii is far better at handling unstabilised super-tele than say the GX7 or E-PL7, a long lens certainly performs better with some form of stabilisation. So is the G9 but it doesn't give you the option to chose, so I can't test that. Dual-IS knocks spots off it, imo Olympus have shot themselves in the foot by not implementing their Sync-IS with all the Panasonic OIS lenses; their cameras can use the Panasonic OIS so they could do so; it is a joint system, the lenses are supposed to be fully interchangeable. The Panasonic 14-140 offers Dual2 on the G9. No 10X super-zoom will have the best performance but it doesn't have many faults.

  • @alantuttphotography
    @alantuttphotography 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I thought in-camera corrections were only possible when the lens was made by the same company that made the camera. As you say, lenses like this aren't for pixel peepers.

    • @mattisulanto
      @mattisulanto  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      The corrections are possible also for third party lenses.

  • @ruuddirks5565
    @ruuddirks5565 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    It looks like a poor choice if you compare it with the Panasonic options (with IS and wheater sealing and image correction). And those options are in the same price range.

    • @mattisulanto
      @mattisulanto  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      The Lumix lens has better specifications, for sure.

  • @miso56
    @miso56 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I have no experience with this lens (not a choise for my small gf7), but check this review - th-cam.com/video/bKuysHpw1OQ/w-d-xo.html ... General opinion about ibis telephoto seems to be not so true. Can you try to proces the raws with a app that is ignoring geometry/ optical corrections stored in raw file? According to reviews in general, such visible (not fully) corrected distoration points on low resolution in general - > additional corrections make it just worse (edges of panl 15 mm etc.). I do not mean pixel peeping, I am just currios.

    • @mattisulanto
      @mattisulanto  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      How IBIS works is not a matter of opinion, it's a fact that IBIS is not optimal for telephoto lenses, but of course we can have an opinion on how effective we think it is. I.e. I can say it's mediocre and you can say it's pretty good.
      With the Tamron, there are no embedded corrections in any file.

  • @dmitryrublev4934
    @dmitryrublev4934 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    add subtitles

    • @mattisulanto
      @mattisulanto  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I'd like to, but for some reason they don't work in this video.

    • @dmitryrublev4934
      @dmitryrublev4934 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@mattisulanto can I get a brief summary of this lens from you?

    • @mattisulanto
      @mattisulanto  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@dmitryrublev4934 Here is a pretty good summary: www.dxomark.com/tamron-14-150mm-f-3-5-5-8-di-iii-micro-four-thirds-mount-lens-review-accessibly-priced-addition-to-the-range/