Quasistatic and reversible processes | Thermodynamics | Physics | Khan Academy

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 77

  • @MrElectricSkittles
    @MrElectricSkittles 10 ปีที่แล้ว +65

    Better call Sal

  • @omealyjackson6795
    @omealyjackson6795 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Khan academy is the greatest thing to ever happen to education. 🙌🏾🙌🏾🙌🏾

  • @shanu508
    @shanu508 12 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    You are simply amazing.
    the concept seems so hard when you read it in the textbooks,but you made it look like the easiest thing in the world.
    thanks a ton!:D

    • @themiz4792
      @themiz4792 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Please share me..what you understand here...what is quasi static process and what is reversible ? I cannot understand for this poor slides.

  • @Phi1618033
    @Phi1618033 9 ปีที่แล้ว +45

    When I think infinitesimally small, I think calculus.

    • @hrn8935
      @hrn8935 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Same but i think this idea is very intertwined with calculus

    • @Omniverseeee
      @Omniverseeee ปีที่แล้ว +1

      that's why we have calculus, we need instantaneous values..

  • @Orangesoda65
    @Orangesoda65 10 ปีที่แล้ว +47

    Why is my textbook so bad at explaining things? Khan Academy should write textbooks. :p

    • @themiz4792
      @themiz4792 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Please share me..what you understand here...what is quasi static process and what is reversible ? I cannot understand for this poor slides.

  • @lakshmiv2223
    @lakshmiv2223 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Khan Academy has its own way of explaining concepts

  • @ratigadre6755
    @ratigadre6755 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    TH-cam is a way better teacher than any school teacher

  • @ratigadre6755
    @ratigadre6755 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Khan academy has revolutionized education
    But I still feel it's underrated

  • @Mr.Proghead
    @Mr.Proghead 15 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    A few less "little-littles" and "super-doupers" would've been enough, but very well explained!

  • @secretsocietyserver
    @secretsocietyserver 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Reversible processes are quasistatic and most quasistatic processes are reversible. Got it!

  • @sarang8207
    @sarang8207 9 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Now thats what I was looking for!!!!!!!!!!

  • @nathangillespie8492
    @nathangillespie8492 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is unbelievably helpful. Thank you!!

  • @binaykumar170
    @binaykumar170 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Truth is when you face a problem you have a better solution for it to prevent others from facing it like you did in understanding reversible process

  • @yeetholmes619
    @yeetholmes619 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Completely Understood. Thank You.

  • @matthewheide6816
    @matthewheide6816 12 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    2:25 all hell broke loose!!!! Lol

  • @vishalmishra5825
    @vishalmishra5825 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome explanation searching the answer for almost 4 years but here I got it... Thankyou so much

  • @arturouriarte4006
    @arturouriarte4006 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Indeed! superbly well explained. lots of thanks

  • @uranium-h3o
    @uranium-h3o 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This man is a hero

  • @muhammedsahil1011
    @muhammedsahil1011 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    just wow!! khan academy should write textbooks :)

  • @ManojP847
    @ManojP847 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    10:58 Example of irreversible quasi static process?

  • @laurencesaliba
    @laurencesaliba 12 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    thank. this really helped me understand these terms

  • @Stejarulpufos70
    @Stejarulpufos70 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This is the kind of lesson where you understand everything but you're like 'ok so what's the point?'. Ok so a system is in equilibrium when it has the macrostates well defined, the macrostates are well defined when process is really slow and we call that 'cvasistatic' and if we do this really slow process backwards, and we presume that there is no energy loss we have a 'reversible process'. Great, now how do we relate that with the real life pistons and the next chapters in Thermodynamics? Are engineers trying to create pistons that can keep as much as possible states of equilibrium between movements ? Having states of Equilibrium helps us finding out the work that a system does more easily? If cvasistatics processes are not real life relatable what's the point that we're making? etc
    Great lesson and a huge thank you for having this matterial for free for everyone that's willing to learn !

  • @gooddeedsleadto7499
    @gooddeedsleadto7499 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    If macro state variables are not defined when u blew out half the load, then on what bases we use the lower of the pressure to calculate irreversible work done by the system, p2x(v2-v1).
    Thanks

  • @redjr242
    @redjr242 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you so much for these videos.

  • @brunomartel4639
    @brunomartel4639 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    It's like loss of heat is loss of energy and loss of energy is loss of information, if we lose energy due to heat we will never be able to go back or reverse to one macrostate because we don't have the same energy as in the beginning.

  • @gooddeedsleadto7499
    @gooddeedsleadto7499 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Could u explain reversibility in case of adiabatic compression & expansion?
    Thanks

  • @chlorophyllphile
    @chlorophyllphile 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So why would volume not be well defined between equilebria? Are you saying the volume is kind of independent from the dimensions of the cylinder when there is no equilibrium?

    • @CutleryChips
      @CutleryChips 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Oscillation of the piston which only died down because there will be friction in reality

    • @mylegispotato
      @mylegispotato 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Little bit late but may help others: What I understand is that pressure, volume and temperature are connected - if you compress the gas (decrease the volume) either pressure or temperature has to rise. Other way if you decompress the gas by pulling the piston up and making the volume bigger then pressure or temperature will decrease. So after instantaneous removing the rock the pressure causes a fast decompression, so fast that you can't measure the temperature and pressure inside. Depending on what was used in the experiment the pressure will overshoot the equilibrium same way the spring does. Then the gas will want to compress because there is still half of the rock pushing the piston down. Back and forth, back and forth and after some time it gets to the equilibrium and stops. This is the moment you can measure pressure, volume and temperature.
      Tl;dr: You could define volume between equilibrium, but it would make no sense as there are other factors - pressure and temperature - that you need to take into account.

  • @Yusuf-gc5dj
    @Yusuf-gc5dj 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The best teacher

  • @gooddeedsleadto7499
    @gooddeedsleadto7499 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can we say
    Quasi static process leads to equilibrium
    Equilibrium means temperature & pressure is homogeneous
    Reversibility in s process exists due to the quasi static process equilibrium.
    One thing leads to the other.
    Reversible ensures the initial state of system & surrounding is establish able or restorable at every point in time during the process.
    And
    Drop or rise In the amount of heat, pressure, temperature, volume, are in included in this continual ability of the process to restore.
    Thanks

  • @joeyvigil
    @joeyvigil 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Side note: the graph should be a pv=constant graph as opposed to linear graph.

    • @CutleryChips
      @CutleryChips 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      The hypothetical reversible process can be controlled to take any path. Example: it could constructed from several infinitesimal reversible isobaric and isochoric processes

  • @iChoctate
    @iChoctate 14 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks Sal!

  • @pink_floyd1
    @pink_floyd1 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    For example, we have something on the piston, and this pigeon is mixed down and the piston is pushed because of the pressure of the pressure. If this mass is uniformly increased gas is expanded and the work performed by gas at this time will be really equal to the work that is calculated by quasi-static assumption? This means that quasi static process does not proceed with this process, which means that in any fixed time frame of the process there will be no different pressure and temperature. But then this quasi static process theoretical model is simply and such processes do not actually exist. Is not it?

  • @baldriasleonardoarana9219
    @baldriasleonardoarana9219 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you sir!

  • @ilimselyardm9698
    @ilimselyardm9698 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you sir, may Allah bless you

  • @blblbl2178
    @blblbl2178 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you!

  • @gooddeedsleadto7499
    @gooddeedsleadto7499 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why do we need to consider reversible processed?
    Is it to compare thermodynamic efficiency or COP of various engines, heat pumps & refrigerator cycles with Carnot engine efficiency?
    Because the Carnot efficacy gives u the maximum possible efficiency & COP?

  • @rassimsimou1594
    @rassimsimou1594 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Good 😊

  • @gooddeedsleadto7499
    @gooddeedsleadto7499 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Please correct me:
    Reversibility ensures heat rejected to the surrounding is equal to the heat added to the system in the forward & backward isothermal expansion & compression.
    It ensures the change of entropy of the universes remains at 0?

  • @cavelinguam6444
    @cavelinguam6444 ปีที่แล้ว

    Love the explanation

  • @theAi_journey
    @theAi_journey 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent

  • @itsthesamegame
    @itsthesamegame 15 ปีที่แล้ว

    I LOVE YOU!!! YOUR A LIFE SAVER!!!

  • @TRCxESPORTS
    @TRCxESPORTS 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is mangenta colour your favorite?..

  • @jasminechan7861
    @jasminechan7861 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you soooooo much

  • @gooddeedsleadto7499
    @gooddeedsleadto7499 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Just like this process from 1 to 2 has to be extremely slow to make it a reversible process, adiabatic expansion process should go fast to keep it reversible?
    If so, why?

  • @nishantdaima34
    @nishantdaima34 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank U a lot.....

  • @pink_floyd1
    @pink_floyd1 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    if we will take all balls at the same time at this time gas will complete a work and this work will be equal to work which we calculate cvazistatistical acces?

  • @sciencenerd7639
    @sciencenerd7639 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    wow!

  • @medhashreetak1306
    @medhashreetak1306 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you :)

  • @gooddeedsleadto7499
    @gooddeedsleadto7499 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    In quasi static, equilibrium & reversible process the the macro states of the system are continually going up or down without changing the equilibrium of the system, conversely not changing the equilibrium of the micro states of the surroundings, plus the net change of heat energy added to the system is equal to the heat energy rejected to the surrounding?
    Could u please verify this understanding?
    Thanks

    • @pink_floyd1
      @pink_floyd1 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      For example, we have something on the piston, and this pigeon is mixed down and the piston is pushed because of the pressure of the pressure. If this mass is uniformly increased gas is expanded and the work performed by gas at this time will be really equal to the work that is calculated by quasi-static assumption? This means that quasi static process does not proceed with this process, which means that in any fixed time frame of the process there will be no different pressure and temperature. But then this quasi static process theoretical model is simply and such processes do not actually exist. Is not it?

  • @klmstudycircle8684
    @klmstudycircle8684 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    What happens if sand remove at once????

  • @s0m0c
    @s0m0c 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    Gracias.

  • @pabitraamadhurima6960
    @pabitraamadhurima6960 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Why every reversible process is mandatory to be quasi-static??

    • @pink_floyd1
      @pink_floyd1 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      what is quasi-static process?

  • @stset-m7u
    @stset-m7u 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    What is equilibrium here? I mean, between what things , we are talking about equilibrium

    • @CutleryChips
      @CutleryChips 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      That the stuff inside the container is homogenous and thus the properties be described by a single number, P,V,T.

  • @vbcambajogai
    @vbcambajogai 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I would have chosen the job of sal's car driver if he allowed me for 1-2 yrs..

  • @mohithraju2629
    @mohithraju2629 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    HOW WOULD THE GAS HAVE A LOWER TEMPERATURE AFTER THE WEIGHT IS BLOWN OFF

    • @Ebani
      @Ebani 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Bc as it expands, work is flowing outside the system which means it's losing internal energy (since U=W+Q), the consequence being the system (or gas in this case) will cool down. You can easily prove this with spray cans, the more you discharge it the colder it'll get.

  • @yohaijohn
    @yohaijohn 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    You didnt explaine WHY there isnt a lost of energy.

    • @anguyen1920
      @anguyen1920 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think this is just a concept in an ideal situation (not achievable yet in real life) where there's no lost in energy

    • @yohaijohn
      @yohaijohn 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@anguyen1920
      Its is just ideal, but he didnt got into the reason on why it happens.
      I think i has somthing to do with the fact that when you compress a gas slowly the tempeture stays constant but when you do it fast it heats up. Cant yet understand why tho

  • @paulceltics
    @paulceltics 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    all hell broke loose!

  • @catrinapodberesky385
    @catrinapodberesky385 7 ปีที่แล้ว

    similes of youth vera the eld

  • @nurubelete851
    @nurubelete851 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    about information

  • @mikethareaper1789
    @mikethareaper1789 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Entropy irreversible

  • @HariKrishna-zb7vx
    @HariKrishna-zb7vx 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Simply waste

  • @Obiwa1kenobi
    @Obiwa1kenobi 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The slides are ugly. what do you intend to do by showing such a lousy slide. it looks like a fish market. even though your content is proper and nice but the slides make it bad.

    • @ummchilesoanyways1313
      @ummchilesoanyways1313 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      bro it was made in 2009 back then only MS paint existed to work with.

  • @rahulmaurya6309
    @rahulmaurya6309 8 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks a lot