Seismic Analysis Lecture #3 - Dirk Bondy, S.E.

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 6 ต.ค. 2024
  • Site specific seismic design values and base shear using the Equivalent Lateral Force Procedure Part 2

ความคิดเห็น • 23

  • @joro8604
    @joro8604 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Excellent teaching. Good supplement to the Hiner Seismic Design course. Superb description of how to draw the response spectra and what it means.

  • @purshep
    @purshep 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Went to Pamona in April last and it was tough SE exam I am not confident but after just getting my PE this is easier now to understand nearly 3 years when I first saw this video.

  • @andresfeliperodriguez8257
    @andresfeliperodriguez8257 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great Videos Dirk. For anyone who is following the videos, According to the ASCE7-16. The value of Fv is between 1.8 and 1.9, Doing interpolation I got Fv=1.87. This value gives S(M1)=0.8 and S(D1)=0.54

  • @hddevani
    @hddevani 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Please, sir, make videos on wind analysis...Thank you for uploading these videos...

  • @kohyar6165
    @kohyar6165 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Dirk thank you for a good presentation, could explain where is the Cu factor - Period Parameters Cu - Table 12.8-1.

  • @LEON-vt8zz
    @LEON-vt8zz 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you Sir very informative specially for seismic design.

  • @ardiansyah6069
    @ardiansyah6069 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    realy helping for me to understand, thanks from Indonesia

  • @DawnPatr0l69
    @DawnPatr0l69 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    "T sub naught.... I don't care if you calculate it or not...". I see what you did there.

  • @haythamibraheem8323
    @haythamibraheem8323 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    thank you for the great effort. By the way @ 7:39 I think values for Ct & X are in table 12.8 - 2 not in table 12.2 - 1. once again thanks for your effort.

  • @ВладиславДанько-ы4с
    @ВладиславДанько-ы4с 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    -any questions?
    -none!
    😂

  • @AMREALBARODY
    @AMREALBARODY 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dear Eng. Dirk Bondy, In the lecture No. 2 At the minute 6 : 44 you told SDC = D But according to table 11.6-1 0.33

    • @dirkbondy
      @dirkbondy  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      That part of the Code changed between ASCE 7-10 and ASCE 7-16

  • @vartantelian2078
    @vartantelian2078 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dear professor, is this series of videos enough to pass CA seismic exam?
    If not can you give some advice and tips
    Thanks in advance

    • @dirkbondy
      @dirkbondy  3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I think it should be enough for most of the analysis, but you still need the design portion. You would have to get that from material design textbooks and experience in design.

  • @umaraliarshad7454
    @umaraliarshad7454 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    According to SDC our site class is E, but for SDs and SD1 site category D is used, Why?

    • @dirkbondy
      @dirkbondy  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The site soil category doesn't have anything to do with the Seismic Design Category - they are two completely different things. The first is a soil property and the second has to do with the spectral acceleration at 1.0 seconds (the S1 value). If the S1 value exceeds 0.75 then the structure must be designed as a Seismic Category E building.

    • @umaraliarshad7454
      @umaraliarshad7454 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@dirkbondy ok.Thank you sir.

  • @Stalkerthegame
    @Stalkerthegame 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can someone post the link to the site where he gets the S1 values(The site which allows you to search longitude and altitude)? I can't seem to locate it. I keep on landing on this site earthquake.usgs.gov/moving.php