@@TheChieftainsHatch Check out the French battleship Charles Martel, USS Texas (1892), French battleship Henri IV, Japanese battleship Satsuma, SMS Schleswig-Holstein, and the HMS Agamemnon (1906). The pre-dreadnoughts are the inter-war tanks of the sea, lots of ideas but then later designs got serious.
Having seen Drach talking about how he likes tanks and telling us that he will be at tankfest for a couple years now , the only surprising thing is that it took this long for the time to be found for Drach to do this
That is because the TC is supposed to be sitting half out of the hatch with their sword drawn to charge the enemy, or I might be thinking of the imperial guard
But do you shift the gears in the traditional manner by beating on the gearshift lever with a 2.5kg hammer from the tank's toolkit the transmission goes up and allows it to go into gear?
@@Kumimono Well, that is the special Model designed for the 'oh Comrad-Bugger the tank is on fire' test, which it is very likeli to win, if you for once would it get on fire finaly.
Ok so now we have to get an episode of the chieftain playing "ho bugger, the ship is on fire" from the depth of the boiler room of battleship New Jersey and the "all things metal that go boom" crossover will be complete
@@TheChieftainsHatch Do a lot of stair steps. Those ladders spawn everywhere and the ship monster likes to hide in all those passageways and overheads but it loves the deck plates especially around the hatches lol. That would be epic Chieftain!
@butternades - Battleship New Jersey with Ryan is doing a great job I watch for all their videos. Tank Musem and Drachinifel did a great job. A neat and engaging way to promote TH-cam channels and keep history alive
@@gregorywright4918 Dam I wasn't aware of that, my grandmother lived in Aberdeen so when we went to visit, dad, pop and myself would scoot to the base to see the displays
Either a Scorpion or Scimitar Commander in the Falklands jumped out of his Turret and sank in the boggy ground up to his knees, his vehicle was sitting on top of the ground still.
I've heard a story that one CVT in the Falklands ran someone over, the crew realised with horror as it happened and got out, only to have some irate squaddie with a now ruined backpack pull himself out of a now Wile E. Coyote style mans shaped hole in the ground and give them some rather 'blue' language. It's one of those stories no one is sure is true, but heard it from a veteran that knew someone who knew someone who saw it ;)
It has been pointed out that due to the early involvement of the navy in tank design, a lot of terminology was adopted for the new machines. So they were equipped with Hulls, hatches, turrets, sponsons. Taking the naval design factor to its extreme, you could have included some of the multi-turreted leviathan's that were built in the 1930s.
One of the top 5 (my #1) of this series based on the extraordinary combination of engaging articulate presenter and depth of information so succinctly covered. Bravo Zulu Drach!!!
Well, Drach was in a British Museum, highlighting the features of a British operated (and modified) variant. Granted, the U.S. versions did not mount the 20mm weapon BUT if you re-run the video, you will notice that the weapon has a "snail drum" magazine. No Browning M2 ever had a magazine in that shape. There WERE two .50 M2s though, just forward of the ramp. @@scipioafricanus4328
@@scipioafricanus4328 the LVTP's were later cold war amphibs that did mount a 20mm gun or a combo .50 M-2and 40mm M19 AGL there were also cold war LVTP's that mounted 105mm howitzers WW2 LVT's also mounted 37mm guns (both AT guns and automatic guns) and 4.5" rockets
For those that don't know... The Royal Naval Air Service operated land based for most of WW1, at the very start of the war they had in effect "snatch squads" with cars to rescue downed pilots, while the front was fluid this worked well, but some blokes in field grey didn't like this and kept shooting at them. So the RNAS started to put armour on their snatch cars, then machine guns, then you get stuff like the Seabrook lorry mounting a 3pdr gun. With all that knowledge built up through design and use, the navy remained involved in armour car operations for the rest of the war.
Great list, and interesting to see a top 5 with a naval aspect. Also loved the bit in the T-55 with the comment about The Chieftain (and the cutout view of Drach inside looked a bit like an image made post-production, at least to me).
Come on Drach, the T-55 has another NAVYish connection. It may not swim on water but can kind of dive like a submarine and deep fording rivers with a snorkel.
@@Drachinifel There is another, less obvious connection you missed, which is the naval infantry T-55 variant of the tank (which I doubt you can find outside of russian museums these days). The soviet Naval infantry in the early 80s essentially took a look at the shiny new T-72s that the army was fielding and realised "This thing is too big and too heavy to fit on our landing craft" and as landing craft tend to have a limited capacity due to well... Having significant size and draft restrictions, they essentially asked their old, smaller T-55s to get the "Drozd" active protection system fitted on them, active protection systems are essentially just airburst munitions designed to take out incoming rounds or rockets, in case you dont know much about that... So essentially for a while there, the only tanks in the world to have this cutting edge tank technology (which only started seeing adoption outside of the USSR in the last 10 years or so) under the command of the soviet Navy instead of the Army
@@domaxltv Does it work as well as the ones in Ukraine, because they don't seem to be working that well, if they even have real explosive in their bricks...
@@gregorywright4918 You're thinking about Explosive Reactive Armour (ERA). Active Protection Systems act ahead of the impact, destroying the projectile before it reaches the tank.
@@lavrentivs9891 The problems with Drozd were it didn't offer 360 degrees protection and it was lethal to friendly dismounted infantry around the tank 😬
It’s funny that you start next to a Centurion because it immediately reminds me of my dad’s time in the Navy. He was RFA in the 70s and 80s and spent a lot of time around Centurions shipping them to Canada. He really enjoyed getting to drive them when loading and unloading
Loved it. I would love to see an episode with Drach, Jingles, Lindybeige and Chieftain, all put inside a tank, locked form the outside without the possibility to get out until they have reached an agreement on what the best tank in history was.
Thanks. I appreciated the tour of the WW2 era LVT-4 Buffalo. I served at Camp Pendleton in the early 1980s, at which time there was still a splendid outdoor display of at least a dozen WW2 era Amphibious Tractors. We were still scavenging useful cables and lighting modules from a dozen or more Vietnam-era LVTP-5's which were parked at the Las Pulgas fire station before being towed out to the range to serve as targets. I later had the dubious distinction of serving in an LVTC-7 during the Gulf War.
Very well done! My #1 Naval tank, for WWII, is the M4 Sherman, as all of them had to take a boat ride to get to battle. Quay side cranes limited the size of the tanks which were delivered, same as landing craft. Had to have the Navy involved. Same went for Desert Storm
All tanks were transported by ship, Churchills (40t) to USSR and North Africa and later to Australia and Korea. Tiger 1s (50t) to North Africa. Liberty Ships were designed to be able to self load/unload. They had a 50t Boom Derrick for their No. 2 Hold which was where 14 Medium tanks were loaded, some were built especially for tank transport with four holds with 50t Derricks. During the war some 2000 90t steam locomotives were exported worldwide, dockyard cranes rated at 100t. General cargo cranes in UK were mostly rated at 35t (Pitt and Stothert) but in the Wartime Emergency they could lift 50t by limiting jib extension and running cable life. Landing Ship Tank LCT were built with a 60t Ramp. They also carried 14-16 tanks depending on type. The limitations on Tank weight was determined by Bridge Class which at the beginning of the war was around 20t The British, with the expectation of the Churchill developed Bailey Bridge and the 30ft Small Girder Bridge that 40t Churchill Bridgelayer could use. The Churchill on a Tank Transporter need a Class 70 Bridge. Bailey was adopted by the US. The limitation on width was mainly for Loading Gauge on Railways. The British found that the tall Lee/Grant tanks made the Scammel Transporter/Recovery Trailers unstable cross country and had poor height clearance ( they were uprated to carry 40t Churchill) This was the reason they ordered the Diamond T tractor with a lowloader trailer which was also adopted by the US as the M19, the only Diesel truck the US used.m
I agree, I so thought the Sherman would have been on the list. It was designed to be shipped anywhere in the world and it was. The Chieftain commented a few times the most important part of the Sherman were the large tow loops on the Sherman so cranes could easily move them from ship to shore and vice versa. It was even a "boat" itself on D-Day where several waded ashore (or sank) and fought the Germans. So it did the same thing as the Scorpion as mentioned in the video above, as it could be floated into combat, but did it many years earlier.
This reminded me of the story of a TC of a Scorpion in the Falklands that had stopped to consult with some infantry his tank was to be supporting, hopped down and instantly went into the mud up to his thighs.
A naval historian in The Tank Museum? I was expecting to see the TOG II on this list and wasn't disappointed. It's one of the few of His Majesty's Ships in the museum.
Very good point ! These things were armored as well, IIRC, so they count as floating tanks. And because that still wasn't enough they often plonked some Katjushas on top !
Funny additional naval connection with the T-55 is that Finnish Defense Force Coastal Artillery branch used turrets from T-55 tanks as Light Coastal Artillery Guns until 2012, so while not mounted on ships those were meant to be used against ships.
There was an LVT in service with the Queensland government until the late 90s. It was used to maintain powerlines running from through the daintree north to Cooktown during the wet season.
Minor correction: the LVT Buffalo displayed at the Bovington Tank Musuem does have a pair of Browning .50 caliber machineguns mounted on the sides, but the gun on the front is a 20mm Polsten automatic cannon as fitted during the crossing of the Rhine River in February 1945. Second, the rear ramp had become standard on all NATO armored personnel carriers for the reasons that you mentioned. It seems that only the Russians still debark infantry over the tops of their APCs. Consider all the infantry casualties and shortages of infantry suffered during the current war in Ukraine.
Britain is absolutely resolute in being the historiographers of our day. Drach a legend already. I visited the museums in the UK. All of you watching this should seriously consider visiting. There is a camaraderie that is shared by veterans of our countries. The entire Commonwealth. We all speak the same language and fundamentally, I think you'll feel strongly seeing these machines. We feel the same way today. Our basic beliefs are more similar than the machines we operate on the battlefield today. In remembrance of all the good people lost nearly 100 years ago. Your stories will be told 🇬🇧🇺🇸🇨🇦🇦🇺🇳🇿
Interesting, I was expecting the T-55 to be because of its naval infantry connection. Naval guns aren't an infrequent source of tank guns, you've got things like the M10's 3 inch gun with that lineage.
I always learn something new watching your videos. Thanks to you and The Tank Museum for making this fascinating video. The Tank Museum is high on my bucket list to visit!
The Buffalo has another surprising connection. The .50bmg was created as an anti everything gun, and is famous for its ww2 performance, however these weapons were all but phased out before ww2. Only being retained for use on patrol boats. If it weren't for that use the US would have to use .30s on all if it's fighter planes and tanks.
When I saw the T-55 I thought he was going to make a link between the Soviet (and earlier the German) interest in snorkelling with the Schnorkels used on U-Boats.
Drach, this was a very enjoyable video. So, will there be a video on your channel featuring one of the people from the Tank Museum discussing his top five favourite navel vessels?
I’m surprised that *(Spoiler)* neither the Sherman nor Churchill made the list given how many of them were converted into Funnies for amphibious landings.
Drach is one of the most pleasant presenters I've ever seen or heard. And that's not even considering how stellar his actual research and subject matter are. I'm not gonna name names, but I clicked on a video the other day that was about the F-35 jet. The information in the video was interesting and engaging. The content itself was my sole reason for watching more then 10 seconds, because the guy doing the presentation had one of the absolute worst, unbearable voices I've ever heard. The only way to describe it would be more familiar to the old O&A crowd. It was like if you took late or even modern Opie, but crossed his voice with Bobo's way of sorta shouting everything. The guys baseline was all vocal fry but with high projection, like a blown out speaker with way too much pre-amp. It was remarkably terrible, and by contrast makes me immeasurably appreciate people like Drach and Matt Easton, who are always so pleasant and mindful that you could effortlessly listen to them for hours on end and never tire. Some people really "need" things that can help them pass the time, and give them something to think about and get immersed in. Something to distract them from their own circumstances and keep their mind away from negativity or sorrow. Drach and Matt are so perfect at providing such distractions and immersions, and thus are so helpful to those who need them. There's likely far more than a mere few who's daily lives are made more bearable because of people like them. It's something I think about every time I click on one of their video's. If you ever happen to see this Drach or Matt, sincerely, thank you. ^_^
This was great fun, thanks for letting me come and climb over the tanks! :)
The ending. What a joyful moment 😂
The best Naval Historian .. at the worlds greatest tank museum … Touché on picking the Buffalo …! Thanks
Well this is a bit different. Well done drach.
Armoured cruisers takes on a whole new meaning.....
I would say that I'm not jealous that you got to climb over these tanks. But that would be an obvious lie.
Tanks a lot.
Can't wait for the Chieftan's top 5 pre-dreadnought battleships video
If there're no french ones on that list, I'll be disappointed
@@propellhatt I shall give it some consideration.
@@TheChieftainsHatch much appreciated, that's still a lot more consideration than the French designers and decision makers did for the designs 😀
Actually, Chieftain has done some battleship (and battle) reviews on WoT.
@@TheChieftainsHatch Check out the French battleship Charles Martel, USS Texas (1892), French battleship Henri IV, Japanese battleship Satsuma, SMS Schleswig-Holstein, and the HMS Agamemnon (1906). The pre-dreadnoughts are the inter-war tanks of the sea, lots of ideas but then later designs got serious.
Legendary crossover, didn't expect to see Drach on here
Having seen Drach talking about how he likes tanks and telling us that he will be at tankfest for a couple years now , the only surprising thing is that it took this long for the time to be found for Drach to do this
A very pleasant surprise on the TH-cam feed..!
If it has guns and resembles a Ship, Drach will be there. That being said, I was as surprised as you were!
No one expects the Drach! (To show up at the Tank Museum if it’s not Tankfest)
Tanks are tiny compared to the things with guns he usually talks about.
I fit reasonably well in a T-55 as it happens…TC’s position is a bit tight, though.
I'm assuming that's without the Stetson on.
But there's a great big hole on the side! Getting out should be easy, at the least.
That is because the TC is supposed to be sitting half out of the hatch with their sword drawn to charge the enemy, or I might be thinking of the imperial guard
But do you shift the gears in the traditional manner by beating on the gearshift lever with a 2.5kg hammer from the tank's toolkit the transmission goes up and allows it to go into gear?
@@Kumimono Well, that is the special Model designed for the 'oh Comrad-Bugger the tank is on fire' test, which it is very likeli to win, if you for once would it get on fire finaly.
Drach - renowned for Naval History.
The Tank Museum - Early tanks were called Land Battleships.
Drach: Close enough!
Hi Tank Nuts! Let us know what you think of Drachinifel's Top 5 Tanks. Which tanks do you think deserved a place on his list?
The LVT’s series please … each and every one .. maybe do a top five amphibious tanks …?
@@stephenrickstrew7237 PT-76 FTW on that one...
TOG 2 , if you think about it as an amphibious monitor, it finally makes sense 👍 Brings in mind the one that is kept on Danube in Budapest.
Wot! No Sherman DD?
@@steveholmes11 - The 'cast steel & canvass canoe' - no thanks! : )
Finally: Drach sharing his view on "big armored things with guns on them".
Land edition.
Woohoo! I did NOT expect to see you here Drach... you kept this well under your shirt! Great vid.
Speaking of "not expected to be seen here..."
Ok so now we have to get an episode of the chieftain playing "ho bugger, the ship is on fire" from the depth of the boiler room of battleship New Jersey and the "all things metal that go boom" crossover will be complete
Next time I’m there, I’ll give it a go.
@@TheChieftainsHatch OMG, a response by the man himself, my day is complete! (Yeah, I'm kind of a 40YO bearded groupie...)
@@TheChieftainsHatch DEW IT!
I guess PT-boat is tank-equivalent of naval combat.
@@TheChieftainsHatch Do a lot of stair steps. Those ladders spawn everywhere and the ship monster likes to hide in all those passageways and overheads but it loves the deck plates especially around the hatches lol.
That would be epic Chieftain!
A surprisingly insightful crossover. Credit to Drach for putting in some work on this!
He always does. :)
@@TheEDFLegacy I second that
Tank Museum and Royal Armories are doing a great job of engaging the online community, wish museums in the US did similar.
I wish Aberdeen hadn't closed up and shipped it's stuff to some base that is not open to the public...
USS New Jersey is trying! Ryan’s running a darn good channel
@butternades - Battleship New Jersey with Ryan is doing a great job I watch for all their videos. Tank Musem and Drachinifel did a great job. A neat and engaging way to promote TH-cam channels and keep history alive
@@gregorywright4918 Dam I wasn't aware of that, my grandmother lived in Aberdeen so when we went to visit, dad, pop and myself would scoot to the base to see the displays
Either a Scorpion or Scimitar Commander in the Falklands jumped out of his Turret and sank in the boggy ground up to his knees, his vehicle was sitting on top of the ground still.
I've heard a story that one CVT in the Falklands ran someone over, the crew realised with horror as it happened and got out, only to have some irate squaddie with a now ruined backpack pull himself out of a now Wile E. Coyote style mans shaped hole in the ground and give them some rather 'blue' language. It's one of those stories no one is sure is true, but heard it from a veteran that knew someone who knew someone who saw it ;)
I read that they sank up to their chest.
Now look at that. The grandmaster of Naval history vs the best Tank museum. ❤
Ah ah ah, i's say, as a german, our Deutsches Panzermuseum Munster is at least equally good! If not better, that is, of course.
@@rictusmetallicus shhhhh. Don’t tell der Feind what our Panzers are doing
It has been pointed out that due to the early involvement of the navy in tank design, a lot of terminology was adopted for the new machines. So they were equipped with Hulls, hatches, turrets, sponsons.
Taking the naval design factor to its extreme, you could have included some of the multi-turreted leviathan's that were built in the 1930s.
I dont know if bovington has any of the multiturret monsters in its collection or he may have. They tend to stick to tanks bovington has on site.
@@awalllen212 they have an Independent I believe
"Quite interesting " in English translates to American as "I'm super pumped about this".
Adding a comment for the algorithm. Thank you to two of my favorite channels.
If there is one person I never expected to do a top 5...it's Drach.
Brilliant. Loved this. Thank you :)
One of the top 5 (my #1) of this series based on the extraordinary combination of engaging articulate presenter and depth of information so succinctly covered.
Bravo Zulu Drach!!!
That ".50 cal" at the front of the Buffalo is a 20 mm Polsten gun (quite similar to an Oerlikon 20 mm).
Yup. It did have those 2x 50s on the side. Which brings up the point, wow this thing had a lot of guns! A 20 mm and 2x 50 cals!
I think Drac knows what a 20 mm cannon is. His dialogue was referring to pacific operations where the US did not mount 20 mm cannons on their LVPT’s.
Well, Drach was in a British Museum, highlighting the features of a British operated (and modified) variant. Granted, the U.S. versions did not mount the 20mm weapon BUT if you re-run the video, you will notice that the weapon has a "snail drum" magazine. No Browning M2 ever had a magazine in that shape. There WERE two .50 M2s though, just forward of the ramp. @@scipioafricanus4328
@@scipioafricanus4328 true. We did have LVTs with flamethrowers & 75mm cannon though.
@@scipioafricanus4328 the LVTP's were later cold war amphibs that did mount a 20mm gun or a combo .50 M-2and 40mm M19 AGL
there were also cold war LVTP's that mounted 105mm howitzers
WW2 LVT's also mounted 37mm guns (both AT guns and automatic guns) and 4.5" rockets
For those that don't know... The Royal Naval Air Service operated land based for most of WW1, at the very start of the war they had in effect "snatch squads" with cars to rescue downed pilots, while the front was fluid this worked well, but some blokes in field grey didn't like this and kept shooting at them. So the RNAS started to put armour on their snatch cars, then machine guns, then you get stuff like the Seabrook lorry mounting a 3pdr gun. With all that knowledge built up through design and use, the navy remained involved in armour car operations for the rest of the war.
Dracinifel is also one of my favorite creators. This is a great combination. Thank you!
Great list, and interesting to see a top 5 with a naval aspect. Also loved the bit in the T-55 with the comment about The Chieftain (and the cutout view of Drach inside looked a bit like an image made post-production, at least to me).
It's the lighting. Yeah, it's pretty cool, I don't remember seeing anyone sitting in a cutaway tank.
@@uzivatel56 There's so many T-55s laying around, no one gets upset if you cut into the side of a "historical vehicle"...
@@gregorywright4918 Historical? Lads busy eating javelins in Ukraine
@@lermiapolar8680 the after effects of eating them are quite explosive though, kinda like take out from taco bell
This is an unexpected but welcome crossover. 😊
A crossover I was NOT expecting! Awesome :D :D
A crossover I've hoped for for a long time!
We love Drach 👌
Another terrific guest! Drach has one of my very favourite YT channels and his choices for Top 5 are fascinating. Well done to all concerned.
Come on Drach, the T-55 has another NAVYish connection. It may not swim on water but can kind of dive like a submarine and deep fording rivers with a snorkel.
True, but that feature isn't as unique as essentially stealing a naval gun 😀
@@Drachinifel There is another, less obvious connection you missed, which is the naval infantry T-55 variant of the tank (which I doubt you can find outside of russian museums these days). The soviet Naval infantry in the early 80s essentially took a look at the shiny new T-72s that the army was fielding and realised "This thing is too big and too heavy to fit on our landing craft" and as landing craft tend to have a limited capacity due to well... Having significant size and draft restrictions, they essentially asked their old, smaller T-55s to get the "Drozd" active protection system fitted on them, active protection systems are essentially just airburst munitions designed to take out incoming rounds or rockets, in case you dont know much about that... So essentially for a while there, the only tanks in the world to have this cutting edge tank technology (which only started seeing adoption outside of the USSR in the last 10 years or so) under the command of the soviet Navy instead of the Army
@@domaxltv Does it work as well as the ones in Ukraine, because they don't seem to be working that well, if they even have real explosive in their bricks...
@@gregorywright4918 You're thinking about Explosive Reactive Armour (ERA). Active Protection Systems act ahead of the impact, destroying the projectile before it reaches the tank.
@@lavrentivs9891 The problems with Drozd were it didn't offer 360 degrees protection and it was lethal to friendly dismounted infantry around the tank 😬
I love Drach so much, this is a great video.
It’s funny that you start next to a Centurion because it immediately reminds me of my dad’s time in the Navy. He was RFA in the 70s and 80s and spent a lot of time around Centurions shipping them to Canada. He really enjoyed getting to drive them when loading and unloading
Loved it. I would love to see an episode with Drach, Jingles, Lindybeige and Chieftain, all put inside a tank, locked form the outside without the possibility to get out until they have reached an agreement on what the best tank in history was.
That sounds like suffering.
They might agree on the sherman due to all being able to fit in it easily.
Oh god that's hilarious, we have to bribe jingles to only vote for the TOG 2!
Drach's enthusiasm is what makes his videos great
Thanks. I appreciated the tour of the WW2 era LVT-4 Buffalo. I served at Camp Pendleton in the early 1980s, at which time there was still a splendid outdoor display of at least a dozen WW2 era Amphibious Tractors. We were still scavenging useful cables and lighting modules from a dozen or more Vietnam-era LVTP-5's which were parked at the Las Pulgas fire station before being towed out to the range to serve as targets. I later had the dubious distinction of serving in an LVTC-7 during the Gulf War.
What a fantastic collaboration between two amazing channels!
Very well done! My #1 Naval tank, for WWII, is the M4 Sherman, as all of them had to take a boat ride to get to battle. Quay side cranes limited the size of the tanks which were delivered, same as landing craft. Had to have the Navy involved. Same went for Desert Storm
And lots of them sank.
@@rogersmith7396 So did many battleships. Ask the Germans and the Japanese. 🙂
All tanks were transported by ship, Churchills (40t) to USSR and North Africa and later to Australia and Korea. Tiger 1s (50t) to North Africa.
Liberty Ships were designed to be able to self load/unload. They had a 50t Boom Derrick for their No. 2 Hold which was where 14 Medium tanks were loaded, some were built especially for tank transport with four holds with 50t Derricks.
During the war some 2000 90t steam locomotives were exported worldwide, dockyard cranes rated at 100t.
General cargo cranes in UK were mostly rated at 35t (Pitt and Stothert) but in the Wartime Emergency they could lift 50t by limiting jib extension and running cable life.
Landing Ship Tank LCT were built with a 60t Ramp. They also carried 14-16 tanks depending on type.
The limitations on Tank weight was determined by Bridge Class which at the beginning of the war was around 20t The British, with the expectation of the Churchill developed Bailey Bridge and the 30ft Small Girder Bridge that 40t Churchill Bridgelayer could use. The Churchill on a Tank Transporter need a Class 70 Bridge. Bailey was adopted by the US.
The limitation on width was mainly for Loading Gauge on Railways.
The British found that the tall Lee/Grant tanks made the Scammel Transporter/Recovery Trailers unstable cross country and had poor height clearance ( they were uprated to carry 40t Churchill) This was the reason they ordered the Diamond T tractor with a lowloader trailer which was also adopted by the US as the M19, the only Diesel truck the US used.m
@@rogersmith7396 Well, at least at Normandy...
I agree, I so thought the Sherman would have been on the list. It was designed to be shipped anywhere in the world and it was. The Chieftain commented a few times the most important part of the Sherman were the large tow loops on the Sherman so cranes could easily move them from ship to shore and vice versa. It was even a "boat" itself on D-Day where several waded ashore (or sank) and fought the Germans. So it did the same thing as the Scorpion as mentioned in the video above, as it could be floated into combat, but did it many years earlier.
It's like a Reese's Cup. Two of my favorite things put together. And now I know how to pronounce Drachinifel. Thanks gents!
What an iconic and unexpected collaboration is this! I'm pretty sure Drach had a very great time!
This reminded me of the story of a TC of a Scorpion in the Falklands that had stopped to consult with some infantry his tank was to be supporting, hopped down and instantly went into the mud up to his thighs.
Thanks!
A naval historian in The Tank Museum? I was expecting to see the TOG II on this list and wasn't disappointed. It's one of the few of His Majesty's Ships in the museum.
Excellent production, Drachinifel. And thanks the Tank Museum.
Great to see Drach in an alien environment. Great guest spot!
This was a nice surprise! Drach is one of my favorite channels
I was expecting one of the soviet T34, because they bolted some of these turrets onto river boats.
Also armored train cars
Very good point ! These things were armored as well, IIRC, so they count as floating tanks. And because that still wasn't enough they often plonked some Katjushas on top !
I was expecting one of the soviet T34, because they >flooded< gerrmany ;)
Thumbs up just for having Drac as the host. Absolutely my favourite historian alive.
The youtube crossover event i never even imagined... The Drach and the tank.. Love it. :)
Drac is one of the best historians on You Tube. Thanks!
What an amazing collab between two Icons of British TH-cam 👏👏
Uncle Drach looking at land-boats is exactly what makes my Friday that much better
A great museum. Well worth the visit!
Great Video Drach
By Jove this is a welcome surprise!
Funny additional naval connection with the T-55 is that Finnish Defense Force Coastal Artillery branch used turrets from T-55 tanks as Light Coastal Artillery Guns until 2012, so while not mounted on ships those were meant to be used against ships.
That is a 20mm Polsten Cannon mounted on the LVT(Buffalo, British Service). Note the Drum Magazine.
Two of My Favourite YT programmes in one . Brilliant , Thanks everyone at Bovington & of course Drach himself.
I watched a documentary about how they used to put old tanks together. It was riveting.
Welded to your seat. I bet the casting was on point.
Amazing! Drach's content is some of the best on YT. Great collab!
There was an LVT in service with the Queensland government until the late 90s. It was used to maintain powerlines running from through the daintree north to Cooktown during the wet season.
Minor correction: the LVT Buffalo displayed at the Bovington Tank Musuem does have a pair of Browning .50 caliber machineguns mounted on the sides, but the gun on the front is a 20mm Polsten automatic cannon as fitted during the crossing of the Rhine River in February 1945. Second, the rear ramp had become standard on all NATO armored personnel carriers for the reasons that you mentioned. It seems that only the Russians still debark infantry over the tops of their APCs. Consider all the infantry casualties and shortages of infantry suffered during the current war in Ukraine.
@@robertwarner5963 i beleive you were not replying to me?
"More is better" for Drach content, and this was an unexpected pleasure. Drach is so good at presentation.
Should have ended it with the 5 minute guide's computer voice "Thanks for watching........"
Britain is absolutely resolute in being the historiographers of our day. Drach a legend already.
I visited the museums in the UK. All of you watching this should seriously consider visiting. There is a camaraderie that is shared by veterans of our countries. The entire Commonwealth. We all speak the same language and fundamentally, I think you'll feel strongly seeing these machines. We feel the same way today. Our basic beliefs are more similar than the machines we operate on the battlefield today.
In remembrance of all the good people lost nearly 100 years ago. Your stories will be told 🇬🇧🇺🇸🇨🇦🇦🇺🇳🇿
I'm surprised at how many people thought this was unexpected, I was thinking it's about time Drach was on here🤣
Drach at the tank museum. Two of my favourite channels in one.
If Drach is involved. You know it's going to be good
I knew this was going to be good, as soon as I saw the thumbnail!
Quick question, how many barrels of Grog can fit in the TOG 2? I have a feeling that for people in the tank, it would feel like being on a ship.
Wonderful video.
Thanks Drac & The Tank Museum.
Interesting, I was expecting the T-55 to be because of its naval infantry connection. Naval guns aren't an infrequent source of tank guns, you've got things like the M10's 3 inch gun with that lineage.
"Uncle Drac, a fish out of water"
Awesome to see work between two of my favourite channels :)
Surprised he didn’t mention the fact many tank terms like sponson, turret, hull, etc all came from naval terms
I always learn something new watching your videos. Thanks to you and The Tank Museum for making this fascinating video. The Tank Museum is high on my bucket list to visit!
Drach? Tanks? Did I wake up in a mirror universe this morning!?
He also has appeared on Scholagladiatoria's channel talking about boarding actions, swords & HEMA.
Drach subscriber here. That was a fun surprise seeing this pop up!
The Buffalo has another surprising connection. The .50bmg was created as an anti everything gun, and is famous for its ww2 performance, however these weapons were all but phased out before ww2. Only being retained for use on patrol boats. If it weren't for that use the US would have to use .30s on all if it's fighter planes and tanks.
Hey mate, love your content, wit, knowledge & voice. I've been away for a bit. I've seen your face now!! Keep it up pal, you're one of the best x
What 's next?
Drach crossing the sea and going to DAYTON , OHIO and visiting the National Museum of the US Air Force!
(My hometown , btw)
i loved this aspect of the tank museum and Drach's perspective
When I saw the T-55 I thought he was going to make a link between the Soviet (and earlier the German) interest in snorkelling with the Schnorkels used on U-Boats.
Woohoo, I was hoping for this video for ages, glad to se Drach on here finally!
Can we get James May to do one of these videos?
I'm so glad to see this person on the video. So much researched knowledge, Thanks.
Nice ending. Did they let you out?
I was hoping to see the elusive Japanese Torpedo Tank on this list
I'm sure you could "see" one if you look around. They do seem to be everywhere.
Thank you, your No.1 spot choice explains a couple of questions I'd always had.
Drach, this was a very enjoyable video. So, will there be a video on your channel featuring one of the people from the Tank Museum discussing his top five favourite navel vessels?
Cool video, love anything with Drach starring!
Well to be brutally Honest, PT-76 deserves the position for No.1 Tank in this segment. Sadly it's not available at the moment with Tank Museum 😔
I was wondering about that myself.
I was wondering about that myself.
Chinese type 85's an indirect improved copy of the PT-76 would be better at #1
Fantastic episode from the Top 5 Tanks series. This guy is great.
You can't ask Drach to do a video on something, and expect to get a quick, 5-10 minute video. The guy knows too much! 🤣🤣🤣
Except for his literally less than 10 minute videos on specific ships.
@@Destroyer_V0 Which have a tendency to run over into the 10 minute range in length...
@@chemech shhh
They are "5" minute guides
@@Destroyer_V0 ;) 5 minute(ish) guides, as per Drach's own words... ;)
@@chemech (in a human voice)
Good to see Drach presenting other (loosely naval connected) subject matter 🙂
Tanks, arrows and armour Drach, doesn't that just make you a historian, rather than naval historian?
I like history :)
@@Drachinifel been enjoying your cross channel collaborations, even if it's just catching you manoeuvre a dummy in armour.
“Oh bugger, the ship is cracking in half” - the Chieftan from deep within the machine spaces of a light cruiser that has been struck with a torpedo
I'm waiting for Jago Hazzards top 5 now.
He’ll be focusing on armoured trains and railway guns :)
Thank you for watching, you are the armored recovery vehicle to my stuck tank.
Any new top 5s I Normally skip .
Drach is so respected in what he does .
I had to watch .
Always in depth with Drach .
You should invite Mark Felton! That would be epic!
I'd second that
I close the nomination.
I would love to see Mark Felton do a video with lots of history channels but unfortunately I don’t think he does collaborations videos.
@@DardanellesBy108 rather he is so infamous for spreading wild off myths and reading wiki that nobody really wants to collab with him
@@mememetal6631 Yeah that whole thing with the German Panzer Museum pretty much finished off his credibility.
I’m surprised that
*(Spoiler)*
neither the Sherman nor Churchill made the list given how many of them were converted into Funnies for amphibious landings.
Called it for the MK1! Great stuff! Was very surprised to see Drach do a video on tanks, but hey, why not?
Drach is one of the most pleasant presenters I've ever seen or heard. And that's not even considering how stellar his actual research and subject matter are. I'm not gonna name names, but I clicked on a video the other day that was about the F-35 jet. The information in the video was interesting and engaging. The content itself was my sole reason for watching more then 10 seconds, because the guy doing the presentation had one of the absolute worst, unbearable voices I've ever heard. The only way to describe it would be more familiar to the old O&A crowd. It was like if you took late or even modern Opie, but crossed his voice with Bobo's way of sorta shouting everything. The guys baseline was all vocal fry but with high projection, like a blown out speaker with way too much pre-amp. It was remarkably terrible, and by contrast makes me immeasurably appreciate people like Drach and Matt Easton, who are always so pleasant and mindful that you could effortlessly listen to them for hours on end and never tire. Some people really "need" things that can help them pass the time, and give them something to think about and get immersed in. Something to distract them from their own circumstances and keep their mind away from negativity or sorrow. Drach and Matt are so perfect at providing such distractions and immersions, and thus are so helpful to those who need them. There's likely far more than a mere few who's daily lives are made more bearable because of people like them. It's something I think about every time I click on one of their video's. If you ever happen to see this Drach or Matt, sincerely, thank you. ^_^
It's cool how drac is so detail focused on his top 5.
Love to see you taking part in this lovely museum!
Drac. Great and informative presentation! Bob