hello thank you again for your clarity, but in my smart pls i don't have the correlation icon. so can we get the same information if we run pls algorithm and then get the outer loadings? thank you
Thanks for the video. I have a sample composed of two categories, say males and females, when I test a certain path using SmartPls cb-sem it gives insignificant results in both categories, surprisingly, when I test the same path for the whole sample it gives significant result!!! This doesn't appear when I use Amos (in Amos the path is insignificant for the whole sample too). If testing structural model is not yet reliable in SmartPls cb-sem, can I use it for CFA only and then test hypotheses using Amos? Given that the two softwares give very close results regarding CFA, but SmartPls is just more user-friendly
Thank you, prof. as long as smartPLS now provide PLS-SEM and CB-SEM, when can we choose one of them?. is it up to us or according to the study model and objective?
you didn't discuss how to improve the model fit using CB=SEM in smartpls
Hopefully soon
@researchwithfawad okay prof. Hoping it comes soon to help me improve my model fit
hello thank you again for your clarity, but in my smart pls i don't have the correlation icon. so can we get the same information if we run pls algorithm and then get the outer loadings? thank you
Yes, but PLS and CB-SEM are two different techniques.
yes you gave me the answer in the other video thank you again@@researchwithfawad
Thanks for the video. I have a sample composed of two categories, say males and females, when I test a certain path using SmartPls cb-sem it gives insignificant results in both categories, surprisingly, when I test the same path for the whole sample it gives significant result!!! This doesn't appear when I use Amos (in Amos the path is insignificant for the whole sample too). If testing structural model is not yet reliable in SmartPls cb-sem, can I use it for CFA only and then test hypotheses using Amos? Given that the two softwares give very close results regarding CFA, but SmartPls is just more user-friendly
The results may slightly differ. I recommend using same software for both analysis.
Thanks for sharing. if the loading factors were good >=0.4, but CFI and TLI
Thanks for watching. SMARTPLS4 doesn't yet provide modification indices that can help improve model fit. Waiting for an update.
Thanks for watching. SMARTPLS4 doesn't yet provide modification indices that can help improve model fit. Waiting for an update.
Hello please I can't find the correlation icon on the pls smart v 4? how can we correct this please
Run CB-SEM Algorithm, and on the left side form the menu, the correlation table is in the Latent Variables sub-menu.
perfect thank you@@researchwithfawad
Thank you, prof. as long as smartPLS now provide PLS-SEM and CB-SEM, when can we choose one of them?. is it up to us or according to the study model and objective?
Pleasure. I am glad you liked it. The choice still is based on the the data and the model.
Hello sir, Can you provide the dataset so that I can practice?
Thanks for watching. You can download the resource here
researchwithfawad.com/index.php/download-research-resources/
how we can incrase or decrease model fit indicators in CB-SEM
Please check Standardised Residual Covariance. Hopefully soon I will make a video on it.
Why we do CFA not EFA??
whats the difference?
Please watch
th-cam.com/video/Hag1xSdYce0/w-d-xo.html