The editing is top notch. I would also argue that because there is so much information in our hands, people tend to shut down, ignore the problems completely.
I can't believe your channel isn't more popular. Your writing, delivery and animations are all brilliantly done. I thank you again, one of the best content creators on here.
Fantastic!!!! I am currently gathering information about post truth for a paper that i intend to write, and this was very helpful. I enjoy the particularly the synthesis because really gives me a notion of the whole picture, very didatic... Love the editing by the way, excelent job.
hi, now i'm doing my paper about post truth also. I hope your paper doing well, cause is not an easy topic. I hope we can share what we have know about this topic. Peace
Wow, I really enjoyed your video and the fact I found your channel recently by looking for information about Plato and now I see you’ve got other valuable content.
Who is the author? Who is the targeted audience? What is their claim? What is their purpose? These are the essential questions we must ask whenever viewing media.
... though in a way, the flooded sources in the internet become confusing, flooded sources is still preferable than a one side source of known falsiness...
Nice video. But I think it gives way too much importance to philosophical discourse. The claim that some french philosophers that were only read by highly cultivated people have somehow paved the way for fake news was thrown in with absolutely no demonstration (quite contradictory I guess). And it presupposes that fake news would need a philosophical basis somehow coherent with it (statings that there are no objective facts etc.), which doesn't make any sense. Finally, if we could just make everyone critical by teaching them philosophy, all our problems would be solved. If you really see that as a concrete solution to the post-truth problem, you must really live in the platonic world of ideas.
I think he is referring to deconstructionism of Derrida's philosophical views. Not that it has paved the way to fake news per se but it has shaken the structures of objective reality, towards a better understanding on how it has been constructed in the first place. What is the internet if not a breeding ground for ideas, a highly abstract world. It'll be a matter of knowing how to distinguish between the important ones from the superfluous ones. I think he hits the nail on the head, philosophical studies maybe crucial to rise above the post-truth era.
... with your anagram, the computer age generations would be much more discerning as it is very very easy to see many many references and many many discussions... minds of even the petty would be obliged to wonder instead of simply having one source of reading material... two generations passed by me that verbal news updates though takes 60 days to 90 days are reliable than wasting time reading newspapers... or watching tv news... or listening to radios...
"Politicians like Trump".... aaaand all others, but why not focus on him to provide such an interesting matrioshka video that is about post-truth, AND post-truth at the same time.
I don't think it's necessarily like that. Truth is truth. Even if you take back towards it's base latin meaning. Just like so with the word lie or lies, false or fake. They have a meaning for purpose. You take those out of context to mean what you want them. Is no different than those who lie. There is a good ans and a bad and a right and a wrong. Becasue no matter how to label it or twist words around. The actions from your choices will speak for themselves and you will have to label them for what they are not what you want them to be.
No, footnoting is a scientific article that is more recent. The did some footnote in the 19th century but only a fraction of today. Get your facts straight. Right now you are between well-researched sights ( example: th-cam.com/video/zJeyeIPNEiU/w-d-xo.html ) and pop sights with much looser fact-checking.
And once again, here is the "postmodern" strawman. I'm sure all the birds are impressed. But then again, blaming postmodernism for Trump is an easy bet - a lazy bet, but easy nonetheless.
He didn't use PM as a strawman here. If you know the tenants of PM then you must know how it questions the validity of stances in every area of discourse including science/religion/philosopy etc. The criticism of PM is not it's propositions (IMHO) and even Jordan Peterson backs up much of what it presents, but admitting how flawed something is without a solution, doesn't get you anywhere- which is the PM issue. The video isn't 'blaming' Post Modernism, if anything it's showing how at least PM's assertions are TRUE by showing how subjective arguments are such that even objective 'facts' can be manipulated (pictures/news) and once the distortion is set, since nothing can be trusted, only the tribalism trust is followed. I just read an article today regarding the guy sending the bombs in the mail (now labeled MAGAbomber...see what was done there?) and the story showed the FB posts of the alleged bomber. The story re-printed the FB post, BUT, left out the last 2 lines he printed in the post and I believe it was intentional because those last 2 lines were negative to the authors bias. Hell, I've witnessed actual quotes being written differently and supposedly that's impossible because THATS WHAT MAKES IT A QUOTE!
The editing is top notch. I would also argue that because there is so much information in our hands, people tend to shut down, ignore the problems completely.
Thank you. Yes, I'd agree.
I can't believe your channel isn't more popular. Your writing, delivery and animations are all brilliantly done. I thank you again, one of the best content creators on here.
Fantastic!!!! I am currently gathering information about post truth for a paper that i intend to write, and this was very helpful. I enjoy the particularly the synthesis because really gives me a notion of the whole picture, very didatic... Love the editing by the way, excelent job.
hi, now i'm doing my paper about post truth also. I hope your paper doing well, cause is not an easy topic. I hope we can share what we have know about this topic. Peace
Amazing work! I wish you would list your sources for those who want to do some further reading.
Wow, I really enjoyed your video and the fact I found your channel recently by looking for information about Plato and now I see you’ve got other valuable content.
Who is the author? Who is the targeted audience? What is their claim? What is their purpose? These are the essential questions we must ask whenever viewing media.
Great video, where can I find your sources?
People has grown used to being told whatever they want to hear. There's no going back from there.
Post truth is a horrible and frightening direction for society to be moving into.
Good work bro ! Keep it up.
This is an awesome video man thank you for putting this together
+1 for Kevin MacClouds music 🎵
"Who is searching for the truth if he hadn't already tasted a lie of the loved one?" Who wrote this?
You did just then
Absolutely brilliant. I pretty much agree with most of this.
... though in a way, the flooded sources in the internet become confusing, flooded sources is still preferable than a one side source of known falsiness...
Nice video. But I think it gives way too much importance to philosophical discourse. The claim that some french philosophers that were only read by highly cultivated people have somehow paved the way for fake news was thrown in with absolutely no demonstration (quite contradictory I guess). And it presupposes that fake news would need a philosophical basis somehow coherent with it (statings that there are no objective facts etc.), which doesn't make any sense. Finally, if we could just make everyone critical by teaching them philosophy, all our problems would be solved. If you really see that as a concrete solution to the post-truth problem, you must really live in the platonic world of ideas.
I think he is referring to deconstructionism of Derrida's philosophical views. Not that it has paved the way to fake news per se but it has shaken the structures of objective reality, towards a better understanding on how it has been constructed in the first place. What is the internet if not a breeding ground for ideas, a highly abstract world. It'll be a matter of knowing how to distinguish between the important ones from the superfluous ones. I think he hits the nail on the head, philosophical studies maybe crucial to rise above the post-truth era.
Fuck yeah dude this channel is mint
amazing! Great video!
Excellent video!
Post Truth Scenario existed from the beginning of the time......
Whats new? Bullshit permeates our lives non stop.
That was great.
... with your anagram, the computer age generations would be much more discerning as it is very very easy to see many many references and many many discussions... minds of even the petty would be obliged to wonder instead of simply having one source of reading material... two generations passed by me that verbal news updates though takes 60 days to 90 days are reliable than wasting time reading newspapers... or watching tv news... or listening to radios...
"Politicians like Trump".... aaaand all others, but why not focus on him to provide such an interesting matrioshka video that is about post-truth, AND post-truth at the same time.
I don't think it's necessarily like that. Truth is truth. Even if you take back towards it's base latin meaning. Just like so with the word lie or lies, false or fake. They have a meaning for purpose. You take those out of context to mean what you want them. Is no different than those who lie. There is a good ans and a bad and a right and a wrong. Becasue no matter how to label it or twist words around. The actions from your choices will speak for themselves and you will have to label them for what they are not what you want them to be.
The one who constructs in history is a politician true or false
...and thus we need to slow down...good luck with that
This whole channels is social constructivist properganda
No, footnoting is a scientific article that is more recent. The did some footnote in the 19th century but only a fraction of today. Get your facts straight. Right now you are between well-researched sights ( example: th-cam.com/video/zJeyeIPNEiU/w-d-xo.html ) and pop sights with much looser fact-checking.
And once again, here is the "postmodern" strawman. I'm sure all the birds are impressed. But then again, blaming postmodernism for Trump is an easy bet - a lazy bet, but easy nonetheless.
He didn't use PM as a strawman here. If you know the tenants of PM then you must know how it questions the validity of stances in every area of discourse including science/religion/philosopy etc. The criticism of PM is not it's propositions (IMHO) and even Jordan Peterson backs up much of what it presents, but admitting how flawed something is without a solution, doesn't get you anywhere- which is the PM issue. The video isn't 'blaming' Post Modernism, if anything it's showing how at least PM's assertions are TRUE by showing how subjective arguments are such that even objective 'facts' can be manipulated (pictures/news) and once the distortion is set, since nothing can be trusted, only the tribalism trust is followed. I just read an article today regarding the guy sending the bombs in the mail (now labeled MAGAbomber...see what was done there?) and the story showed the FB posts of the alleged bomber. The story re-printed the FB post, BUT, left out the last 2 lines he printed in the post and I believe it was intentional because those last 2 lines were negative to the authors bias. Hell, I've witnessed actual quotes being written differently and supposedly that's impossible because THATS WHAT MAKES IT A QUOTE!
#Trump2020