i feel like most of these definitions didn't do justice to the thoughts and ideas behind each concept. it's a good video to be introduced to these concepts but it's way more complex than just a paragraph. i'd love to see deep dives into each concept!
interesting video bro... personaly i think ppl unconciously take parts from all kinds of philosophies but managing to have a certain belief and carry that for years or even for ur whole life is powerfull but also limiting i think its important to be able to switch perspectives in certain situations but thts just my opinion... good vid bro x
I like your thinking there. I too found myself resonating with many of the mentioned beliefs and thought that finding balance between them all, similar to what you said, is the key to observe paths of life and choose which one to pursue. Perhaps not all philosophies, but a good handful of them.
It is a misunderstanding of Stoicism to say that they put emotions to the side and choose to live their lives by reason. Desire and Fear, for example, were identified as emotions that cause harm, they were likewise tied to people having unwarranted expectations. Unwarranted expectations are, expectations from things outside of your control, meaning expectations from life, and people. The classical Stoic says the only thing one can have reasonable expectations from and of, are from yourself. It is 100 percent within the human experience to feel emotions, and thus you can expect to feel things, these feelings can inform, but should not guide your actions. The classical stoics let emotions come and go and do not let them guide their choices in the day to day. A classical stoic would tell you that you're being unreasonable by denying your emotions in their entirety and that it isn't rational to expect an experience without them, rather it would be rational to identify why you feel a certain way, and to weigh your feelings via practice and meditations. ((literally just like what Marcus Aurelius did)). Classical Stoicism is more about limiting expectations from others and life, so one can more easily achieve Eudaimonia ((the good life)) one free-ish from desires, fear, and the like.
desire isn’t a pair with fear, hope is. repulsion or hatred is the pair of desire. you can never eradicate, nor even diminish really, hope and fear, because they are like precursors of, and are married to, joy and pain: you cannot experience joy without then feeling hopeful afterwards of repeating that feeling; you cannot experience pain without feeling fearful afterwards of repeating that unpleasant feeling; buddhists etc THINK that it is possible to do so, and I hate to burst their bubble, but it just isn’t. What DOES happen though is through confronting one’s fears and pains one becomes stronger and immune to them, and then climbs higher to a new plane; however, only new pains and joys await such a person upon that higher plane, ad infinitum.
@@rickwrites2612 Buddha wouldn't give two shits about a strong Kataleptic ascent of phantasiai; so no. Similar thoughts but the end goals are different. Buddha believes in both a metaphysical and material suffering and are actively trying to avoid reincarnation of the soul, Stoics are materialists that deal with the comprehension (katalepsis) of impressions (Phantasiai) through a lens moral responsibility (often enforced through some kind of metaphysical argument, like respect for ancestors whom brought you to this point.) Eudaimonia, and Apatheia are two goals though similar to Nirvana, are not such. The stoic sage can become these things through practice within a person's lifetime, while many forms of becoming a recognized Buddha seem to only be achievable when you give samsara (life as we know it on the wheel); my point Nirvana isn't achievable until you're not in Samsara (so you got to be one with the universe, not a person by any normal measure of a person, they seem to be mostly dead is what I'm getting at.) tldr; Stoics believe in comprehending the suffering and growing from it to live a life in accordance to what they thought was 'human nature' (measured expectations, responsibility and honor; Material things of this world help them live in it.) Buddhism believes that in comprehending the suffering, one gains the understanding to reach spiritual unity with nature so that they can no longer suffer now and also never be reincarnated again (because if you're Buddhist you believe in reincarnation, it is literally key for the concept of Samsara and Nirvana; both very metaphysical ideas. Maybe not samsara because that is all of THIS going on here, but I digress.) They're similar but, only when squinting your eyes together.
It’s important to clarify that classical liberalism is different from American liberalism as a matter of fact, it resembles conservatism more in a sense that government should be smaller
You seem as confused as the creator, who has conflated politics and philosophy and meaning of life. Also liberalism means something much broader than that and includes most western political thought of past few hundred yrs it's a philosophy including capitalism and individual rights and pluralistic society. Basically all western politics today exists within it, it has nothing to do with the word Americans use for their moderates (who they think are left, 😂).
I feel Lewis C.K had the best "meaning of life" philosophy. God is the most important person (logically speaking), so we therefore must make Him the most important one for us, or else we are doomed to worship idols that will not and cannot sustain us or itself. Only God is eternal, so if we truly commit ourselves to Him fully, then we can be free from the slavery, which is pride. I believe God made humans in "his image" by making us value "feeling important" as the most important human motivator, because God values being praised and worshipped the most. He becomes jealous when people worship idols, and requires us to worship Him alone, because He is the most important One. God is the only one who truly exists if you think about it, because He exists without needing to "exist", unlike everything else that needs to begin to exist. The meaning of Life is to fully surrender to God. Only then can we have Life. True Life. It's hard, since we want to be important, but if we humble ourselves, we can be made important by demoting ourselves to last place. Just like what Jesus says, "If you want to be first, make yourself last".
probably the worst take as it’s completely subjective: your point of departure is just accepting without question the word of some idiot in a frock and a dusty old book of stories. gods are real. but all you’ve done here is a dance to further convince yourself that yahwe is supreme magiclord over everything..
nihilism is not pessimism. while I’m not a nihilist myself, this is a common myth. nihilists do not see inherent meaning to life, yes. however, they often do believe in creating your own meaning. they don’t all believe in doing as you wish either, as nihilism is an existentialist viewpoint, not an ethical one. you can be a nihilist who holds consequentialist ethical philosophies, for example. more research into it was probably needed
Nice video I just feel like this combines political concepts with “meaning of life” concepts. U can be a liberal and a theist for example (one being a political stance and the other a metaphysical stance). Just wanted to point that difference out as some of the terms used aren’t really comparable
People say they just want to be happy. I've been happy. Ive lived happy moments. Happiness perfumes the soul rot of an unsatisfactory life, for a while. Pain is unavoidable. Chaos, inevitable. Happiness is ever-fleeting. You must affirm your existence. Do something worth being proud of, despite the suffering you endured. That's all there is. It could just be making your coffee shop the best in town. It could be performing in theatre in front of a thousand people. It could be raising kids with a loving spouse. As long as you did it because it matters to you, and not just because it makes you feel good in the moment. That's my meaning. I fail too often, but that's the standard for me.
I wish this video actually put the different meanings of life in the iceberg meme to compare their popularity and weirdness instead of just listing them in no particular order.
I might have misinterpreted, but humanism isn’t about prioritizing humans over non humans because humans are the caretakers of the world. The “human” in humanism isn’t in contradiction to non human living things but rather in contradiction to ideologies, religions and other abstract concepts. Humanism says that the locus of moral concern is the individual human being, not nation states, gods, political parties, etc.
A loud crack of thunder, like a gunshot, startles you from above, and the sky begins to pour with heavy rain. The sound of rain soothes your soul. The landscape - or, really, your mindscape - feels enchanted, exactly as you want it to be.
Love the videos… just wanted to mention that nihilism isn’t necessarily a pessimist thing but more relies on the idea that nothing matters in a “greater” way - ex the universe is unknowable and meaningless. However, optimistic nihilism furthers this idea by saying that as the most intelligent and conscious beings in the universe (that we know of), human beings are here to MAKE meaning out of the universe. Which IMO is very different than what most people think of when they think of nihilism
Then that’s just existentialism. Real nihilist aren’t pessimistic; they simply do not care about what others think is important and that universe doesn’t care. I’m not a nihilist but any other description would just be contradictory.
@@hopelesslyoptimistic8231 I thought absurdism and existentialism are both variations of nihilism. existentialism meaning that everyone makes meaning out of their own lives and absurdism meaning that their is no such thing as meaning and will never exist yet meaning that one can find happyness without meaning
@@revengance4149 Nihilism is just the belief that nothing has meaning and any meaning we give anything is meaningless because ultimately it doesn’t matter. This is opposite to existentialism and absurdism because they believe in a meaning. Existentialism is the belief that we have to find our own meaning while absurdism is the belief that the struggle to find a meaning is the meaning of life itself. Nihilism is just nihilism; there isn’t any versions of it that wouldn’t just be something else because it’s impossible to give meaning to an idea that believes in no meaning. Nihilism just objects the idea of meaning in the first place. Nihilism isn’t inherently bad, but existentialism and absurdism are just (unironically) more meaningful.
@@revengance4149 I recently heard, in my opinion, probably one of the best explanations to how these three interconnect and: Absurdism and existentialism are "answers" to nihilism.
"Crush your enemies, see them driven before you and hear the lamentation of their women." - Conan the Cimmerian, Hyborian Age, post destruction of Atlantis
I feel like most if not all of these are true just in connection with each other, This is why I think we find it hard to name a meaning of life, its not that its not there, its just not easily described, its the synergy of multiple meanings and the balance between them, there is no singular meaning, us as humans i guess just want a simple end goal but the truth is there isn't a single one, there are multiple qualifications for meaning and over indulging in one or the other is normally not very good.
@@rip5905 Just because it doesnt encompass everything we do doesn't make it not the meaning of life. Just because I yell at my parents sometimes doesn't make my opinion of the meaning of life irrelevant. The meaning of life is a fairly simple answer. The answer to why are we here. Regardless of if you're Atheist or a theist. Being a servant to others your whole life is a great meaning if everyone does it
@@noahsd true but helping others vs not helping others is one axis, it can be one meaning of life but there is more to that, im saying there isnt one simple meaning of life, life has multiple meanings and its the connection and the emphasis on those different meanings that matter.
That's what I was thinking, for one, posing such question is kind of absurd, as it is a very complex question and not easy to answer. Also I do believe since nature seems to move in a very counter-intuitive and moral-less, way, it would make sense to think that life has no concrete meaning and it's mostly just the consequence of conscience and biology, stoicism can be compatible with this logic, posing the idea that since life has no concrete meaning, it's best to leave life be and accept the things life throws at us, good or bad, and in enjoying the good things in life, you can find the hedonistic philosophies, and in accepting the bad things that happen in life, we can find philosophical pessimisism, posing the idea that it's best to not expect good things to happen and not expect to be happy in life. All of these sentences, thoughts, ideas and philosophies can be compatible and be sinergical one with the other, or so I believe.
I am watching this and it seems like a lot of modern ideas are simple rehashes of these different philosophies. It seems like they have just been turned on their head.
I feel like Monarchy comes under idolatry too. Becuase they’re human beings just like me. So why tf am I bowing to you just Becuase you’ve decided to call him king or queen. Now I have to idolise you above me
@@galenburnett9791 primary: survival and procreation Secondary: creation, knowledge/understanding and upholding and embodiment of higher values such as loyalty, honor, glory, discipline, kindness, freedom, independence...etc. There is NOTHING besides this.
@@KolyaUrtz let’s discuss what you call the primary and secondary aspects separately. to thrive (i know you said survive, i’m just expanding on that) and reproduce, certainly this is what all life does. however do you ever stop to ask why it is that life does this, why it is that we and all life desire to thrive and reproduce? surely we must answer this for your primary meaning of life, as you put it, to have any thoughtful impact.
@@galenburnett9791 It strives to stay alive because if it doesnt it ceases to exist. What ceases to exist is irrelevant in a bigger picture. Anything which does not strive to survive is irrelevant.
lol Ii had all of these believes before knowing their names. humans are all of these and sometimes some are stronger than others, they are always changing.
@@darianmerley8985 i think i see now, you were mocking the idea of there being a ‘meaning of life’ in the first place, right? so i would say there is no super-objective inherent in being alive beyond suffering and enjoying. in my opinion the soul is immortal and continues to suffer and enjoy in equal measure through eternity. the motivation or incentive or objective of every living soul is always to flee from, or seek to diminish or eliminate, their suffering, while chasing their joy; and they have no ‘obligation’ to do this, they just do it automatically and can’t actually help but do it; but that is as close as we can get to a ‘purpose’ or to finding a ‘meaning’ in life.
Legalisim remembers me of Thomas Hobbes' political theory. It establishes that the government/state must be strong and heavy-handed in order for the citizens to respect laws and society. It also states that *man is evil by nature* and, therefore, it can only respect social contracts if it sees any kind of risk in breaking them.
That’s what Liberalism should mean but most of the people who claim to be liberals don’t practice that all, they’re bat ish crazy and this is coming from a guy that mainly claims liberal type views, when going the definition you gave.
My take: most of them are true, but in a different way. For example absurdism is true in the sense, that we cant understand our meaning with our tools and the state that our species is RIGHT NOW. Humanism is true in the sense, that we are the highest form of intelligence that we can interact with, so its only useful to at least pretend that its all on us. Stoicism is th path to evolve into more than human. Live that way for long enough, and evolution will do the best (think of "fake it till you make it" for us as a species)
One thing that conscious beings do since birth til their ends is learning. I really like to believe that we are existence learning about the existence of existence itself, as if the history of the universe was the journey of self-discovery of existence by existence itself, so, as long as you are learning new things about existence, your existence is worth for existence, so you will probably keep on existing.
i feel like most of these definitions didn't do justice to the thoughts and ideas behind each concept. it's a good video to be introduced to these concepts but it's way more complex than just a paragraph. i'd love to see deep dives into each concept!
He literally says that at the beginning of the video
A deep dive would take away from the experience of, oh I dunno, googling it yourself if you're really that interested???
interesting video bro... personaly i think ppl unconciously take parts from all kinds of philosophies but managing to have a certain belief and carry that for years or even for ur whole life is powerfull but also limiting i think its important to be able to switch perspectives in certain situations but thts just my opinion... good vid bro x
I like your thinking there. I too found myself resonating with many of the mentioned beliefs and thought that finding balance between them all, similar to what you said, is the key to observe paths of life and choose which one to pursue. Perhaps not all philosophies, but a good handful of them.
A.r.ism
It is a misunderstanding of Stoicism to say that they put emotions to the side and choose to live their lives by reason.
Desire and Fear, for example, were identified as emotions that cause harm, they were likewise tied to people having unwarranted expectations. Unwarranted expectations are, expectations from things outside of your control, meaning expectations from life, and people. The classical Stoic says the only thing one can have reasonable expectations from and of, are from yourself.
It is 100 percent within the human experience to feel emotions, and thus you can expect to feel things, these feelings can inform, but should not guide your actions. The classical stoics let emotions come and go and do not let them guide their choices in the day to day. A classical stoic would tell you that you're being unreasonable by denying your emotions in their entirety and that it isn't rational to expect an experience without them, rather it would be rational to identify why you feel a certain way, and to weigh your feelings via practice and meditations. ((literally just like what Marcus Aurelius did)).
Classical Stoicism is more about limiting expectations from others and life, so one can more easily achieve Eudaimonia ((the good life)) one free-ish from desires, fear, and the like.
desire isn’t a pair with fear, hope is. repulsion or hatred is the pair of desire. you can never eradicate, nor even diminish really, hope and fear, because they are like precursors of, and are married to, joy and pain: you cannot experience joy without then feeling hopeful afterwards of repeating that feeling; you cannot experience pain without feeling fearful afterwards of repeating that unpleasant feeling; buddhists etc THINK that it is possible to do so, and I hate to burst their bubble, but it just isn’t.
What DOES happen though is through confronting one’s fears and pains one becomes stronger and immune to them, and then climbs higher to a new plane; however, only new pains and joys await such a person upon that higher plane, ad infinitum.
It's basically like a type of Buddhism
@@rickwrites2612 Buddha wouldn't give two shits about a strong Kataleptic ascent of phantasiai; so no. Similar thoughts but the end goals are different.
Buddha believes in both a metaphysical and material suffering and are actively trying to avoid reincarnation of the soul, Stoics are materialists that deal with the comprehension (katalepsis) of impressions (Phantasiai) through a lens moral responsibility (often enforced through some kind of metaphysical argument, like respect for ancestors whom brought you to this point.)
Eudaimonia, and Apatheia are two goals though similar to Nirvana, are not such. The stoic sage can become these things through practice within a person's lifetime, while many forms of becoming a recognized Buddha seem to only be achievable when you give samsara (life as we know it on the wheel); my point Nirvana isn't achievable until you're not in Samsara (so you got to be one with the universe, not a person by any normal measure of a person, they seem to be mostly dead is what I'm getting at.)
tldr; Stoics believe in comprehending the suffering and growing from it to live a life in accordance to what they thought was 'human nature' (measured expectations, responsibility and honor; Material things of this world help them live in it.)
Buddhism believes that in comprehending the suffering, one gains the understanding to reach spiritual unity with nature so that they can no longer suffer now and also never be reincarnated again (because if you're Buddhist you believe in reincarnation, it is literally key for the concept of Samsara and Nirvana; both very metaphysical ideas. Maybe not samsara because that is all of THIS going on here, but I digress.)
They're similar but, only when squinting your eyes together.
MAN!!! u really are a hidden gem. im going thru all ur videos right now. u r just so! good at compiling info and narrating!!!!
Wow, thanks! Appreciate that my friend. Cheers
Me to I'm going through all of them rn
It’s important to clarify that classical liberalism is different from American liberalism as a matter of fact, it resembles conservatism more in a sense that government should be smaller
Imagine if you think the meaning of life has a government involved 😅
LOL
You seem as confused as the creator, who has conflated politics and philosophy and meaning of life. Also liberalism means something much broader than that and includes most western political thought of past few hundred yrs it's a philosophy including capitalism and individual rights and pluralistic society. Basically all western politics today exists within it, it has nothing to do with the word Americans use for their moderates (who they think are left, 😂).
I feel Lewis C.K had the best "meaning of life" philosophy. God is the most important person (logically speaking), so we therefore must make Him the most important one for us, or else we are doomed to worship idols that will not and cannot sustain us or itself. Only God is eternal, so if we truly commit ourselves to Him fully, then we can be free from the slavery, which is pride.
I believe God made humans in "his image" by making us value "feeling important" as the most important human motivator, because God values being praised and worshipped the most. He becomes jealous when people worship idols, and requires us to worship Him alone, because He is the most important One. God is the only one who truly exists if you think about it, because He exists without needing to "exist", unlike everything else that needs to begin to exist.
The meaning of Life is to fully surrender to God. Only then can we have Life. True Life. It's hard, since we want to be important, but if we humble ourselves, we can be made important by demoting ourselves to last place. Just like what Jesus says, "If you want to be first, make yourself last".
probably the worst take as it’s completely subjective: your point of departure is just accepting without question the word of some idiot in a frock and a dusty old book of stories.
gods are real. but all you’ve done here is a dance to further convince yourself that yahwe is supreme magiclord over everything..
Theism
Thing is, not everyone needs God to live a satisfying life. A set of virtues can help. Plus I'm very suspect of a deity that can be jealous.
nihilism is not pessimism. while I’m not a nihilist myself, this is a common myth. nihilists do not see inherent meaning to life, yes. however, they often do believe in creating your own meaning. they don’t all believe in doing as you wish either, as nihilism is an existentialist viewpoint, not an ethical one. you can be a nihilist who holds consequentialist ethical philosophies, for example.
more research into it was probably needed
Thats what he said
Nice video I just feel like this combines political concepts with “meaning of life” concepts. U can be a liberal and a theist for example (one being a political stance and the other a metaphysical stance). Just wanted to point that difference out as some of the terms used aren’t really comparable
People say they just want to be happy. I've been happy. Ive lived happy moments. Happiness perfumes the soul rot of an unsatisfactory life, for a while.
Pain is unavoidable. Chaos, inevitable. Happiness is ever-fleeting. You must affirm your existence. Do something worth being proud of, despite the suffering you endured. That's all there is. It could just be making your coffee shop the best in town. It could be performing in theatre in front of a thousand people. It could be raising kids with a loving spouse. As long as you did it because it matters to you, and not just because it makes you feel good in the moment.
That's my meaning. I fail too often, but that's the standard for me.
You deserve more subs my man!
Hey thanks for the compliment mate. Cheers.
I wish this video actually put the different meanings of life in the iceberg meme to compare their popularity and weirdness instead of just listing them in no particular order.
This video deserves more views!
inb4 christian bot accounts type massive paragraphs about how we need to convert or we're going to hell.
They already done been invadin! And there are a ton of bots in general advertising some link that nobody should click. Gotta keep them comments clean!
they are cringe af. but why do you need to put ‘in’ in front of ‘before’ lol?
I recently acquired the subjectivism and logical positivism.
Time to upgrade these to the next tier.
lol that’s funny, like items in zelda
Things to consider:
*your life*
lol.
I might have misinterpreted, but humanism isn’t about prioritizing humans over non humans because humans are the caretakers of the world. The “human” in humanism isn’t in contradiction to non human living things but rather in contradiction to ideologies, religions and other abstract concepts. Humanism says that the locus of moral concern is the individual human being, not nation states, gods, political parties, etc.
A loud crack of thunder, like a gunshot, startles you from above, and the sky begins to pour with heavy rain. The sound of rain soothes your soul. The landscape - or, really, your mindscape - feels enchanted, exactly as you want it to be.
Dude, you're channel is great, keep doin' what you're doin' Good luck!
Love the videos… just wanted to mention that nihilism isn’t necessarily a pessimist thing but more relies on the idea that nothing matters in a “greater” way - ex the universe is unknowable and meaningless. However, optimistic nihilism furthers this idea by saying that as the most intelligent and conscious beings in the universe (that we know of), human beings are here to MAKE meaning out of the universe. Which IMO is very different than what most people think of when they think of nihilism
Then that’s just existentialism. Real nihilist aren’t pessimistic; they simply do not care about what others think is important and that universe doesn’t care. I’m not a nihilist but any other description would just be contradictory.
@@hopelesslyoptimistic8231 I thought absurdism and existentialism are both variations of nihilism. existentialism meaning that everyone makes meaning out of their own lives and absurdism meaning that their is no such thing as meaning and will never exist yet meaning that one can find happyness without meaning
@@revengance4149 Nihilism is just the belief that nothing has meaning and any meaning we give anything is meaningless because ultimately it doesn’t matter. This is opposite to existentialism and absurdism because they believe in a meaning. Existentialism is the belief that we have to find our own meaning while absurdism is the belief that the struggle to find a meaning is the meaning of life itself. Nihilism is just nihilism; there isn’t any versions of it that wouldn’t just be something else because it’s impossible to give meaning to an idea that believes in no meaning. Nihilism just objects the idea of meaning in the first place.
Nihilism isn’t inherently bad, but existentialism and absurdism are just (unironically) more meaningful.
@@hopelesslyoptimistic8231 ok thanks for the education m8. I appreciate it :)
@@revengance4149 I recently heard, in my opinion, probably one of the best explanations to how these three interconnect and: Absurdism and existentialism are "answers" to nihilism.
Dmt, lsd, psilocybin, mescaline, all spiritual substances. Ananda marga is a good practice
Algorithm
Love your stuff
Subscribed ♥️
Awesome! Thank you! ♥️
Funny how that “Liberalism” definition holds up today 🤣
lol yep!
You are American, most likely. Liberalism means a very different thing outside of the Us and Canada but I get your point lmao
You forgot 42
I did...
Loved this!
"Crush your enemies, see them driven before you and hear the lamentation of their women." - Conan the Cimmerian, Hyborian Age, post destruction of Atlantis
A lot of these are similar and could be made into categories, that could be made into one category "purpose"
when nihilism is 2nd down on the iceberg you know shits bouta get real
I feel like most if not all of these are true just in connection with each other, This is why I think we find it hard to name a meaning of life, its not that its not there, its just not easily described, its the synergy of multiple meanings and the balance between them, there is no singular meaning, us as humans i guess just want a simple end goal but the truth is there isn't a single one, there are multiple qualifications for meaning and over indulging in one or the other is normally not very good.
Meaning of life is easy. Give up your life for others
@@noahsd thats not the meaning, its a good way to live by but not by itself and it definitely does not encompass all of the things we do
@@rip5905 Just because it doesnt encompass everything we do doesn't make it not the meaning of life. Just because I yell at my parents sometimes doesn't make my opinion of the meaning of life irrelevant. The meaning of life is a fairly simple answer. The answer to why are we here. Regardless of if you're Atheist or a theist. Being a servant to others your whole life is a great meaning if everyone does it
@@noahsd true but helping others vs not helping others is one axis, it can be one meaning of life but there is more to that, im saying there isnt one simple meaning of life, life has multiple meanings and its the connection and the emphasis on those different meanings that matter.
That's what I was thinking, for one, posing such question is kind of absurd, as it is a very complex question and not easy to answer. Also I do believe since nature seems to move in a very counter-intuitive and moral-less, way, it would make sense to think that life has no concrete meaning and it's mostly just the consequence of conscience and biology, stoicism can be compatible with this logic, posing the idea that since life has no concrete meaning, it's best to leave life be and accept the things life throws at us, good or bad, and in enjoying the good things in life, you can find the hedonistic philosophies, and in accepting the bad things that happen in life, we can find philosophical pessimisism, posing the idea that it's best to not expect good things to happen and not expect to be happy in life. All of these sentences, thoughts, ideas and philosophies can be compatible and be sinergical one with the other, or so I believe.
This a nice channel mane 👍🏾
Thanks very much!
Yes.
This video should be titled :"Anything ending with ism"
I am watching this and it seems like a lot of modern ideas are simple rehashes of these different philosophies. It seems like they have just been turned on their head.
What is it called when your concept of the meaning of life falls under multiple concepts?
it simply crosses multiple labels
Self-destruction
Indecisive
this made me think, and i don’t think a lot
I feel like Monarchy comes under idolatry too. Becuase they’re human beings just like me. So why tf am I bowing to you just Becuase you’ve decided to call him king or queen. Now I have to idolise you above me
One last one he forgot is everythingism wich is me 😂
Create and strive and struggle
the overarching goal of all life is to reach the form of the homo sapiens
so that it may watch TH-cam
2:00 to 2:20 and the Google definition makes me unable to comprehend why everyone and their dog hates them so much.
human nature to hate someone who is negative or acts negative. Even if they arent negative
It’s funny how every single one of these ideas (concepts) seems to resonate but the negative ones 🙏🤔😅
bro fuck a meaning of life can we just chill and live happy lives?
The meaning of life is either incomprehensible/unknowable or nonexistent.
The meaning of life more like
Idk vine boom effect boom effect boom effect boom effect boom effect boom effect
lol. I was really wondering where the hell that was going.
Well played.
Well played.
Purpose of life is pretty simple. It's also objective.
what is it then?
@@galenburnett9791 primary: survival and procreation
Secondary: creation, knowledge/understanding and upholding and embodiment of higher values such as loyalty, honor, glory, discipline, kindness, freedom, independence...etc.
There is NOTHING besides this.
@@KolyaUrtz let’s discuss what you call the primary and secondary aspects separately.
to thrive (i know you said survive, i’m just expanding on that) and reproduce, certainly this is what all life does. however do you ever stop to ask why it is that life does this, why it is that we and all life desire to thrive and reproduce? surely we must answer this for your primary meaning of life, as you put it, to have any thoughtful impact.
@@galenburnett9791 It strives to stay alive because if it doesnt it ceases to exist. What ceases to exist is irrelevant in a bigger picture. Anything which does not strive to survive is irrelevant.
@@KolyaUrtz ...we’ve established that. it seems you don’t want to answer the question
There is a grammar mistake at 12:18, belief isn't spelled right.
These are good bandnames
Solipisim wtf
I get it a bit I too feel like people who are not around me , kinda don't exist
lol Ii had all of these believes before knowing their names. humans are all of these and sometimes some are stronger than others, they are always changing.
No logotherapy sadly but great video!
I feel like most of these were beliefs or ways of thinking and not necessarily a proposed meaning of life. Still enjoyed the video though.
Damn bro u gotta put a spoiler alert at the beginning :/
Was scared Nihilism was gonna get dissed hard as per usual, nice to see it wasn't for once.
Im never satisfied with any answers because life doesn't revolve around one meaning, don't create yourself illusions.
A lot of these entires arent even given a meaning of life so I am confused
I what to know more about this video
Aren’t daoism and quietism the same thing?
a lot of these arent meanings of life, their just philosophies
Legalism was based on Li Si and Han Feizi and their research.
What good has Theism brought to the world???...I'm seriously asking.
What level are they in
Hi
Hi Mary! Pleasure seeing you as always! Cheers friend.
@@Maker1 thanks
You have officially become the #1 receiver for comment hearts. Thanks for all the support, Mary. Much love.
@@Maker1 I'm a big fan since the first time I met you I really appreciate the content you been Making one again your welcome
After listening to this video a lot seemed more a course of action rather than a belief.
I recently began to look at everything from a biological and zoological perspective, so I guess I'm a darwinist
In my perspective existentialism is the best cure.
just act like kant says to act and you shall be ok
42ism, L.I.F.E. limited information for everyone
Ur definition of pragmatism is actually the definition of utilitarianism. Big difference.
those defintions are waaaaaay too simplified (or wrong as for daoism and platonism)
Guenonian/Evolian tradizionalists are watching this video with a smirk right now
Here to share the Catholic Christian answer to the meaning of life in the shortest way possible: be a Saint
Taoism yes?
Learn and teach to infinity ♾️
The meaning of life is "the" and "meaning" and "life" itself. In fact it's "it" and "is" and "self" itself.
care to explain lol?
@@galenburnett9791 what do you mean when you say "meaning of life"?
@@darianmerley8985 i think i see now, you were mocking the idea of there being a ‘meaning of life’ in the first place, right?
so i would say there is no super-objective inherent in being alive beyond suffering and enjoying. in my opinion the soul is immortal and continues to suffer and enjoy in equal measure through eternity. the motivation or incentive or objective of every living soul is always to flee from, or seek to diminish or eliminate, their suffering, while chasing their joy; and they have no ‘obligation’ to do this, they just do it automatically and can’t actually help but do it; but that is as close as we can get to a ‘purpose’ or to finding a ‘meaning’ in life.
Legalisim remembers me of Thomas Hobbes' political theory. It establishes that the government/state must be strong and heavy-handed in order for the citizens to respect laws and society. It also states that *man is evil by nature* and, therefore, it can only respect social contracts if it sees any kind of risk in breaking them.
We were recently taught this in class, and it was kind of interesting for me, so I didn't forget it
liked ans subbed
Do the Aztecs know why there a Period when Men were changed into Monkeys?
no egoism?!? i will start a riot!
Always knew Morgan Freeman had the answers!!!
you forgot about dwarfism. 0/10
The meaning of life is to get back to GOD!
I will make a new way of thought
You did not explain absurdism correctly
Your definition of Liberalism is very US Centric.
there’s truth to all of these lol. they all have noticed different aspects of reality.
andrej babiš mladší mě sem přivedl
lajkuj pokud máš taky schízu
aren't existentialism and subjectivism basically the same thing?
Yeah I'm confused about that one
That’s what Liberalism should mean but most of the people who claim to be liberals don’t practice that all, they’re bat ish crazy and this is coming from a guy that mainly claims liberal type views, when going the definition you gave.
My take: most of them are true, but in a different way. For example absurdism is true in the sense, that we cant understand our meaning with our tools and the state that our species is RIGHT NOW. Humanism is true in the sense, that we are the highest form of intelligence that we can interact with, so its only useful to at least pretend that its all on us. Stoicism is th path to evolve into more than human. Live that way for long enough, and evolution will do the best (think of "fake it till you make it" for us as a species)
The meaning of life for all with awareness is to enhance that awareness through living in order to be consumed by the universe
One thing that conscious beings do since birth til their ends is learning.
I really like to believe that we are existence learning about the existence of existence itself, as if the history of the universe was the journey of self-discovery of existence by existence itself, so, as long as you are learning new things about existence, your existence is worth for existence, so you will probably keep on existing.
@@ws6778 doesn't matter what you like to believe. We are prey
@@lierx.agerate8230 prey to what or who?
@@thebesthuman4794 all that is out there, right here
@@lierx.agerate8230 how about mf I’m a predator to all that is out there, right here
laknsubskrab
What a mess. Ugh.
Hi
Hello there.