Tariel Kapanadze no moving parts generator. Jump start it with a battery, and it runs for a while. He is a Russian physicist who produced a katcher coil resembling a German Han Grenade. Akula 0083 performed how to duplicate Tariel's work. The story goes that this is the type resonate amplifier boxed up produced by Nicola Tesla and produces 60 KW that ran the electric motor in the Pierce Arrow automobile.
Just yesterday I was watching Christoph’s 3D printed BLDC videos and one striking thing I noticed was the high efficiency he achieved without utilizing stator backirons as well as using only a vaguely ferromagnetic armature core made of iron-doped PLA, still achieving +80% in 600W configurations. By using Halbach arrays he concentrates much of the stator flux however I’m curious as to why exactly a low-ferrous armature worked as well as it did. In a similar fashion to Litz wire skin-effect, I imagine it was more to do with the orientation of the field through a medium rather than the actual medium material. High resolution lamination via 3D printing may serve to carry high-density magnetism in a similar fashion to Litz wire carrying high-voltage current. If magnetic flux takes the path of least reluctance, assuming the flux can overcome a given insulator-in his case the PLA, air bubbles, and layer lines-would that flux not just bypass the insulator and jump from iron grain to grain until inducing upon the copper armature winding?
I feel like the main difference between high magnetic and low magnetic production is the rpm used and heat generated. Like variable field alternators basically.
Not sure whether you mentioned or if I missed it, but the most important fact about energy is that it can't be created. A lot of hokum is based around the idea that energy suddenly appears from nowhere--if you just arrange things a certain way. The real innovation happens where a previously unknown source of energy is found, so I think it's good people try these things, you just have to be careful when it comes to parting ways with your money :)
@@markhathaway9456 now? Maybe not. But we don't know if we don't look. The nuclear forces weren't known about until relatively recently in human history.
You are absolutely right about energy conservation laws. Though , there are many people who are researching , so called , "zero point energy" and I mean real scientist , not the regular tricksters , trying to get someone's money. Even Tesla (among other famous scientists ) talked about sea of energy that surround us (I mean beyond static energy and ionic /radiation energy) . Now , problem with that is , that we don't have a proverbial "yardstick" to measure that energy and it is not properly defined (like telekinesis , for an example). Neither we have (that I know of) widely available device (that uses , or converts that energy) , from any of the people who had similar claims (we have some videos , and testimonies , but nothing yet available in the market). But still , everyone loves an idea of putting up an antenna and connecting it with some kind of device , to produce "free energy" forever and ever. 😁
@@markhathaway9456 someone very recently found that air passing through very small holes can generate electricity so i would say yeah we're still finding new ways to harvest energy
Focusing of magnetic fields is a very neat field. There is much to be learned here. In the same way we try to conserve electricity, we should be looking to conserve other forces within or models. If you waist energy in any of it's forms it's lost for good. Magnetic field lines not confined, could be considered an escape of energy.
The mystery is key. EM, Gravity, both part of our daily lives, and our technologies and theories (which are models used for outcome predictions), are still mysteries at their core. This doesn't mean we can't solve them, as we have many successful examples, but there are still core issues we haven't even identified, let alone solved for. This isn't a lack, it is an opportunity! Thanks RMS.
I saw the video # and thought it meant, "In the year 2123..." heh. Potential is a fascinating thing since there are many kinds and all relate to what we would call "effective force" (to include gravity without calling it a force). The idea of a "differential" is behind potential and it offers a lot of possibilities. There's atmosphere vs vacuum, altitude above mass (gravity), charge vs no charge (electricity), cold vs hot, (I suppose) momentum of a mass vs a mass at rest (see photovoltaics perhaps or a baseball bat hitting a baseball on a Tee), etc. The idea of focusing something like light or heat or "energy" is one we've used for a long time. Converting oil or coal or peat or wood via fire to heat, steam, and motion of a turbine, is quite useful (it turns out). Combining differential with focus and you get quite an effect. I love the videos. Cheers!
No. Holcomb is a scammer. He has absolutely nothing. Has there been an objective third party confirmation for the function of his devices? No. He claims there are such confirmations but he can't show reports.
Great video. I thought magnetism was due to individual spins of unpaired electrons being fixed in a solid. Please come back to me if this is incorrect. Everyday is a school day, here to learn 😊👍
The beauty of it is that it's something left wide open for anyone to figure out, and it's such a simple problem that chances are the explanation is equally simple. I don't think it even requires any instrument to solve, just a lot of thinking outside the box. Magnetism and gravity are the most exciting and elusive puzzles I can think of.
The Holcomb Energy System Generator operates based on Edward Leedskalnin's perpetual motion magnetic currents principles. It employs a three-phase Permanent Magnet Motor (PPM) to excite three interconnected coils. These coils are arranged in a series-parallel configuration to induce self-oscillation, simulating a magnetic rotor in motion. The stator coils then capture the magnetic field generated by this system. With its innovative design, the Holcomb Generator efficiently converts the magnetic field of the stator into electricity, eliminating the need for moving parts. Dr. Holcomb has integrated the best concepts from Leedskalnin’s work, portable electric generators, portable gas generators, AC transformers, and three-phase motors, to enhance the functionality of the Holcomb Energy System Generator. ( This information was derived from the patent information.)
You got my like at ed leedskalnins.. whatever else sounds like a good implementation thereof.. Imma stick with the kromrey design and currently am figuring out a way to make that work
Hello Robert :) that is an interesting comparison: plastic vs steel cores… the two situations have the same flux H… but magnetic field B is thousands of times stronger in the steel, due to the material contribution (low reluctance)
I'm recording the video so I have a copy lol. Thankyou for a lovely insight which I would never have known and Mr Hokum should be happy you bringing his idea/product to alot of people's awareness
Would it be possible to generate free energy by using the phase change of water? We have a thermally isolated pipe with water in it and a piston. The water is at 1 degree celsius. We cool the water to 0 then we go back to 1 in one minute. At 0 the ice pushes the piston and at 1 a spring or another piston pushes back the piston. With this system we have 1 rotation per minute. By using a a gearbox we increase the RPM. We may also use a lever to increase the distance the piston moves. I have read that water when it changes from liquid to ice it has about 250 atm pressure. Wouldn't it be possible to generate more energy than we put in with this system?
Many years ago, I thought up a generator consisting of ringed magnets with a central verticle tube containing a conductive gas, as the gas moves slightly it goes through the magnetic field & gets warmer through the induced current, at the top of this is a metal semispherical collector with spikes on the inside, as the gas cools it descends on the outside of the magnets which is shielded to prevent induction. Whether this idea is possible or not, I don't know. Apparently, hydrogen is a good conductor of electricity.
Content creators that have energy generation videos on their channels, need to post videos like this for their own safety. I seen another of your comments where you were life threatened "only cats have 9 lives" by a guy I digged a bit and found that is working at a very suspicious place. Stay safe.
It's all simplicated. A lot of simple things put together to make complex things. Break them back down to the simple bits, understand those, and see how they are interconnected to make the whole. Works with mechanical things, programming, and so many things. Also helps as you did to see the magical nonsense that gets injected (i.e. I understand the bits but the sum total that is being sold clearly doesn't make sense). Crowd funded stuff is so full of this kind of thing. Thanks for sharing and explaining it clearly. 😃
Now a harder question, ball bearing magnetic accelerator/ cannon must do work because it accelerates. These cannons are commonly sold as science tools. Unless it is somehow trading distance for speed like a reverse lever/pulley.
I saw on the Holcombe video Bob that the 3-phase amplifier system is capable of 500% boost in power although am a little sceptical. Although there's alot of emphasis in the iron windings being used. Wish I has an exact schematic diagram as it would be interesting to take a punt over experimenting with this bad boy lol Got to admit this is an interesting one!
There are many scammers around pretending to have new energy generation methods, Holcomb is one of them. They simply try to get money from gullible investors. They claim there are confirmations by institutions as SGS but they can't show the reports. LOL. Any experimenting is wasted time.
Thank Robert. I was wondering if there was a way of creating different magnetic 'gradients' for attraction & repulsion to keep objects in stasis so I guess this is a good place to start. Not sure how I'd differentiate them yet but I love a good puzzle.
Have Schröders cat been missing again? My ansver is "L" or "J"! If a little part of the magnet shift N and S but the big part of the magnet work like a magnetic bearing! We might have something!
A question kind sir - when we concentrate and focus energy (like a lens) doesn’t it allow you to harvest that energy and make better use with less waste regardless of initial input being the same because of the intensity or density? Or so I thought from what you yourself taught me. So I’m genuinely confused. I only say this out of a sincere hope that you’ve possibly left us with an incorrect perspective because you didn’t continue your thoughts through to what we normally hope to achieve, a “better way” that us every day folks may take advantage of and be empowered by. (Which I really hope this approach of switching magnetic fields with no moving parts will do for us. I seem to remember this idea from another start up years ago but my knowledge was slim to none back then, though I remember it had to do with a incredibly higher efficiency, because of software and programming improvements with the timing and switching frequencies of the electromagnets they employed in their motor, I believe it was an all electromagnetic motor. And it did have moving parts. So maybe this idea isn’t completely new!)Yes, it’s important to have a proper understanding and point out his mistake in wording and possible purposeful misleading and correct it. Thankfully your genius and eye for detail has done that for us and at the same time helped conceptualize the process, which I greatly thank you for. But I’m left wondering, in the end, does it outperform conventional means regardless of how he presents it. Also, you might not be aware, but from my research so far, this is a fella who’s already built a life of success and recognition in multiple fields, and disciplines. Including being a doctor of neuroscience. Besides already, seemingly being independently wealthy in funding much of this himself. I also would point out he is in his later years of life and so far I haven’t found any motivation for him to be anything but what he says he is, doing what he says he has done, for the reasons he explains in his videos. Which is not an electrical engineer, or physicist, hence his mistake in wording, and possible misunderstanding, hopefully!!! This is my first opposition that I’ve ever had to any of your videos, and though it may sound like opposition, it is purely meant as a case of confusion with the highest respect one could have for someone he considers to be one of if not my most valued teacher, and mentor. And the first channel I plan to become a member of to unlock even more opportunities for me to learn from a great master. For real for real, thank you, Robert.
Indubitably! And it’s a darn good thing that we already exist in Over-unity, otherwise we’d probably never get any joy out of the things that actually work.
Hello. Interesting experiments you do. I often watch your channel. I have thought for a long time about whether you could somehow get the energy out of centrifugal forces. Huge forces there that don't need a lot of power to keep rotating. Is it something you have thought about. Greetings from Örjan in Sweden
You can only get back what you put in, so no matter how strong the centrifugal force may be and how long it stays there by adding a tiny amount of power to keep it rotating (which is the exact amount of energy lost to friction), it's no different from placing a massive weight on a column, which is then compressed strongly indefinitely, but that compression can't be tapped directly nor indefinitely, you have to let the massive weight move down to get some energy out of it, which won't be more than it took to lift it up there. There's so much energy available from water motion, wind and sun that there's no real need on earth to find and use other sources of energy. What needs to be found though, is a better portable energy storage solution than the centuries old battery design. If all the "free energy" efforts would focus on storage, we might have some real breakthrough by now.
I think you're looking at it wrong because of using the capacitors switches making a first electromatic electromagnetic pulse picked up by the stator Harry Young into it makes sense I thought about this pretty much exactly the same way he talks about it pretty much everything I've seen that you talked about before this has been spot on I also think he's got a patent on this and already got them on in commercial use from what I understand all hearsay
No energy is for free except free energy. You put more energy in iron core than air core to build the magnetic flux to saturation and when it collapse it releases the same back. Flux store the energy as energy storing device not energy generator.
All we can see is energy, light is energy, no light no sight. Then there is that big glowing thing in the sky. Some energy is invisible but much is not.
Thinking about these primary issues like force etc. is I feel needed, to uncover hidden aspects of reality. I used to research this area, and came up with a new representation of magnetism. This predicted what we know, and at least one other aspect. Get a sort steel rod with some wire wound about it, and place the N of a strong magnet at one end. Now, add another magnet at the other also using its N (...two S will also work). Monitor the coil, and move it back and forth. What did you get? Did you expect that? I've not seen or heard of this generator anywhere. Anyone know what it's called? All out of an alternative magnetism model. Nothing new in energy terms, but a novel device.
@@ThinkingandTinkering Hmmm... little info on this on the web. The device I described is a square-wave / reciprocating generator (or reciprocating motor) which I've not seen elsewhere. Not sure what the use-case would be for this guy... All the best!
Porsupuesto q lo amplifica esto ocupa la reactiva los caminos del hierro son los q canalizan los rechazos y los manda donde son absorvidos y no rechazados fijese en el diceño antes saludos
The only problem is that if your "basic principles" are flawed your assessment is likewise flawed. That's why a lot of inventions were traditionally done by people who have not known the "basic principles" of their era (or disregarded them). Holcomb system is one of many existing and proven ways to obtain excess energy. Luckily for us the inventor also disregarded the "basic principles" so that we can benefit from it.
You are comming close to free energy u might disappear..... I saw a video couple months ago with using reluctance using a small motor to turn a much larger generator and it all but disappeared from the internet I want to send it to you
I may have seen that one as well. I recall a rather big (outer) wheel or frame, like 1 meter diameter. And I think there where two axes involved, to 'uncouple' forces or so. I cannot recall all details, and my impression, of what I can recall, is that it was unfinished. And perhaps a reason for me to not watch it too closely. And so I am not able to recall it anymore. (and most probably we are not talking about the same device, but ah... well).
@@ThinkingandTinkering the device used the reluctance and altering the flux lines using small motor turning a small magnet connecting flux lines to turn a huge wheel when one flux line broken with a sliding motion the next one snaps into place causing rotor with bigger magnets to rotate as it goes along
what bothers me is why more speed and magnet passes build up voltage and amps. or charge and amps. when a magnet moves slowly through a coil or inductor, whatever spike in voltage at two turns at one rpm should still be the same charge at 100 rpm. but its not. its like saying that spinning a six volt battery can make it produce 9 volts...of course, if we allow for an aether, and one that is tiny packets of energy, and that magnetic flux can pick it up or gather it and focus it, and transfer it through flux lines into an inductor's matter, well to me that makes reasonable sense...
Hi Robert, I hope all is well there with you , your family, Luke, & his family. My wish is that Luke is managing studies with low stress at University. After watching this video I did addtional searches under your name to better understand eddy currents in a way only you are able to make learning clear, and fun.. Question is: Have you ever done an video explanation, or discussed Hysteresis, or convey whats happening when Eddy Currents are acting in Iron Core laminate stack ? My search brought up some reference to these, but for me the mystery of Hysteresis remains. Robert maybe add my request to others asking for your special clarity skills expresing therios like no one Hi Robert, I hope all is well there with you , your family, Luke, & his family. My wish is that Luke is managing studies with clarity of mind, and low stress at University. After watching this video, I did additional searches under your name to better understand eddy currents in a way only you are able to make learning clear, and so fun.. I ask permission to lean on your knowledge base a bit more. Question is: Have you ever done a dedicated video explanation, or discussed Hysteresis in detail, or conveyed what's happening when Eddy Currents when these currents are passing along in an Iron Core laminate stack ? My search brought up some reference to these, but for me the mystery of Hysteresis remains. I will watch others' explanations, while hoping to stay tuned in, and be fascinated when you're offering up concepts explained with a chuckle. Robert maybe add my request to others asking for your special clarity skills expressing theories like no one else can on the topics mentioned here by me. Best wishes from sent there. Enjoy the Days ahead. : ) .
IRON ACTS AS A CURRENT AMPLIFIER AMPLIFYING THE CURRENT BY THE mu FACTOR IRON AND STEEL DOES NOT JUST CONCENTRATE THE AVAILABLE FLUX µ--(the relative permeability of the material) Page194-Essentials of Electromagnetism
isn't this "just" the 'electromagnetic permeability' term in the Maxwell equations? Plexiglass does not pass it, and carbon-in-steel does, so like any resistor balances current by 'not allowing it to pass as stochastically often', so ought the plexiglass retard the advancement and building of the electromagnetic field. I'm not sure what the difference is between 'permittivity' and 'permeability' in this case. Perhaps, having many copper sticks around a magnetic coil would enhance the permittivity, allowing the 'backflux' to reach across more air; whilst the sticks themselves should be less permeable, having mostly just solid copper rather than 'air'. Should be worth 'proving something' by varying the atmosphere, and observing the magnetic fields, and having various metal arrangements 'in the field' somewhere.
magnetism is force i.e. electrodynamic discharge - the entire universe is just charge/discharge. the bohr model of the atom is incorrect, there are no particles - atoms are just small generators of electrical charge/discharge.
I'm VERY skeptical. Show me the thing actually powering something significant, preferably in a trustworthy third party's test lab, and I'll belirve it, but not until then.
The shape of steel and the coil are the most important thing believe. I don't think that they are optimized. Electricity naturally flows in a spiral. Even sound waves are not really a wave form. A sign wave is only flattening the spiral. Only looking a the spiral vortex from the side. There is a lot to be optimized when looking at it this way
we all have different ideas of what is the important thing mate -and from what I can tell everyone believes their version to be the right version - such is life lol - cheers
@@ThinkingandTinkering That is so true. It would be nice if here was a place like the Alexandria Library still where we could all go and share ideas in person and work on them together. So many things would be perfected.
Hmmm... nice video. But i don't agree with you on all points. I was thinking about Holcomb System too, and i think it is possible to achieve a greater output with his method. The key is not only about the flux. I'll mail you some details. Greetings from Poland
How? Not saying I don't believe you, but seeing as they're still not available to the public, there's a bunch of us who would build our own if we had some grasp on how it works. For all the things I've seen I still don't understand this one. Not yet.
5:20 ::: "nobody" ::: no ::: see the video ::: "NATURE´S SECRETS OF MAGNETISM" from Theoria Apophasis ::: or read his book ::: he is the king of magnetism ::: "he is our god"
Is it the reification fallacy? (Wikipedia has a good definition). Reification (also known as concretism, hypostatization, or the fallacy of misplaced concreteness) is a fallacy of ambiguity, when an abstraction (abstract belief or hypothetical construct) is treated as if it were a concrete real event or physical entity. Hence energy is something or an abstract concept (albeit a useful one) not a concrete thing.
I'm at work I did not have time to proofread Google Voice I like call it Google Speak and Spell and mess up I hope you I hope everyone gets my meaning on my last two comments I hope Google didn't screw me up too bad make me look like an idiot no bigger than I already am
You're not producing a transfer of electricity please create an electromagnetic force using iron what you got to admit is a greater magnetic force in iron core wrapped with copper wire is a much greater electromagnetic force than just copper wire with electricity running alone copper wire.
@@ThinkingandTinkering It is self suistaining electromagnetic generator-motor normaly technology , not use eletronic parts : it forever works and long life ! Use electronic parts no life because capacitors !
Open-Source Energy Systems have existed since the Tartarian Empire. The principals are intellectual property and to my knowledge all the patents no longer apply. Holcomb Energy Systems is fine operating off the mains grid with private energy magnification for their self-consumption however everyone that I know of that's tried to offer a completed cookie cutter manufactured system to the world for a price and trade soon depart this construct habitation destitute and penniless. Evidently, those who know the complete energy system are limited to share without reward or labor compensation and not create it for others. Sounds selfish in one vein of thought but conquering the paradigm has consequence. When we discover these types of systems and employ the technology for ourselves, they are priceless to teach without compensation for teaching others. Pass through energy magnification does require batteries, has a very high "Q" factor but like a sailboat isn't free energy or perpetual motion.
dear rob your uploads are becoming more and more ! dare i say based on a mad idealisem ! used to watch when you actualy inspired people to experiment . sadly it seems that now you just upload . without a thought of how usefull your content may bee.
Besides theory: "Inventors" like Holcomb never hand over their devices to experts for an objective test. Although this would help them considerably in finding investors. This alone makes it rather obvious that they are deliberate scammers. The comparison of plexiglass and steel is completely wrong. The factor is not five but more than thousand. This shows the incompetence of the Holcomb people clearly.
His demonstration test didn't prove anything to me. If you take apart a hoverboard wheel which is a brushless motor with stator in center and magnets that rotate on outside wheel. Remove the circuit board & hall sensors and you end of with a 3 phase alternator with stator in center and power can be generated by rotating the outside magnets. The Holcomb energy system is replacing those rotating magnets (alternating polarity) that require mechanical motion, with electromagnets that would have some kind of switching circuit replacing the function of the magnets. That electromagnetic switching circuit requires power to operate. His demonstration test is pointless. Put amp/volt meters on input coils and on output stator coil and prove there is more power output than input.
It is sufficient to refer to conservation of energy. The Holcomb system is phony. The Holcomb people are just another example in the long list of free energy scams.
I cant believe that you dont understand the reason why iron is used in solenoids motors and generators. iron does amplify the flux input from wire carrying the current input, If you understand basic electromagnetic theory and formulas then the factor mu should be known to you. I now wonder if you are a gatekeeper. You need to make a new video after reviewing any basic electromagnetic related info about the amplification that iron provides in electromagnets. Iron atoms contribute their magnetic fields to an externally applied field causing a net gain in solenoid type constructed devices up til the saturation point is reached. Have you never understood this basic prniciple of electromagnetics , How do you not know this by now. You need to apologise to the Holcomb people and your followers for this video.
This channel is such bs. He never tests any device. All he does is say, "I dont think it works because xyz and therefore it doesn't or can't work." Dude never does anything to actually check anything. He's just some armchair nobody that contributes literally nothing.
I don't want to defend Robert M-S, but in this case it is difficult to make a check. You can hardly go to the Holcomb people and say "Hey, can I test your system? And also dismantle it to be sure there is no trickery?". You could try to build one yourself according to the known informations but if it doesn't work you never know if your construction was correct. However, the Holcomb system is in contradiction to laws of physics. And there has never been a validation of its function by independent experts, although this would help a lot to get it into market. If you encounter contradiction to laws of physics and no independent validation exists the alarm bells should ring: Holcomb is just another free energy scammer.
Tariel Kapanadze no moving parts generator. Jump start it with a battery, and it runs for a while. He is a Russian physicist who produced a katcher coil resembling a German Han Grenade. Akula 0083 performed how to duplicate Tariel's work. The story goes that this is the type resonate amplifier boxed up produced by Nicola Tesla and produces 60 KW that ran the electric motor in the Pierce Arrow automobile.
Just yesterday I was watching Christoph’s 3D printed BLDC videos and one striking thing I noticed was the high efficiency he achieved without utilizing stator backirons as well as using only a vaguely ferromagnetic armature core made of iron-doped PLA, still achieving +80% in 600W configurations. By using Halbach arrays he concentrates much of the stator flux however I’m curious as to why exactly a low-ferrous armature worked as well as it did. In a similar fashion to Litz wire skin-effect, I imagine it was more to do with the orientation of the field through a medium rather than the actual medium material. High resolution lamination via 3D printing may serve to carry high-density magnetism in a similar fashion to Litz wire carrying high-voltage current. If magnetic flux takes the path of least reluctance, assuming the flux can overcome a given insulator-in his case the PLA, air bubbles, and layer lines-would that flux not just bypass the insulator and jump from iron grain to grain until inducing upon the copper armature winding?
most modern generators are around 99% efficient mate
I feel like the main difference between high magnetic and low magnetic production is the rpm used and heat generated. Like variable field alternators basically.
Not sure whether you mentioned or if I missed it, but the most important fact about energy is that it can't be created. A lot of hokum is based around the idea that energy suddenly appears from nowhere--if you just arrange things a certain way. The real innovation happens where a previously unknown source of energy is found, so I think it's good people try these things, you just have to be careful when it comes to parting ways with your money :)
"previously unknown source of energy"? Is it possible there is such a thing now?
@@markhathaway9456 now? Maybe not. But we don't know if we don't look. The nuclear forces weren't known about until relatively recently in human history.
You are absolutely right about energy conservation laws. Though , there are many people who are researching , so called , "zero point energy" and I mean real scientist , not the regular tricksters , trying to get someone's money. Even Tesla (among other famous scientists ) talked about sea of energy that surround us (I mean beyond static energy and ionic /radiation energy) . Now , problem with that is , that we don't have a proverbial "yardstick" to measure that energy and it is not properly defined (like telekinesis , for an example). Neither we have (that I know of) widely available device (that uses , or converts that energy) , from any of the people who had similar claims (we have some videos , and testimonies , but nothing yet available in the market). But still , everyone loves an idea of putting up an antenna and connecting it with some kind of device , to produce "free energy" forever and ever. 😁
@@markhathaway9456 someone very recently found that air passing through very small holes can generate electricity so i would say yeah we're still finding new ways to harvest energy
I agree mate - nice one
Focusing of magnetic fields is a very neat field. There is much to be learned here. In the same way we try to conserve electricity, we should be looking to conserve other forces within or models. If you waist energy in any of it's forms it's lost for good. Magnetic field lines not confined, could be considered an escape of energy.
The mystery is key. EM, Gravity, both part of our daily lives, and our technologies and theories (which are models used for outcome predictions), are still mysteries at their core. This doesn't mean we can't solve them, as we have many successful examples, but there are still core issues we haven't even identified, let alone solved for. This isn't a lack, it is an opportunity! Thanks RMS.
i agree mate but can I add - it often doesn't really matter if we solve them or not
i live in buncombe county, north carolina,. which is where the word, "bunkum" comes from. oh, well...
is it? - awesome - cheers mate
Duplin county, North Carolina
I have learned so much through your ability to explain things, thank you so much for taking the time to share your gift... have an awesome day!
Wow, thank you!
Very well said .
Thank you for telling the truth in a way I can understand it.
Many thanks Rob.
I saw the video # and thought it meant, "In the year 2123..." heh.
Potential is a fascinating thing since there are many kinds and all relate to what we would call "effective force" (to include gravity without calling it a force). The idea of a "differential" is behind potential and it offers a lot of possibilities. There's atmosphere vs vacuum, altitude above mass (gravity), charge vs no charge (electricity), cold vs hot, (I suppose) momentum of a mass vs a mass at rest (see photovoltaics perhaps or a baseball bat hitting a baseball on a Tee), etc.
The idea of focusing something like light or heat or "energy" is one we've used for a long time. Converting oil or coal or peat or wood via fire to heat, steam, and motion of a turbine, is quite useful (it turns out). Combining differential with focus and you get quite an effect.
I love the videos. Cheers!
i never really notice - well spotted mate lol and you are right there are lots and lots of possibilities
This device would use more energy than it generates , of course
Holcomb has something that works and is electrodynamicaly practical
No. Holcomb is a scammer. He has absolutely nothing. Has there been an objective third party confirmation for the function of his devices? No. He claims there are such confirmations but he can't show reports.
Depends what you mean by 'works', it works but it's pointless because it will use more energy than you'll get out of it.
Thank you for making this video.
You’re 100% brilliant and I love your sense of humor!🤣👏🏻👍
Great video.
I thought magnetism was due to individual spins of unpaired electrons being fixed in a solid. Please come back to me if this is incorrect. Everyday is a school day, here to learn 😊👍
Thanks for confirming what I’ve always thought how do magnets work no one really knows 😮
The beauty of it is that it's something left wide open for anyone to figure out, and it's such a simple problem that chances are the explanation is equally simple. I don't think it even requires any instrument to solve, just a lot of thinking outside the box. Magnetism and gravity are the most exciting and elusive puzzles I can think of.
If Mr. Murray-Smith could test their machine it would validate science and prove something.
if they send me one I would be happy to
Once again , Rob is bending space-time continuum and teleports me back in my 5th and 6 th grade. Great video !
lol - cheers mate
The Holcomb Energy System Generator operates based on Edward Leedskalnin's perpetual motion magnetic currents principles. It employs a three-phase Permanent Magnet Motor (PPM) to excite three interconnected coils. These coils are arranged in a series-parallel configuration to induce self-oscillation, simulating a magnetic rotor in motion. The stator coils then capture the magnetic field generated by this system. With its innovative design, the Holcomb Generator efficiently converts the magnetic field of the stator into electricity, eliminating the need for moving parts. Dr. Holcomb has integrated the best concepts from Leedskalnin’s work, portable electric generators, portable gas generators, AC transformers, and three-phase motors, to enhance the functionality of the Holcomb Energy System Generator.
( This information was derived from the patent information.)
Perpetual motion machines don't work, that's why they don't get granted patents - that's a patent application.
You got my like at ed leedskalnins.. whatever else sounds like a good implementation thereof.. Imma stick with the kromrey design and currently am figuring out a way to make that work
Hello Robert :) that is an interesting comparison: plastic vs steel cores… the two situations have the same flux H… but magnetic field B is thousands of times stronger in the steel, due to the material contribution (low reluctance)
I'm recording the video so I have a copy lol. Thankyou for a lovely insight which I would never have known and Mr Hokum should be happy you bringing his idea/product to alot of people's awareness
nice - awesome mate!
A shiny example of "First Principal thinking"
cheers mate
My comment after this was "Wow, he's got a big brain!" Yep, it's when you break down something complicated and make it simple. Best teacher ever!🎉
wow - cheers mate
Always the basics uncle Rob.
Great vid ..I was chomping at the bit for you to throw what a horse power is or the calculation....
Oh the joy of simplicity!
yep lol
Thanks for the info Rob
cheers mate
Would it be possible to generate free energy by using the phase change of water? We have a thermally isolated pipe with water in it and a piston. The water is at 1 degree celsius. We cool the water to 0 then we go back to 1 in one minute. At 0 the ice pushes the piston and at 1 a spring or another piston pushes back the piston. With this system we have 1 rotation per minute. By using a a gearbox we increase the RPM. We may also use a lever to increase the distance the piston moves. I have read that water when it changes from liquid to ice it has about 250 atm pressure. Wouldn't it be possible to generate more energy than we put in with this system?
@@Claudiu-st5c no
How about Heins' bi-toroid transformer? Seems like it could be easier to make with a ferrofluid core.
i will have to look that up mate
See patent US9230730B2
Many years ago, I thought up a generator consisting of ringed magnets with a central verticle tube containing a conductive gas, as the gas moves slightly it goes through the magnetic field & gets warmer through the induced current, at the top of this is a metal semispherical collector with spikes on the inside, as the gas cools it descends on the outside of the magnets which is shielded to prevent induction. Whether this idea is possible or not, I don't know. Apparently, hydrogen is a good conductor of electricity.
Ooooh!, the flat earth society will not like that! Using physics and stuff!
Very good explanation mate.
lol - no they won't lol
By the way I believe it's pronounced "Hol-Com" but I'm sure you already knew that Robot 😘 x
;)
Content creators that have energy generation videos on their channels, need to post videos like this for their own safety. I seen another of your comments where you were life threatened "only cats have 9 lives" by a guy I digged a bit and found that is working at a very suspicious place. Stay safe.
It's all simplicated. A lot of simple things put together to make complex things. Break them back down to the simple bits, understand those, and see how they are interconnected to make the whole. Works with mechanical things, programming, and so many things. Also helps as you did to see the magical nonsense that gets injected (i.e. I understand the bits but the sum total that is being sold clearly doesn't make sense). Crowd funded stuff is so full of this kind of thing. Thanks for sharing and explaining it clearly. 😃
cheers mate
Now a harder question, ball bearing magnetic accelerator/ cannon must do work because it accelerates. These cannons are commonly sold as science tools. Unless it is somehow trading distance for speed like a reverse lever/pulley.
Have you ever seen two cones rolling up an incline mate? It's the same idea
Others know all so about magnetism far greater than conventional teachings
I saw on the Holcombe video Bob that the 3-phase amplifier system is capable of 500% boost in power although am a little sceptical. Although there's alot of emphasis in the iron windings being used. Wish I has an exact schematic diagram as it would be interesting to take a punt over experimenting with this bad boy lol Got to admit this is an interesting one!
There are many scammers around pretending to have new energy generation methods, Holcomb is one of them. They simply try to get money from gullible investors. They claim there are confirmations by institutions as SGS but they can't show the reports. LOL. Any experimenting is wasted time.
If I can turn on an off permanent magnet can u make a solenoid with only magnets push type
yes
Thinking linear gravity generator push a magnet though a coil then let gravity drop it back down and repeat
Thank Robert. I was wondering if there was a way of creating different magnetic 'gradients' for attraction & repulsion to keep objects in stasis so I guess this is a good place to start. Not sure how I'd differentiate them yet but I love a good puzzle.
let me know how you get on mate
That's just magnetic field strength, and that's proven to be really hard to make stable for some configuations and realy easy for others.
Have Schröders cat been missing again? My ansver is "L" or "J"! If a little part of the magnet shift N and S but the big part of the magnet work like a magnetic bearing! We might have something!
for sure mate
A question kind sir - when we concentrate and focus energy (like a lens) doesn’t it allow you to harvest that energy and make better use with less waste regardless of initial input being the same because of the intensity or density? Or so I thought from what you yourself taught me. So I’m genuinely confused. I only say this out of a sincere hope that you’ve possibly left us with an incorrect perspective because you didn’t continue your thoughts through to what we normally hope to achieve, a “better way” that us every day folks may take advantage of and be empowered by. (Which I really hope this approach of switching magnetic fields with no moving parts will do for us. I seem to remember this idea from another start up years ago but my knowledge was slim to none back then, though I remember it had to do with a incredibly higher efficiency, because of software and programming improvements with the timing and switching frequencies of the electromagnets they employed in their motor, I believe it was an all electromagnetic motor. And it did have moving parts. So maybe this idea isn’t completely new!)Yes, it’s important to have a proper understanding and point out his mistake in wording and possible purposeful misleading and correct it. Thankfully your genius and eye for detail has done that for us and at the same time helped conceptualize the process, which I greatly thank you for. But I’m left wondering, in the end, does it outperform conventional means regardless of how he presents it. Also, you might not be aware, but from my research so far, this is a fella who’s already built a life of success and recognition in multiple fields, and disciplines. Including being a doctor of neuroscience. Besides already, seemingly being independently wealthy in funding much of this himself. I also would point out he is in his later years of life and so far I haven’t found any motivation for him to be anything but what he says he is, doing what he says he has done, for the reasons he explains in his videos. Which is not an electrical engineer, or physicist, hence his mistake in wording, and possible misunderstanding, hopefully!!! This is my first opposition that I’ve ever had to any of your videos, and though it may sound like opposition, it is purely meant as a case of confusion with the highest respect one could have for someone he considers to be one of if not my most valued teacher, and mentor. And the first channel I plan to become a member of to unlock even more opportunities for me to learn from a great master. For real for real, thank you, Robert.
I believe you Missed the alignment of the flux.
Indubitably! And it’s a darn good thing that we already exist in Over-unity, otherwise we’d probably never get any joy out of the things that actually work.
lol - ain't that the truth - nice one mate
Hello. Interesting experiments you do. I often watch your channel.
I have thought for a long time about whether you could somehow get the energy out of centrifugal forces. Huge forces there that don't need a lot of power to keep rotating. Is it something you have thought about. Greetings from Örjan in Sweden
Sounds very much like a flywheel mate
You can only get back what you put in, so no matter how strong the centrifugal force may be and how long it stays there by adding a tiny amount of power to keep it rotating (which is the exact amount of energy lost to friction), it's no different from placing a massive weight on a column, which is then compressed strongly indefinitely, but that compression can't be tapped directly nor indefinitely, you have to let the massive weight move down to get some energy out of it, which won't be more than it took to lift it up there.
There's so much energy available from water motion, wind and sun that there's no real need on earth to find and use other sources of energy. What needs to be found though, is a better portable energy storage solution than the centuries old battery design. If all the "free energy" efforts would focus on storage, we might have some real breakthrough by now.
This is a really nice video Rob, I heard of their machine a few years back...do you think you can DIY it for educational purposes?
cheers mate - i guess i could try
I would really like this also
To educate people about the fact that perpetual motion machines don't work?
I think you're looking at it wrong because of using the capacitors switches making a first electromatic electromagnetic pulse picked up by the stator Harry Young into it makes sense I thought about this pretty much exactly the same way he talks about it pretty much everything I've seen that you talked about before this has been spot on I also think he's got a patent on this and already got them on in commercial use from what I understand all hearsay
No energy is for free except free energy. You put more energy in iron core than air core to build the magnetic flux to saturation and when it collapse it releases the same back. Flux store the energy as energy storing device not energy generator.
All we can see is energy, light is energy, no light no sight. Then there is that big glowing thing in the sky. Some energy is invisible but much is not.
lol - very good point mate - cheers
Thinking about these primary issues like force etc. is I feel needed, to uncover hidden aspects of reality. I used to research this area, and came up with a new representation of magnetism. This predicted what we know, and at least one other aspect.
Get a sort steel rod with some wire wound about it, and place the N of a strong magnet at one end. Now, add another magnet at the other also using its N (...two S will also work). Monitor the coil, and move it back and forth.
What did you get? Did you expect that? I've not seen or heard of this generator anywhere. Anyone know what it's called? All out of an alternative magnetism model. Nothing new in energy terms, but a novel device.
It sounds like the Garron Transformer to me mate
@@ThinkingandTinkering Hmmm... little info on this on the web. The device I described is a square-wave / reciprocating generator (or reciprocating motor) which I've not seen elsewhere. Not sure what the use-case would be for this guy... All the best!
Porsupuesto q lo amplifica esto ocupa la reactiva los caminos del hierro son los q canalizan los rechazos y los manda donde son absorvidos y no rechazados fijese en el diceño antes saludos
Reluctance is just the first step to understand the concept. There is more. This generators are overunity.
The only problem is that if your "basic principles" are flawed your assessment is likewise flawed. That's why a lot of inventions were traditionally done by people who have not known the "basic principles" of their era (or disregarded them). Holcomb system is one of many existing and proven ways to obtain excess energy. Luckily for us the inventor also disregarded the "basic principles" so that we can benefit from it.
You are comming close to free energy u might disappear..... I saw a video couple months ago with using reluctance using a small motor to turn a much larger generator and it all but disappeared from the internet I want to send it to you
I may have seen that one as well. I recall a rather big (outer) wheel or frame, like 1 meter diameter. And I think there where two axes involved, to 'uncouple' forces or so. I cannot recall all details, and my impression, of what I can recall, is that it was unfinished. And perhaps a reason for me to not watch it too closely. And so I am not able to recall it anymore. (and most probably we are not talking about the same device, but ah... well).
@@deslomeslager yes idk about magnetic motor but it was a torque magnifier i guess and it had a patent but I can't find the video at all
Are you talking about the Thain Heins device?
Confirmed video removed from internet should have recorded the patent number
@@ThinkingandTinkering the device used the reluctance and altering the flux lines using small motor turning a small magnet connecting flux lines to turn a huge wheel when one flux line broken with a sliding motion the next one snaps into place causing rotor with bigger magnets to rotate as it goes along
Happy Thanksgiving!
you too mate and cheers
what bothers me is why more speed and magnet passes build up voltage and amps. or charge and amps. when a magnet moves slowly through a coil or inductor, whatever spike in voltage at two turns at one rpm should still be the same charge at 100 rpm. but its not. its like saying that spinning a six volt battery can make it produce 9 volts...of course, if we allow for an aether, and one that is tiny packets of energy, and that magnetic flux can pick it up or gather it and focus it, and transfer it through flux lines into an inductor's matter, well to me that makes reasonable sense...
Ala perpetual motion. Some motion of mechanism may appear to operate indefinitely, but unable to do any work or generate any power.
Hi Robert, I hope all is well there with you , your family, Luke, & his family. My wish is that Luke is managing studies with low stress at University. After watching this video I did addtional searches under your name to better understand eddy currents in a way only you are able to make learning clear, and fun.. Question is: Have you ever done an video explanation, or discussed Hysteresis, or convey whats happening when Eddy Currents are acting in Iron Core laminate stack ? My search brought up some reference to these, but for me the mystery of Hysteresis remains. Robert maybe add my request to others asking for your special clarity skills expresing therios like no one Hi Robert, I hope all is well there with you , your family, Luke, & his family. My wish is that Luke is managing studies with clarity of mind, and low stress at University. After watching this video, I did additional searches under your name to better understand eddy currents in a way only you are able to make learning clear, and so fun.. I ask permission to lean on your knowledge base a bit more. Question is: Have you ever done a dedicated video explanation, or discussed Hysteresis in detail, or conveyed what's happening when Eddy Currents when these currents are passing along in an Iron Core laminate stack ? My search brought up some reference to these, but for me the mystery of Hysteresis remains. I will watch others' explanations, while hoping to stay tuned in, and be fascinated when you're offering up concepts explained with a chuckle. Robert maybe add my request to others asking for your special clarity skills expressing theories like no one else can on the topics mentioned here by me. Best wishes from sent there. Enjoy the Days ahead. : )
.
Rat trap there's a chalenge
One of the guys who's not a complete whore...
How come music? Music moves without mass or force 💪
only the heart mate lol
Hey great video, as always... Is it possible for you or I to cast a plexiglass core? And would it be worth it?
yeah you can as for it being worth it - i have no idea mate - sorry
IRON ACTS AS A CURRENT AMPLIFIER AMPLIFYING THE CURRENT BY THE mu FACTOR IRON AND STEEL DOES NOT JUST CONCENTRATE THE AVAILABLE FLUX µ--(the relative permeability of the material) Page194-Essentials of Electromagnetism
is that right mate? - thanks for sharing
I am absolutly correct@@ThinkingandTinkering
lol - Of course you are mate - in your mind. How could you be anything different? But to be honest I don't mind what you think
isn't this "just" the 'electromagnetic permeability' term in the Maxwell equations? Plexiglass does not pass it, and carbon-in-steel does, so like any resistor balances current by 'not allowing it to pass as stochastically often', so ought the plexiglass retard the advancement and building of the electromagnetic field. I'm not sure what the difference is between 'permittivity' and 'permeability' in this case. Perhaps, having many copper sticks around a magnetic coil would enhance the permittivity, allowing the 'backflux' to reach across more air; whilst the sticks themselves should be less permeable, having mostly just solid copper rather than 'air'. Should be worth 'proving something' by varying the atmosphere, and observing the magnetic fields, and having various metal arrangements 'in the field' somewhere.
magnetism is force i.e. electrodynamic discharge - the entire universe is just charge/discharge. the bohr model of the atom is incorrect, there are no particles - atoms are just small generators of electrical charge/discharge.
is that right? awesome
I'm VERY skeptical. Show me the thing actually powering something significant, preferably in a trustworthy third party's test lab, and I'll belirve it, but not until then.
Force or Farce
lol - indeed
So hokum is the correct pronunciation.
The shape of steel and the coil are the most important thing believe. I don't think that they are optimized. Electricity naturally flows in a spiral. Even sound waves are not really a wave form. A sign wave is only flattening the spiral. Only looking a the spiral vortex from the side. There is a lot to be optimized when looking at it this way
we all have different ideas of what is the important thing mate -and from what I can tell everyone believes their version to be the right version - such is life lol - cheers
@@ThinkingandTinkering That is so true. It would be nice if here was a place like the Alexandria Library still where we could all go and share ideas in person and work on them together. So many things would be perfected.
So if "they" take down your video I think you should make a Hokum sorry Holcomb machine and test it. 🤔
lol - i might do just that!
Hmmm... nice video. But i don't agree with you on all points. I was thinking about Holcomb System too, and i think it is possible to achieve a greater output with his method. The key is not only about the flux. I'll mail you some details. Greetings from Poland
No worries mate - these are only my thoughts - I don't claim to be right - but I am happy to say what I think
Hej, never mind. I was thinking like u when I first heard of Holcomb. But on my second thought, I got the key behind it. And yes, it works.
How? Not saying I don't believe you, but seeing as they're still not available to the public, there's a bunch of us who would build our own if we had some grasp on how it works. For all the things I've seen I still don't understand this one. Not yet.
5:20 ::: "nobody" ::: no ::: see the video ::: "NATURE´S SECRETS OF MAGNETISM" from Theoria Apophasis ::: or read his book ::: he is the king of magnetism ::: "he is our god"
plenty of people claim to understand mate - the sad thing is no one does lol
Is it the reification fallacy? (Wikipedia has a good definition). Reification (also known as concretism, hypostatization, or the fallacy of misplaced concreteness) is a fallacy of ambiguity, when an abstraction (abstract belief or hypothetical construct) is treated as if it were a concrete real event or physical entity. Hence energy is something or an abstract concept (albeit a useful one) not a concrete thing.
I'm at work I did not have time to proofread Google Voice I like call it Google Speak and Spell and mess up I hope you I hope everyone gets my meaning on my last two comments I hope Google didn't screw me up too bad make me look like an idiot no bigger than I already am
You're not producing a transfer of electricity please create an electromagnetic force using iron what you got to admit is a greater magnetic force in iron core wrapped with copper wire is a much greater electromagnetic force than just copper wire with electricity running alone copper wire.
If the technology use electronic parts then no long life , I think self suistaining gene-motor will is best !
what is a gene motor mate?
@@ThinkingandTinkering It is self suistaining electromagnetic generator-motor normaly technology , not use eletronic parts : it forever works and long life ! Use electronic parts no life because capacitors !
@@ThinkingandTinkering if must use electron parts then , I think : normal electronic inverter will better !
Energy is useless without low entropy
Open-Source Energy Systems have existed since the Tartarian Empire. The principals are intellectual property and to my knowledge all the patents no longer apply. Holcomb Energy Systems is fine operating off the mains grid with private energy magnification for their self-consumption however everyone that I know of that's tried to offer a completed cookie cutter manufactured system to the world for a price and trade soon depart this construct habitation destitute and penniless. Evidently, those who know the complete energy system are limited to share without reward or labor compensation and not create it for others. Sounds selfish in one vein of thought but conquering the paradigm has consequence. When we discover these types of systems and employ the technology for ourselves, they are priceless to teach without compensation for teaching others. Pass through energy magnification does require batteries, has a very high "Q" factor but like a sailboat isn't free energy or perpetual motion.
I will have to look into it - cheers mate
If the Insane Clown Posse is to be believed, the way magnets work… is ‘miracles’. 😂
No it's quantum physics or magic as you know it
lololol - brilliant mate
@@ThinkingandTinkeringWhen you know, you just know. Knew it when I was a child, still know it.
dear rob your uploads are becoming more and more ! dare i say based on a mad idealisem ! used to watch when you actualy inspired people to experiment . sadly it seems that now you just upload . without a thought of how usefull your content may bee.
I still have to use electronic components and I don't like it! It appears that Holcomb's invention is similar to Figuera !
Besides theory: "Inventors" like Holcomb never hand over their devices to experts for an objective test. Although this would help them considerably in finding investors. This alone makes it rather obvious that they are deliberate scammers. The comparison of plexiglass and steel is completely wrong. The factor is not five but more than thousand. This shows the incompetence of the Holcomb people clearly.
His demonstration test didn't prove anything to me. If you take apart a hoverboard wheel which is a brushless motor with stator in center and magnets that rotate on outside wheel. Remove the circuit board & hall sensors and you end of with a 3 phase alternator with stator in center and power can be generated by rotating the outside magnets. The Holcomb energy system is replacing those rotating magnets (alternating polarity) that require mechanical motion, with electromagnets that would have some kind of switching circuit replacing the function of the magnets. That electromagnetic switching circuit requires power to operate. His demonstration test is pointless. Put amp/volt meters on input coils and on output stator coil and prove there is more power output than input.
It was all a bit suspect for sure mate
I find your argument unconvincing. You need at least to refer to quantum mechanics and use that as your framework.
It is sufficient to refer to conservation of energy. The Holcomb system is phony. The Holcomb people are just another example in the long list of free energy scams.
I cant believe that you dont understand the reason why iron is used in solenoids motors and generators. iron does amplify the flux input from wire carrying the current input, If you understand basic electromagnetic theory and formulas then the factor mu should be known to you. I now wonder if you are a gatekeeper. You need to make a new video after reviewing any basic electromagnetic related info about the amplification that iron provides in electromagnets. Iron atoms contribute their magnetic fields to an externally applied field causing a net
gain in solenoid type constructed devices up til the saturation point is reached. Have you never understood this basic prniciple of electromagnetics , How do you not know this by now. You need to apologise to the Holcomb people and your followers for this video.
Don't insult me mate - I don't mind if you believe in something different - you do what you want - cheers
Como siempre, dando refutaciones muy escuetas y tergiversadas. Una total decepcion.
This channel is such bs. He never tests any device. All he does is say, "I dont think it works because xyz and therefore it doesn't or can't work." Dude never does anything to actually check anything. He's just some armchair nobody that contributes literally nothing.
I don't want to defend Robert M-S, but in this case it is difficult to make a check. You can hardly go to the Holcomb people and say "Hey, can I test your system? And also dismantle it to be sure there is no trickery?". You could try to build one yourself according to the known informations but if it doesn't work you never know if your construction was correct. However, the Holcomb system is in contradiction to laws of physics. And there has never been a validation of its function by independent experts, although this would help a lot to get it into market. If you encounter contradiction to laws of physics and no independent validation exists the alarm bells should ring: Holcomb is just another free energy scammer.