@@themanftheworld8439 the indigenous population in the UK have had their right to safety stripped away. The Rαριsts who were supposed to be convicted after being convicted of trafficking vulnerable white working class girls across the country apparently have more right to a `family life’ than the victims do to safety.
@@walkaz No real evidence though is there? I have a copy of the Qur'an. You think that makes me a Muslim?🤣 Gimme some tangible evidence before you ask me to 'beleive'. I'll wait for the court case, rather than beleiving the race baiting bs on farcebook.😘
I don't see why a parliamentary question to Starmer about whether he represented the father would have or could have any prejudicial effect on the trial of the son. So someone should ask.
The point being made in social media, isn't that the son is culpable because of the father's alleged war crimes, the point being made on social media is, that if the father hadn't been given sanctuary in this country, he would have not had a child that went on to commit crimes in the UK.
Starmer was the lawyer for Celestin Ugirashebuja, one of the architects of the genocide. Starmer earned huge sums of money preventing Celestin Ugirashebuja from being sent to trial. Another architect of the genocide was Ancylon Rudakubana, so there's a possible connection. But as Rudakubana, is a very common nam , not necessarily
The wisdom of granting asylum to war criminals is at the root of the problem, as is Starmer's willingness to enable that outcome. Raising the issue of his lack of judgement...again. This seems to be an ongoing problem. But how has this man been allowed to fly so high when he is so clearly a flawed individual?
All those different levels of people who were right in saying it was a Muslim and then got imprisoned, must be pardoned and compensated, for their obvious assumption of who committed this shocking heartbreaking terror
The non-charging of the Manchester airport attackers seems to me a bigger mystery - though this Southport affair also reeks. One firm fact we do know - Starmer is a pathological lair.
No mystery mate. The judiciary of the UK is as fuct as everything else. Like the NHS, you have to wait for the cps to get around to your turn and then you have to wait for a trial. Probably about two years. Be patient and keep your fingers crossed for news of a conviction. Some time in 2026?😂
The point is that Starmer should be answering questions about it all, not trying to gag and threaten anyone asking questions. And you missed the connection that Keir could have a conflict of interest if he is connected by a court case to the father. The whole thing stinks, and the UK should be outraged about being kept in the dark and being threatened with jail for asking questions.
Alas it is sub judice, there are strict rules around active court cases. www.parliament.uk/site-information/glossary/sub-judice/#:~:text=The%20sub%20judice%20rule%20prevents,legal%20outcome%20of%20a%20case.
Simon also misses the key point that if the parents had not been allowed into Britain the first place, their sub human terrorist offspring would not be in this country either.
A Bangladeshi teacher I had 30 years ago said this is common in their communities as well. Not necessarily the fraud, since that especially appears to be a Nigerian speciality, but for the taxman. Yet there are those that have the cheek to call out Tommy R. for using a pseudonym.
I loathe Starmer, but I hardly think he can be charged as an accessory just because the man he let in fathered a son in the UK who later converted to Islam and committed terrorist murders.
@@MistersandyrobertsonTrue in many ways ! But why is this crimes being kept quiet on every level and why is this murder of children allowed to cover his face in court ! Which is normally forbidden !? Or is it a face now being much older many people would recognize ?? Only photos showing him as a young child. when have photos been put out showing only the child picture of serious criminals ? ! No Mug Shot photo as in other cases ! This particular case is being treated on a totally different level ! Question is Why !!! Also how did he obtain Rysin at 18 !! So many anomalies from all sides.
@@MistersandyrobertsonI agree (on both counts) however, he should answer for the jailing of people for telling the truth (calling the perpetrator a terrorist) or for saying things he doesn’t like. And for the absolute shambles of an attempt to cover up these links - withdrawal of parliamentary privilege on raising the subject, denial of the existing evidence perpetrator’s terror links and religious beliefs? Of course, we cannot at this stage say anything for certain without clear evidence or preferably certain proof but the efforts to create a smokescreen around the whole subject do not help.
the greedy and very corrupt people that govern and rule this country are allowed to do as they please ,unfortunately , but change is comeing to prevent this happening in the future.
You are spot on, I think that a lot of people are joining up the dots & the Labour government are deep trouble… I am sure some might ask - what else are we not privileged too?
Protesters jailed - criminals remaining uncharged: what a mess! I wonder: does Starmer sleep easily at night? Oh, I forgot: as a lawyer he has had plenty of practice. Pathetic!
We really are - another five years of the uni-party means another 8-10 million immigrants. And I just don't know if they'll be enough of Britain left by the end of that to rally. I hope I'm wrong.
Yes, but the point being, at least for the moment, we don't know that Starmer was involved at all. If the killer's father was a known terrorist, then that opens an entire new can of worms.
@@Occident.The Government of the time allegedly did want it turned back when they realised the facts of who and how many were on board but they were unable at that time to stop it.
I hate to be "that guy" once again, but if proven correct then I called it at the very beginning. I said "why are the parents never a suspect in these cases? The same with Begum : they MUST be getting their radicalisation from somewhere; and where better than at home? Especially when the first people who condition them are their family circle." We shall see how this plays out.
Not necessarily true; take for example career criminals ie gangsters, a lot of them successfully compartmentalised various aspects of their lives in such a way that their parents never found out until their son’s arrest. It’s the same with serial killers, they are able to compartmentalise their lives, and it is only when they get caught and their crimes exposed by the media that others find out. Some parents especially mothers tend to be ignorant of what their adult offspring get up to behind their back.
It did go through my mind that the parents never seemed mentioned and not much detail about the son either. Here's hoping the truth comes out over time.
@theprincipalofficer_1 There's a distinct difference between those who believe, and those whose belief moves them to act, while being actively encouraged to do so. If you cannot see that, then thats on you. They are all capable - some are more capable than others.
Starmer knew who the attacker was, that he was a Muslim, that he was a terrorist, that he possessed ricin and if the father is a war criminal. Starmer lied and imprisoned innocent people, he must go.
I remember an african colleague of mine from Cameroon a few years ago, he lost his wallet at a conference. separately, it turned out he'd left it on a table and we looked into it to figure out who owned it. Amongst the great many credit cards and ID he was known as almost as many separate variations of his name that we knew him by. So there's that.
@HistoryDebunkedsimonwebb we innocently at the time asked him why this was, he said it was various tribal names and such. But it occurred to us that there were "tax implications" here which were allowing certain liberties to be taken.
Indeed it should be. Strange, therefore, that the current government seems blissfully happy to imprison its citizens who like to point out its two tier treatment of illegal residents over and above others.
I met a Rwandan war criminal once. He was in hospital in East London where I was working. He told me that he killed very many people with a machete. Anyway, he was allowed to live in Britain as an “asylum seeker.” ECHR and all that. I’m glad the 1940s German war criminals were brought to justice at every opportunity (though probably many more should have faced justice), but I can’t understand the leniency shown to African war criminals.
Never heard of Operation Paperclip? Google how many Nazis received the death penalty if you want to both be depressed and understand how we got where we are!
Geopolitics. Rivalry between Anglophone Africa and Francophone Africa. How many scientists of German heritage worked for the US and for the USSR on their respective space programmes?
It may have been him or maybe not, but it is certain that Starmer worked in the business of getting people we don't want here to be allowed to stay here.
@@HistoryDebunkedsimonwebbRemember the time after that poor girl was stabbed in Dublin last year, Si? You happily spread a demonstrably false claim re: the identity of the suspect. A claim which your source then retracted. LOL
It is alleged that Axel Rudakubana said to a pupil from his school in Southport "Your country needs genocide". And he was excluded from this school after he was found carrying a knife - this was in the local paper the Southport Champion. Of interest to is Tony Blair's (who has a flat in Southport) and his links to Rwanda's Paul Kagame, this needs looking into.
What facts do we know. Alphonse Rudabukana came to the country just after the genocide. There's no evidence that Starmer was his lawyer. Starmer was the lawyer for Celestin Ugirashebuja, one of the architects of the genocide. Starmer earned huge sums of money preventing Celestin Ugirashebuja from being sent to trial. Another architect of the genocide was Ancylon Rudakubana, so there's a possible connection. That leads to questions? 1. Was Alphonse involved? 2. Did he change his identity? 3. Has Starmer met Alphonse in the past?
So , does that mean by helping this war criminal to avoid trial, under Echr rules ,as he is not legally a war criminal,he is therfore entitled to apply n recive asylum in the UK? Nice work starmer, wtf is in your head
@@angloirish-c8n Look at the sums Starmer clean up on these cases. Look, I've no qualms about people have a defence lawyer in court. But having lawyers prevent people from going to trial for genocide is something despicable. It's like being Heinrich Himmler's personal lawyer.
The Apple doesn’t fall far from the tree !!! If the Son took the lives of three innocent underage girls then maybe if not the parent a relative who shares an affinity for murderous proclivities !!!
Scummy is a subjective. You may believe you are not scummy, yet there will be people who see you as exactly that. They will all need protecting by the legal profession. A poem from Pastor Martin Niemoller First they came for the Communists And I did not speak out Because I was not a Communist Then they came for the Socialists And I did not speak out Because I was not a Socialist Then they came for the trade unionists And I did not speak out Because I was not a trade unionist Then they came for the Jews And I did not speak out Because I was not a Jew Then they came for me And there was no one left To speak out for me
Interesting concept. But swearing an oath only works on people that fear something might happen to them by way of state or divine retribution should they break it. I don't know about Starmer but there are people around that do not hold any such fears.
@@Occident. They're all narcissists. All they're really interested in is the self-reflection. I've worked with these type of people all my life. I've also noticed how keen they are to spend your money and how mean they are when spending their own.
Don't mind Do-gooders who actually pay for their good deeds monetarily or with self-sacrifice, but today these are as rare as hen teeth. 99,9% of modern do-gooders just virtue signal then let someone else pay for it, if not actually make money off their "virtue".
Are you sure they do this because they are "do gooders" or just as means to an end? Being a successful barrister will generally open doors and assist you climb the social ladder far more easily than being from a technical or hands on background. The money that they can earn is pretty good as well, though of course there are plenty of ordinary barristers etc who do not end up at the top or making fortunes, they are probably the ones that genuinely do want to help the ordinary people of this country.
Relying on 'official' documents is a major mistake. I can assure you, as someone who's witnesses the corruption within the British Court system many times, the term 'official' has lost all credibility.
In December 2006 Ugirashebuja was arrested in Walton-on-the-Naze, Frinton, Essex, by UK police, acting on a request by the Rwandan government. who requested his extradition for trial on suspicion of murder and for planning or incitement to commit genocide of Tutsis between 1 January 1994 and 12 December 1994. Three other Rwandans were arrested at the same time (Charles Munyaneza, Vincent Bajinya (Brown) and Emmanuel Nteziryayo). The accused were held in Belmarsh prison, South London, while the extradition case was heard at Westminster Magistrates Court (September 2007 - May 2008) before District Judge Evans. Ugirashebuja had a number of very senior barristers acting for his defence including now Labour leader Sir Kier Starmer, Edward H. Fitzgerald, Rachel Kapila, Patrick C. Hill and Rebecca J. Wright. Legal aid fees were at least £183,000.
@@__logan__duvalier__ Legal aid fees for Ugirashebuja for this second extradition case were at least £324,000. £507,000 on legal aid to prevent an Genocidal criminal from getting his day in court.
What is a certain is that the courts in this country have often become a mockery of justice. Today it is reported that a man from Congo has been given leave to remain in the UK rather than being deported after his conviction for violating young girls, including his own step-daughter. The reason given, naturally , was that to deport this man would deny him his 'right to a family life'. The rights of his step-daughter and others to a life free from fear of this odious individual apparently don't matter.
Not to mention Mr Lynch. I have a terrible feeling that we need an independent pathologist report on the ‘suicide’. Do you believe anything this government says?? Why did he not receive protection in prison?? He’d already been beaten up by Muslims, the cowards. Sleaze, sleaze, sleaze!! A Veteran
What is important isn't if this particular man was defended by Starmer but that he was complicit in defending the immigration of people who have brought nothing to the uk apart from their personal political or cultural problems.
I had a tenant who had 11 different names on her payslips from 11 London Boroughs where she was an Outreach Worker, all while living /studying120 miles away. She was taking about £450k pa in wages from London taxpayers for nothing. She told me she was paying my mortgage and I ought to be grateful to her. After I gave her notice for multiple breaches of contract, not paying rent and attacking neighbours, she smashed up the house, defecated on the walls and somehow got her deposit back off the Gov run DPS. That's ok because I'm white. After repairing it at my expense, I sold the house and paid the government CGT for all their hard work. Never again.
If they won’t tell us the truth, they can’t c o plain at the rumours and speculation that arise. Get the case to court and see what there is to be seen.
It’s equivalent to complaining about escalating burglary whilst simultaneously leaving all one’s doors and windows permanently unlocked and telling everyone about it… Clearly our scrofulous government can exert far greater effort in quelling rampant speculation with cold hard facts. Unless of course they’ve got something to hide... 🙂
When Tony Blair was before the courts at westminster in the early 80's for importuning the local public toilets and was caught, he gave the name Linton Blair to avoid recognition. It does and can happen.
@@MrT01582 It is actually Anthony Charles Lynton Blair. FOI letters have been sent to the Home office, one in particular in 2015. A Pdf reply is online which states there are no known records? But newspaper clips and court documents still exist from Bow Street magistartes court to the case. Obviously it seems Blair had the relevant documents held by the home office destroyed when he was PM IMO?
@@MrT01582Court documents name the person as Lynton Blair. He was fined £500 at Bow street. Police notes disappeared over the years. Charles Lynton who was at University was known as Miranda, a promiscuous cross dresser who played the guitar badly.
@@FishingFan2 No he wasn't. £500 in the early 1970s is the equivalent of £6,600 today. Nobody would be fined that sum of money for a misdemeanour. Much as I loathe Blair, there is no evidence whatsoever that he has a criminal conviction - under any name - for any type of deviant activity.
@@mikecrimlis3366 From August this year - The Prime Minister's spokesman told reporters: “Anyone who stokes this violence, whether on the internet or in person, can be prosecuted and face prison.” So Prime Ministers involve themselves with online rumours when they want to.
Remember this: Your MP knew this. The newsreader knew about it. The journalists you read knew as well. The celebrity who condemned you for your opinion almost certainly knew as well.
You’re missing one point, the two are connected because if the father had been extradited back to Rwanda on the allleged arrest warrant for war crimes then the son would never have been a “quiet welsh choirboy” nor would he have even been here.
The problem Starmer has though is he has become the story and its overshadowing everything else the government does, usually in cases like this there is only one outcome.
Starmer has, by his own words and actions, tied himself into the fate of an accused multiple murder. That's enough to tell us there is something seriously wrong with the man.
Why hasn't Starmer actually addressed the rumours and called them false. Why has the subject been banned from being discussed in parliament. I hate that the government doesn't think we have the right to know what is going on in our country, with our kids. When we speculate, we get locked up.
It wouldn’t be unreasonable to surmise the rumours may be accurate in view of the fierce protection of denial of free speech about this case including in parliament. Starmer seems determined to stop all conversation about it. maybe in time with the threat of a jail sentence.
![เปิด อาณาจักร หมื่นล้าน "สาระตั้ม" l [Nickynachat]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/3XE0nPF4YkQ/mqdefault.jpg)
Starmer protects promotes and imports the growing enemy within.
Well he is married to "one"
Shalom
"Whenever their is trouble and strife in a nation expect to find the dews at the heart of it " Henry Ford
"I was Europe's last chance " Austrian Painter
The enemy within 👃
"To understand what is happening in the West is to understand who is actually doing it dues"
Dr David Duke
What about the human rights of those murdered little girls???
@@themanftheworld8439 unfortunately it seems these days if you're white you have no human rights it's a sad thing to say those poor girls need Justice
Oh they don't matter to our Liberal Left. The human rights of others are far more important.
Black feelings matter more than white lives
@@themanftheworld8439 the indigenous population in the UK have had their right to safety stripped away. The Rαριsts who were supposed to be convicted after being convicted of trafficking vulnerable white working class girls across the country apparently have more right to a `family life’ than the victims do to safety.
Exactly 😔😔
Yvette Cooper has gone to ground while Starmer is more often than not out of the country. Wonder why.
Commies leaving the damage for others to clear up.
More often than not? How often has he been abroad since the election?
because he doesnt like this country
@@jimjones-bk2is He is in Rio de Janeiro at the moment.
@geoff873 no, it's because it's his job.
I'm sick and tired of these Welsh doctors and engineers
Bloody taffs
What about aspiring architects?
And scumbags with toolmaker fathers.
@@stratblaster As a taff, he's not a taff and never will be a taff, if you don't mind. 😄😄😄
@@user-sw9vy9lh7f🏴
The very fact parliamentary privilege has been taken away for the first time tells us that there's something major being surpressed!
Suppressing rumours, scaremongering and stiring up, unnecessary racial hatred I suspect.
Is this real? Where did you hear this news?
Without doubt there is a connection, and the logical conclusion one can draw is that it's to do with F2TK's previous job.
@@gregsmith7821ah just like they said the killer wasn’t a Muslim or a terrorist?
@@walkaz No real evidence though is there? I have a copy of the Qur'an. You think that makes me a Muslim?🤣 Gimme some tangible evidence before you ask me to 'beleive'. I'll wait for the court case, rather than beleiving the race baiting bs on farcebook.😘
Here's the crux...why suspend parliamentary privilege?....an act which has never happened before....something stinks....and it WILL out in the end
When the Speaker of the Commons forbids questions about something, you know there's something there.
Keir Starmer has never been PM before. He clearly has Lindsay Hoyle on side, too. I wonder what's going on there?
Why doesn't Farage just say what he knows? Consequences be damned
People love their phrases.
He toast
The truth will out
Justice is blind
Democracy is fair
…
I don't see why a parliamentary question to Starmer about whether he represented the father would have or could have any prejudicial effect on the trial of the son. So someone should ask.
This story is getting murkier and murkier.
It’s more deeper than this connection.
The point being made in social media, isn't that the son is culpable because of the father's
alleged war crimes, the point being made on social media is, that if the father hadn't been given sanctuary in this country, he would have not had a child that went on to commit crimes in the UK.
Starmer was the lawyer for Celestin Ugirashebuja, one of the architects of the genocide.
Starmer earned huge sums of money preventing Celestin Ugirashebuja from being sent to trial.
Another architect of the genocide was Ancylon Rudakubana, so there's a possible connection. But as Rudakubana, is a very common nam , not necessarily
Like father like son
And if my Auntie had balls she'd be my Uncle.
@@jimjones-bk2is And your mum would be your sister...
The wisdom of granting asylum to war criminals is at the root of the problem, as is Starmer's willingness to enable that outcome.
Raising the issue of his lack of judgement...again.
This seems to be an ongoing problem. But how has this man been allowed to fly so high when he is so clearly a flawed individual?
All those different levels of people who were right in saying it was a Muslim and then got imprisoned, must be pardoned and compensated, for their obvious assumption of who committed this shocking heartbreaking terror
But they were spreading Malinformation !
They should be but they won't.
@davidroyston1671 Your probably correct there
Except that that is not what they're in prison for.
The non-charging of the Manchester airport attackers seems to me a bigger mystery - though this Southport affair also reeks. One firm fact we do know - Starmer is a pathological lair.
And a coward, bully, twat, thicko.
Hoax that's why.
You mean he’s a lawyer. Same thing I suppose!
I suspect one or both are important muslims with strong connections and the Muslim prosecutors won’t charge them.
No mystery mate. The judiciary of the UK is as fuct as everything else. Like the NHS, you have to wait for the cps to get around to your turn and then you have to wait for a trial. Probably about two years. Be patient and keep your fingers crossed for news of a conviction. Some time in 2026?😂
The presence of them both in this country, lead to this slaughter of innocents.
That is beyond doubt. And we don't know anything about Rudakubana senior's attitude towards Britain or how he brought up his son.
Gates of toledo
The point is that Starmer should be answering questions about it all, not trying to gag and threaten anyone asking questions. And you missed the connection that Keir could have a conflict of interest if he is connected by a court case to the father. The whole thing stinks, and the UK should be outraged about being kept in the dark and being threatened with jail for asking questions.
Agree 100%
Hear hear
Kier should be in jail for bringing criminals into the UK.
Alas it is sub judice, there are strict rules around active court cases.
www.parliament.uk/site-information/glossary/sub-judice/#:~:text=The%20sub%20judice%20rule%20prevents,legal%20outcome%20of%20a%20case.
Simon also misses the key point that if the parents had not been allowed into Britain the first place, their sub human terrorist offspring would not be in this country either.
You won't hear about this in the MSM !!
Why would we?
Simon has just shown that it is 99% certain not to be true.
This rumour was floating about since the incident happened
Yes i noticed that.
Because it's nonsense
My wife worked with a Nigerian woman who used multiple family names to move from company to company after being fired for fraud.
Born scammers
Yoruba, I'll be bound!
A Bangladeshi teacher I had 30 years ago said this is common in their communities as well. Not necessarily the fraud, since that especially appears to be a Nigerian speciality, but for the taxman. Yet there are those that have the cheek to call out Tommy R. for using a pseudonym.
@@HistoryDebunkedsimonwebb Harriet Cade, Fenton Sadler and Jay Clanton
Has Reeves got Nigerian blood?
If it's true then Starmer should be charged as an accessory.
I loathe Starmer, but I hardly think he can be charged as an accessory just because the man he let in fathered a son in the UK who later converted to Islam and committed terrorist murders.
@@MistersandyrobertsonTrue in many ways ! But why is this crimes being kept quiet on every level and why is this murder of children allowed to cover his face in court ! Which is normally forbidden !? Or is it a face now being much older many people would recognize ?? Only photos showing him as a young child. when have photos been put out showing only the child picture of serious criminals ? ! No Mug Shot photo as in other cases ! This particular case is being treated on a totally different level ! Question is Why !!! Also how did he obtain Rysin at 18 !! So many anomalies from all sides.
@@MistersandyrobertsonI agree (on both counts) however, he should answer for the jailing of people for telling the truth (calling the perpetrator a terrorist) or for saying things he doesn’t like. And for the absolute shambles of an attempt to cover up these links - withdrawal of parliamentary privilege on raising the subject, denial of the existing evidence perpetrator’s terror links and religious beliefs? Of course, we cannot at this stage say anything for certain without clear evidence or preferably certain proof but the efforts to create a smokescreen around the whole subject do not help.
@@charliebryer2802 Absolutely agree with you. And his sidekick Reeves seems to be a serial liar.
We let every man and his dog in the country. We even let Serbian war criminals in and they are among us even today.
The apple never fails far from the tree
Politicians have a lot of apples on the floor
Excellent video - more journalism in five minutes from Simon than in a whole week from the BBC!
Year.
More to the point, why the hell were the judiciary letting in *anyone* from that country in the first place? Utter insanity.
Literally 'choir boys' compared to what's been shipped in since
ECHR
To do exactly what they do, I assume?
the greedy and very corrupt people that govern and rule this country are allowed to do as they please ,unfortunately , but change is comeing to prevent this happening in the future.
@@fisherman5517 What is going to change, they can do as they please, what is going to stop that?
Living day to day in Britain today is beyond depressing !
Yep!!!
@@Bartholomew2408Yup, soul destroying
Can we widen that to almost the whole world please?
I’m glad it’s not just me, 🤔Or maybe I’m not glad it’s not just me☹️
@@Bartholomew2408 I'm usually a positive person but my glass is definitely half empty at the moment !
You are spot on, I think that a lot of people are joining up the dots & the Labour government are deep trouble… I am sure some might ask - what else are we not privileged too?
Protesters jailed - criminals remaining uncharged: what a mess! I wonder: does Starmer sleep easily at night? Oh, I forgot: as a lawyer he has had plenty of practice. Pathetic!
Get Him Out.
Simon, it's clear you are distancing your self from this speculation to avoid being nicked. Wise man.
You are always the voice of reason, Simon. Thanks!
That is nice of you to say.
Agreed.
Well said.
@@HistoryDebunkedsimonwebb he the only one who has
Don’t let lawyer’s into politics.
don't let a lawyer's what into politics?
lawyer’s???
This is the reason we're in this mess because of the bloody lawyers.
Or bankers
Particularly 'human rights' .lawyers.
Good point. I am hopeful the truth will come out, but am not 100% confident it will.
Have they found that mystery bus that took the man head off yet
Yes, the destination on the front of the bus said “Mecca Bingo”
@@brianweekes1 The bus was ''heading '' for Mecca then ?
The UK is beyond fucked,
🇦🇺 is not far behind
Not yet we’re not! The fight back hasn’t started yet, but it’s not far off!
You are sadly very correct and it's going to get much worse with the lefties in government. We are really be fucked up good.
We really are - another five years of the uni-party means another 8-10 million immigrants. And I just don't know if they'll be enough of Britain left by the end of that to rally.
I hope I'm wrong.
By the politicians that are payed to look after us They are in effect being paid for what they should do.
Murderous criminality is a heritable trait.
If the father had not been allowed in to Britain his son would not be here and the murders would not have happened so it is all about the father
Yes, but the point being, at least for the moment, we don't know that Starmer was involved at all. If the killer's father was a known terrorist, then that opens an entire new can of worms.
@ correct! But regardless of Starmers role father not here son unlikely to be here to attack children
If only the Windrush had been turned back.
I Agree. It’s also about who allowed that to happen.
@@Occident.The Government of the time allegedly did want it turned back when they realised the facts of who and how many were on board but they were unable at that time to stop it.
There’s something very wrong about Lindsay Hoyle gagging Parliament and him being a Labour supporter.
I hate to be "that guy" once again, but if proven correct then I called it at the very beginning.
I said "why are the parents never a suspect in these cases? The same with Begum : they MUST be getting their radicalisation from somewhere; and where better than at home? Especially when the first people who condition them are their family circle."
We shall see how this plays out.
Seventh Day Adventists? You're like nazi little rats, all swarming around Webb's emaciated teats for succour.
Not necessarily true; take for example career criminals ie gangsters, a lot of them successfully compartmentalised various aspects of their lives in such a way that their parents never found out until their son’s arrest. It’s the same with serial killers, they are able to compartmentalise their lives, and it is only when they get caught and their crimes exposed by the media that others find out. Some parents especially mothers tend to be ignorant of what their adult offspring get up to behind their back.
It did go through my mind that the parents never seemed mentioned and not much detail about the son either. Here's hoping the truth comes out over time.
What radicalisation its what they all believe one book never changed.
@theprincipalofficer_1 There's a distinct difference between those who believe, and those whose belief moves them to act, while being actively encouraged to do so. If you cannot see that, then thats on you.
They are all capable - some are more capable than others.
Starmer knew who the attacker was, that he was a Muslim, that he was a terrorist, that he possessed ricin and if the father is a war criminal. Starmer lied and imprisoned innocent people, he must go.
Hopefully the coverup will now unravel very quickly, Starmer is a proven liar.
Time for the King to dissolve this corrupt parliament and hold another vote
KC will never do that , spineless
King Charles is in favour of diversity and is a so-called champion for all faiths.
The monarch cannot dissolve parliament, he is a constitutional monarch.
He has the power of royal assent but lacks the will and the balls to do so ,useless
he's behind it all
Your a wise man Simon, thanks.
Funny how Starmer wants to represent the 'human rights' of some, but not of those of the indigenous UK population.
I remember an african colleague of mine from Cameroon a few years ago, he lost his wallet at a conference. separately, it turned out he'd left it on a table and we looked into it to figure out who owned it. Amongst the great many credit cards and ID he was known as almost as many separate variations of his name that we knew him by. So there's that.
A common enough thing with Africans!
@HistoryDebunkedsimonwebb we innocently at the time asked him why this was, he said it was various tribal names and such. But it occurred to us that there were "tax implications" here which were allowing certain liberties to be taken.
@@jumblestiltskin1365 With 'colleagues' like you, who needs enemies?
Some claim benefits in various towns under different names. The night busses are full of them.
@@HistoryDebunkedsimonwebb well pointed out Harriet Cade, Fenton Sadler and Jay Clanton
First duty of government should be to protect it's citizens.
Indeed it should be. Strange, therefore, that the current government seems blissfully happy to imprison its citizens who like to point out its two tier treatment of illegal residents over and above others.
I met a Rwandan war criminal once. He was in hospital in East London where I was working. He told me that he killed very many people with a machete. Anyway, he was allowed to live in Britain as an “asylum seeker.” ECHR and all that.
I’m glad the 1940s German war criminals were brought to justice at every opportunity (though probably many more should have faced justice), but I can’t understand the leniency shown to African war criminals.
Cors they're oppressed blacks you see@😡
Never heard of Operation Paperclip? Google how many Nazis received the death penalty if you want to both be depressed and understand how we got where we are!
Most African war criminals are Muslim
Geopolitics. Rivalry between Anglophone Africa and Francophone Africa. How many scientists of German heritage worked for the US and for the USSR on their respective space programmes?
It may have been him or maybe not, but it is certain that Starmer worked in the business of getting people we don't want here to be allowed to stay here.
Thankyou for being the voice of reason as usual!
You're welcome.
@@HistoryDebunkedsimonwebbRemember the time after that poor girl was stabbed in Dublin last year, Si? You happily spread a demonstrably false claim re: the identity of the suspect. A claim which your source then retracted.
LOL
@@candy-le4nhWhen the facts change they allow us the opportunity to change 🤭🤡
@candy-le4nh
Still liking your own posts, Candy girl?
Tsk tsk.
When you have a nightmare and wake up to find youre living one.
Life in England.
They now outnumber our army. Let that sink in.
It is alleged that Axel Rudakubana said to a pupil from his school in Southport
"Your country needs genocide". And he was excluded from this school after he was found carrying a knife - this was in the local paper the Southport Champion.
Of interest to is Tony Blair's (who has a flat in Southport) and his links to Rwanda's Paul Kagame, this needs looking into.
The way how the government and the police covered up the Southport case is shameful! 😰
When it comes to the UK in 2024 under Starmer's Labour government it is perfectly natural to assume that there is deceit at work.
thank you so much for bringing balance Simon....much appreciated!
You are very welcome.
What facts do we know.
Alphonse Rudabukana came to the country just after the genocide.
There's no evidence that Starmer was his lawyer.
Starmer was the lawyer for Celestin Ugirashebuja, one of the architects of the genocide.
Starmer earned huge sums of money preventing Celestin Ugirashebuja from being sent to trial.
Another architect of the genocide was Ancylon Rudakubana, so there's a possible connection.
That leads to questions?
1. Was Alphonse involved?
2. Did he change his identity?
3. Has Starmer met Alphonse in the past?
So , does that mean by helping this war criminal to avoid trial, under Echr rules ,as he is not legally a war criminal,he is therfore entitled to apply n recive asylum in the UK? Nice work starmer, wtf is in your head
@@angloirish-c8n Look at the sums Starmer clean up on these cases.
Look, I've no qualms about people have a defence lawyer in court.
But having lawyers prevent people from going to trial for genocide is something despicable.
It's like being Heinrich Himmler's personal lawyer.
The Apple doesn’t fall far from the tree !!!
If the Son took the lives of three innocent underage girls then maybe if not the parent a relative who shares an affinity for murderous proclivities !!!
Guys don't forget that lawers job is to defends their clients. And usually, they looked at the money not the client CV
@@v.3924 I've no problems with that at a trial. However, preventing a trial is perverting justice.
Starmer does like protecting scummy people
Because he is one.
@bsport131
And the scummy vermin that voted for him .
Because he's scum himself and a war criminal
Scummy is a subjective. You may believe you are not scummy, yet there will be people who see you as exactly that. They will all need protecting by the legal profession.
A poem from Pastor Martin Niemoller
First they came for the Communists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Communist
Then they came for the Socialists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Socialist
Then they came for the trade unionists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a trade unionist
Then they came for the Jews
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Jew
Then they came for me
And there was no one left
To speak out for me
Starmer should be questioned under oath..
Interesting concept. But swearing an oath only works on people that fear something might happen to them by way of state or divine retribution should they break it. I don't know about Starmer but there are people around that do not hold any such fears.
They hope for us to be in a similar situation to the Tutsi.
Labour will end the UK.
I reckon the Conservatives did that with their mass immigration influx. They destroyed our Nation!
That is the plan.
If they don't achieve it, the Tories will just carry on from where they left off. Unless we can get a Reform government.
Could this also be the reason Starmer was dead against the Rwanda plan and scraped it once in No10?
Do-gooders are a curse.
How much destruction has Starmer triggered with his neurosis to 'be good'??
Millions of do-gooders in Britain, hence the state we are in.
Be good?! That's the last thing he is!
@@Occident. They're all narcissists. All they're really interested in is the self-reflection. I've worked with these type of people all my life. I've also noticed how keen they are to spend your money and how mean they are when spending their own.
Don't mind Do-gooders who actually pay for their good deeds monetarily or with self-sacrifice, but today these are as rare as hen teeth. 99,9% of modern do-gooders just virtue signal then let someone else pay for it, if not actually make money off their "virtue".
Are you sure they do this because they are "do gooders" or just as means to an end? Being a successful barrister will generally open doors and assist you climb the social ladder far more easily than being from a technical or hands on background. The money that they can earn is pretty good as well, though of course there are plenty of ordinary barristers etc who do not end up at the top or making fortunes, they are probably the ones that genuinely do want to help the ordinary people of this country.
It's all rather queer isn't it Simon.
😂😂😂
Yes very quare indeed.
Relying on 'official' documents is a major mistake. I can assure you, as someone who's witnesses the corruption within the British Court system many times, the term 'official' has lost all credibility.
In December 2006 Ugirashebuja was arrested in Walton-on-the-Naze, Frinton, Essex, by UK police, acting on a request by the Rwandan government. who requested his extradition for trial on suspicion of murder and for planning or incitement to commit genocide of Tutsis between 1 January 1994 and 12 December 1994. Three other Rwandans were arrested at the same time (Charles Munyaneza, Vincent Bajinya (Brown) and Emmanuel Nteziryayo). The accused were held in Belmarsh prison, South London, while the extradition case was heard at Westminster Magistrates Court (September 2007 - May 2008) before District Judge Evans. Ugirashebuja had a number of very senior barristers acting for his defence including now Labour leader Sir Kier Starmer, Edward H. Fitzgerald, Rachel Kapila, Patrick C. Hill and Rebecca J. Wright. Legal aid fees were at least £183,000.
Blimey
Comment needs pinnning
Who was paying for the defence?
who paid the £183k legal fees ?
@@__logan__duvalier__
Legal aid fees for Ugirashebuja for this second extradition case were at least £324,000.
£507,000 on legal aid to prevent an Genocidal criminal from getting his day in court.
What is a certain is that the courts in this country have often become a mockery of justice. Today it is reported that a man from Congo has been given leave to remain in the UK rather than being deported after his conviction for violating young girls, including his own step-daughter. The reason given, naturally , was that to deport this man would deny him his 'right to a family life'. The rights of his step-daughter and others to a life free from fear of this odious individual apparently don't matter.
Starmer has blood on his hands.
Starmer caused the deaths of those kids in Southport
Not to mention Mr Lynch. I have a terrible feeling that we need an independent pathologist report on the ‘suicide’. Do you believe anything this government says?? Why did he not receive protection in prison?? He’d already been beaten up by Muslims, the cowards.
Sleaze, sleaze, sleaze!!
A Veteran
What is important isn't if this particular man was defended by Starmer but that he was complicit in defending the immigration of people who have brought nothing to the uk apart from their personal political or cultural problems.
How much has it cost keeping a war criminal in the country ?
Can it get any more muddy? This is lunacy.
The strange way in which starmer dealt with the riots etc., is enough to arouse suspicion for me and maybe that’s why he spends so much time away?
The Right are always right
Stuck Farmer
I'm going to order the tee shirt
Haha brilliant
EXPLAINS WHY STARMER WENT OTT WITH THE PROTESTS. HE HAS BLOOD ON HIS HANDS
Throw enough mud some of it might stick.
I’ve never felt such distaste for a politician as I have for Comrade Starmer.
Hideous man.
He’s a revolting specimen.
Keep digging away Simon, always something of value and honesty on your Channel !
I had a tenant who had 11 different names on her payslips from 11 London Boroughs where she was an Outreach Worker, all while living /studying120 miles away. She was taking about £450k pa in wages from London taxpayers for nothing. She told me she was paying my mortgage and I ought to be grateful to her. After I gave her notice for multiple breaches of contract, not paying rent and attacking neighbours, she smashed up the house, defecated on the walls and somehow got her deposit back off the Gov run DPS. That's ok because I'm white. After repairing it at my expense, I sold the house and paid the government CGT for all their hard work. Never again.
What an ordeal.
Well said 🎉
Panic developing behind the Govt front lines as the persistent Volcanos rumble.
If they won’t tell us the truth, they can’t c o plain at the rumours and speculation that arise. Get the case to court and see what there is to be seen.
As father as son
The apple never falls far from the tree
Now there’s a thing, Two Tiers Starmers judgement is now more than ever being brought into question?
You are right. This rudekabana issue is just a tiny part of the bigger scandel i think. Im sure ks helped a lot of such people to stay in the country
Did you research that assumption, or just make it up?
Even if the rumours are false, the lack of facts released and the gaslighting is a huge breeding ground for rumour.
It’s equivalent to complaining about escalating burglary whilst simultaneously leaving all one’s doors and windows permanently unlocked and telling everyone about it…
Clearly our scrofulous government can exert far greater effort in quelling rampant speculation with cold hard facts. Unless of course they’ve got something to hide... 🙂
Truth will out, as the old saying goes.
I admire your optimism but in todays world I am rather dubious.🤔
And even if it does you will be frightened into submission by the full force of the authorities, nothing will come of it
Looks like the rumours are getting out and about.
When Tony Blair was before the courts at westminster in the early 80's for importuning the local public toilets and was caught, he gave the name Linton Blair to avoid recognition. It does and can happen.
Charles Linton
Dopey twat. 'Linton Blair' might have been a giveaway.
@@MrT01582 It is actually Anthony Charles Lynton Blair. FOI letters have been sent to the Home office, one in particular in 2015. A Pdf reply is online which states there are no known records? But newspaper clips and court documents still exist from Bow Street magistartes court to the case. Obviously it seems Blair had the relevant documents held by the home office destroyed when he was PM IMO?
@@MrT01582Court documents name the person as Lynton Blair. He was fined £500 at Bow street. Police notes disappeared over the years. Charles Lynton who was at University was known as Miranda, a promiscuous cross dresser who played the guitar badly.
@@FishingFan2 No he wasn't. £500 in the early 1970s is the equivalent of £6,600 today. Nobody would be fined that sum of money for a misdemeanour. Much as I loathe Blair, there is no evidence whatsoever that he has a criminal conviction - under any name - for any type of deviant activity.
"I thought I was depressed but it turned out I was living in the UK". This is a real meme.
Keep digging Simon, I am sure you will be the man to get to the truth.
Rudakastarmer
Starmerkubana
@ the hottest spot north of Havana
Hit the translate button! 😆🗣🎙🎶
Sir Keir Savile of rotherham and southport
The labour brand, with starmer in charge is now unelectable
If the name is entirely coincidental, why hasn't The Prime Minister come out and clarified it?
TBF, it's an own to talk about something simply to dismiss it when it's not been raised. Why bring more attention to himself.
@@RpattoYT Not raised officially, but surely he must know of the rumour on Social Media.
@@pierrewave7235 Prime Ministers need to be above wasting time discussing online rumours.
@@mikecrimlis3366 From August this year - The Prime Minister's spokesman told reporters: “Anyone who stokes this violence, whether on the internet or in person, can be prosecuted and face prison.”
So Prime Ministers involve themselves with online rumours when they want to.
@@Hereford1642 He's a tw@t without a doubt, but that quote makes no mention of rumours, it only mentions violence.
“Anyone who stokes this violence"
I think I can safely say that ........ STARMER MUST GO !!!!!! 😠🏴
Remember this: Your MP knew this. The newsreader knew about it. The journalists you read knew as well. The celebrity who condemned you for your opinion almost certainly knew as well.
Starmer continues to act as an insurgent rather than the elected leader of the British people.
He's not indigenous.
You’re missing one point, the two are connected because if the father had been extradited back to Rwanda on the allleged arrest warrant for war crimes then the son would never have been a “quiet welsh choirboy” nor would he have even been here.
The problem Starmer has though is he has become the story and its overshadowing everything else the government does, usually in cases like this there is only one outcome.
Only on this herrenvolk shitshow of a hate page. In the real world, we're laughing at you Nutzis.
Christ Simon, you are sailing close to the wind. More power to your elbow.
Starmer has, by his own words and actions, tied himself into the fate of an accused multiple murder.
That's enough to tell us there is something seriously wrong with the man.
Thankyou Simon for your investigative work and analysis.
Everyone is talking about Starmer.
Oh bugger ive seen all this on Twitter, i was hoping itd bring about his spectacular fall from grace!
He was certainly an active player among those who did. There is no more than two degrees of separation between him and the man with the blade.
Some westerners live in such a bubble, it’s terrifying. Keep the wolves in the hills, to do the opposite is madness.
Why hasn't Starmer actually addressed the rumours and called them false. Why has the subject been banned from being discussed in parliament.
I hate that the government doesn't think we have the right to know what is going on in our country, with our kids. When we speculate, we get locked up.
This nonsense has reached the scale of even murderous despots allowed to have a family life here. 😮
It wouldn’t be unreasonable to surmise the rumours may be accurate in view of the fierce protection of denial of free speech about this case including in parliament. Starmer seems determined to stop all conversation about it.
maybe in time with the threat of a jail sentence.
of course he is doing this so he can have another opportunity to put more of the "Far right" in prison