Warm Audio WA-47 Tube Condenser Microphone Quick n' Dirty

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 24 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 43

  • @RayGravin
    @RayGravin 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    To the vocalist for the demo, I liked the character of your voice and dynamics of your style. Character is everything to me though when it comes to vocals.

  • @MissKittyVideo
    @MissKittyVideo 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you

  • @saramej8749
    @saramej8749 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Comparison with u47 please

  • @peterm3964
    @peterm3964 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    RAWK !!! Get a vocalist who’s got a pair . Any 47 has it’s strength in the heft of it’s response across the freq range .

  • @CarlosGunX
    @CarlosGunX 7 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Wondering how it compares with the Vanguard V13 ($749)?

    • @soundpurestudios
      @soundpurestudios  7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi, our pro audio folks would be able to best answer this question, you can reach them at proaudio@soundpure.com

    • @shane2973
      @shane2973 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Carlos, I can't speak to this specific mic, but I have a 47 I built and I have the V13 and the WA87. My 47 I think resembles the Flea 47 IMHO which is designed to sound like a real one which the WA47 is as well. Anyway they are definitely diff sounding mics. The 47 has a more mid forward sound where the V13 has a big bottom and big top. V13 is airy not harsh. my 47 sounds more pronounced in the 6-8k range than the V13. V13 sounds happy and 47 sounds, not sad but not happy. Kind of like the V13 is a bright sunny day and the 47 is overcast, slightly raining. Both are great and with the WA87 I have everything I need covered. The 87 sounds like the 47 but more neutral. I've used the 87/v13 on acoustic guitar and the 47 on vox. Also the V13 for vox if its a major type song, wa87 for a minor and the 47 is just great on vox always...sorry for the novel, but imho either mic rocks and both are even better. lastly my 47 has a dif capsule an PVC and this is a K47/49 reproduction. still mics sound similar for sure...fwiw

  • @Dragon-Slay3r
    @Dragon-Slay3r ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Ufffff this is the different poop club 😭

  • @MusicCityOdia
    @MusicCityOdia 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    It is dual diaform mic ?

  • @seansvoice
    @seansvoice ปีที่แล้ว

    Just out of curiosity, if you are reviewing a microphone, why not use THAT microphone to describe THAT microphone?

  • @LilOreoCovers
    @LilOreoCovers 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can I used this mic to my Scarlett Focusrite interface?

  • @kos.studio9304
    @kos.studio9304 7 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    what is your preamp?

    • @soundpurestudios
      @soundpurestudios  7 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hello, we used the Phoenix Audio DRS8 mk2 in this audio sample: www.soundpure.com/p/phoenix-audio-drs-8-microphone-preamp/2395

  • @CS-xi9dz
    @CS-xi9dz 5 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Change the vocalist and then give a proper sound test.

    • @drampadreg1386
      @drampadreg1386 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      No kidding, that was painful. The vibrato was nauseating as hell.

    • @2018574
      @2018574 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      It looks like "no proper sound test because we have chines capacitors in the circuit, and yes you will paid $900 for it, but real 47 will win in 5 sec"

  • @frailynpayano2010
    @frailynpayano2010 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Do you think the Avalon M5 should bring the volume up front using this wa87? cuz I went to Sweetwater and they have a lot of different mics shoutout i don’t know if buying the akg C214 or this one, so my point is using an Avalon M5 should sound present and upfront with this mic the wa87 ? To me the wa87 sounded without presence That’s all I need to know please

    • @frailynpayano2010
      @frailynpayano2010 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      I mean I don’t have neither ones I’m just trying to buy the right mic for the Avalon M5 please

  • @drampadreg1386
    @drampadreg1386 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Sadly I don't think your choice of vocalist was very well suited to show off the character of the mic, I found it irritating. Try someone with a richer more dynamic voice and show off what the mic can do. Like a Scott Walker or Sade, a warmer fuller voice not so shrill and narrow.

    • @jonos138
      @jonos138 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Have to agree.

  • @krane15
    @krane15 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Some of you have a penchant for exaggeration. The demo may not have been reference, but it was hardly appalling, horrible, or some of the other very negative adjective used to describe it. In fact, I got a very real natural sense of presence from it. Maybe you should check your speakers?

  • @2018574
    @2018574 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Am I the only one who sees Chinese black/gray capacitors in the circuit photo? I know really well really great sounding capacitors look like (Elna, Nichicon, etc.)

  • @pedrolucena1576
    @pedrolucena1576 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Por favor alguien que entienda español y que lo hable que me diga si los comentarios son a favor o encontra, pues estoy apunto de adquirir este micrófono pero todavía tengo alguna duda, hago bien si lo compro? Gracias ojalá alguien me responda

    • @robertmcdaniel8147
      @robertmcdaniel8147 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yo voy a comprar una de Sweetwater. Sequin Sweetwater, :¿Cómo lo hace Warm Audio? Piden piezas y construyen en cantidad, lo que mantiene bajos los costos y ofrece un valor asombroso, pero no escatiman en piezas. El WA-47 está construido con componentes totalmente discretos de primera calidad, como un tubo de vacío JJ Slovak 5751, condensadores franceses Wima y Solen, un transformador de salida TAB-Funkenwerk USA y una reproducción personalizada de la cápsula utilizada en el vintage '47, diseñado con la misma configuración de orificio y respuesta de frecuencia.
      Una gran parte del sonido de cualquier micrófono proviene de su cápsula. La complejidad de la cápsula k47 utilizada en el WA-47 requiere un minucioso proceso de fabricación; Una calidad tan alta no se encuentra normalmente en micrófonos de condensador asequibles. Para un audio cálido, las piezas de primera calidad y el diseño meticuloso brindan un micrófono con un sonido superior, uno que no cuesta una fortuna. Rendimiento estelar, piezas de primera calidad y un valor increíble: esa es la fórmula de Warm Audio, y el WA-47 lo clava.

  • @zoolygreb7885
    @zoolygreb7885 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    O' Michael Bublé, where are you when needed?

  • @AsafSmilan
    @AsafSmilan 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hi Chuck, thanks for this great review, I bought a Warm Audio WA-47. While testing the microphone I've noticed that there are some annoying mid range frequencies coming from this mic.
    I've also noticed that if I'm tapping on this mic there's a strong resonance that comes from the mic's body.
    Does your WA47 act the same?
    Please watch this short video and hear what I'm talking about.
    th-cam.com/video/bJTcRyvJmsk/w-d-xo.html

  • @tiagoserodio1694
    @tiagoserodio1694 5 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    What a horrible sound example. The vocals are distorting, and performance is appalling. Extremely exaggerate HPF. This makes zero justice to this fabulous mic.

  • @qw1419xtj
    @qw1419xtj 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    This is HORRIBLE ! Waste my time

  • @hazysativa3045
    @hazysativa3045 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Horrible sound choice

  • @danieljenkins6818
    @danieljenkins6818 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Wow that was horrible lmao

  • @midnightwind8067
    @midnightwind8067 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    thats it? really?

  • @anthonyman8008
    @anthonyman8008 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Horrible EQing! That's what get for playing horrible back ground music the entire video!

  • @xmanzcovers4434
    @xmanzcovers4434 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    terrible talent choice, couldn't focus on tonal characteristics of the mic because of terrible singer.

  • @Trackformers
    @Trackformers 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Doesn't sound that good tho be honest 🤔

    • @drampadreg1386
      @drampadreg1386 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Wasn't a very rounded voice to be honest, shrill and irritating to me. Maybe record a grand piano or upright bass.

    • @Viralbihariladka
      @Viralbihariladka 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@drampadreg1386 yeah that's true

  • @ronjames-music
    @ronjames-music 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I was looking forward to hearing the microphone but didn't care for it. My $50 Samson sounds better.

    • @LafemmebearMusic
      @LafemmebearMusic 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I think its the recording cus let me tell you, it aounds farrrrr better in person than your shure mic

    • @anthonyman8008
      @anthonyman8008 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@LafemmebearMusic eqing is bad