It Really Is Rocket Science!

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 ก.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 81

  • @AkramKhan-sf3yc
    @AkramKhan-sf3yc 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    These are the men of Honour, with their efforts only we can see the advancements in Science and technology and engineering solutions for the tasks associated with Rocketry

  • @mogreasy8499
    @mogreasy8499 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I just got done watching old videos of different rocket testing by Sandis National Labs, and those had to be some of the best time of those scientists live testing those rockets! USA has to be the best in the world in designing rockets and anything else those guys designed. Unbelievable videos it's a must watch. Hats off to those fellas!!

  • @NorwayT
    @NorwayT 4 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    Your historical films are just pure excellence! I hope Sandia National Labs will produce more of these golden nuggets of learning in the time to come! Thank you!

  • @josephgeis6641
    @josephgeis6641 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    God bless all of you. Were still here, God bless America !

  • @davyaldy76
    @davyaldy76 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Delighted to hear of the Lancelin solar eclipse test, one of the launchers with a mockup rocket is on display at the RAAFA aviation museum in Bull Creek - a suburb of Perth - and when I saw it the information did not mention the results of the test so I went looking. I found a book about it and discovered the failures. Very cool to have something like that in an easy drive range.

  • @leonardtozzolo7963
    @leonardtozzolo7963 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Job well done.
    Thank You!

  • @firstlast9731
    @firstlast9731 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Some awesome engineering.

  • @leoarc1061
    @leoarc1061 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The "new key lar" bombs were in fact designed to be aerodynamically draggy.
    A nuclear bomb with an optimal aerodynamic shape might reach its detonation height fast enough to destroy the plane which carried it. That isn't good. As yields went up, bombs were even fitted with parachutes - a notoriously draggy aerodynamic shape.

    • @aerosoapbreeze264
      @aerosoapbreeze264 ปีที่แล้ว

      "parachutes - a notoriously draggy aerodynamic shape" lol

  • @cat637d
    @cat637d 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thanks to every single Patriot that enabled these scientific miracles!

  • @KA-uk9sp
    @KA-uk9sp 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Really an amazing documentary. Congratulations

  • @Mark_Ocain
    @Mark_Ocain 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Very interesting

  • @jasebatey5468
    @jasebatey5468 6 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    This was very cool, thank you very much for sharing it - would love to see more just like this!

  • @briand4000
    @briand4000 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Sandia is a constantly evolving enterprise that inspires the best minds in the world to create amazing things. I really enjoy my work there, although in a purely support role to the line research orgs. Incredibly well done video!

  • @Andy-le8xy
    @Andy-le8xy 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I would like to have been part of all of this from their beginning. I would still like to be part of where they are going with this technology!! Sandia National Labs is cool.

  • @micahwilson4244
    @micahwilson4244 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The nuclear bomb was shaped that way to slow it down and give the bomber more time to fly away before it detonates.

  • @aether5213
    @aether5213 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Riveting and inspiring documentary. Thanks!

  • @GraemeWight-wx3xz
    @GraemeWight-wx3xz 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    That high triumphalist music is super annoying. Constantly droning right throughout even when folk are just sitting talking.

  • @dougball328
    @dougball328 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I am curious about the Strypi vehicle. They said they developed it in two months. NASA's Astrobee 1500 flew a year before Strypi and used the same Castor with Recruit strap ons. To me it seems like the Strypi is a derivative, not a new vehicle.

  • @boogieallgood2539
    @boogieallgood2539 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I love science.🤔 But....idc for where it's gotten us all.!😞 But i "TRULY RESPECT" it.😎✌🙏

  • @joelperillotempra9324
    @joelperillotempra9324 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    With out science we can't improve our modern life manufacture and test to check it's usage what ever it's worst or even safe

  • @kriztiannelson13
    @kriztiannelson13 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    If you have ever watched interstellar then you know who Im talking about.

  • @threeheartsfarm8586
    @threeheartsfarm8586 7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Fascinating!

  • @ThompPL1
    @ThompPL1 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Looks like those days of *actual* geniuses running our national priorities is over ? . . . Replaced by backwards, upside-down, & inside-out politics ! 😪

  • @patrichausammann
    @patrichausammann 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    3:26 Poor dog Laika! 🥺😭😔

    • @tonyc7352
      @tonyc7352 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Here is a great story about this. The channel "The history guy" has a video called "Laika and the Soviet space dogs".

  • @tangibleblockofwisdom6386
    @tangibleblockofwisdom6386 ปีที่แล้ว

    // inference toward robert oppenheimer being responsible for bad aerodynamics within first few minutes //

  • @blip1
    @blip1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    When they're showing photos of the space shuttle, but are actually talking about MIRVs 🤣🤣

  • @dennismaxberry5272
    @dennismaxberry5272 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    And yet we me and you still have to worry if not about what you are thinking, hun. About what they are thinking about.
    They get it right, and then it will be about the commission on what uses will prevail from them. Then when you bring to the table just
    a certain number of companies it either slows down progress, without or with a plan b c. It just isn't any secrecy any more.

  • @Monaco-BuilditFixitDriveitEver
    @Monaco-BuilditFixitDriveitEver 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Nuculer ! :(

  • @feeshtacos
    @feeshtacos 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wish i could have been a 🚀 surgin or a brain 🧠 scientist's ...

  • @vaughnbay
    @vaughnbay 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Yes sir, those rocket scientists were really smart!.....They helped run us broke!

    • @impv1se
      @impv1se 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      what?

    • @chadj1797
      @chadj1797 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Agreed!

  • @notsogreat123
    @notsogreat123 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Nuclear pronounced [ˈno͞oklēər] not nuculer

    • @andycroucheaux4568
      @andycroucheaux4568 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @ notsogreat123 Thank you .

    • @robinwells8879
      @robinwells8879 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      notsogreat123 seriously annoying narrators accent. Keeps putting the emphasis in all the wrong places.

  • @evansaadat2927
    @evansaadat2927 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The quaint iran simplistically remain because umbrella gergely moor but a befitting slice. overt, incredible mosque

  • @antonioragazze7920
    @antonioragazze7920 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Was Hätten die ohne sie Vorarbeit der Nazis gemacht?

  • @zarlok5294
    @zarlok5294 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why can’t people pronounce the word nu - cle - ar ....especially narraters for films on this subject.. the word is NOT
    “nuc - yu - ler “.

  • @tangibleblockofwisdom6386
    @tangibleblockofwisdom6386 ปีที่แล้ว

    also, ms announcer lady, it is pronounced : "nu-clee-ar" not "nuke-u-larr"....

  • @dangehret
    @dangehret 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    New cue lar? I though it was new clee are! This video was probably narrated by a marketer and not a nuclear physicist. What a pity.

  • @Rich-hy2ey
    @Rich-hy2ey 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    The people they have here talking about developing and testing nukes appear to be in their 70's and 80's while the people working on nukes in Iran are in their 30's and 40's. This should terrify people in the West, if they have any sense...

    • @perniciouspete4986
      @perniciouspete4986 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The people who are ACTUALLY working on nuclear weapons are at Los Alamos National Laboratory. My son is one of them--he's 26. Sandia only works on the periphery. If you don't believe that, just listen to the video.

    • @skindianu
      @skindianu 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Be terrified by yourself. All kinds have worked on these projects

  • @twstf8905
    @twstf8905 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Jeezus! This unusually and inappropriately chipper and upbeat narrator lady is annoying as F!! 🤣

  • @ghostedyoutuber263
    @ghostedyoutuber263 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The word NUCLEAR is two syllables, not three syllabes. Stop mispronouncing the word.

    • @dougball328
      @dougball328 ปีที่แล้ว

      No, they are both three syllables, just there is the proper pronunciation and then there's "W's" !

  • @hammathguy3995
    @hammathguy3995 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Germany launched the first man-made object? I don't think Robert Goddard would agree with you there.

    • @PaddyPatrone
      @PaddyPatrone 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      They launched the first missles that reached space.

    • @indigohammer5732
      @indigohammer5732 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      The Paris Gun fired projectiles into space.The gun was capable of firing a 106-kilogram (234 lb) shell to a range of 130 kilometers (81 mi) and a maximum altitude of 42.3 kilometers (26.3 mi) The greatest height reached by a human-made projectile until the first successful V-2 flight test in October 1942.

    • @dougball328
      @dougball328 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      The Chinese beat everyone by centuries.

    • @willreid8240
      @willreid8240 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      amen , I get so tired of the incorrect info in these shows

    • @bladeshotone
      @bladeshotone 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@willreid8240 Actually it's correct

  • @benjaminnagy8770
    @benjaminnagy8770 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    The productive calculus superiorly invent because potato laparoscopically wait through a hideous high sturgeon. private, apathetic composer

  • @JoseMedina-st9fh
    @JoseMedina-st9fh 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    The apathetic dinghy aboaly learn because yam technically puncture round a unruly noodle. craven, bitter kiss

  • @frankfrank8799
    @frankfrank8799 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome documents, disgusting topic thou

  • @edwilko8819
    @edwilko8819 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    these bombs didnt lead to the end of ww2 who soo wrong

    • @dougball328
      @dougball328 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      That is debatable. It looked like Japan was going to force the allies into invading the main Japanese islands. The estimated number of casualties, on both sides, was enormous. The dropping of the bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki convinced the most of the government to surrender. Tojo did not want to, but the Emperor stepped in and made the decision to surrender. So while WWII in the Pacific would have ended anyway, the nuclear bombs ended it sooner and with much less loss of life to both sides.

  • @datguyoverdere6616
    @datguyoverdere6616 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    one of the most annoying voices ever

  • @jamiemeadows7727
    @jamiemeadows7727 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    The delicate saw habitually present because pastry immunohistochemically zip excluding a open bobcat. flaky, married snowstorm