Get the full video course with 9h 45m of content as well as the downloadable PDF and ePub at: www.atomicworkflows.com/atomi... --- Blog: meda.io Twitter: / martin_adams
Very good video. Another thing that help me a lot is making questions for the great subjects. From those questions I break them down into smaller and smaller texts, increasing the specificity of the notes.
I dont understand why you say to create atomic notes but then you dont do that. For example you create the note "benefits of critical thinking", but that's not really atomic; atomic would be the single benefits, for example a note named "critical thinking improves the democracy". I know the process would be slower, but in my experience only notes like this last one have that quality of being linkable, differently from "benefits of critical thinking" note that is more like a chunk. Thanks, by the way nice content
You’re absolutely right and that is a very great observation. This is a good example where the note fails to convey one atomic idea per note, and as such makes it harder to link to. Ideally the benefits could have been a map of content for each one in turn. Then if you’re teaching about the benefits, you can look at the map of content.
I'm brand new to Obsidian and that is why I found your video. Thanks for the clear break down :)
Very good video. Another thing that help me a lot is making questions for the great subjects. From those questions I break them down into smaller and smaller texts, increasing the specificity of the notes.
i see atomic notes. i subscribed
I dont understand why you say to create atomic notes but then you dont do that. For example you create the note "benefits of critical thinking", but that's not really atomic; atomic would be the single benefits, for example a note named "critical thinking improves the democracy". I know the process would be slower, but in my experience only notes like this last one have that quality of being linkable, differently from "benefits of critical thinking" note that is more like a chunk. Thanks, by the way nice content
You’re absolutely right and that is a very great observation. This is a good example where the note fails to convey one atomic idea per note, and as such makes it harder to link to. Ideally the benefits could have been a map of content for each one in turn. Then if you’re teaching about the benefits, you can look at the map of content.