Headway in our Case Against Colorado's Ghost Gun BAN!

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 1 ก.พ. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 55

  • @ericsfishingadventures4433
    @ericsfishingadventures4433 2 วันที่ผ่านมา +29

    Keep fighting for Americans civil rights!

  • @armedmindset6778
    @armedmindset6778 2 วันที่ผ่านมา +18

    Much appreciated! Keep fighting for us!

  • @ColoradoGunGal
    @ColoradoGunGal 2 วันที่ผ่านมา +13

    Wonderful update!

  • @chrispeckat4277
    @chrispeckat4277 2 วันที่ผ่านมา +8

    Thank you for all you do for us law abiding citizens.

  • @badboysfpv1724
    @badboysfpv1724 2 วันที่ผ่านมา +11

    you guys rock thanks for the hard work

  • @CL-ue9bu
    @CL-ue9bu วันที่ผ่านมา +4

    Thank you all for fighting for us and standing up for us!

  • @jimcombs6760
    @jimcombs6760 2 วันที่ผ่านมา +25

    I propose the following:
    1) Any government, business, or property owner prohibiting the lawful possession/carrying of a self defense weapon, must provide adequate protective measures to provide the same or higher level of protection that the individual would/could/should have been able to provide for them selves.
    2) Any politician that proposes, sponsors/cosponsors, votes for, or enacts an unconstitutional ordinance, mandate, bill, rule, regulation, or law will be guilty of treasonous activity, punishable by removal from office, banned from ever holding elected/appointed office for life, fines totaling their salary during their elected/appointed term +5 years, and prisoned for not less than 5 years.
    3) Any group, civil or political in nature that, by their actions or charter prohibit, or attempt to prohibit lawful/constitutional activities or that violate any part or parts of the Bill of Rights will be subject to the terms laid out in section 2.
    Of course, I’m not a lawyer, politician, or judge. I’m just a person sick and tired of this.

    • @Morinehtur
      @Morinehtur วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      2A does not mention "self-defense ", thus, there is no need to introduce unnecessary wording.

    • @jimcombs6760
      @jimcombs6760 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      @ I like it!

  • @liquidgames7362
    @liquidgames7362 2 วันที่ผ่านมา +9

    That's our boy Ian! Keep winning bigly, hoss

  • @thedeathwobblechannel6539
    @thedeathwobblechannel6539 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    Great news! I want to build my first one but I can't receive the jigs and the tools because I live in Colorado.

  • @goodcitizen64
    @goodcitizen64 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Thanks for your hard work for all American citizens' rights! I'm a very proud member!!

  • @PaulWatson-l7p
    @PaulWatson-l7p 2 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

    Thank you. Please keep up the good fight.

  • @pawel900rr99
    @pawel900rr99 2 วันที่ผ่านมา +4

    Thank you 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸👏👏👏👏🔥🔥🔥🔥😎😎😎

  • @borabora4480
    @borabora4480 2 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

    enjoy the win when we get it at every level.

  • @armedjoy3403
    @armedjoy3403 2 วันที่ผ่านมา +7

    Finger on the button to start printing firearms again.

  • @elliottschnitman5532
    @elliottschnitman5532 14 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

    God bless all of you! Freedom isn't free

  • @mytquin7605
    @mytquin7605 2 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    THANK YOU

  • @JUNEYSKI90002
    @JUNEYSKI90002 2 วันที่ผ่านมา +4

    Great Job🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉

  • @ianfoltin
    @ianfoltin วันที่ผ่านมา

    thank you very much

  • @twigsaregood
    @twigsaregood 2 วันที่ผ่านมา +3

    Great! I'm sure it'll just eventually get appealed En Banc and tied up for more years but perhaps I'm wrong. Thanks for all that you're doing regardless of the terrible situation we're all in right now!

  • @tedmaas3588
    @tedmaas3588 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Hopefully RMGO will be the first in line to bring a lawsuit against the state. When the new law BANNING ALL SEMI-AUTO'S and everything else that goes with it gets signed into law.

  • @Tyler-kl2xx
    @Tyler-kl2xx 2 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    Keep it up!

  • @turnuptheradio6057
    @turnuptheradio6057 2 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Still we are going to loose.Ask Scotus.They agree 👍 Can't even take the snope case.

  • @ZOMBIEHEADSHOTKILLER
    @ZOMBIEHEADSHOTKILLER 2 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    Unconstitutionl.... and a violation of basic humam rights..... do not comply

  • @ryanwilliams4550
    @ryanwilliams4550 6 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

    TO ARMS! TO ARMS!

  • @georgesebastian6306
    @georgesebastian6306 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Proudly renewed my membership! Money well spent.

  • @farhan.naushad
    @farhan.naushad 13 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

    When are you re-filing the mag capacity case? The one that NSSF backed out of. I think it was Gabe v. Polis.

  • @dalepres1
    @dalepres1 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Can you explain the interest in fighting the state ghost gun ban ahead of the federal ghost gun ban? What good is overturning the Colorado ban when the Federal ban stays in place and overules?

  • @evansanchez1968
    @evansanchez1968 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Hope you guys will do something about Illinois' ghost gun ban. It's basically a ban on homemade firearms.

  • @partsbroker795
    @partsbroker795 วันที่ผ่านมา

    It's well past time to get Congress to repeal all unconstitutional gun control laws. A lifetime ban on gun ownership for de minimus federal crimes is unacceptable. 18 USC 922 (g) 1 needs to be repealed. "Potential sentencing range" effectively disarms the entire United States population, even if the sentence is a $1 fine and incarceration is waived.

  • @KingdomKillaz117
    @KingdomKillaz117 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Destroy this legislation.

  • @travisi6283
    @travisi6283 วันที่ผ่านมา

    "Bruen - Bruen? We don't need no stinking Bruen"?

  • @CandyGramForMongo_
    @CandyGramForMongo_ 2 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Do Oregon next?

  • @alanrobinson4318
    @alanrobinson4318 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Consequently, using their reasoning, we would have to limit free speech to parchment and ink and quill. Giving up phones, computers, radio, TV, etc. Because, they weren't around back then.

  • @robertcaccavalla6469
    @robertcaccavalla6469 2 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    GVR?

    • @CandyGramForMongo_
      @CandyGramForMongo_ 2 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

      Grant, vacate, remand.

    • @KenWilson-j1j
      @KenWilson-j1j 2 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      In order words, " kicking the can down the road to drag it out longer than needed. "
      Especially being a complete violation of the constitution.

  • @djdrack4681
    @djdrack4681 วันที่ผ่านมา

    IF State Legislation doesn't do Bruen Analysis when Bill is submitted for consideration = It automatically (admin process) gets killed
    IF State Court doesn't do Bruen Analysis pre-trial phase (when considering to accept it) = Anti-2A side should lose, w/ prejudice.
    IF State Exec (IE Governor) issues mandate w/o Bruen Analysis = It automatically (admin process) gets repealed
    Same should apply to municipal level.

    • @djdrack4681
      @djdrack4681 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Its akin to 4/5A violations: Not reading Miranda Rights, Illegal (warrantless Searches/seizures), bribing the judge or intimidating jurors...Its so egregious and seditious, that such actions CAN NOT be permitted even for a vote or 'consideration'; they're tyrannical by nature.

  • @santos_bjj
    @santos_bjj 2 วันที่ผ่านมา

    👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽

  • @mattr172
    @mattr172 2 วันที่ผ่านมา +5

    Why doesnt nagr bring lawfare to lawmakers personally? The kangaroo courts grift is getting old, and im starting to view the NAGRs, the GOAs, etc as playing for the the same team as the tyrants. Im pulling all donations until actual permanent results securing our rights has been accomplished. So sick of tyrants and grifters.

    • @mattr172
      @mattr172 2 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      TH-cam edited this comment without my consent or direction.

    • @KenWilson-j1j
      @KenWilson-j1j 2 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Unfortunately that's just the way our court system is structured.

    • @clutchcargo1239
      @clutchcargo1239 2 วันที่ผ่านมา

      They Freudian slip- joked about the money... It's not profitable to end this fight or any other fight so long as we keep sending money without results. What's profitable will never end. There are laws on the books today that remedy the unconstitutional actions by a tyrannical government and politicians that intentionally violate the law or our rights of United States citizens.... Lot's of people see this, and feel the same.

    • @Wise-1-x1y
      @Wise-1-x1y 2 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@KenWilson-j1j
      It is the way the court is structured. The courts could not be transparent because the abuses of power would infuriate most of us and their power of influence would crumble.
      We have to at least be grateful for Bruen text, history and tradition in the meantime.

  • @kx8960
    @kx8960 วันที่ผ่านมา

    The 2A is a Right RECOGNIZED by no less than the Constitution, like the 1A, and all the others. THEREFORE, no state or local gov't should have ANY right to infringe upon it since it is FEDERALLY recognized. You never hear of a state infringing on the 1A, people would go nuts. How come this tact isn't taken?