Revolution Takes On Rolex's All New 2020 Submariner Family of Watches
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 3 ก.ค. 2024
- Hosted by Wei Koh & Ross Povey, in this ZOOM Webinar discuss Rolex’s pursuit of the depths of the Earth, advancements in waterproofness & the complete new collection of the 2020 Submariner family of watches.
Find us on www.Revolution.Watch/
Instagram: / revolution.watch
Facebook: / revolution.watch
Twitter: / revolutionwat_h
#Rolex #Submariner #Cerachrom - บันเทิง
Introduction: Out of the blue
Reality: Out of stock
New feature: Up to 70 hours power reserved + Minimum 70 months of waitlist
Hahahahahahh
Chi Lai true...
I have 2 coming to me because I have my client’s that are VIPS they buy them on my behalf I am so so happy
I bought four of them...three the first week and one last week. More coming. You can see them on my channel.
I actually waited 3 weeks for my submariner LN
33:36 “kinda like the guy who goes to the gym everyday but never does a leg day” 😂
the nicest one by far is the new black dial Smurf .. white gold! wow! VERY well done presentation btw.. great detail and knowledge of the watch on display here.
Great video but why do even watch experts incorrectly say a dive bezel is for timing how much "oxygen" you have 39:23. In normal diving we breathe regular air (21% oxygen) not pure oxygen, and it's a pressure gauge that will tell you how much air is left in the tank. A diving bezel is literally just to time the dive and safety stops.
I think it's safe to say you covered everything! Well done!
Thank you Wei for the perfect introduction, I truly like what Rolex did here, a brand that evolves with times. The Blueberry is stunning, but I also like the regular Sub date. Thank again!
Excellent job, very detailed information about these new Submariner watches.
Great, informative video. Thank you for posting this. I learned a lot
Loved the content and insight, keep up the good work 👍
Thanks for the amazing video!
Great Video. Thank you guys.
Nice Vid! Good rundown, cheers! 👍
so true Wei, i too have to walk one arm behind my back in Singapore!
Phenomenal information presented.
I love Wei he is in fact the Dragon of Time.
Thank you!
Amazing analysis! I have the new Batgirl with the slimmed down lugs and the 114060 Sub with the Maxi Case and I appreciate both variations. Not rushing out for the new case but I do really like the new Cermit. Cheers
I recently sold my old Sub Date #116610LN and bought a Sea Dweller 43 #126600. I’m happy I did. The new 2020 Sub is just catching up to everything else in the Rolex lineup, with the upgrade to the Caliber 3235 movement.
Awesome Wei :)
Dude you are the Best!!!
The 126600 seadweller 50th edition is the first slim or trimmed down lugs and all there features like Trip lock and new mechanism 3235 I’m sure of it... thank you maestro Kai for the review
I have a heirloom Red label Vintage Submariner. Absolutely love it.
Interested to know whether these lugs on the new Sub are slimmer than the lugs on the 126710 GMTs?
This is the event advertised on the Rolex Singapore IG Live but wasn't explaine you had to register.
A 'webinar' must be a digital seminar like a University seminar, although i'm not entirely sure what that is, as I didn't go.
Man...Rolex Marketing material...Always the right words lol
2:40 There an incorrect reference number here.
3:07. I’m confused by the year and reference number for the one on the left. Not sure they got that right.
I reckon the lug taper is not that different, but the wider bracelet makes more of a difference to the appearance of the lug width...
Which Sub is heavier, the new date Sub or the old one?
Best video on Rolex ever!! Seriously loved it! I have a few questions about collectors:
Why isn’t the watch world shouting “thank you” to Rolex for finally actually producing a “Blueberry” sub? Isn’t this what collectors have been asking for? Or why is it that collectors lament when Rolex listens and produces “stella” like dials. Didn’t they (we) ask for the old days? And finally, why is it that collectors are not saying, thanks for listening when Rolex slims down the lugs and beefiness of the submariner case? Didn’t collectors hate the maxi case? I have not seen a video pointing out any of these things. Rolex actually listens to the collector community! This is the most “collector” focused watch rollout we’ve seen in some time. We even received a Kermit with a ceramic dial (also lamented for by collectors)!
Even though the lugs on the new sub have been tapered, with a new 21mm lug width, does it mean the slimmer lugs don’t actually make much of a difference?
Isn’t it “super case” and “maxi dial”? Not maxi case. Am I wrong here?
Watch noob here. Press fit balance wheel or staff? I read somewhere that Swiss watches use riveted balance staffs. In my experience press fit anything is less reliable. For example bicycle bottom brackets come threaded or the much more difficult to service or replace “press fit”
This will increase the old Rolex models in value
I thought the 2012 reference was 11610 not 16610. I have a 1995 16610 with the thinner lugs.
they didn't need to go 21mm wide on the bracelet, 20mm would have been totally fine and would look better. I know it is a little thing but I don't want the watch as much now, 41mm case, 20mm lugs would have been perfect. That extra wide bracelet will make it wear bigger.
It doesn't wear bigger as thickness is 12.5mm, and lug to lug is 47.5mm.
Lug width has little to do with how big it wears. Lug to lug length and case thickness is what’s important
20mm would ruin the new lug countours. The explorer 2 with 41mm case is also with 21mm SEL
@@yooseemotoringchannel3357 no the width of bracelet does make the watch look bigger. I really don't want 21mm bracelet. I wear these watches and notice these things.
The jury is still out regarding that wider bracelet and larger case. The ratios look slightly off like it’s been stretched slightly wide in photoshop. I guess it’s a case of having to readjust to a new design having been used to a 40mm design for so many years. Some wrist shots coming through show the Sub to wear large on some guys. Flat wide and large. Almost into SeaDweller territory. It would be good to get this new guy on the wrist in person to get a feel of how it sits. Hopefully not too many months/years to wait. This latest iteration seems to be moving a rugged chunky steel tool watch into a flashy dress piece especially the polished centre link versions. Oh yes. And about that new price...
The Hulk came out in 2010 so I think at 3:00 the information where you stated that it came out in 2003 is wrong, otherwise good video
Would be interesting to compare the new Kermit with the original Green Sub. I'll be the differences would be fairly pronounced.
21:38 on the right is not a 16610. Your picture shows a comparison between a 126610LN vs a 16610 but your video shows a 116610LN ceramic.
What is rocko sefredi?
I’m liking the new Hulk replacement “Starbucks” watch!
Wrong reference # on the 2012 Sub, but nice video comparison otherwise.
What is the weight of the new sub no date? It's the weight not the size that denotes comfort.
The comparison between the 126610 is with the 116610 or 16610? I thought the 16610 stopped production in 2010? But your video says 2012 16610.
What about the all important lug to lug distance, is it the same or longer than the outgoing range? What are the lug to lug measurements by the way?
47.5mm. The Supercase is 47mm. Regards.
Watch Reviews 4K thanks, I was very curious about that measurement. So slightly longer than the outgoing models then. But still sub-50mm, so fine for normal sized wrists.
@@DavidDatura Yes, but its the same 12.5mm thickness so wears the sale. the 1mm thinner lugs and 21mm lug width make the 41mm look slimmer than the 40mm Supercase. Regards.
Obviously, Rolex is correcting all of their sins pf the previous blocky Ceramic model. Now the new Sub 41 looks like a direct lineage from the 5 digit Submariners. One issue with the new LV is the best reason to own a LVC “Hulk” was the green sunburst dial but Rolex took that away and left the milky green ceramic bezel that wasn’t universally liked. The white text on the gold models feel off and not as complete of a look as the gold text. Obviously black on black is the no brainer winner in overall design execution and as THE “icon”. These will be unicorns for years.
33:20 the ref no for the 2012 is not 16610... should be 6 digits! e.g. 116610.
The release was a little bit of a let down for me on the Submariner front, however the OP release was really interesting, big fan of the new dial colours
You like jelly beans?
@@gmshadowtraders No.
@@JasonTheWatchGuy Haha I'm just messing with ya. I like the bumblebee or the pikachu one myself.
@@gmshadowtraders I can completely get on board with those nicknames! I did think the red was an orange (slightly colour blind) so that was a let down).
116610 is more esthetic , I would like to have a 116610 case with 70 hours new movement
Did you measure the lug to lug? That is the most important measurment instead of just knowing its 41mm.
It's over 50mm now. So I do not believe it wears smaller at all.
@@R0karn Where did you see thats its over 50mm? The previous gen came in at 50.5mm.
@@armanvardumian213 the previous subC was 48? Or am I missing something
@@R0karn You are mistaken. 47.5mm.
@@R0karn The Supercase was 47mm. The 41mm case is 47.5mm. Yes, you are missing something; fact.
Please answer this: Why do demo Rolexes have ALWAYS the same time and do not run when being shown in ALL videos (I know about the 10:10 story but even the seconds is the same in all watches) and the crown screwed in an upright position? Do they have a movement inside?
they're dummy samples, not with working movement.
@@jamz113 Thanks! I think they're the only brand that does this...
@@pacocandano No prob. Other brands do this too actually from time to time.
The new green Kermit is a much better tone of green. I’m Irish and darker green always looks more classy lol.
what about the black dial? Do you like the sunburst or the new black? I personally liked the sunburst green.
minibus1351 I totally get that. Personal taste I guess. I like the new black but have to see it more closely to get a good idea.
35:20 the green bezel is the same as the hulk
Steve Downey yeah it is but the green on the hulk has always been different to the Kermit. The previous one was much lighter.
Nathan Mawhinney yes it absolutely is.
Which do we like better, the Hulk? or the new Yoda?
Please invest in a better microphone setup. There's a big difference in the audio fidelity between you two.
The new ones even look a little bit better imho. Great anyway.
The second I learned the new Sub has 21mm Lug width I stopped playback and lost all interest... same thing with the EXII
STOP saying 904L steel is harder than 316, it's NOT!!!. It's about the same as 14ct gold if you compare them on the Vickers hardness scale. That is why you keep hearing about them being scratch magnets. Its harder to work with because its softer and the heat generated by machining effects the metal
Is this guy Yakuza?
116610 not 16610 ;)
So here’s my opinion about Tudor. First, I think they purposely don’t have an outstanding finish because they are the prop value brand and if they would provide a finish like Rolex then that’ll be too competitive. So they have in-house movements yet they’re fat. I love my blue Pelagos and it’s worth every penny but the markers aren’t meticulously aligned and I excuse it because it is a value prop BUT deep down I still think it should be perfect, $4k isn’t chump change for a guy like me :-). Look at Omega, I own the Sedna/SS (210.22.42.20.01.002), it’s perfectly finished, even after I louped it. Tudor’s finish should be like this, the watches thinner (we know they can do it).
The only thing not to like of the new models is getting one! 🤣 my favorite is the ever classic 126610LN!
New Green/Blk sub= Hermit (Hulk+Kermit)
12:18 🤣
Is there a degree in swiss watch engineering? I think this guy can run the course.
4:13 - DON WATCH
Wei is 51? Fuck he looks good for his age.
16610 comment is incorrect! 116610 don’t know what they are on about!
The video is over an hour long. How about giving us a timestamp so we know to which comment you are speaking? If it's the incorrect label at 1:19 then I hear you.
Rolex used the be the Brand of "firsts".... Now, after 10 years you get a little more powerreserve and implementation of long esablished shock absorbing... oh, and one more millimeter in the Submariner you probably never will get your hands on. WOW!!!
Poor Pedestrian Lane Discipline is legit
WHY THE HECK EVERY ROLEX MODEL THAT THEY RELEASE ARE ALWAYS "OUT OF STOCK"!?????
1:04 My AD already sold me both of those watches...and two OP41s. See my video.
1:19 Wrong model # on the right (it's 116610, not 16610).
2020 is CLEARLY bigger.
I don´t get everyone who r saying its smaller lol
China demand?? China minimum wage is $1.52hr with a countries average income across the entire country is only $55k. These are not Rolex level buying incomes. You can flip burgers in the USA now for $18hr. So what everyone is trying to say is the very small percentage of the people that are wealthy in China is now demanding a Rolex??
It’s the scale of the population. There are about 100 million adults that earn over $100K USD in China.
It stopped, thnx
Sorry but I don't like the shape of the new Submariner 41mm. The Sub is a diver watch and why need a diver to be elegant????????? A really diver watch need to be sporty, masculine and no elegant, slim shaped and skinny! If somebody want an elegant Rolex, please pick the Datejust or the Daydate!
Why the annoying music? It's distracting to the content presented, anybody else agree?
If Rolex were that good the watch would be right the first time, the fact they keep altering it to "perfect it" is an excuse for their shortcomings.
Name one product that hasn't "evolved" in over 50years? All the icons that enthusiasts "lust" after change over time. Whether by technology, environmental or consumer tastes, its natural.
The most obvious comparison is the Porsche 911. Park a vintage 911 next to the current one and they are completely different cars. Park one of each generation next to each other and the evolution is more obvious.
Now that i think about it, there is one icon that is relatively unchanged but still relevant....
(drumrolllll....)
The 1911
(God bless John Moses Browning)
@@alwong604 Barbed wire.
@@IANSPA Bad news dude. Barbed wires seen massive changes since the late 1800s, when it was first introduced, including as recent as the 2000s when resistance to corrosion was a major change. Similar to 904l steel. www.popsci.com/barbed-wire-invention-history/
What a joke still no AR coating on there sapphire crystals.
@5L No it is not they just want to cheap out.
Natra no, it’s a deliberate decision by Rolex. It’s much more costly to have double AR just on the cyclops than it is to apply on the entire crystal, which is what Rolex does. The coating process is several steps more complicated. Plus, Rolex uses high quality AR crystals, better than most brands. I coat many of my watches with double AR where the glass basically looks invisible from most angles, and I never do it on my Rolex, because it kills the quality and destroys the overall aesthetics.
@@crybabyteamo It is not a deliberate move because they think it looks better it is a cost-saving move and there's nothing to do with the aesthetics if you look at all rolexes advertisements about their watches you cannot see any glare on the glass but when you look at it in real life then it looks cheap it's all in the glaring in different angles. And my friend how much do you think a Rolex cost to produce. And I have a Breitling have owned a Rolex and I also owned Omega and the Rolex looks cheap in comparison and it has all to do with the crystal because it does not have AR coating.
@@Cerim112 it is deliberate to create more depth to the dial and make the watch more shiny.
@@Cerim112 I don't think you read my comments properly. So here it is again: it is more expensive/costly, whether it's for Rolex or whoever else, to produce a crystal with only double-AR on the cyclops, than it is to coat the entire crystal with double AR. The economies of scale will not address the per unit cost issue entirely due to the specific process involved to coat just the cyclops. I know this for a fact because I contract lab to coat watch crystals. By the way, the way Rolex manufactures and polishes its crystal is also different from other companies. If you really handled an Omega/Breitling crystal vs. a Rolex crystal by hand, you would know. I refrain from arguing in the aesthetics angle because that's highly subjective, but in my personal opinion I prefer my Rolex just as is, while I do have 100% of the means to coat the entire crystal with double AR into an "invisible glass" at a marginal cost.
For the love of god Wei, stop saying "EM EM"
It is a tic, he can't help it.
@@locutusdborg126 He can't say "millimetre"?