AE511: Always good to go back to the "basics" with deriving EOM. Very nice how the complicated EOM can coalesce into a state space representation and look much simpler in a simulink representation
In case it is helpful, here are all my Control Theory videos in a single playlist th-cam.com/play/PLxdnSsBqCrrF9KOQRB9ByfB0EUMwnLO9o.html. You can support this channel via Patreon at @t . Please let me know what you think in the comments. Thanks for watching!
Cool... i modeled a 2 stage LV for a class using simulink... had constant thrust and manually varied pitch angle hoping and praying my model got to orbit :D I'm motivated to cracking the model open and implementing some of this! Great content as always!
[AE 511] Appreciate you going over EOM derivation and simulink construction. It sometimes is taken for granite and imo is the one of the more difficult parts of modeling systems.
Actually incrediable content that i could not find anywhere else. I am using these concepts for a university project of a autonomous boat. Thank you so much
Hi Joao, Thanks for the kind words, I'm glad you enjoyed the video. If you find these videos helpful, I hope you'll consider supporting the channel via Patreon at www.patreon.com/christopherwlum. Given your interest in this topic, I'd love to have you a as a Patron as I'm able to talk/interact personally with all Patrons. Thanks for watching! -Chris
This model is going to be much simpler than RCAM but a lot of the concepts can be moved over. Let's talk behind the firewall and we can discuss some interesting items in the future.
AE511: Awesome! I was with you every step of the way on this lecture. Looking forward to seeing where we go with it. The one question I have is what is the block you used in Simulink to perform the input saturation?
Do you have a timestamp? I'm not sure if this is what I used in the video but there is literally a block called 'Saturation' that is very helpful for this type of activity.
Hello Professor Lum, amazing video! I was wondering how you might transform these equations to the form: dx = Ax + Bu. Also, would an energy approach via Lagrangian Method using generalized coordinates to derive EOM work on this system the same way the direct method did?
Hi, this is an excellent, informative video. Thanks a lot. Do you have a document( e.g. a paper, lecture notes, tech report etc.) which explains the details of this model? I would like to refer to it in my related work and implementation. Thanks a bunch in advance.
Hi, Thanks for the kind words, I'm glad you enjoyed the video. If you find these videos helpful, I hope you'll consider supporting the channel via Patreon at www.patreon.com/christopherwlum or via the 'Thanks' button underneath the video. Given your interest in this topic, I'd love to have you a as a Patron as I'm able to talk/interact personally with all Patrons. I can also answer any questions, provide code, notes, downloads, etc. on Patreon. Thanks for watching! -Chris
@@ChristopherLum I will do so... One more additional question, even though this is a planar and 2D model, if the vehicle rotates around a fixed point with some constant angular velocity there should be additional centrifugal force acting on the body... do you consider taking it into consideration?
Hi, Thanks for reaching out. If you have questions or would like to request a video, I hope you'll consider supporting the channel via Patreon at www.patreon.com/christopherwlum. I'd love to have you as a Patron as I'm able to talk/interact personally with Patrons. Thanks for watching! -Chris
AE511: Always good to go back to the "basics" with deriving EOM. Very nice how the complicated EOM can coalesce into a state space representation and look much simpler in a simulink representation
In case it is helpful, here are all my Control Theory videos in a single playlist th-cam.com/play/PLxdnSsBqCrrF9KOQRB9ByfB0EUMwnLO9o.html. You can support this channel via Patreon at @t . Please let me know what you think in the comments. Thanks for watching!
Cool... i modeled a 2 stage LV for a class using simulink... had constant thrust and manually varied pitch angle hoping and praying my model got to orbit :D
I'm motivated to cracking the model open and implementing some of this! Great content as always!
This is awesome man, thanks for these videos!!
[AE 511]
Appreciate you going over EOM derivation and simulink construction. It sometimes is taken for granite and imo is the one of the more difficult parts of modeling systems.
Actually incrediable content that i could not find anywhere else. I am using these concepts for a university project of a autonomous boat. Thank you so much
Hi Joao,
Thanks for the kind words, I'm glad you enjoyed the video. If you find these videos helpful, I hope you'll consider supporting the channel via Patreon at www.patreon.com/christopherwlum. Given your interest in this topic, I'd love to have you a as a Patron as I'm able to talk/interact personally with all Patrons. Thanks for watching!
-Chris
AE511: I loved the experience in AE512 working with the RCAM model - excited to see a similar opportunity here with the 2D vehicle model.
This model is going to be much simpler than RCAM but a lot of the concepts can be moved over. Let's talk behind the firewall and we can discuss some interesting items in the future.
Can you suggest books for learning this?
AE511: Awesome! I was with you every step of the way on this lecture. Looking forward to seeing where we go with it.
The one question I have is what is the block you used in Simulink to perform the input saturation?
Do you have a timestamp? I'm not sure if this is what I used in the video but there is literally a block called 'Saturation' that is very helpful for this type of activity.
@@ChristopherLum 35:11
@@sethwhittington28 Yep, that is the 'Saturation' block, I recommend you give it a try, it is really easy to use.
Hello Professor Lum, amazing video! I was wondering how you might transform these equations to the form: dx = Ax + Bu. Also, would an energy approach via Lagrangian Method using generalized coordinates to derive EOM work on this system the same way the direct method did?
Hi, could you clarify this expression (dx = Ax+Bu) in order to understand the question. I will appreciate it, and thanks a lot in advance.
As a teacher, I can relate to Fu. I ran into a similar problem with a 4Q charge while teaching electrostatics.
That laugh gets me everytime :D
Hi, this is an excellent, informative video. Thanks a lot. Do you have a document( e.g. a paper, lecture notes, tech report etc.) which explains the details of this model? I would like to refer to it in my related work and implementation. Thanks a bunch in advance.
Hi,
Thanks for the kind words, I'm glad you enjoyed the video. If you find these videos helpful, I hope you'll consider supporting the channel via Patreon at www.patreon.com/christopherwlum or via the 'Thanks' button underneath the video. Given your interest in this topic, I'd love to have you a as a Patron as I'm able to talk/interact personally with all Patrons. I can also answer any questions, provide code, notes, downloads, etc. on Patreon. Thanks for watching!
-Chris
@@ChristopherLum I will do so... One more additional question, even though this is a planar and 2D model, if the vehicle rotates around a fixed point with some constant angular velocity there should be additional centrifugal force acting on the body... do you consider taking it into consideration?
Hi professor, do you have the simulink files?
Hi,
Thanks for reaching out. If you have questions or would like to request a video, I hope you'll consider supporting the channel via Patreon at www.patreon.com/christopherwlum. I'd love to have you as a Patron as I'm able to talk/interact personally with Patrons. Thanks for watching!
-Chris
@@ChristopherLum Thanks, just trying to see if you have the simulink files for this lecture, if not that's okay.