Victim should be present, in our mock trial the victim being Anver Williams was both direct and cross-examined. I don't think it was displayed in these videos but yes the victim should be there.
@@alexm.2960 I understand what you mean..I guess the route would be asking questions as to protocol on collecting evidence because im certain no matter what state you are in and even up here in Canada that individual police officers cannot hold evidence in a locker and not disclose that as evidence in the disclosure prior to trial..
@@andrenabrydon6505 "You sure you just not buy them now??" You suggested something like this be in the objection. This is a baseless accusation and will get the defense in trouble.
That's a question for cross examination, which the defense will conduct here. Objections are towards the judge, not the witness on the stand. Objections are usually used for relevance, the two examples used in this video, etc.
Leading questions those are not allowed!
Lots of leading questions resorted in chief which ought to have objected by the defence
This is literally epic
did u arraign the guy without the victime? in our criminal justice system here ij the philippines the victim should be present
Victim should be present, in our mock trial the victim being Anver Williams was both direct and cross-examined. I don't think it was displayed in these videos but yes the victim should be there.
nice
hmm..no objections from defence like ..Object your honour,so this evidence was in your locker???Till today??You sure you just not buy them now??
That would be a baseless objection and would be overruled. She is an officer. Accusing someone like her with pure conjecture will put you in trouble.
@@alexm.2960 I understand what you mean..I guess the route would be asking questions as to protocol on collecting evidence because im certain no matter what state you are in and even up here in Canada that individual police officers cannot hold evidence in a locker and not disclose that as evidence in the disclosure prior to trial..
@@andrenabrydon6505 "You sure you just not buy them now??" You suggested something like this be in the objection. This is a baseless accusation and will get the defense in trouble.
That's a question for cross examination, which the defense will conduct here. Objections are towards the judge, not the witness on the stand. Objections are usually used for relevance, the two examples used in this video, etc.
is that a girl or a guy
lmao
please don't leave rude comments these people worked hard
@@kavyasood4352 I agree
does it matter
There were way to many leading questions.
You can lead in direct
@@Rameon you can’t lead in direct. you can lead in cross.
@@heythere8318 no it’s in direct
@@Rameon look it up. i’m 99.9999% sure i’m right. cross examination is when you can ask leading questions.
@@heythere8318 you are correct, leading questions is on cross only
Lol a little mistake in the introduction, guess re-shooting was out of the question