The Federalist Papers Explained (AP US Government and Politics)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 2 ต.ค. 2024
  • Download your AP U.S. Government Study Guide Pack here:
    marcolearning....
    In this video, Tom Richey introduces you to the Federalist Papers. The Federalist Papers were written by James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay in order to persuade the people of the state of New York to support the ratification of the Constitution. Antifederalist writers, such as Brutus, had claimed that the Constitution would be neither federal nor republican in nature. Madison, Hamilton, and Jay argued that the Constitution would preserve republican government and would preserve the federal system and the rights of the states.
    This video will be helpful for students preparing for the AP United States Government and Politics exam. AP Gov students are expected to be familiar with Federalist 10, Federalist 51, Federalist 70, and Federalist 78.
    Download a free full-length practice test for AP U.S. Government and Politics at marcolearning....
    Marco Learning is committed to providing the best, most complete resources for AP® students, their parents, and teachers.
    Instagram: @marcolearning
    TikTok: @marcolearning
    Twitter: @marcolearning
    Facebook: @marcolearningap
    #agov #apusgov #apexams #federalistpapers #usgovernment

ความคิดเห็น • 181

  • @naomichadwick4223
    @naomichadwick4223 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    "John Jay got sick after writing 5. James Madison wrote 29. HAMILTON WROTE THE OTHER 51!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"

  • @googleuser1937
    @googleuser1937 4 ปีที่แล้ว +117

    Alexander Hamilton be carrying the Federalist Party on his back.

    • @MarcoLearning
      @MarcoLearning  4 ปีที่แล้ว +17

      Yes, that should have played a larger role in the musical.

    • @region-_-1721
      @region-_-1721 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Joseph Ferro your cringe bruh

    • @FunkSoulBubby
      @FunkSoulBubby 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Burr almost got him.

    • @owlnyc666
      @owlnyc666 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Would he be a contemporary Republican or Democrat? I think Democrat. Hamilton wanted a unitary government. He wanted the president and the senators to serve for life. He thought that the "model" government was Great with the Monarchy , the House Of Lords. He chose Republican form of government Modeled after the Roman Empire. NOT a Democracy modeled after Athens. Hamilton was a PLATIONIST. And Plato, Soccrates and Aristole and they did not trust the undereducated commoners to rule. It was the ignorant mob that convicted and sentenced Soccrates to commit suicide. And their was the mob of Shay's rebellion. Which struck fear and terror into the hearts of the wealhy-educated ELITE. 🤔😉😏

    • @thomasblaz3846
      @thomasblaz3846 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah he was also the biggest s*** head moron to ever exist he is the one who made centralized Banking and its privately owned he took the same thing from what we were trying to get rid of and implemented it right here but the difference was he had the power

  • @dsr3178
    @dsr3178 3 ปีที่แล้ว +98

    More people need to catch up on the constitution nowadays

    • @MarcoLearning
      @MarcoLearning  3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Yes! Thanks for watching!

    • @jamesoppy5957
      @jamesoppy5957 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      And learn just how distorted it has become

    • @DJK-cq2uy
      @DJK-cq2uy ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Especially RepubliCON

    • @Jordan-qq2ss
      @Jordan-qq2ss ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ​@@DJK-cq2uythose darn republicans. They just don't understand that the founding documents clearly meant that prepubescent children had full autonomy, and could decide for themselves that they were ready for gender affirming surgery and drugs.
      Clearly they hate freedom.

    • @georgethebugeater7950
      @georgethebugeater7950 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Jordan-qq2ss😂👍👍

  • @fijimorgan
    @fijimorgan 2 ปีที่แล้ว +103

    The anti-federalists would be saying I told you so if they saw our current government. Although, to be fair, our current government is doing their best to shred the constitution.

    • @davidtrindle6473
      @davidtrindle6473 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Complete nonsense

    • @FUCKINGENIOUS
      @FUCKINGENIOUS 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@davidtrindle6473 nope

    • @petepotaczek2534
      @petepotaczek2534 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      100% agree! Funny how pertinent those papers have become and how insightful.

    • @barbaradonohue4822
      @barbaradonohue4822 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@davidtrindle6473 Trump just truth socialed how he wanted it eliminated,

    • @cannapurp2833
      @cannapurp2833 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@barbaradonohue4822 And? He's an idiot which most Republicans no longer support. DeSantis please....

  • @Harrison_801
    @Harrison_801 4 ปีที่แล้ว +59

    A better summation than I could've asked for in an entire class period

  • @SSArcher11
    @SSArcher11 3 ปีที่แล้ว +96

    I must say I'm impressed by the objectivity of this presentation. I'm so accustomed to hidden agendas.

    • @MarcoLearning
      @MarcoLearning  3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Thank you!

    • @NotesFromTheOwlBox
      @NotesFromTheOwlBox 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hidden agendas in historical TH-cam presentations? What do you mean? Name one. Hidden agendas in modern media anaylsis? Yeah its called politics and Aaron Burr wrote the book.

    • @advocacynaccountablity
      @advocacynaccountablity 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ok....

    • @edwardmabanglo2076
      @edwardmabanglo2076 ปีที่แล้ว

      what were u expecting?
      "THE FEDERALIST PAPERS ARE A SOCIALIST PLOY TO TURN YOUR CHILDREN INTO TRANSGENDERS"

  • @matthewgillespie2835
    @matthewgillespie2835 4 ปีที่แล้ว +73

    Brilliant explanation. I've heard that the federalist papers are an essential reading if one is to understand thoroughly the structure of the constitution, and thus, the structure of the US government, and I wanted to find a nice explanation of the context within which the federalist papers were written. This video did just that! Mr. Richey is a wonderful instructor! I will definitely have to look at more of his instructions.

    • @MarcoLearning
      @MarcoLearning  4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thanks!

    • @lemonaid8678
      @lemonaid8678 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Sadly some people have no idea that they even exist

    • @ryanluna7322
      @ryanluna7322 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      to much freedom of each state, leads to potential division, too much division = civil unrest, and guess a dictator ship would be bad if your one of the few who fall outside the lines of what they want, but like a military or any social group, without some level of direction and control people fall apart, and to much delegation leads to everything going slow or stagnating or people fighting and no one gets anywhere, feel the constitution is more than enough rules, if you add in the religions and common outlook of the day, mean stuff they left out of the constitution to them woulda been seen as common sense even under the old rule, and they were christian, so allot of that to them wouldnt need to have been said, but would still have been part of the original outlook, stuff such as murder/ or adultry ect ect, they didnt need to add but there was a time when all of it was punished, feel if it wasnt for the unwritten rules of the time and they added everything they thought or we try to interpret what they meant, certain stuff would be added, mean they say right to bear dosnt mean private guns? but then its like you know they didnt really like same sex couples back then eather right?but common outlook back then made it not something your need to say. so if we go by anything other than the literal meaning of what they said, and go by what they may have meant theres allot of stuff that should be banned way before firearms

    • @stevewise1656
      @stevewise1656 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ryanluna7322"they were Christians." That's not true by any stretch. Most were agnostic, atheist, or didn't believe God had anything to do with what was happening on earth from day to day. This is why our government was constructed to be separate from church and state/government. Your thesis seems to be they believed stating anything about Christianity in the Constitution or not writing anything in the Constitution was a given at the time. How does that square with the separation of church and state? It doesn't. Facts don't have two sides.

  • @mickeywood3012
    @mickeywood3012 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Done while Jefferson was in France serving the American People.

  • @bernicejenkins1515
    @bernicejenkins1515 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    Matt Damon is now a historian.

  • @ElevatedMediaHouse
    @ElevatedMediaHouse 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The constitution is Probably both the most important AND most destructive to America
    We gave up our rights many times over since the founding, the forefathers would be throwing up right now, the population versus representatives is way off balance.
    Great Britain 2.0

    • @Loganvbills
      @Loganvbills 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's wild how much worse things have gotten when globalists enter a government and give themselves powers they were never meant to have... it's been increasing since at least 100 years ago.

  • @Fadoua07
    @Fadoua07 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    I'm a Master 1 LMD Algerian student of English my specialty is : Literature and civilization and I want to say THANK you for the effort you put into ur videos it's really helpful and clear 🌹👌

  • @ophidiaparaclete
    @ophidiaparaclete 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Speak One's Own Law.
    Speak One's self TRUTH.
    Speak Science Self sovereignty. Speak law self sovereignty.
    Speak freewill self sovereignty
    Speak freewill self sovereignty to self-govern.
    Why does the individual freewill sovereign to self-govern lose this inherent character and nature in lieu of a legal personality assigned by these who represent us? Preying not in our ignorance, NO these prey upon the public vulnerability to self-govern and childlike innocence of our sovereign SAFETY. Boo Hiss

  • @thefreeman8791
    @thefreeman8791 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    We can all read the Federalist Papers for ourselves and say here is what Hamilton says in #11 or something like that. But the bigger and more important question is what influence did they have on ratification itself? Did the delegates of the states read the Federalist papers and be like we agree to that and ratify the Constitution because they were convinced by the Federalist Papers? Mostly, the answer to that is no. Outside of NY, the Federalist Papers were not widely published and where they were they were mostly ignored by locals who tended to pay attention to their own leaders over an anonymously written letter. However, James Wilson gives a speech in November of 1787 and that is immediately published in major newspapers in 12 of the 13 states and it was distributed in booklet form to make it easier to spread. That was never done with the Federalist Papers. I am not saying that they are not important. I am just saying that people act like they had a profound influence on the ratification process as if a delegate in GA read an anonymous written letter published in a NY news paper and said yeah I am gonna vote for ratification because of this anonymous letter. That did not really happen. They had an incredibly amount of influence in NY but James Wilson's speech had much more influence outside of NY.

    • @plouismarie
      @plouismarie 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      As explained in the video the papers were aiming not only but mainly NY , so it worked. Also Thomas Jefferson himself hailed The Federalist Papers as the best commentary ever written about the principles of government. That’s a nice confirmation of the appreciation it has generated.

  • @Cat-bg2ge
    @Cat-bg2ge 20 วันที่ผ่านมา +2

    The colonist's were rich. The Whitehouse was called " The American Palace" George Washington was like a King. He had every luxury including slave's.

  • @tttrfdsdhh2798
    @tttrfdsdhh2798 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    *HaMiLToN wrOtE thE otHer 51*

  • @chrismarchand3570
    @chrismarchand3570 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    This was tremendously informative. Thank you.

  • @raychevalier2741
    @raychevalier2741 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I heard my 11 year old talking to his sister about the federalist papers but did not interject before I brushed up on the subject. This gave me everything I needed to contribute to their conversation in a more constructive manner.

    • @Jordan-qq2ss
      @Jordan-qq2ss ปีที่แล้ว

      What was the conversation like between your kids?

    • @nekoqueen5524
      @nekoqueen5524 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Is his sister not your daughter as well? I'm confused by this wording

    • @EnwardHiggins
      @EnwardHiggins หลายเดือนก่อน

      I​@@nekoqueen5524 it's his wife's daughter.

  • @danegerzone4889
    @danegerzone4889 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Seems like Hamilton got what he wanted

    • @MarcoLearning
      @MarcoLearning  4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      In many respects, he did! Thanks for watching!

    • @danegerzone4889
      @danegerzone4889 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@MarcoLearning Thanks for the highly informative video. This is a fascinating topic. I only wish I had teachers like you in school, but I'm lucky enough I can learn from you today!

    • @jorden9821
      @jorden9821 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      He did, unfortunately

  • @skipfantry5059
    @skipfantry5059 6 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Can you lend your talents to the anti-federalist papers? It has as much insight into our constitution as the federalist papers do.

  • @lunarl1ly
    @lunarl1ly 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    the hamilton musical tells this story so well so If you want to learn the history in detail (more surrounding hamilton and his experiences) all the while watching an amazing play, I highly reccomend it

  • @msnrsn
    @msnrsn 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Great video. Thanks Tom!

  • @mickeywood3012
    @mickeywood3012 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Extract from Thomas Jefferson’s Notes on the State of Virginia

  • @JTSunriseMusic
    @JTSunriseMusic ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Was also focused on New York, which had a concentration of aristocrats

  • @jeffjgarrett269
    @jeffjgarrett269 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    You’re an excellent speaker. You should make a Great Course by The Teaching Company. Id love to watch that.

  • @mickeywood3012
    @mickeywood3012 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Young Adults, Federalists are what Jefferson warned Americans about. “He” (Jefferson) became suspicious of all around him, for he regarded the indifference of the people to the struggles of the French, their old allies, as an evil omen. He had scarcely taken his seat in the Cabinet before he declared that some of his colleagues held decidedly monarchical views; and the belief became fixed in his mind that there was a party in the United States continually at work, secretly and sometimes openly, for the overthrow of republicanism here. This idea became a sort of monomania and haunted him until his death more than thirty years afterward.
    From Benson Lossing, Our Country.

    • @Loganvbills
      @Loganvbills 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      And now we are living it with the uniparty at odds against the people, at odds against the constitution, and especially doing everything they can to disarm the people and divide us in such a manor that we no longer vote on policy, rather, we vote on emotion controlled via media fear mongering. I'm still weary of Trump, myself, but I see in the people who support him that they want liberty back. They want the people to have control again and trust that Trump has the same goal. If it fails, I do believe there will be only one final option for our freedoms...

  • @markh.2899
    @markh.2899 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    This is fabulous! Thank you, Macro Learning!

  • @Sasha-wv3oy
    @Sasha-wv3oy 10 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Politics usually makes me wanna fall asleep but you explained it so good that I really found myself actually listening 100%…thank you so much!

  • @rayvandenberg4574
    @rayvandenberg4574 หลายเดือนก่อน

    good explanation of a subject all Americans should be more understanding of.., the greatness of the founders and what a great, the greatest, of country's America is.

  • @andrewbesso4257
    @andrewbesso4257 10 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Reading the Federalist Papers as an adult in the 21st century, I could feel the Civil War coming.

  • @johnwinthrop2702
    @johnwinthrop2702 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    you just came up with the greatest and most ifluental document in the history of the world and people aren't impressed.

  • @ambrielclements5946
    @ambrielclements5946 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Super video! I applauded for $2.00 👏

  • @ArmchairRamb0
    @ArmchairRamb0 10 วันที่ผ่านมา

    This is a very good summary of several very important concepts. thanks

  • @MrDan11422
    @MrDan11422 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The way I understand this, it basically means the federal government has more power than the state government.
    If I'm wrong let me know.

    • @georgethebugeater7950
      @georgethebugeater7950 ปีที่แล้ว

      It means that the state government and the federal government are separate, and state laws trump federal. So technically the federal government is more powerful as a whole, but state does not have to follow federal. This is from my understanding.

  • @melissajohnson5917
    @melissajohnson5917 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Really interesting! Thank you👍🏻

  • @ReverenXero
    @ReverenXero 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Some time needs to be spent teaching people what expressed powers are.

    • @MarcoLearning
      @MarcoLearning  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      This is an important topic, for sure.

  • @イッゼィセブ
    @イッゼィセブ 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    For anyone interested, it's the Indigenous (native American) tribes that created what we consider our modern democracy today and our united States constitution. If you don't know what I'm talking about:
    Research Hiawatha's Wampum Belt and his ideas about bringing the 6 nations of the Haudenosaunee (People of the Longhouse... The Iroquois Confederacy) who, together, created -what would be transplanted as- our 3 branches of government. They thought of it first. Benjamin Franklin, who spent lots of time with the Confederacy of the Iroquois, wrote about his experiences with them and their ideas about governing before the founders even started writing any democratic document.

    • @TeoOfficial_1
      @TeoOfficial_1 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Humm sounds about right

    • @Enceladus...
      @Enceladus... 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you for sharing. I've read this before in one of my books but have since forgotten 'til you reminded me.

  • @Nenets15
    @Nenets15 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I just got my copy of the federalist papers
    Wish me luck

    • @MarcoLearning
      @MarcoLearning  4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Good luck with your new copy of the Federalist Papers!

  • @jaredk6591
    @jaredk6591 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Very informative video keep up the great work

  • @its_magic9516
    @its_magic9516 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I´m a germa student who tried to understand the full thing about it, because i have a course about the 18. Century in USA and you explained it really well with a clear voice. It was a pleasure:)

  • @blackquiver
    @blackquiver 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    8:14.. Soo I had it right to begin with . Than I got it backwards. The republic is the rights. Federalism is the constitution.. Holy crap am I confused. I gotta go bad think strict in the morning..

  • @jillslack9013
    @jillslack9013 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    "Hi I'm Tom Richie I'm the exact midpoint between Matt Damon and Josh Brolin."

    • @karenwaddell9396
      @karenwaddell9396 4 วันที่ผ่านมา

      I was thinking the same thing.

  • @kromekicks
    @kromekicks 6 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Hamilton was a central bank plant.

  • @leoaguilar5950
    @leoaguilar5950 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    What is to be said when federal laws impede or invade the freedom of choice. Where state or national popular opinion is controlled by media or news and votes are diluted and disputed... why should federal government have such power?

  • @jmalko9152
    @jmalko9152 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thanks for making this video!

  • @eggo601
    @eggo601 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    One of the clearest explanations I’ve ever listened to. I will be looking at more of your videos asap.

  • @AndyRhodes1
    @AndyRhodes1 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

    This was a helpful video.

  • @CaptainXiJinpooh
    @CaptainXiJinpooh 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    50% surfer dude 50% cowboy

  • @Oora44
    @Oora44 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Do the federalist papers have any context in constitutional law?

  • @ryanweaver962
    @ryanweaver962 ปีที่แล้ว

    I think this is fantastic information. When we consider large shifts of concepts and needs… various processes and education are very needed.

  • @arnooww
    @arnooww 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you so much for the explanation. So, so, so useful.

  • @That-Dude
    @That-Dude 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This was very well presented.

  • @verballyconstipated
    @verballyconstipated 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Life so stagnant im listening to this even tho im not a us citizen and have never been to the us

  • @TeoOfficial_1
    @TeoOfficial_1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Subbed and ty I needed this like water in a desert

  • @davidpineda2345
    @davidpineda2345 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    That's right, I'm here for the musical Hamilton

  • @russellniebolt1493
    @russellniebolt1493 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This was a really good encapsulation! Thanks.

  • @ViniHaxhiaj
    @ViniHaxhiaj 9 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Belt way😂😂😂😂😂

  • @charleskeefer3043
    @charleskeefer3043 ปีที่แล้ว

    Card catalog, then, mandate of the No. xxxx.

  • @johnnysalazar3951
    @johnnysalazar3951 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This man is brilliant!

  • @YuriTarrdid
    @YuriTarrdid 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    you should have extended that victory sip at 10:24

  • @BraydenDarrell
    @BraydenDarrell ปีที่แล้ว

    Very interesting! Thanks for the information

  • @ritchie9030
    @ritchie9030 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Well done.

  • @mockapp6973
    @mockapp6973 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent presentation! Now get some well deserved sleep

  • @ViniHaxhiaj
    @ViniHaxhiaj 9 วันที่ผ่านมา

    😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

  • @Rylee_DJ
    @Rylee_DJ ปีที่แล้ว

    Incredible explanation! Thank you!

  • @givemethemusicd
    @givemethemusicd ปีที่แล้ว

    comment

  • @williamsmith8041
    @williamsmith8041 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you,I'm about to begin a college class on this subject

  • @shahub5
    @shahub5 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great video thanks

  • @jamesoppy5957
    @jamesoppy5957 ปีที่แล้ว

    MY HERO IS JAMES MADISON

  • @michaelwoodsmccausland5633
    @michaelwoodsmccausland5633 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ola! Nor did the Torrey’s leave!

  • @burrows10011
    @burrows10011 ปีที่แล้ว

    fantastic explanation

  • @Iceman1800
    @Iceman1800 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you. Very good explanation

  • @elle-be3lz
    @elle-be3lz 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent explanation ... fascinating as well.

  • @brittgayle467
    @brittgayle467 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent summary

  • @stephenfegely
    @stephenfegely 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great 👍🏻

  • @andy_182
    @andy_182 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wonder what Ben Shapiro thinks

  • @heatherdale5571
    @heatherdale5571 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you.

  • @reneadinaro8183
    @reneadinaro8183 28 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Wait a minute here. I'm no smart guy. However, I have a question. Who's paying these people to think and make laws. Where's the money coming from?

  • @bengordon6573
    @bengordon6573 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you!

  • @charleskeefer1143
    @charleskeefer1143 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    We

  • @shawnburnham1
    @shawnburnham1 ปีที่แล้ว

    9:00

  • @jamesstanley6879
    @jamesstanley6879 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Just imagine the amount of tyranny that would exist today if those people didn’t fight for the bill or rights to long ago!

  • @babarca56
    @babarca56 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Who else here for homework

  • @robertleewhitt6241
    @robertleewhitt6241 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Outstanding presentation A+++

  • @WattHowar-e9i
    @WattHowar-e9i 13 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

    Rodriguez Jason Miller Donald Martin Laura

  • @johnnyreb8030
    @johnnyreb8030 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You are an excellent speaker. Please stand and hold your hands behind you. Sholders back.

    • @FUCKINGENIOUS
      @FUCKINGENIOUS 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Lol no, just let the dude be himself.

  • @charleskeefer1143
    @charleskeefer1143 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    When did the aforementioned decide to choose a government to be the people, and the w.s. to ask about a.f.a.m. 1812 to combine without 2/3 Europe till the papers write to after the Dec. Ind. Yet the before has trust before hand.

  • @SeedsAndStuff
    @SeedsAndStuff 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Words matter Steve

  • @jorden9821
    @jorden9821 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Where did it lead us to today? That's all you need to know. The Constitution is unfit to exist.

    • @georgethebugeater7950
      @georgethebugeater7950 ปีที่แล้ว

      I’m mean. You seem to be in good health. Have you fought any battles against a tyrannical government as of lately? That’s what I thought.

    • @jorden9821
      @jorden9821 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@georgethebugeater7950you have no idea about what I'm talking about

    • @Loganvbills
      @Loganvbills 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @jorden9821 Are we talking about the globalist agenda? People in our government giving themselves powers they were not meant to have?

  • @FUCKINGENIOUS
    @FUCKINGENIOUS 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Well i couldnt follow any of that.

  • @DJK-cq2uy
    @DJK-cq2uy ปีที่แล้ว

    Stop using the R word please

  • @bignastysavage150
    @bignastysavage150 ปีที่แล้ว

    Bro looks like if Theo Von didn’t grow up in Florida