What people also don't seem to realise is that it basically is showing what football academies are like. Even if you're a striker, to improve your game, you will be played in other positions. The idea of if you fail at blue lock, you will never be the national team striker, is the equivalent of you being let go of the academy and never getting a chance in the first team. In academies, even though you have to work in a team, you are all competing against each other your ego's to get selected to join the first team ahead of your teammates. (This is also why it makes sense that they can form their teams, but they also have to get use to joining other teams and groups in blue lock and why they got to be an egoist as they have to prove their worth to be there and be selected for a professional contract) They're kids not athlete's, so their potential is not really known when they are under pressure, so just like in academies, if you can't prove your worth, your potential is not deemed good enough and you're cut.
It's simple really: Bluelock egoism doesn't spare the egoists from consequences. Barou acting like a jerk to his teammates gets him isolated, Isagi getting too cocky about his ability before proving it gets his ass handed.
I think the real problem is that we want to separate ourselves from the sociopaths and psychopaths , you are correct teamwork is a dance of egos aligned to hit a common goal. It's a mutual using of each other. Good people should be egoist just not egomaniacs , if egotistical behaviour gets at a common good then it's deserved there is a reason nature gave us an ego. That goodness that benefits the group at the cost of one persons ego is the real penetration
While its good to focus on others, it's also exceedingly important to focus on yourself. This is why, even though perhaps I would, I'd rather not sacrifice my life for another's. If you want to be a good person and make the world a better place, you cant forget about yourself. You are also part of the world! And others want to see *you* grow, too! Besides, if you dont take care of yourself, or stand up for yourself, you cant take care of others. And, in a world where we'd only take care of others, and never of ourselves, we'd be putting the burden of taking care of oneselves onto those others...not that needing to be taken care of is bad, necessarily. But to each their needs, and to each their capabilities, right? A healthy amount of self-servingness is good!
Just found your channel and you definitely give off the vibe of "I know some fundamental truths and I'm gonna tell you what they are" which is why I will definitely never forgive you if you won't uptade this video after blue lock ends
I am not an Egoist. I am a Legalist. I know I already told you about this. But it seemed to me that Egoism and Legalism appeared to operate by the same principle. According to Legalism, all humans are naturally evil and inherently selfish. And the only reason a human is willing to do something else for another human or die for that human is because of their shared self-interests. And since you said that Egoism in teamwork is primarily about each member's interests, the only reason for them to work with each other is because their own interests are aligned. So it is in their best interests for them to win this together. If not, they lose everything. And this is when Ash'ari comes into play. Ash'ari is the Islamic theology that stated that we humans have free wills to do what we pleased but our choices to choose do so are limited by the situations, circumstances and possibilities outlined and/or provided by God or the time period and the place we are living in at the moment. And so, we humans have "acquired" responsibilities for the decisions and the actions we have taken by our own free wills that are also shaped by our environments and possibly, by God. So if the responsibility is shared such as in a team, I do not really know where the guilt is lying or whose fault it is or the entire team is even at fault or not because there are times that even doing their best still mean losing in the end. But what I know is that guilt and fault is not the same despite that they've often being used interchangeably. However, guilt is a feeling of shame while fault is an action made either by mistake or intention.
based on what you said here it does sound like egoism and legalism have similar base views on the nature of humanity when it comes to individuals acting in their own self-interest. however i guess one difference would be that egoism doesn't frame this as "evil," in fact it actually says acting selfishly is morally good, which is an obvious difference from legalism. also i believe egoism is more of an anarchist ideology while legalism obviously involves rules and laws
@@chryysanth As much as I valued free will since I believed in Ash'ari despite not being a Muslim, I also know that laws are important as long as they are being used properly and making sense because we humans cannot be trusted to be alone on our own devices. And this is why I believed in both Legalism and Ash'ari. They sorted of balancing each other in my personal belief. Heck, I am still thinking that the Dynastic Cycle is the best option of ruling over the society here because it is an endless cycle of anarchy and autocracy. And unlike the cycle of hate, this one cannot be break. And if it broke, it means democracy has come. And I have lost my faith in democracy already because it always eventually lead to "the majority is always right" belief and that will lead to the peoples who are part of the majority to become the tyrants of their own society by oppressing and persecuting the minority. I prefered the endless war between a group of rebelling anarchists and the autocratic government that lost its way rather than seeing the peoples themselves becoming the tyrants of their own society and abused their free wills on pretty much everything. In other words, the balance between anarchy and autocracy needed to be preserve with Legalism promoted order over the society while Ash'ari promoted free wills for everyone to express themselves.
Some would say it is! I believe that belief would be "psychological egoism," though not everyone agrees with that view of human nature. If I had to give my position, I would say that self-interest is going to be the primary driving force for most people. However I think this oversimplifies things and ignores some other important factors in people's decision making, especially each person's sense of morality. Most people will break an egoistic pursuit if they feel like some part of their moral code overrides that action, and I believe we all fall along a spectrum of where exactly the line is at which our morals silence our ego.
What people also don't seem to realise is that it basically is showing what football academies are like.
Even if you're a striker, to improve your game, you will be played in other positions.
The idea of if you fail at blue lock, you will never be the national team striker, is the equivalent of you being let go of the academy and never getting a chance in the first team.
In academies, even though you have to work in a team, you are all competing against each other your ego's to get selected to join the first team ahead of your teammates. (This is also why it makes sense that they can form their teams, but they also have to get use to joining other teams and groups in blue lock and why they got to be an egoist as they have to prove their worth to be there and be selected for a professional contract)
They're kids not athlete's, so their potential is not really known when they are under pressure, so just like in academies, if you can't prove your worth, your potential is not deemed good enough and you're cut.
It's simple really: Bluelock egoism doesn't spare the egoists from consequences.
Barou acting like a jerk to his teammates gets him isolated, Isagi getting too cocky about his ability before proving it gets his ass handed.
Here for the Monogatari ost 😵💫
Finally someone who gets it
😎
I think the real problem is that we want to separate ourselves from the sociopaths and psychopaths , you are correct teamwork is a dance of egos aligned to hit a common goal. It's a mutual using of each other. Good people should be egoist just not egomaniacs , if egotistical behaviour gets at a common good then it's deserved there is a reason nature gave us an ego. That goodness that benefits the group at the cost of one persons ego is the real penetration
Awesome video, egoism is cool and good in bluelock!
thank you very much masongindlesperger1506
While its good to focus on others, it's also exceedingly important to focus on yourself. This is why, even though perhaps I would, I'd rather not sacrifice my life for another's. If you want to be a good person and make the world a better place, you cant forget about yourself. You are also part of the world! And others want to see *you* grow, too!
Besides, if you dont take care of yourself, or stand up for yourself, you cant take care of others. And, in a world where we'd only take care of others, and never of ourselves, we'd be putting the burden of taking care of oneselves onto those others...not that needing to be taken care of is bad, necessarily. But to each their needs, and to each their capabilities, right?
A healthy amount of self-servingness is good!
I dont watch sport anime
Fine I will watch this sports anime!
Just found your channel and you definitely give off the vibe of "I know some fundamental truths and I'm gonna tell you what they are" which is why I will definitely never forgive you if you won't uptade this video after blue lock ends
I am not an Egoist. I am a Legalist. I know I already told you about this. But it seemed to me that Egoism and Legalism appeared to operate by the same principle. According to Legalism, all humans are naturally evil and inherently selfish. And the only reason a human is willing to do something else for another human or die for that human is because of their shared self-interests. And since you said that Egoism in teamwork is primarily about each member's interests, the only reason for them to work with each other is because their own interests are aligned. So it is in their best interests for them to win this together. If not, they lose everything. And this is when Ash'ari comes into play. Ash'ari is the Islamic theology that stated that we humans have free wills to do what we pleased but our choices to choose do so are limited by the situations, circumstances and possibilities outlined and/or provided by God or the time period and the place we are living in at the moment. And so, we humans have "acquired" responsibilities for the decisions and the actions we have taken by our own free wills that are also shaped by our environments and possibly, by God. So if the responsibility is shared such as in a team, I do not really know where the guilt is lying or whose fault it is or the entire team is even at fault or not because there are times that even doing their best still mean losing in the end. But what I know is that guilt and fault is not the same despite that they've often being used interchangeably. However, guilt is a feeling of shame while fault is an action made either by mistake or intention.
based on what you said here it does sound like egoism and legalism have similar base views on the nature of humanity when it comes to individuals acting in their own self-interest. however i guess one difference would be that egoism doesn't frame this as "evil," in fact it actually says acting selfishly is morally good, which is an obvious difference from legalism. also i believe egoism is more of an anarchist ideology while legalism obviously involves rules and laws
@@chryysanth As much as I valued free will since I believed in Ash'ari despite not being a Muslim, I also know that laws are important as long as they are being used properly and making sense because we humans cannot be trusted to be alone on our own devices. And this is why I believed in both Legalism and Ash'ari. They sorted of balancing each other in my personal belief. Heck, I am still thinking that the Dynastic Cycle is the best option of ruling over the society here because it is an endless cycle of anarchy and autocracy. And unlike the cycle of hate, this one cannot be break. And if it broke, it means democracy has come. And I have lost my faith in democracy already because it always eventually lead to "the majority is always right" belief and that will lead to the peoples who are part of the majority to become the tyrants of their own society by oppressing and persecuting the minority. I prefered the endless war between a group of rebelling anarchists and the autocratic government that lost its way rather than seeing the peoples themselves becoming the tyrants of their own society and abused their free wills on pretty much everything. In other words, the balance between anarchy and autocracy needed to be preserve with Legalism promoted order over the society while Ash'ari promoted free wills for everyone to express themselves.
THANK YOU.
Great video! Thanks for posting!
Video is insane mate, keep it up!!
good essay! :D
thanks!
damn you learn something new everyday
isn't egoism just human nature?
Some would say it is! I believe that belief would be "psychological egoism," though not everyone agrees with that view of human nature.
If I had to give my position, I would say that self-interest is going to be the primary driving force for most people. However I think this oversimplifies things and ignores some other important factors in people's decision making, especially each person's sense of morality. Most people will break an egoistic pursuit if they feel like some part of their moral code overrides that action, and I believe we all fall along a spectrum of where exactly the line is at which our morals silence our ego.
@@chryysanth great take professor, i agree with it.
Can we have a talk about gurren lagan