A BREATHTAKING INTEGRATION RESULT

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 31

  • @guilhermegoncalves110
    @guilhermegoncalves110 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    If I had a dollar for every time I correctly guessed that the results of these integrals would include the Riemann Zeta function, or the Gamma function, or both, I'd be set for life :)

  • @YahontAction
    @YahontAction 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Ваши видео на ютуб, по части вычисления интегралов - лучшие. Я просто обожаю их смотреть, отдыхая на диване. Знать языка совсем не нужно, весь ход мыслей и так прозрачен, как партия на шахматной доске.
    Вычисление интегралов, действительно - целое искусство, которое требует глубокого знания и практики высшей математики. Даже в этой задаче, вначале алгебраические манипуляции, потом разложение в ряд 1/(1-x), потом применение знаний по специальным функциям (Гамма и Дзета-функция Римана). Кстати вижу, что вы далеко не первый раз применяете связку таких подходов к вычислению несобственных интегралов.

    • @maths_505
      @maths_505  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Спасибо, мой друг. Я рад, что вам нравятся видео. Действительно, решение интегралов - это увлекательный опыт, позволяющий использовать инструменты из различных областей математики.

  • @lmaorofl3229
    @lmaorofl3229 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    idk if you already did this but try doing the integral of ln^n(x)/(x^2 +1) very simple using contor integration it contains pi many times

    • @maths_505
      @maths_505  ปีที่แล้ว +6

      DUDE!
      I JUST MADE A WRITE UP FOR THAT YESTERDAY!
      THIS IS SO COOL!!!

    • @roshanmadhav8876
      @roshanmadhav8876 ปีที่แล้ว

      That also the nth partial derivatives of the Euler reflection formula if the integral is from 0 to ♾️ or the n power is even

  • @MyNordlys
    @MyNordlys ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Is it an error at the end ? x to the four rather than x to the s ?

    • @maths_505
      @maths_505  ปีที่แล้ว

      No that's a case I evaluated

  • @manstuckinabox3679
    @manstuckinabox3679 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ah something very similar to a blast from the past! keep em up boii!

  • @nhatnam7168
    @nhatnam7168 ปีที่แล้ว

    good solution ,thank you

  • @MrWael1970
    @MrWael1970 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is very impressive integral. So, the last integral has x^4 instead of x^s. Thank you for your featured effort.

  • @Jalina69
    @Jalina69 ปีที่แล้ว

    So sweet I almost cried

  • @maurichan6868
    @maurichan6868 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Duuuude the day of the next cult meeting was getting near and I was going mad deciding which integral I would bring the boys this time, this couldn't have dropped at a better moment

  • @josephlorizzo8997
    @josephlorizzo8997 ปีที่แล้ว

    WOW THAT'S SO COOL

  • @0519ryan
    @0519ryan ปีที่แล้ว

    what application do you use to write?

  • @xizar0rg
    @xizar0rg ปีที่แล้ว

    Why can you get away with the convergent geometric series substitution (around 3min mark) without chopping up the integral from 0,1 and 1,inf? Seems like on that first region, exp(-x) tends to be larger than 1.

    • @maths_505
      @maths_505  ปีที่แล้ว

      Nope. It's less than 1 on (0, ♾️)

    • @xizar0rg
      @xizar0rg ปีที่แล้ว

      @@maths_505 Ah, I see my brainfart. I was conflating e^-x with e^(x^-1). Thanks.

  • @Daniel-yc2ur
    @Daniel-yc2ur ปีที่แล้ว

    Next video is integrating navier stokes equations aha

  • @thesattary
    @thesattary ปีที่แล้ว

    I really enjoyed this one Pakistani boy :)

  • @MathPhysRadi
    @MathPhysRadi 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Great video , for sake of how beautiful \Gamma(5) * \Zeta(4) as the answer is i would just let it be the answer without evaluating it . Just my opinion

  • @idjles
    @idjles ปีที่แล้ว

    Im glad that your pi now is starting to look like a pi and not an x with a hat, but your s always looks like a 5, and here you had both.

    • @maths_505
      @maths_505  ปีที่แล้ว

      I'm afraid that's something that can't be fixed😂

  • @AzharLatif-d4z
    @AzharLatif-d4z ปีที่แล้ว

    Why not improve handwriting skills first, your S can be easily taken as 5(five)? Your mention of the Gamma function must need a separate explanation rather than assuming the learner's depth of unexpected topics such as the Gamma Function or Zeta Function.

    • @julianneubacher2194
      @julianneubacher2194 ปีที่แล้ว

      This level of integration i would consider so advanced, that knowledge about these functions can be expected

    • @daddy_myers
      @daddy_myers ปีที่แล้ว

      Bud, he can only explain the integral to you, not understand it for you.

    • @daddy_myers
      @daddy_myers ปีที่แล้ว

      Judging by your past interactions with the channel, I can only assume that you're either rage-baiting, or you're genuinely the type of person to stop their Mathematics professor right in the middle of explaining something by saying:
      "🤓☝️ Achtually, Prof. You forgot to add the dot on the i in the sin!"
      While being absolutely clueless about what a phase shift is.

  • @SuperSilver316
    @SuperSilver316 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Math is a cult

  • @ELKCreativist
    @ELKCreativist ปีที่แล้ว

    SUIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII

    • @maths_505
      @maths_505  ปีที่แล้ว

      SUIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII