Absolutely great video. I really appreciate that you don't skip those "obvious" steps. They are not so obvious for the new guys that are just learning. Thank You!
@@teachphilosophy Could Symbolic Logic be used in analysing statements made by alleged criminals during interrogation/interviewing to see if what they say is true?
It's not fun when it's a mandatory credit and you'll probably have to drop it and lose the grand you paid for it cause you're not getting anything the teacher is throwing at you
First thanks for your video and that's absolutely helpful for my logic class! But I do have a question here. At 3:41 on this video when you talk about 4)B triplebar Y you give an explanation on the screen saying "Triple bar is true only when both letters are true or both letters are false", but in your first video you said "F triplebar T" would also be true, so there should be another condition that the triple bar is also true when the left letter is true and right is false. So I guess this explanation therefore is incorrect, right? Thanks.
I think you are confusing triple bar with horseshoe. For the triple bar either both must be true or both much be false. An easy way to remember is that the triple bar represents equivalence so both must be equal or the same.
Shouldn't (P->Q) be given an undetermined truth value when P is false and Q is true? Surely you can't confirm that P implies Q only on the basis that Q is true. As a matter of fact, by this logic, (P->Q) when both P and Q are true should also have an undetermined truth value. It's only in the case when P is true and Q is false that you can definitively say the (P->Q) statement is false. Any other combination of truth values for P and Q should give undetermined truth values for (P->Q).
![The Rules of Truth-Functional Logic [ILIEKMATHPHYSICS]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/jPQ2IHhPxrA/mqdefault.jpg)
![เปิดใจ "อาจารย์เบียร์ คนตื่นธรรม" อดีตเคยสุดทุกทาง ถ้าใช้หนี้หมดไปบวชแน่ l [Nickynachat]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/IxeE0xVhy08/mqdefault.jpg)
Absolutely great video. I really appreciate that you don't skip those "obvious" steps. They are not so obvious for the new guys that are just learning. Thank You!
Thanks, glad it was helpful.
@@teachphilosophy Could Symbolic Logic be used in analysing statements made by alleged criminals during interrogation/interviewing to see if what they say is true?
Amazingly well explained. Love your videos!
All ur videos are awesome. RESPECT!!
Thanks. :)
thank you so much for your video, this literally made me understand the whole concepts
Correct me if I am wrong, but you did not complete #5 did you?
Otherwise loved the video. It's a pleasure to hear you reason out the steps above.
Sir , very nice explanation .👍👍
Thanks from India 🙏🙏
I've never been to a logic class in my life but this stuff is interesting and fun as hell! Yes I'm a weird one.
It's not fun when it's a mandatory credit and you'll probably have to drop it and lose the grand you paid for it cause you're not getting anything the teacher is throwing at you
What is the last one? My answer would be T.
First thanks for your video and that's absolutely helpful for my logic class! But I do have a question here. At 3:41 on this video when you talk about 4)B triplebar Y you give an explanation on the screen saying "Triple bar is true only when both letters are true or both letters are false", but in your first video you said "F triplebar T" would also be true, so there should be another condition that the triple bar is also true when the left letter is true and right is false. So I guess this explanation therefore is incorrect, right? Thanks.
I think you are confusing triple bar with horseshoe. For the triple bar either both must be true or both much be false. An easy way to remember is that the triple bar represents equivalence so both must be equal or the same.
Billy Chen
Shouldn't (P->Q) be given an undetermined truth value when P is false and Q is true?
Surely you can't confirm that P implies Q only on the basis that Q is true.
As a matter of fact, by this logic, (P->Q) when both P and Q are true should also have an undetermined truth value. It's only in the case when P is true and Q is false that you can definitively say the (P->Q) statement is false. Any other combination of truth values for P and Q should give undetermined truth values for (P->Q).
I love you bro
Very helpul
This is the weirdest ASMR video I've ever seen
you should use ! for not
do you like pie ?
who dislike this💀
this video was great 👍