That's a great video, thank you for uploading this video :D Hope someday, you can make a video about time series using tidymodels with hyperparameter tuning
This is what I've been looking for thank you very much. Now to figure out how to quantify which approach provides the most accurate model performance. Thanks again.
Excellent tutorial and demonstration! However, there is one thing I don't really get. Why would one define an outcome variable for PCA? I mean isn't the point of this type of models to reveal hidden dimensions that express the variability of the data without having an outcome variable?
Oh for sure, it is not necessary to specify an outcome. You can see how to set up a recipe step with no outcome in the examples here: recipes.tidymodels.org/reference/step_pca.html#ref-examples The reason I included an outcome here was to show how you could use dimensionality reduction as a preprocessing step before fitting models, like this: www.tmwr.org/dimensionality.html#bean-models
@@JuliaSilge Thank you for the links! Chapter 16 of the book uses the "class" variable as the outcome variable for all four types of PCA that are exemplified and it was not clear to me whether I would need to add an outcome variable while preparing the recipe. You reply here clears that out. In the mean time, I also watched yesterday an earlier video of yours that uses "~." for ignoring the outcome variable, while conducting PCA. Keep up the good work!
I wouldn't say "need to" per se; you can read more here: stats.stackexchange.com/questions/92791/why-does-sphericity-diagnosed-by-bartletts-test-mean-a-pca-is-inappropriate
@@JuliaSilge Thanks Julia! I'll take a look. Do you test these assumptions when diving into PCA? Or what approach do you take if that makes sense? So many nuances to these methods/assumptions can definitely bog down some steps.
@@JuliaSilge By definition PCA is a method for quantitative variables. My question is about handle tabular data to apply multidimensional reduction as PCA, PLS or UMAP.
@@guberney I'm not sure what you mean here; "tabular data" typically means data arranged in a table form with rows and columns like what I have used here, like what you would find in a CSV or database or an R dataframe. Maybe you mean something else?
@@guberney Ah gotcha. You can use `step_dummy()` to create dummy/indicator variables for any nominal/factor/string variables, before normalizing: recipes.tidymodels.org/reference/step_dummy.html
I am only able to set the resolution to 360p. Do you still have the original recording at a higher resolution? It is difficult to read the text in the IDE. thak you for the excellent tutorials. I know it is a lot of work.
I'm sure that your videos make a greather impact in the quality of my work than any paid course
Thank you
Awesome. Thank you so much !
16:50 very interesting point!
That's a great video, thank you for uploading this video :D
Hope someday, you can make a video about time series using tidymodels with hyperparameter tuning
This is what I've been looking for thank you very much. Now to figure out how to quantify which approach provides the most accurate model performance. Thanks again.
Once again. Thank you Julia!
awesome video as usual!
Excellent tutorial and demonstration! However, there is one thing I don't really get. Why would one define an outcome variable for PCA? I mean isn't the point of this type of models to reveal hidden dimensions that express the variability of the data without having an outcome variable?
Oh for sure, it is not necessary to specify an outcome. You can see how to set up a recipe step with no outcome in the examples here: recipes.tidymodels.org/reference/step_pca.html#ref-examples
The reason I included an outcome here was to show how you could use dimensionality reduction as a preprocessing step before fitting models, like this:
www.tmwr.org/dimensionality.html#bean-models
@@JuliaSilge Thank you for the links! Chapter 16 of the book uses the "class" variable as the outcome variable for all four types of PCA that are exemplified and it was not clear to me whether I would need to add an outcome variable while preparing the recipe. You reply here clears that out. In the mean time, I also watched yesterday an earlier video of yours that uses "~." for ignoring the outcome variable, while conducting PCA. Keep up the good work!
Do you need to use tests such as Bartlett's sphericity test and the KMO index (Kaiser-Mayer-Olkin) before doing PCA?
I wouldn't say "need to" per se; you can read more here:
stats.stackexchange.com/questions/92791/why-does-sphericity-diagnosed-by-bartletts-test-mean-a-pca-is-inappropriate
@@JuliaSilge Thanks Julia! I'll take a look. Do you test these assumptions when diving into PCA? Or what approach do you take if that makes sense? So many nuances to these methods/assumptions can definitely bog down some steps.
Superb, thank you.
Very cool 👍 wish my teachers did videos like this
Thank you. An excellent video. Do you have any suggestions for multidimensionality reduction using tabular data as input?
Yes, these will all work for tabular data. Unless you mean something I am not understanding?
@@JuliaSilge By definition PCA is a method for quantitative variables. My question is about handle tabular data to apply multidimensional reduction as PCA, PLS or UMAP.
@@guberney I'm not sure what you mean here; "tabular data" typically means data arranged in a table form with rows and columns like what I have used here, like what you would find in a CSV or database or an R dataframe. Maybe you mean something else?
@@JuliaSilge I mean qualitative variables, nominal or ordinal. I am sorry for the “tabular data” expression.
@@guberney Ah gotcha. You can use `step_dummy()` to create dummy/indicator variables for any nominal/factor/string variables, before normalizing:
recipes.tidymodels.org/reference/step_dummy.html
I am only able to set the resolution to 360p. Do you still have the original recording at a higher resolution? It is difficult to read the text in the IDE. thak you for the excellent tutorials. I know it is a lot of work.
Can you try again? I can set it all the way to 1080p.
@@JuliaSilge Yes, different resolutions up to 1080p are available with the default at 720p