114(A) of I E ACT-IF A RAPE VICTIM SAYS THAT SHE DID NOT consent to the sexual intercourse.then the Court *SHALL PRESUM* that she did not consent as a rebuttable presumption. Mathura rape case commited by 2 police men to a tribal girl in police custody ,26march,1972
174(3)(v) to koi bata nhi rha 😂😂😂 sab teacher aise hi h zara wo postmartem ke baad kya likha h usme doubt h maximum logo ko jise ap log aise hi flow flow me padh ke nikal jate ho.
Thank you very much sir
Thanku sir 🙏
Nice lecture sir👍🙂
Really loved your video.
Finally completed.
Very useful
❤
Thanks sir
Welcome
Sr ek bar pura chapter 12 revison kra Dena 🤗
Case name :-Tuka Ram And Anr vs State Of Maharashtra on 15 September, 1978
Mathura rape case = Tuka ram v. state of maharashtra 1978 -- ammendments= addition of section 376A,B,C,D & Brden of proof shifted on accused etc.
114(A) of I E ACT-IF A RAPE VICTIM SAYS THAT SHE DID NOT consent to the sexual intercourse.then the Court *SHALL PRESUM* that she did not consent as a rebuttable presumption.
Mathura rape case commited by 2 police men to a tribal girl in police custody ,26march,1972
174(3)(v) to koi bata nhi rha 😂😂😂 sab teacher aise hi h zara wo postmartem ke baad kya likha h usme doubt h maximum logo ko jise ap log aise hi flow flow me padh ke nikal jate ho.