This tank has such terrible DPM and high ammo cap, you can start firing as soon as the game starts and still have 10 rounds left when the 15 minutes are up.
This reminds me in the time 2 Lowes trolled me in my LT in airfield, those bastard cycled fire the bush effectively trapping me behind the rock for a good 4 minutes.
This tank was an actual design from the 1950s, named at a time when the UK was defending Europe - with its US and European allies - from a potential Soviet invasion. So it's based on a historic design, and the name seems quite fitting for a tank defending Europe alongside European allies.
@@adriantsang3838 dude Charlemagne was Germanic, he was king of the Franks who were a Germanic tribe originating from the lowlands, later on after the Franks conquered Gaul they where Christianized, they also very quickly Romanized until their Germanic language (Frankish) soon became Old French.
I like this tank. It feels like they're making it weird and gimmicky and fun without just giving it an autoloader or autoreloader, or siege mode and whatever other things they've added.
Yeah, but it still . . . WG is giving the players a "free" tier 8 premium and make the normal ammo mostly useless, so most of the players will spam gold and dont make profit in it.
They really aughta remove bad players who complain because they’re too shit to deal with light tanks or arty. The only real problem the game has is the p2w shit. P2w ammo, p2w repair kits and consumables, etc. they should make it so no matter what tank you’re in or how bad you do, you cannot LOSE credits unless you use premium consumables
For a target, moving cross your field of fire at 50km/h at 300m range, equivalent to 13.9m/s, your standard shell takes, 300/579=0.52s to reach the target, which means target has moved 7.2m. T-54 is capable of moving at this speed, and its hull is 6.04m. That means you have to lead your shot 20%-120% of the hull length of to hit the hull; 20% to scrape the back end of the hull, and 120% to scrape the front, so anywhere inbetween is a hit. That may not seem like a lot, but considering how the aiming system works in WoT, if 60% of hull length ahead of a moving tank you have your aiming circle on the ground far in the background, for your slow shell to hit that spot, it has to leave the muzzle at a much higher trajectory, meaning your shell won't get anywhere near where the target will be in 0.52s. In the same situation, if you load gold AP, the target will only move 4.5m instead of 7.2m. Meaning you only need to aim at the very front end of the hull to hit somewhere in the back half of the hull. Above calculation is based on shells travel at straight lines. If taking trajectory arch into consideration, the slow shell needs to lead more, and more likely to miss.
It's like a tank from 2014 where the premiums were worse than even tech tree tanks... Honestly it feels so bad that WG gives such a bad tank "fOr FrEe" and the new skoda is like a strong tier 9 with worse HP
yeah aim time means not much if the dispersion values are that good. Just look at the Bourrasque, it has actually the same aiming time as a Charlemagne, but its dispersion values are godlike. So you still end up hitting pretty much most of the time cos the reticle is very small from the start. And I never heard anyone complain about its aim time.
@@obi-wlankenobi Multiple weakspots* (everything around the mantle is 175ish). Man that thing is a walking blister. Fine if WoT was balanced, buuut we're way past that line.
Something to be aware of: the slower the shell velocity, the higher the gun arc on the tank. Usually guns that have this kind of characteristics are... howitzers. When you lob HE shells at low velocity with poor penetration, and no normalization, the penetration mechanics are not exploited to their full extent. A high arc, slow moving AP shell which retains a good pen value over 500m, will hit sloped armor already negating angling effectiveness. Add in the 5° degrees of normalization upon impact, and I suspect this tank has a WAY higher penetration capability than it seems.
The shell velocity has to be the worst feature of this thing.. Not worth the 15k bonds at all imo although I'm a muppet.. But that one doesn't need an Einstein to figure out lol
@@MM-ny7dv bro 440 ALPHA, tier 8 HT doesn't really have good DM either mostly below 2000. u put gun rammer and vents like QB Charlemagne DPM reach 2K like 4 rounds a minute. 10 degrees of gun dep. Not a lot of tanks tier 8 can get 10 -12 deg of gun dep (even the weakpoint up top can be hidden if u use ur gun dep). Very Good Mobility for its tank type, Very Small Tank, Above average Armor layout, Gun Handling and Aim time not a problem for a Big gun caliber, View Range is average for its tier. U can kill tier 6 with two shots. The only downside of this tank is the velocity which is a BIG AND BAD THING and I must say that is a GOOD THING. I don't want another donker/chieftan in my tiee 8 matchups
Leading shots on moving targets in this tank will be a nightmare. Fast shells travel flat, slow shells arc high into the air. For slow shells the terrain you aim at (in front of your target) will apply a vertical trajectory to your shell which will sometimes mean that the shell will cruise way over the top of your target and land on the next map. Otherwise it looks kinda fun and memey
A British tank called the Charlemagne? Might as well call it the Martel or the Napoleon. What a load of old sweaty bollox. QB I don't know how you maintain your enthusiasm for this game even if you make a living from it. Fair play to you.
I don't see any issue with a tank named Charlemagne when we have Lewandowskiego (I don't dislike the idea by the way), it's like having a tank named Leclerc or Abrams.
@@Flackeify he's referring to why a British tank bears the name of a person of Germanic heritage, who later united the lands that would be later known as France. If anything the name should be for a french tank.
"The name Charlemagne, by which the emperor is normally known in English," Wikipedia In the hands of QB any tank will display prowess, power and performance. Obviously some tanks were designed to encounter and counter specific types of enemy machines. So how well you do in a mixed arena like WOT depends on how well you command your tank. GLHF Thank you Will for another concise reveal.
According to a WG employee in 2018 they were working on a new British heavy line but nothing new has ever come of it sadly, I'd love to see new British tanks of any kind The British tree is the only one where I've played enough to get every Tier 10
Is it over powered? No. Well done War Gaming not making a mistake and over tuning it. The Charlemagne is good at some stats and poor at others. It gives a rather unique and well balanced product. Excellent news. This tier VIII will not damage game play in all tier VIII games. Well done WG for balancing a reward tanks.
It's like a high tier Matilda with the howitzer derp gun (which has a shell velocity of mere 182 m/s). Probably fun, but about as good as its shell velocity.
FOOL!! NO ONE SSSSILENCES COBRA!! I love the Cobra Commander, but yeah trying to talk over him I get it. lol And you had it right Quacky, GIJoe (Duke, Snake Eyes, Road Block, etc) vs Cobra (Cobra Commander, Destro, Baroness, Major Blood, etc) BRAVO! 😄
Apparently in my dream last night I had an awesome game in my good'ol T110E5. Don't remember details lol. Gods I loved that tank in 2014 :') P.S. Haven't played this game for a year now.
Love ya' bruvva but can you do your reviews assuming maybe 2 1/2 skills? not sure how many us have 4 skill crews on all our tanks. particularly when it comes to showing us test sever stuff that has 7 skills.
@@devynd6476 Yes. But he doesn't really state that this is poor pay to win and he doesn't really criticise it besides mentioning that it costs more. He should HIGHLIGHT it over and over again that this game is pay to win.
You could arguably drop the rammer too since the DPM is awful anyways and just hope you get to trade single shots as much as possible. That being said I'm not sure what I would take instead, more HP maybe?
I saw two minutes and thought: ANOTHER british tank WG has dumped on: No Aim time, pen, armor. It has decent mobility - on stats. But... it's british so British Cruising Speed at 20 kph is expected. Now I'll watch the full video and cry a little more. Brit tanks were known for their precision, and it was great when I started 9 yrs ago. Now? Crusader: No pen, changed to medium, AND a tier higher. Covenanter is expected to do the same thing one tier higher. New brit light tanks: No pen.
This is kind of off topic but I saw a premium Conqueror in QB's garage called the Conqueror FL, and I'm just curious to know what that if anyone can lmk
WG pushes out more and more premium garbages quicker and quicker. They just showed us a Tier 9 premium tank and they are constantly adding more and more premiums. I miss thr 2013 days....
I hardly play and I would be interested in selling my account, do you know where I can and for how much would it be a reasonable price? I have many Premium Tanks and I am sorry to have them obsolete.
They just make tanks with 2 same types of ammo where the premium is better than standart in every way. Not like most old tanks that have APCR or AP and HEAT as gold where you actually have to think at what you fire. Or atleast you used to, now that HEAT rounds penetrate walls even that thought process is gone
@@hebrewhammer4086 I only compare them because the alpha damage is relatively similar, and the reload is as well. However, the Only complaint that I have about the 122 tm is the terrible reload speed, whereas with the Charlemagne I have at least 10 complaints lol. I agree with you in short.
Cobra Commander was the "black hat" the Bad Guy. From a certain point of view... For your mistakes i sentence you to 30 hours of Cold War match ups on WoT: Console.
At least a "reward - premium" tank that is not OP and has some flaws so that very good players wll not troll casual players with their OP tanks. A specialist tank that needs taming.
0,44 is great accuracy, while 0,34 is terrible. Seems to me some tanks have a better coefficient for hitting towards the center of the aim-circle. Just like in WoWs, there is a sigma coefficient on your guns. I always seem to miss my shots with the most accurate tanks in the game (like the Grille 15, Leopard 1).
I seriously wonder wtf WG thinks at this point when it makes up these new tanks. I mean, it has light tank DPM, tier 5 derp gun shell velocity. Unless you have it already you'd be insane to pick this over the Concept 1B. Also.. Has anyone been dumb enough to spend 10K bonds for a style for either of those tanks?? Like seriously WG, what muppet would spend that much just for a 3D style for a tank?
![KRK - ชนิสรา Ft.WanMai , N/A [Official MV] Prod. By Sakarin](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/C-WMwwYobcU/mqdefault.jpg)
This tank has such terrible DPM and high ammo cap, you can start firing as soon as the game starts and still have 10 rounds left when the 15 minutes are up.
This reminds me in the time 2 Lowes trolled me in my LT in airfield, those bastard cycled fire the bush effectively trapping me behind the rock for a good 4 minutes.
@@LXDNekoNya lol
DPM is not a very important stat anyway.
122 TM has the second highest winrate in the last 60 days of any tier 8 medium, only beaten by the Chimera.
Battles dont last 15 minutes anymore ;)
@@StronkiTube "not very important" wowoow wait there, maybe its not a necessity to have a good tank but it DEFINETELY is important
"Charlemagne" "British tank"
excuse me what the fuck, i thought it was a french tank
For real. It wasn't for nothing that the french SS regiment was named division charlemagne...
I don’t excuse your use of profanity kid
This tank was an actual design from the 1950s, named at a time when the UK was defending Europe - with its US and European allies - from a potential Soviet invasion. So it's based on a historic design, and the name seems quite fitting for a tank defending Europe alongside European allies.
@@adriantsang3838 dude Charlemagne was Germanic, he was king of the Franks who were a Germanic tribe originating from the lowlands, later on after the Franks conquered Gaul they where Christianized, they also very quickly Romanized until their Germanic language (Frankish) soon became Old French.
You know the British are the only ones to name their tanks with unique names unlike other nations (Germany is an exception*
I like this tank. It feels like they're making it weird and gimmicky and fun without just giving it an autoloader or autoreloader, or siege mode and whatever other things they've added.
Seems like a Chimera but HT.
@@willdenoble1898 I can agree with that, yeah, but I think this'll be fun in it's own right
We need more single shooting tanks in the game
Yeah, but it still . . . WG is giving the players a "free" tier 8 premium and make the normal ammo mostly useless, so most of the players will spam gold and dont make profit in it.
They really aughta remove bad players who complain because they’re too shit to deal with light tanks or arty. The only real problem the game has is the p2w shit. P2w ammo, p2w repair kits and consumables, etc. they should make it so no matter what tank you’re in or how bad you do, you cannot LOSE credits unless you use premium consumables
Lobbing slow shells at long range with rng aiming is like throwing darts at a bullseye while being drunk
And then your friend (the enemy tank) somehow hits all bullseyes
Beer pong gun. 👍
Perfect
But with the addition that it's satisfying once you get a hit
For a target, moving cross your field of fire at 50km/h at 300m range, equivalent to 13.9m/s, your standard shell takes, 300/579=0.52s to reach the target, which means target has moved 7.2m. T-54 is capable of moving at this speed, and its hull is 6.04m. That means you have to lead your shot 20%-120% of the hull length of to hit the hull; 20% to scrape the back end of the hull, and 120% to scrape the front, so anywhere inbetween is a hit. That may not seem like a lot, but considering how the aiming system works in WoT, if 60% of hull length ahead of a moving tank you have your aiming circle on the ground far in the background, for your slow shell to hit that spot, it has to leave the muzzle at a much higher trajectory, meaning your shell won't get anywhere near where the target will be in 0.52s. In the same situation, if you load gold AP, the target will only move 4.5m instead of 7.2m. Meaning you only need to aim at the very front end of the hull to hit somewhere in the back half of the hull.
Above calculation is based on shells travel at straight lines. If taking trajectory arch into consideration, the slow shell needs to lead more, and more likely to miss.
Did you take the average ping into consideration?
Calm down Einstein, all you had to say was the gun goes pew pew.
TLDR
Ok
@@crumbyk7798 Lead your shots Hella far and hella well, but like all things you can get the feel of it
The tank commander is a fucking goblin that voice had me cracking up
I love it 😍
COBRA!!!! Yeah he's a fun one.
Cobra Commander from GI Joe. Yeah he does have that kind of a voice.
Historically , if I remembered the project was for shooting HESH round across range , velocity didn’t matter.
But hey, it’s WG, they gave it AP.
It's like a tank from 2014 where the premiums were worse than even tech tree tanks...
Honestly it feels so bad that WG gives such a bad tank "fOr FrEe" and the new skoda is like a strong tier 9 with worse HP
that aim time alone makes this tank seem like a headache to play
yeah aim time means not much if the dispersion values are that good. Just look at the Bourrasque, it has actually the same aiming time as a Charlemagne, but its dispersion values are godlike. So you still end up hitting pretty much most of the time cos the reticle is very small from the start. And I never heard anyone complain about its aim time.
Confusing name for this tank, wargaming are definitely trolling with this one
The Concept 1B is to good. The next british tank MUST be a bad one to even it up.... and here it is
@@hdf31 concept is American
what about 1066 senlac........ it's clearly a dig at the UK
Name confusing? Its an evolved Charmander pokemon.
@@Warspite1701 they love using the UK to add meh tanks for whatever reason
Okay, a new tier 8 hull down premium tank, wg back to normal
BUT it have a weakspot lol xD
It’s not a good tank at all the 597 shell velocity is trash and really bad DPM
@@obi-wlankenobi Multiple weakspots* (everything around the mantle is 175ish).
Man that thing is a walking blister. Fine if WoT was balanced, buuut we're way past that line.
Something to be aware of: the slower the shell velocity, the higher the gun arc on the tank. Usually guns that have this kind of characteristics are... howitzers.
When you lob HE shells at low velocity with poor penetration, and no normalization, the penetration mechanics are not exploited to their full extent.
A high arc, slow moving AP shell which retains a good pen value over 500m, will hit sloped armor already negating angling effectiveness. Add in the 5° degrees of normalization upon impact, and I suspect this tank has a WAY higher penetration capability than it seems.
but when you shot some side armor，it‘s not a good thing think about obj257
18:06 "WE'VE HAD IT, EVERYBODY OUT!"
Yep, that pretty much sums up the state of the game.
Charlemagne? An odd name for British tank, no?
Oui.
well it kinda fits the british MOD propensity for naming tanks that start with the letter C
The shell velocity has to be the worst feature of this thing.. Not worth the 15k bonds at all imo although I'm a muppet.. But that one doesn't need an Einstein to figure out lol
Question I ask myself: would I rather have a M60 or 121B, or a dogshit tier 8 premium lol
Agreed. That shell velocity will prove frustrating time and time again..
That's the balancing feature you guys are stupid
@@hailgerald2060 but the tank is not exactly great
@@MM-ny7dv bro 440 ALPHA, tier 8 HT doesn't really have good DM either mostly below 2000. u put gun rammer and vents like QB Charlemagne DPM reach 2K like 4 rounds a minute. 10 degrees of gun dep. Not a lot of tanks tier 8 can get 10 -12 deg of gun dep (even the weakpoint up top can be hidden if u use ur gun dep). Very Good Mobility for its tank type, Very Small Tank, Above average Armor layout, Gun Handling and Aim time not a problem for a Big gun caliber, View Range is average for its tier. U can kill tier 6 with two shots. The only downside of this tank is the velocity which is a BIG AND BAD THING and I must say that is a GOOD THING. I don't want another donker/chieftan in my tiee 8 matchups
Leading shots on moving targets in this tank will be a nightmare. Fast shells travel flat, slow shells arc high into the air. For slow shells the terrain you aim at (in front of your target) will apply a vertical trajectory to your shell which will sometimes mean that the shell will cruise way over the top of your target and land on the next map. Otherwise it looks kinda fun and memey
A British tank called the Charlemagne? Might as well call it the Martel or the Napoleon. What a load of old sweaty bollox. QB I don't know how you maintain your enthusiasm for this game even if you make a living from it. Fair play to you.
I mean to be fair having a tank with a ridiculous name doesn’t even crack the top 50 of problems with World of Tanks.
Thank goodness Centurions have a long and traditional British pedigree :)
@@stephenhanna8490 Well at least there actually were centurions in England at one point..
I don't see any issue with a tank named Charlemagne when we have Lewandowskiego (I don't dislike the idea by the way), it's like having a tank named Leclerc or Abrams.
@@Flackeify he's referring to why a British tank bears the name of a person of Germanic heritage, who later united the lands that would be later known as France. If anything the name should be for a french tank.
Love how the IS-3-II drives right into the gun of the T95.
1B.. 1B's and Tier 9 Premiums. Nice. The sweetspot of the MM is fucked.
@@alexandergrabowski6265 Tier 8 is shit mm not sweetspot tier 9 is.
Charlemagne is consider as the father of Europe, naming an English tank with this name is a joke.
And Charlemagne was (basically) French
@@HelpMein Maybe a bit German too?
@@philipfoster7269 why i said basically but yeah. Holy Roman emperor
How can it be ENGLISH only if UK is a multiculture Country?
Maybe it was named for the Scottish or Wales?
@@HelpMein It is, European High Court ruled so :D
"The name Charlemagne, by which the emperor is normally known in English," Wikipedia In the hands of QB any tank will display prowess, power and performance. Obviously some tanks were designed to encounter and counter specific types of enemy machines. So how well you do in a mixed arena like WOT depends on how well you command your tank. GLHF Thank you Will for another concise reveal.
Great Review QB, but one thing wasn‘t really clear for me.
Does it have the grunt in the engine?
Do you think that WG is trying to hint at a second British heavy tank line with this tank?
It's WG. The only line they implement are premiums from Tier 3-9 if that's the case.
According to a WG employee in 2018 they were working on a new British heavy line but nothing new has ever come of it sadly, I'd love to see new British tanks of any kind
The British tree is the only one where I've played enough to get every Tier 10
3:01 The borsig has 516 m/s shell velocity on it's gold ammo if you use the 15cm gun.
short review: Charlemagne will give you no advantage on the battlefield or influence it.
Oh my god thank you
This tank is literally named after the roots of my family and we're all in America now. I have to get it on principal.
It's certainly a very unique tank. Don't know if I'd drop 15K bonds on it or would rather drop 12K on the FV 215b first.
Imma just call this champagne tank review
Looks like progetto aesthetically
Bit like Standard B too
You think? I do not see any similarities.
Mostly the roadwheels and the turret
12:28
QB: "Quite entertaining, quite fetching(?) when the brits are the bad guys, right?"
Anyone that knows world history: 😬
that's British sarcasm for you
So basically its a heavy version of Chimera
Not really chimera weights 56436kg and Charlemagne 45k
@@p3tu546 playstyle wise* lol
@@p3tu546 weight in wot can be quite irrelevant
Not a bad analogy
16:03
16:13
K-91 Heavy Tank Confirmed
Is it over powered? No. Well done War Gaming not making a mistake and over tuning it. The Charlemagne is good at some stats and poor at others. It gives a rather unique and well balanced product. Excellent news. This tier VIII will not damage game play in all tier VIII games. Well done WG for balancing a reward tanks.
I think the tank that qb is looking for is the 122 TM
It's like a high tier Matilda with the howitzer derp gun (which has a shell velocity of mere 182 m/s). Probably fun, but about as good as its shell velocity.
All you do in this tank is reload during the whole game, exactly like italian heavy tanks!
FOOL!! NO ONE SSSSILENCES COBRA!! I love the Cobra Commander, but yeah trying to talk over him I get it. lol
And you had it right Quacky, GIJoe (Duke, Snake Eyes, Road Block, etc) vs Cobra (Cobra Commander, Destro, Baroness, Major Blood, etc) BRAVO! 😄
This tank is a rare BALANCED tenk, it has great stats it has horrible stats, balanced!
I like how nobody talks about the Concept 1B that you can buy now .
I’ve never played ranked before. Is it difficult to get to division 2?
@@alexandergrabowski6265 thanks. How many games (ish) do you reckon it would take for an average player?
Apparently in my dream last night I had an awesome game in my good'ol T110E5. Don't remember details lol.
Gods I loved that tank in 2014 :')
P.S. Haven't played this game for a year now.
yep when that tank came it was really good. Not so much anymore
Thank god, the game was running out of tier 8 premium tanks.
Love ya' bruvva but can you do your reviews assuming maybe 2 1/2 skills? not sure how many us have 4 skill crews on all our tanks. particularly when it comes to showing us test sever stuff that has 7 skills.
It's called the Charmelaine and it's got a 120mm LoVe gun? It's the most romantic tank.
After the skoda t56 this feels like a cartoon tank
Wish they gave us more opportunities to get bonds. Balanced tanks like this will never be worth bonds when bond equipment exists.
I think the slow shell velocity could be good for penning armour at distance as it loops and would getter a flatter angle on a hit
They should've called it Æthelstan or Henry or William or Anglo or Saxon, the French or German deserves the name Charlemagne
Love this Tank
QB, why are you using bounty equipment in bonus slot. It's not getting bonus statistic, which are better than bounty.
I think it's better that you compared the tank to a 50TP prot.
Bro, one does not simply silence the Cobra Commander.
Also with the low velocity gun, I wonder if you can shoot over small hills?
this tank looks really remind me of the Mathilda, it's not as good but like it spouts mathilda that is derped and modified
The Pay to win ammunition is 55% faster than the normal one. You should really highlight such things imo.
He does say that… 3:08
@@devynd6476 Yes. But he doesn't really state that this is poor pay to win and he doesn't really criticise it besides mentioning that it costs more. He should HIGHLIGHT it over and over again that this game is pay to win.
It reminds me of a upgraded T5 Matilda well at least the turret.
You could arguably drop the rammer too since the DPM is awful anyways and just hope you get to trade single shots as much as possible. That being said I'm not sure what I would take instead, more HP maybe?
Possibly! But this tank, unlike the 122TM, doesn't have the luxury of being able to hang back and snipe so I feel it needs the DpM too.
after 279e i'm done collecting, after 10 years. i still enjoy the game and like to play. but no more buying tanks.
Quickybaby check out indien panzer reverse side-scraping its darn good
I saw two minutes and thought: ANOTHER british tank WG has dumped on: No Aim time, pen, armor. It has decent mobility - on stats. But... it's british so British Cruising Speed at 20 kph is expected. Now I'll watch the full video and cry a little more. Brit tanks were known for their precision, and it was great when I started 9 yrs ago. Now? Crusader: No pen, changed to medium,
AND a tier higher. Covenanter is expected to do the same thing one tier higher. New brit light tanks: No pen.
i think it have pref MM. does it? if thats the case then its very good tank.
This is kind of off topic but I saw a premium Conqueror in QB's garage called the Conqueror FL, and I'm just curious to know what that if anyone can lmk
Frontline, it's a rental for the event and pointless.
@@QuickyBabyTV Ahhh thank you QB
Also kinda like hwk 12 shell velocity
The Centurions weigh the same as this... not really a heavy except for it's gun. And even then the British heavies are known for their decent guns...
The Charlemagne à british tank.. I'm french et c'est un putain d'outrage. J'espère qu'ils prendront un procès
Can an EBR outrun shells from this thing?
19:50 Anybody notice the Strv K?
16:12 K91 is a medium tank, not a heavy tank.
This VS 122tm?
HOW MANY PREMIUMS ARE THEY GOING TO ADD
WG pushes out more and more premium garbages quicker and quicker. They just showed us a Tier 9 premium tank and they are constantly adding more and more premiums. I miss thr 2013 days....
IS-3+Conqueror= Duck but its a ball
I hardly play and I would be interested in selling my account, do you know where I can and for how much would it be a reasonable price? I have many Premium Tanks and I am sorry to have them obsolete.
In the first round i was thinking about the voice of your commander because it was quite irritating. And in the second you fixed it thank you😀😀
They just make tanks with 2 same types of ammo where the premium is better than standart in every way. Not like most old tanks that have APCR or AP and HEAT as gold where you actually have to think at what you fire. Or atleast you used to, now that HEAT rounds penetrate walls even that thought process is gone
This is test server?
That shell velocity with a high ping will be frustrating to say the least.
so, is this a paper tank or was there at least a prototype
How can you justify even considering that tank for that price?
Immediately seeing that it has terrible velocity, as well as the awful dpm, seems like a clunkier 122 tm, yah No thanks
yeah but the least the 122 TM is good, also the velocity on the 122 is really really good so you cant really compare them at all.
@@hebrewhammer4086 I only compare them because the alpha damage is relatively similar, and the reload is as well.
However, the Only complaint that I have about the 122 tm is the terrible reload speed, whereas with the Charlemagne I have at least 10 complaints lol.
I agree with you in short.
@@wojurera3131 yeah mate
All in all this tank ain't worth no 15 k faclem bonds lol.
Cobra Commander was the "black hat" the Bad Guy. From a certain point of view... For your mistakes i sentence you to 30 hours of Cold War match ups on WoT: Console.
Really thought that it was a FV215b from the thumbnail
imagine trying to hit a full speed EBR with 500 m/s shell velocity
nice tank and well played
At least a "reward - premium" tank that is not OP and has some flaws so that very good players wll not troll casual players with their OP tanks. A specialist tank that needs taming.
Will you do a let's play on the new tank game sprocket at some point???
Actually an OK-ish balanced tank. But not for 15k bonds! I'd rather spend those bonds of 3 bits of bond equipment.
Wait, the concept 1B is going into the bond shop!? Is there a catch? I'm at nearly 15k bonds, if I can get it, I'm saving.
Ranked rewards, you have to get gold first in general which isnt possible anymore
@@Steelingz Oh that stinks. I hate ranked.
why dont you compare it to 50TP pr.??? or defender??? Caern AX and Škoda have completely different playstyles, hello??
0,44 is great accuracy, while 0,34 is terrible. Seems to me some tanks have a better coefficient for hitting towards the center of the aim-circle. Just like in WoWs, there is a sigma coefficient on your guns. I always seem to miss my shots with the most accurate tanks in the game (like the Grille 15, Leopard 1).
Confirmation bias
yes good pls share yr equipment setup at all time
Woooo i did not expect Astolfo to be added in wot or im wrong 😆
I seriously wonder wtf WG thinks at this point when it makes up these new tanks. I mean, it has light tank DPM, tier 5 derp gun shell velocity. Unless you have it already you'd be insane to pick this over the Concept 1B.
Also.. Has anyone been dumb enough to spend 10K bonds for a style for either of those tanks?? Like seriously WG, what muppet would spend that much just for a 3D style for a tank?
Why don't you compare it VS defender, 50tp, that is tanks with this alpha, why vs Carnavon machine gun dpm..
and I thought the Borsig had bad shell velocity on the large gun
Basically Škots t56 but balanced.
This tank seems like a british russian heavy, sorta like IS-3 with good gun depression and worse RoF
So basically with the armour, shoot is anywhere and if your higher tier just auto aim
3:01
The HWK 12 is pretty bad as well tho
This will be a new MemeTank™ for your Twitch poll tanks, QB.
Next it will be a Napoleon soviet tank