Hi Professor, Thank you for the enlightening session. I am intrigued by how you juxtaposed design science with theoretical science in your 2009 paper to bridge practical and theoretical knowledge. This approach resonated with me and was reflected in my initial research papers as well. Could you recommend any readings on transforming 'practical relevance' into 'practical utility,' as mentioned in your summary? Additionally, I would like to share a reflection on writing 'managerial implications' as an early-career researcher. It appears that many practitioners seldom read academic papers, likely due to the vast number of journals available. When they do engage, they tend to seek direct answers in specific sections rather than cramming through 20-30 pages of a paper. This reality ironically makes the managerial implications section “relevant”. And while some might view this reflects researchers' arrogance, I believe such a view is quite harsh, particularly for early researchers. Writing this section not only targets practitioners but also challenges researchers to bridge the gap with their audience effectively. Thank you, Prof, once again for the series of theory contributions.
Thanks from everyone who will watch and learn from this seminar. This is a real contribution.
Hi Professor,
Thank you for the enlightening session. I am intrigued by how you juxtaposed design science with theoretical science in your 2009 paper to bridge practical and theoretical knowledge. This approach resonated with me and was reflected in my initial research papers as well. Could you recommend any readings on transforming 'practical relevance' into 'practical utility,' as mentioned in your summary?
Additionally, I would like to share a reflection on writing 'managerial implications' as an early-career researcher. It appears that many practitioners seldom read academic papers, likely due to the vast number of journals available. When they do engage, they tend to seek direct answers in specific sections rather than cramming through 20-30 pages of a paper. This reality ironically makes the managerial implications section “relevant”. And while some might view this reflects researchers' arrogance, I believe such a view is quite harsh, particularly for early researchers. Writing this section not only targets practitioners but also challenges researchers to bridge the gap with their audience effectively.
Thank you, Prof, once again for the series of theory contributions.