45 Years Intel 8088

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 ก.ย. 2024
  • Hey folks,
    45 years ago, exactly on June 1st, 1979, the i8088 was born. This date marks a unique milestone in the x86 CPU history.
    Let´s explore this milestone a bit more in detail together. In this video I talk about the CPU evolution of the 70s and early 80s starting with Intel´s first microprocessor. The 8088 is an 8-bit version of the 8086. IBM chose this CPU due to several reasons that I will touch in the video. As a result, the 8088 can be regarded as THE grandfather of all PC processors having been used in the original IBM PC and IBM XT. From then on, x86 CPUs were set as standard and still is!
    I will also decap an i8088 and look at the microstructures using my metallurgical microscope. The microstructures of the CPU were identified with the reference of Ken Shirriff´s blog about the 8088 (Ken Shirriff's blog: 8088 (righto.com).
    I also could make a quick stitch of the processor using my 4x objective (+2x optical lense) resulting in 50 pictures to be stitched.
    I hope you enjoy this birthday video dedicated to the Intel 8088!
    CPU Duke
    Chapters
    00:03 The Intel 8088 Birthday
    00:23 Early CPUs from the 1970s
    01:52 Intel´s 8088 strategy
    02:34 8088 in the IBM PC
    03:21 CPU line up
    04:15 Decapping the 8088 chip
    05:50 Zooming into the 8088 microstructure
    08:16 Conclusion and Outro
    Music
    WTF? by tubebackr / tubebackr
    Creative Commons - Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported - CC BY-ND 3.0
    Free Download / Stream: bit.ly/3Pc4uRR
    Music promoted by Audio Library • WTF? - tubebackr (No C...
    Forward by Beau Walker / beauwalkermusic
    Creative Commons - Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported - CC BY-SA 3.0
    Free Download / Stream: bit.ly/2YT8WzH
    Music promoted by Audio Library • Forward - Beau Walker ...
    Artist: French Fuse | Track: Press Fuse
    Download MP3 - hypeddit.com/i...
    Dance & Electronic | Angry
    French Fuse playlist: www.youtube.co....
    Dance & Electronic music playlist: www.youtube.co....
    Angry music playlist: www.youtube.co....
    By Karl Casey @ White Bat Audio - WBA Free Track - The Drop

ความคิดเห็น • 38

  • @mrflamewars
    @mrflamewars 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +27

    The 8088 powered the first PC and was absolutely important because of that - People say x86 is "old and busted" - I say it's durable and capable of evolving with the times - bet it will be with us for a hundred years !

    • @edgeeffect
      @edgeeffect 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Back in the day, I considered the Z80, 6502 or 6800 to be "vastly superior" to the 8080.... but where are the 64 bit versions of all those "better" chips today?

    • @johnrehwinkel7241
      @johnrehwinkel7241 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@edgeeffect The superior CDP1802 led the way, with its register-rich, flexible architecture, which led to RISC, ARM, and some of the most powerful 64 bit CPUs today. Of course, if you want more, the PowerPC line is still going strong and offering 128-bit architectures. It too has RISC heritage going back to RCA's humble 1802.

    • @sharoyveduchi
      @sharoyveduchi 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@johnrehwinkel7241 ARM is not RISC. This is a deception. ARM has dedicated instructions for converting Java Script floats to integers, it has SIMD instructions which are distinctly a CISC thing that were introduced in the Intel Pentium with the MMX instructions, and ARM v8 has more instructions in its ISA than probably any CISC chip from the 1980s and definitely more than the original Intel Pentium. I had counted by hand the instructions from the Intel Programmer's manual for the Pentium versus modern ARM. I would also like to state that modern CPUs do not spend most of their chip area on the logic. Even a fully fledged Ryzen CPU's chip area is mostly cache and not the logic. There is no advantage for someone to choose ARM over x86 in the desktop, laptop, or server arena. Power efficiency? If you see ARM do better than x86 in energy efficiency it's because they either have better manufacturing at their disposal such as when Apple reserves newest technology from TSMC so AMD can't get their hands on it or the comparison makes no sense. For example, comparing a mobile chip with a desktop chip is silly because both Intel and AMD have established power consumption of 65 watts or higher on their desktop chips. Their laptop chips easily go as low as 6 watts such as the Intel N100 and if you undervolt they can go even lower. The Steam Deck is one of those devices where you can lower the power consumption to just 5 watts and games still perform ok.
      If anyone wants to learn more they can check out my video on CISC vs RISC on my channel.

    • @WDUSNBMHHU
      @WDUSNBMHHU 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      My first machine was a 5150 and I learned assembler on it. I remember thinking what a useless instruction XLAT was back then. I just looked it up and it still exists in modern x86 chips. That alone tells me we need to move on from x86. God knows how much other junk there is sitting in that instruction set now.

    • @mrflamewars
      @mrflamewars 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@WDUSNBMHHU From what I've read a lot of those old, seldom used instructions are handled by microcode instead of having dedicated hardware - the transistor budget for keeping the backwards compatibility cooties around is a very small percentage - just like legacy x86 decode is generally - Most things get decoded into micro-ops that handle everything now - the first generation Pentium was the last hard wired x86 machine - the P6 core in the Pentium Pro changed everything.

  • @KennethScharf
    @KennethScharf 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    The 8 bit bus actually doesn't reduce the chips performance by 1/2. Due to the chips internal fetch queue and the fact that it takes several clock cycles to perform each instruction (super scalar processors didn't arrive until the Pentium), means that the 8 bit cpu can almost catch up with the operations of the 16 bit. It DOES depend on the actual instruction mix, but the actual performance of the 8088 is a bit better than 50% of the 8086. It's close enough to justify the lower cost of the 8088 vs the performance of the 8086, especially if one can run at a higher clock speed.
    IBM was initially specing a PC design using the 8085 processor, but Bill Gates at Microsoft suggested that they use the 8088 instead, pointing out the greater memory addressing, and that software development for the newer processor would not cost any more than for the 8085. Big Blue took his suggestion to heart, and the rest is history.

    • @cpu_duke
      @cpu_duke  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I will not hairsplit over this as there is enough margin (the instruction mix). Thanks for listening so carefully!

    • @KennethScharf
      @KennethScharf 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@cpu_duke I never tried to decap a ceramic lid package. I didn't realize that was so easy to do, I' have decaped the metal lid types on eproms and rams (did you know you can use decaped drams as simple image sensors?)

    • @Piero71
      @Piero71 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The 486 can reach, in optimal conditions, one clock cycle per instruction.

  • @algorithminc.8850
    @algorithminc.8850 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Enjoyed this ... I look foward to checking out your channel. Thanks. Subscribed. Cheers

  • @alphadog6970
    @alphadog6970 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    This guy cares about intel more than intel itself 😅

  • @rouelejour4080
    @rouelejour4080 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    People who didn't come to computers until micros don't apreciate how remarkable the 8088 was. Prior to that cpu width and memory width was always the same. 32 bit bit mainframes had 32 bit wide memory, 16 bit mini compuers had 16 bit wide memory. The 8088 was the first processor to separate cpu width and memory width.

  • @phillycheesetake
    @phillycheesetake 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    If the delidded one still works, try cleaning it up and putting a glass cap on. That would make a great centerpiece for a display build.

    • @lidarman2
      @lidarman2 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Interesting idea. But Incident light might create a noise issues since semiconductors emit light but also absorb it.

  • @RuruFIN
    @RuruFIN 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Such an underrated channel, I need to check your other anniversary videos as well.

    • @VoidHalo
      @VoidHalo 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Agreed. Wholeheartedly. I just stumbled across this, myself and was wondering where it's been all my life.

  • @annieworroll4373
    @annieworroll4373 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    oh neat I thought I was a little younger than this chip. but I'm a little older!
    Hugely important chip. Arguably more critical to the platform as a whole than the 8086 itself.

    • @markbrewer8162
      @markbrewer8162 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Gross! U old as F. I'm slightly older than the chip too. :( Great memories playing games on the 8088!

  • @daschefer
    @daschefer 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Very good, I have subscribed. In the Evolution table I couldn't find one that I have here, the Intel RapidCad.

    • @cpu_duke
      @cpu_duke  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thanks, yes I focussed on common CPUs, the RAPIDCAD is more a 386 upgrade FPU solution. I actually don’t have it!

  • @leilanielectronics
    @leilanielectronics 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I still have many of these old chips

  • @bradl7439
    @bradl7439 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    And to this day, Intel CPU's still startup in real mode.

  • @mlann2333
    @mlann2333 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The 4004 wasn't the world's first CPU. It was the first commercially available CPU. The first CPU was part of a chipset for the f14 tomcat in 1969.

  • @MotownBatman
    @MotownBatman 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    New Sub; Detroit, Michigan, US
    Well Done Sir! this was a great video! now do the 80186 LOL
    WAsnt Happy to See that 8088 to Loose its Lid.
    I Would have given it a New Home LOL

    • @cpu_duke
      @cpu_duke  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      The CerDip is not particularly rare. Got 3 for 16 British Pounds including shipping. Kept 2 in my collection…

  • @waldmensch2010
    @waldmensch2010 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    nice video

  • @jackwt7340
    @jackwt7340 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Zeus was stunned.

  • @VoidHalo
    @VoidHalo 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Damn, I missed the anniversary. I have a copy of Emu8088, I could have written something in it to celebrate. Nothing fancy, since I've only dabbled in it. But I could probably make something to output a celebratory message in text.

  • @kilianhekhuis
    @kilianhekhuis 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    When trying to heat something, it helps not putting it in highly thermo-conducting material 😂. Also, that poor 8088 😭.

  • @anthonytoreson5571
    @anthonytoreson5571 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Shows the test of time people are still using them to this day and I still have one or two kicking around someplace

  • @herauthon
    @herauthon 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    i got 8088.. not sure if i have 8086
    but i do have 80186 .. 286
    386.. 486.. P1..P2..P3..P4
    and some more

  • @edgeeffect
    @edgeeffect 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    In the UK , that vice you use is branded as "Stanley" which is a classic old English tool company... what brand does yours have? Came for the classic chips and got distracted by 21st century marketing... sorry.

    • @cpu_duke
      @cpu_duke  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yes it is a Stanley! Never failed me sofar!

  • @aus.deutschland
    @aus.deutschland 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    😱 barbarian, broke good CPU

  • @cedric0850
    @cedric0850 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great Video, man! This stitch looks cool, how do you do this?

    • @cpu_duke
      @cpu_duke  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It’s quite tedious. You take many pictures very accurately next to each other, „scanning“ the die in a zig zag fashion. I use ICE software to stitch it to a large canvas.

  • @gnerakles
    @gnerakles 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Quality content mate